More on the Left/Right Paradigm

The demonization of people who disagree with Barack Obama have turn others to slander Patriots. Keith Olbermann from MSNBC outlined no objectivtely when it came to the Tea Parties. Then, he had the scurrilous Janeane Garofalo on his show. Garofalo lied and said that millions of people in the Tea Parties around the country are racists collectively. Keith Olbermann like usual agreed with her. These neo-liberals like Janeane are just as vicious and mean spirited s the Bush neocons. The neocons supported the murder over a million Iraqis in the Iraq War. This set the stage to elect Barack Obama into the Presidency to continue policies that undermine the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. Garofalo and Olbermann, however, seem to relish in such despicable attacks against people who are expressing their First Amendment rights. Prior to inviting Garofalo on his show, Olbermann ticked off a series of adolescent insults directed at the “teabaggers” — meant in the pornographic sense, as eluded — that is to say anybody and everybody who believes cranking up the national debt to is a disaster in the making. Olbermann and Garofalo aren't true freedom lovers. They are cheerleaders of the present administration. Anyone that disagrees strongly with their leader is a racist. As John Stauber notes, the Obama administration has done a swell job hijacking the antiwar movement. MoveOn.org, Americans United for Change, USAction, and other so-called liberal organizations — so vociferous when Bush was running things — have uniformly failed to condemn Obama’s Afghanistan policy. Even the head of VoteVets named Jon Soltz supports Obama's Afghan strategy in his Op Ed to the Huffington Post. MoveOn, USAction, and VoteVets are funded by the George Soros gang. They don't oppose the slaughter of Afghan children. The DHS calls us extremists for just being pro-life, hating gun control, and wanting to expose the one world government agenda. The elite are playing the race card in order to divide Americans and discount legitimate arguments that many Tea Party protestors are making. Olbermann and Garofalo promote the left/right paradigm just like fake conservative Glen Beck (who denies that FEMA camps exists and disrespected the victims of Hurricane Katrina by calling them scum. He has also disrespected 9/11 victims. Glen Beck is a piece of work). The good news is that an increasing number of Americans reject the propaganda of people like Garofalo. We know the truth, we are not ashamed, and we will never intimidated by any neo-liberal (or neo-conservative for that matter).






More Torture Memos are being revealed to the public. There has been ongoing litigation, so the Department of Justice released four previously undisclosed Office of Legal Counsel (or OLC) opinions (one was which the OLC issued to the CIA in August 2002 and three that OLC issued to the CIA in 2005). “The President has halted the use of the interrogation techniques described in these opinions, and this administration has made clear from day one that it will not condone torture,” said Attorney General Eric Holder. “We are disclosing these memos consistent with our commitment to the rule of law.” So, Holder wants a new era on American torture policy. Holder said that intelligence community officials that acted in good faith on advice from the Justice Department (that their conduct was lawful) wouldn't face federal prosecutions for that conduct. The Attorney General has informed the Central Intelligence Agency that the government would provide legal representation to any employee (at no cost to the employee, in any state or federal judicial or administrative proceeding, brought against the employee based on such conduct and would take measures to respond to any proceeding initiated against the employee in any international or foreign tribunal) including appointing counsel to act on the employee’s behalf (and asserting any available immunities and other defenses in the proceeding itself). These policies in federal law could make the government to indemnify any employee for any monetary judgement or penalty that is imposed agaisnt the person for such conduct (and will provide representation in Congressional investigations). Holder doens't want to prosecute all intelligence agencies for these memos. The OLC said that the torture memos don't represent them. Four Justice Department memos released yesterday approving harsh interrogation techniques for terrorism suspects provide the most comprehensive look so far (at the methods considered and sometimes used in secret overseas prisons). These methods are spraying detainees with 41 degree water, forcing them to live in small boxes, have forced nudity, press a detainee's shoulder blade against a fake wall, producing loud noises, and other sick things. One 2002 memo was signed by Jay Bybee. He was a lawyer in the Justice Department's Office of Legal Counsel. He approved of interrogation techniques like exploiting his fear of insects toward al-Qaeda suspect Abu Zubaydah. Bybee is now a federal appeals judge on the San Francisco-based 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals. The memo said it would be permissible to tell Zubaydah a stinging insect is being placed in a small box with him, while substituting a harmless insect such as a caterpillar. The technique was never used, officials said. The New York Times reported that the Bybee memo approved of waterboarding. Bradbury's memos supported walling, which can be done 20 or even 30 times in order to make the detainee to answer a quesiton. The memos were released with few redactions. A lawsuit made by the ACLU and the Center for Constitutional Rights forced the memos to be released. These legal opinions were withdrawn by President Barack Obama in his second day in office. Obama said CIA employees whose conduct was approved in the memos would not be prosecuted. The deal here is that torture is wrong regardless of what face it shows.





