The Swine Flu Virus

Gun rights have been under threat for a while now. Some in Congress want new anti-gun laws passed. Obama recently went into Central America to meet with Marxist dictators like Hugo Chavez (who is allied with the Pope and publicly calls for a new world order). Some suspect Barack Obama of agreeing with an international treaty that can be a backdoor gun control policy. The treaty is formally known as the Inter-American Convention Against the Illicit Manufacturing of and Trafficking in Firearms, Ammunition, Explosives and Other Related Materials or the CIFTA treaty. The Bill Clinton administration signed the treaty back in 1997, but the U.S. Senate has never ratified the treaty. Obama wants to change that. 33 nations in the Western Hemisphere signed onto the Treaty. The treaty would force Americans who reload ammunition to be required to get a license from the government. Also, factory guns and ammunition would be priced out of existence due to governmental requirements to mark each one that is manufactured. Even the simple act of adding equipment to a gun or reassembling a gun after cleaning it could fall into the category of illicit manufacturing of firearms (which require government license and oversight). The CIFTA can make the U.S. federal government to regulate the whole U.S. firearms industry. Obama can just convince the Senate to pass the CIFTA treaty without judicial oversight or become passed by both houses of Congess. The UN supports the CIFTA Treat. The United Nations have been one of the world's most arden gun control advocates in the world. Some of this extremism is promoted because Obama believes in the false view that 90% of the firearms used by Mexican drug cartels come from the United States. Many studies have thoroughly debunked the 90% myth, including one by William La Jeunesse and Maxim Lott in a recent Fox News report. According to these researchers, the real number is closer to 17%. According to La Jeunesse and Lott, Mexican drug cartels, (which control billions of dollars), obtain the overwhelming majority of their guns from the Black Market, Russian crime syndicates, South America, China, Guatemala, and even from the Mexican army. AK-47s are sent to cartels from China, grenades from South Korea, and shoulder fired rocket launches (from Spain, Israel, and Eastern Europe). You even have M-16 assault rifles made in Belgium sent into cartels. The Mexican government like the American government have corrupt people in them. The CIFTA Treaty isn't the only threat. Liberal Chicago Democrat Congressman Bobby Rush has introduced H.R. 45 in the House of Representatives. HR 45 would require a federal license for all handguns and semiautomatics, including the ones you already possess. It would require handgun and semi-auto owners to be thumbprinted at a police station and sign a certificate that the gun will not be kept in a place where it could be used for the defense of the gun owner's family. So, the government wants to control all of our guns and if necessary get rid of our guns. If you like freedom and the Second Amendment, you should oppose the slick CIFTA Treaty and the dangerous HR 45 bill.

A medical director said that the swine flu was cultured in a laboratory. On Friday, NPR reported that the deadly swine flu “combines genetic material from pigs, birds and humans in a way researchers have not seen before,” thus leading us to suspect it was cooked up in a lab. The swine flu panic is spreading in Mexico. Its soldeirs are patrolling the streets, because it was found that human to human transmission is occuring. This virus is a new strain. It appears to affect young, healthy people the worst. There is a debate about the real origin of the outbreak. Dr. John Carlo, who is a Dallas Co. Medical Director, said that: "... This strain of swine influenza that’s been cultured in a laboratory is something that’s not been seen anywhere actually in the United States and the world, so this is actually a new strain of influenza that’s been identified..." Couldthis swine influenza be deliberately cultured in a laboratory and then released? Time will tell. Some reports have people catching the illness with no contact with pigs whatsoever. These include a man and his daughter in San Diego County, a 41-year-old woman in Imperial County and two teenagers in San Antonio, Texas. In fact, in all U.S. cases, the victims had no contact with any pigs. These victims are starting to prop up in New York. Dr. Wilma Wooten, San Diego County’s public health officer, told KPBS “We have had person-to-person spread with the father and the daughter,” says Wooten, “And also with the two teenagers in Texas, they were in the same school. So that also indicates person-to-person transfer.” Dr. Wooten mentioned that it's unclear how people were exposed to swine flu. She says that none of these people had contact with any pigs. Some believe that the 800 new cases of pnuemonia in Mexico City alone relate to the swine flu. Reuters reported that Mexico has shut down schools, museums, and hundreds of public events in its capital of about 20 million people. The WHO says that the outbreak has pandemic potential (and it is stockpiling supplies of Tamiflu, which is genetically known as oseltamivir). They feel it can treat flu and prevent infection. Ironically, top globalists have a financial stack in the Tamiflu vaccine like Bilderbergers George Schultz, Lodewijk J.R. de Vink and former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld. Rumseld played a role to hype up the outbreak of swine flu back in 1976. Then, he wanted the entire country to get vaccinated. Some of the batches of the vaccine were contaminated. This caused hundreds of sick people and 52 facilities. So, it's time to use our discrenment on this swine flu virus. Could this be a means to force vaccinate citizens again. We will have to wait and see.