There is controversy with Anderson Cooper and Bohemian Grover David Gergen. Some are criticizing Anderson Cooper for mocking the Tea party rallies by using a crude term for a sex act. CNN's Anderson Cooper insulted the grass-roots Tea Parties that blanketed the United States this week by making a lewd joke about the protesters. What can you expect from Cooper. He is the poster child of the elite being related to the Vanderbilts. Cooper is pro-abortion, pro-global warming hysteria, and pro-banker bailout. He told a guest (who said that Republicans are still searching for a voice to address the nation's economy) that: "It's hard to talk when you're tea-bagging." Tea bagging is a term used to described a sick sexual act (done by many people who are homosexuals and non-homosexuals). Ironically, Cooper is a homosexual advocate, a rumored homosexual, and he tries to use disturbing language like that. Now, Anderson and his guest analyst David Gergen refused to apologize for the remark. Cooper should act like a journalist not a slick talking person mocking the First Amendment rights of protestors (who have some legitimate grievances to address). Everybody knows that most of the Tea Party coverage has been biased in CNN and MSNBC. Other hosts have made tea bagging jokes as well. They haven't apologized for their ignorant remarks at all. News should be fair not apart of R-Rated commentary. This vulgar attack on conservatives, libertarians, independents, real liberals, etc. proves that some in the mainstream media don't have journalistic integrity at all. You can't be a real journalist by mocking citizens with a vulgar word with sexual connotations on air. Eric Odom, administrator of TaxDayTeaParty.com, however, told WND he isn't necessarily offended by Cooper's comment, because he isn't surprised by it. "It couldn't become more apparent that CNN is taking their content off left-wing blogs and pushing it out through what they consider ethical and coherent journalism," Odom said. "And I think it further proves the downfall of the mainstream media." The Tea Party protests have thousands of people from across the nation from California to Virginia protesting legally in the streets to make their voices heard (about execessive government spending, the war on terror, the FED, and other real issues going on in the USA).





The G-20 meeting in London have been exposed as what it truly was. Like usual, the CFR-dominated media don't keep the people informed pertaining to the true agenda behind the G-20 meeting. The G-20 meeting was about shifting American sovereignity to internationalists (as found in the IMF and the FSF or the Financial Stability Forum). Even for years, loan policies and interest rates have been manipulated by the IMF. The IMF monitor member nations' financial health and lending funds if needed. The FSF tried to promote international financial stability through information exchange and international co-operation in financial supervision and surveillance. The FSF isn't going a great job since we presently witness an economic crisis. The FSB or the Financial Stability Board is now replacing the FSF. The FSB wants to tell American bankers on how to run ther organizations (or even who can get loans regardless of their credit qualification). Mario Draghi, governor of the Bank of Italy, will Chair this new group. This policies are going into the realm of possible world government and a world currency. Leaders in America, Europe, Asia, etc. are calling for a world economic system or a global currency. Some believe that the SDRs or the Special Drawing Rights is a synthetic paper global currency. It has been issued by the IMF for about 50 years. The people of the G20 are unelected leaders that are trying to use an international board with authority to circumvent our economic system (from approving to disapproving business management decisions to trade). The proposed new Financial Stability Board with have America to have only one vote. Therefore, the group will be largely ruled by European central bankers. The creation of a
Financial Stability Board looks like the first step towards a global financial regulator. Prophecy is being fulfilled rapidly with these news going on. It's certainly an interesting time to be alive. The economic crisis is being exploited by international bankers and other globalists in order to promote globalism.





A Pastor was beaten and tasered for defending his rights. An Arizona pastor was tasered and bloodied by broken glass. He has 11 stitches in his head, He claimed that his injuires came from being stopped at a Border Patrol checkpoint. This place was 75 miles inside of the U.S. He was then battered by the police for refusing to allow agents to search his vehicle. This occurence happened as last week highlights tensions between constitutional rights, the issue of border security, and a controversial Supreme Court ruling that grants an exceptional level of police authority near the Mexican border. Pastor Steven Anderson of Faithful Word Baptist Church in Tempe claims he did nothing to deserve his eventual arrest. He believes that when he refused to allow the search of his car, he was simply standing up for his Fourth Amendment rights. The Fourth Amendment protects people against an unreasonable search without a warrant. Anderson questions why the Border Patrol is allowed to stop and search cars at a checkpoint at Interstate 8, 75 miles inalnd of where the highway nears the Mexican border at Yuma, Arizona. He said that he didn't cross the the international border being in America. Pastor Anderson has a video on Youtube telling his side of the story and the rough treatment he recieved by police officers. The U.S. Border Patrol, however, explained to WND that Anderson misunderstood his constitutional rights and that because a drug-sniffing dog alerted to Anderson's rental car, the pastor was wrong not to allow the agents to search his vehicle. The Border Patrol is slick since they want to follow the illegal and immoral policy of having checkpoints up to 100 miles in America (even if it violates probable cause). Of course, Anderson has every right to question the Border Patrol on their anti-4th Amendment checkpoints. Civil liberty groups have opposed this policy. The courts have typically ruled against "suspicion-less" stops and searches of vehicles at police checkpoints, such as the one that detained Anderson. As recently as 2000, the Supreme Court ruled in Indianapolis vs. Edmond that police cannot establish roadblocks staffed by dogs to randomly search automobiles for drugs. "We have never approved a checkpoint program whose primary purpose was to detect evidence of ordinary criminal wrongdoing," the Supreme Court majority wrote in Indianapolis vs. Edmond. "The [Indianapolis] checkpoints violate the Fourth Amendment." Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas – do not believe the exceptions to the Fourth Amendment are warranted. Anderson spent the evening of his arrest in jail and is awaiting a formal arraignment at which he intends to plead "not guilty." Anderson was tasered by the police. If this fascist policy can happen against a Pastor like Anderson, it can occur against anyone.





Sarah Palin gave a speech at a place. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on April 17, 2009 described about how Sarah Palin talked about pro-life issues. She spoke to almost 3,000 pro-life advocates during a speech. This speech was called the largest Right to Life banquet anywhere in the country. The speech was the first major pbulic event during 2009 that was made by Sarah Palin. She was the vice Presidential nominee for the Republican Party in the 2008 election. She lost the election and some speculate that she might run for President in 2012. Palin criticized the pro-abortion President Barack Obama for his highly pro-abortion record. She said that deciding when babies get human rights isn't above her pay grade. This was in reference to Barack Obama's answering a question to Pastor Rick Warren about not knowing when human life begins. Palin created a special closeness with the audience when she took time to look inward and focus on her own pro-life choices in life -- when she and her husband decided to give birth to a baby with Down syndrome in an era when 90 percent of babies with the condition die in abortions. "The moment he was born, I knew that moment my prayers had been answered," Palin said. "Trig is a miracle. He is the best thing that ever happened to me and I want other women to have that opportunity." "I know for sure my son is perfect just as he is, made in the image of God," she said. “A baby is God’s opinion that the world should go on." Palin said that she had doubts about whether she wanted to be a mother to a disabled baby, but she persisted in her pregnancy to concieve her own child. Ultimately, she told the audience it was time to "walk the walk" concerning her pro-life views. She wants to promotes a culture of life and she commented that life is ordained (and that life is precious). Palin wants teens to choose life over abortion if they are pregnant. Her record on abortion is mixed in terms of her tenure as Governor of Alaska. She promoted adoption, but her critics cite her promoting a pro-abortion Judge on the Alaska Supreme Court. Palin and her husband, (who accompanied her to the Vanderburgh County Right to Life dinner), also were with her Friday morning when she attended a breakfast for the group S.M.I.L.E. S.M.I.L.E. is a nonprofit support organization for people with family members who have Down syndrome. Trig turns 1 on Saturday. The Pro-Life movement will never die. It will exist forever.







Rupert Neate from Telegraph on April 17, 2009 wrote about how one person who was given 1 year in prison for just file sharing. Experts believe that this ruling could be the first step toward ending all "illegal" downloading. This has cost music and film companies billions of dollars in lost revnue. Founders Peter Sunde and Gottfrid Svartholm Warg, along with two other employees Fredrik Neij and Carl Lundström, were sentenced to a year in jail after being found guilty in a Swedish court (of making 33 copyright-protected files accessible for illegal downloading on the website Piratebay.org). What's worse is that they were forced to pay pay $3.6 m (£2.4m) in damages to copyright holders, including Warner Brothers, MGM, Columbia Pictures, 20th Century Fox Films, Sony and Universal, according to Swedish media reports. In a Twitter posting before sentencing, Mr Sunde said: “Nothing will happen to TPB [the Pirate Bay], this is just theatre for the media.” Geoff Taylor supports the decision. This is typical since Geoff is the chief executive of the British Phonographic Industry (BPI). He opposes illegal downloading of music. The verdict is a step in the attitude of those seeking to have an extreme enforcement against copyright infringement as these men were found guilty of providing a conduit for others to break the law (This is not about breaching copyright themselves). Until recently, prosecutors had only acted against sites, such as Napster, which hosted copyrighted material. Mark Harding is the director of intellectual property at KPMG. He said that the verdict was “big shot across the bows of file-sharing sites." Downloading is threaten by this excessive verdict of people downloading music. Simon Levene, joint head of DLA Piper’s intellectual property division, warned that the ruling could also have implications for legitimate websites, including Google, Facebook and YouTube, which host or provide links to copyright material. You have to be careful with copyrights, while we can't endorse censoring free speech on the Internet as well.






By Timothy