CNN has been involved in controversy for years. Bob Unruh from WND.com wrote about the filthy language that was utilized by Anderson Cooper being criticized. The FCC is reviewing complaints it recieved of Cooper's language. Not only him, but they will investigate MSNBC anchors' disrespectful language against Tea Party protestors. Hundreds of thousands of protestors came to disagree with the government's spending that was execessive (and could drag the nation into trillions of dollars in debt). The complaints already are being delivered. A WND reader who asked that a name not be included in this report confirmed: "I called the FCC to make a complaint. They are opening an investigation, and he suggested I get everyone I know, who saw or heard the language, innuendos and slurs to contact the FCC, and complain. They need a number of complaints to be able to do anything." CNN's Anderson Cooper and MSNBC's liberal host David Shuster compared the protestors to extremists and "teabagging" (which is degenerate sexual act). Peter LaBarbera, who is President of Americans for Truth, believes that he said that word, because he could be a homosexual (since homosexual magazines believe that he is). Frankily, I don't care what sexuality Anderson Cooper is. A journalist ought to be fair in their reporting irrespective of their sexuality. I've known about Anderson Cooper since he was in Channel One back when I was in Middle School during the mid-late 1990's. The big picture is that Anderson Cooper should apologize for his disrespectful remarks indeed. Media Research Center President Brent Bozell said that MSNBC hosts have been worse than CNN in demonizing the Tea Party protestors. "Now the news isn't just biased, it's R-rated," said Bozell. "MSNBC and CNN both allow this vulgar attack-journalism to go out on their airwaves without blinking an eye and without any sign of guilt. It appears neither woeful bias nor lowly crassness on their airwaves bothers them a bit." Newsreporting that is crass and filthy has no place in our society. I believe in free speech, so these journalists shouldn't be fired. Yet, I have my free speech rights to criticize them and change the channel when they show cruel language against people that they disagree with. That language doesn't stir debate. It only further polarize the nation and harbor falsely held opinions against conservatives (including independents, libertarians, etc.).

The Taliban are oppressing Christians. Taliban radicals have attacked a community of Christians. They have executed 2 Christians. This occured after a rally that protested Muslim graffiti in their neighborhood that ordered them to accept Islam or die (according to an international Christian organization). These attacks are occuring in Pakistan. The report from International Christian Concern said that it happened in Taseer Town in Karachi. This organization reaches out to Christians who are persecuted from around the world. Asif Stephen is a Christian politican saying that Christians are protesting the Islamic slogans. He said that: "We were protesting peacefully and all of sudden, a few militants carrying the latest weapons rushed in. Some of the attackers entered homes and pillaged money and jewelry and abused the women and burned their properties. The elderly were injured and one child fell to the ground and died in my friend's arms." The Taliban leaders wanted them to convert or die. The terrorists used clubs, iron rods, and whips in their attacks. The even set homes on fire according to the ICC. When 2 Christians resisted, the radicals killed them execution style in front of their families. Their identities aren't confirmed yet according to the ICC. A report in AsiaNews said seven suspects were arrested in the attack. "The Pakistani government has created an opening for terrorists to attack Christians indiscriminately by acceding to their demands in the Swat Valley," said Jeremy Sewall, ICC's director for advocacy. Now, Pakistani Christians have to worry about forced conversion and executions by Muslim radicals not just discrimination. The Christians had been protesting because on Monday residents of Taseer Town in Karachi awakened to find pro-Taliban messages chalked onto the walls of two churches. The Taliban burned shops and churches which injured dozens of more people. The Taliban are cowards and liars that can't even handle a woman (since they oppress innocent women back in Afghanistan). The report said the Pakistan Christian Congress already was seeking help from the United Nations in New York. Religious liberty violations against Christians occur in the West, even in America. Yet, they could be a lot worse like in Pakistan if we don't fight back against those that harbor resentment against religious liberty.

Hillary Clinton must of really lost her discernment of the truth. Hillary Clinton compared eugenicist Margaret Sanger to Thomas Jefferson. Thomas Jefferson wasn't perfect, but even Jefferson didn't want eugenics against innocent human beings. Hillary is now the Secretary of State. He told these words to Congressman Jeff Fortenberry. Sanger wasn't a hero at all. She believed in the lie of overpopulation, she was an occultist, and she believed in the dehumanization of those who were handicapped. This is mentioned by her own words. She said in 1939 that she doesn't want the word to go out that they want to exterminate black people. This comment either means that they want to kill African Americans or they don't want that perception to exist in the black community. Regardless, Sanger was always allied with eugenicists and other extremists. Sanger never fired the blatantly racist and pro-Nazi members of her early so-called "Birth Control" group. Nazis agreed with some of Margaret Sanger's philosophies as well. In fact, it would be the American and British eugenicist that inspired the Nazis to construct their Holocaust system. Many prominent families supported eugenics throughout the 20th century like the Rockefellesr, Carnegie, Harriman, and Osborn families. In fact, John D. Rockefeller Sr. gave money to build the the Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory in the early 1900’s, which housed the Eugenics Records Office from 1910-1944. Rockefeller influence also spread overseas to Germany, where the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Psychiatry, and the Kaiser Wilhelm Institute for Eugenics, Anthropology and Human Heredity resided. They existed as eugenics program centers in the reign of Hitler. Ironically, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton is going to receive the highest award given by Planned Parenthood Federation of America — the Margaret Sanger Award. The wild thing is that this event was hoted by America Ferreira, the lead on the “Ugly Betty” television show, and PPFA President Cecile Richards. Ferreriara is apart of the new generation of people that Planned Parenthood is trying to brainwash to accept their goals. The good news is that people like us (who are young) are waking up and realize what Planned Parenthood is all about. Planned Parenthood uses contraception and birth control as a guise to promote population control. It's as simple as that. Sometimes PP overexaggerates problems in order to fight against any even legitimate pro-life laws. Sanger even went into a Klan rally in the 1920's. Marjorie Dannenfelser (who is the President of the Susan B. Anthony List pro-life organization) said that: “If Secretary Clinton were fully aware of the eugenicist past of Margaret Sanger, I cannot believe that she would be accepting an award in her name. It is in fact shocking that the award still bear’s Sanger’s name.” Sanger said that immigrants and Catholics are reckless breeders. She wrote that some infants should die and other wicked statements in her own words. So, she is an enemy to me. Last year an Idaho Planned Parenthood employee was disciplined for accepting a donation earmarked for the abortion of African Americans. Planned Parenthood ought to be rejected by any descent human being.

Most people realize that the prison system takes advantage of the poor. Eric Ruder from Dissident Voice at April 25, 2009 wrote about the prison system. Back even in the 19th century, America ban imprisoning people who can't pay their taxes as barbaric. In the 1970s and ’80s, the U.S. Supreme Court affirmed that incarcerating people who can’t pay fines because of poverty violates the U.S. Constitution. Now, in the 21st cenutry, state and county jails still have debtors' prisons. This is inspite of the fact that the Supreme Court said that these types of prisons are illegal. Edwina Nowlin is a poor Michigan resident. She was sent into prison, because she couldn't afford to pay to reimbuse a juvenile detention center which costed 104 dollars a month for holding her 16 year old son. Now, the ACLU of Michigan helped her out last week after she spent 28 days in jail. They said that they are seeing more people being sent to jail, because they can't make various court-ordered payments. This is unconstitutional. Not only was Nowlin under orders to pay a fine stemming from someone else’s actions. Yet, she had been laid off from work and lost her home (at the time she was ordered to “reimburse” the county for her son’s detention). Nowlin used a paycheck to try to pay for the fine. Yet, the sheriff wanted to pay for county expenses. Also, she was denied a court-appointed lawyer. This was against her constitutional right to have the court to provide her one. She couldn't fight the contempt charge, because of her poverty. Her fines have only multiplied. “Like many people in these desperate economic times, Ms. Nowlin was laid off from work, lost her home and is destitute,” said Michael Steinberg, legal director of the Michigan ACLU. “Jailing her because of her poverty is not only unconstitutional, it’s unconscionable and a shameful waste of resources. It is not a crime to be poor in this country, and the government must stop resurrecting debtor’s prisons from the dustbin of history.” This evil stuff isn't just going on in Michigan. It's going on across the nation. In 2006, the Southern Center for Human Rights (SCHR) filed a suit on behalf of Ora Lee Hurley, who couldn’t get out of prison until she had enough money to pay a $705 fine. But she couldn’t pay the fine because she had to pay the Georgia Department of Corrections $600 a month for room and board, and spend $76 a month on public transportation, laundry and food. In Gulfport, Miss., the municipal court started a “fine collection task force” to crack down on people who owed fees for misdemeanors. The SCHR website says that this task force is targeting mostly African American neighborhoods. They are rounding people up who have outstanding court fines. They give these people no defense attorney or legal representation. They are jailed for months for having a hearing lasting just seconds. This is wrong. Some jailed are physically disabled and have mental disabilities. The justice system in many cases don't give an iota for poor people. They are restricting their rights, equal protection, and due process. This is an outrage. This isn't unusual since the government is bailing out banks with billions of dollars, while foreclosures and unemployement aren't immediately addressed. So, poor people should never be jailed for being poor. People shouldn't be jailed for not paying fines since it's unconstitutional and immoral.

The economy is in a crossroads. Larry Summers was caught sleeping in a meeting. There is talk about credit card corporation using usury and getting the people's money with endless fees. This meeting where Summers slept at was about talking about creating a consumer-friendly credit card system. There is more than just greed from Visa and Mastercard. There is a banker trend of securitization. “From 2003 to 2007, seven of the largest issuers of credit cards packaged an increasing amount of card debt into securities and sold them to investors, just as banks did with mortgages,” reports USA Today. “Selling off credit card debt has given banks a powerful incentive to raise card fees and penalties, according to interviews with dozens of industry analysts, academics and investment specialists.” This means that bankers get wealth and will securitize the bad loans the same way they do it with bad mortgages. Larry Summers is apart of the Trilateral Commission, the CFR, the World Bank, and the Bilderbergers. So, he is in favor of manufacturing an economic policy that is condusive to the banker establishment. Larry Summers have a history of a controversial economy history. In 1999, he was the Secretary of the Treasury. He worked with the Clinton administration to get rid of the Glass-Steagall Act. This act was formed during the Great Depression to prevent financial concerns from merging or it didn't allow speculators to mix their money policy with regular commercial bankers. Soon, after it was repeal Citicorp could become Citigroup (The repeal of this act was one of the causes of the economic crisis that we witness today). In his book about Enron, Conspiracy of Fools, Kurt Eichenwald acccuses Larry Summers of encouraging California to take it easy on Enron (and to remove state caps on consumer rates). California experienced blackouts and other problems. The people blamed Gray Davis for it, so a recall election came to get rid of him. This was in 2003 and this recall election allowed Arnold Schwarzenegger to be elected the present Governor of California. Hence, Larry Summers' neo-liberal policies are apparent for anyone to witness.

By Timothy