Assisted Suicide is being promoted more and more often. Bob Unruh writing for the WND.com described about how a new assisted suicide law could require physicians to kill on demand. Physicians in Montana are facing "kill on demand" orders from patients who want to kill themselves. This case is pending before a state Supreme Court. The case has been attracting attention nationwide. Lawyers with the Christian Legal Service have filed a friend-of-the-court brief in the pending case because of what it would mean to doctors within the state, as well as the precedent it would set. The catch is that these actions (of forcing a doctor to kill a patient) can violate a doctor's religious or ethical views (even the Hippocratic oath doesn't promote the evil of euthanasia). Assisting an innocent person's death with deadly chemicals is definitely wrong. M. Casey Mattox, a lawyer with the CLS, told WND that states allowing a "right to die" across the country – Oregon and Washington – include an opt-out provision for physicians with ethical or religious opposition to participating in killing a patient. That's funny, because we don't have op outs for murder. Euthanasia (or called assisted suicide in the 21st century) is still murder. Montana's situation, created late last year in a decision from First District Court Judge Dorothy McCarter in the Baxter et al. v. Montana case, is different. There is no provision for a doctor to refuse such "treatment" for a patient. The case has Robert Baxter, who is 75 suffering from lymphocytic leukemia. He was a retired driver from Billings. He filed a lawsuit with 4 physicians in the state district court system. They were aided by the pro-death Hemlock Society, who are called now Compassion & Choices. They want to compare animals with humans in death. The CLS (being joined by the Christian Medical Association) filled briefs asking the state Supreme Court to protect the conscience rights of healthcare professionals. "The trial court's decision to create a constitutional right to 'obtain assistance from a medical care provider in the form of obtaining a prescription for lethal drugs' threatens the rights of healthcare professionals and institutions that hold sincere ethical, moral, and religious objections to participating in the intentional killing of their patients," Mattox said. Mattox told WND that this effort of forcing doctors to kill people is to impose certain ethical standards on Americans They is also about violating the freedom of conscience (i.e. some in the White House want to pharmacists to be restricted of the right not to dispense abortion-inducing medications. Some of them want doctors to eliminate their right of conscience to refuse to do abortions. This is disturbing to say the least). Violating this principle (of the freedom of conscience) is a Jesuit tenet. Mattox said the state still has several weeks to file its briefs in the Montana case, and then there will be further arguments on behalf of requiring doctors to provide terminal treatment. Mattox said that the state has the right to heal patients not to kill them. He is right.
The swine flu is apart of interesting news. Russia Today from May 1, 2009 wrote about the possibility that drug companies could be responsible for the swine flu outbreak. Russia Today has a video about these events. It seems like Russia Today are reporting on real issues in recent times. Typically in some circustances even mainstream foreign news service tell more accurate information than the mainstream media here in America will show. CFR member Vice President Joe Biden made a blunder that he won't fly or use other forms of transportation. Biden later had to qualify his statements. There are at least 16 deaths worldwide from the swine flu worldwide. There is a growing stir about the H1N1 virus. American airport officials diverted a flight from Germany to Washington DC because a 53-year-old female passenger complained she might have symptoms of the deadly disease. Mexico even asked Chile to host 2 football club matches because of the swine flu outbreak. Greece has no confirmed cases and they has indefinitely frozen exports of antiviral drugs to safeguard the country. Across the world more than eleven countries have confirmed cases of the infection, Denmark and Hong Kong being the latest. Mexico wants to shut down parts of its economy for 5 days in order to slow down the spread of the flu. 340 people are infected in the lfu worldwide. The WHO is starting to call the virus influenza A, because the term of swine flu according to the pork industry is misleading. The disease in fact can't be caused by eating pork explicitly. A state of Public Health emergency has been declared in the U.S. A ‘pilot vaccine’ is being developed under the supervision of the EU. The reality is that the swine flu has been over exaggerated by the media and the government. There are vaccines already being promoted to fight against that specific type of flu. Some pharmaceutical companies want profits from the disaster occuring in the world from the swine flu. There are some people in New York City that dismiss the media hysteria, but this virus is serious. It isn't just as serious as other diseases and viruses in the world though. “That’s the whole medical industry. I don’t get the flu shot, ‘cause it seems whenever I get the flu shot I get sick. If I don’t get the flu shot, I don’t get the flu. Are there swine in New York City? Sure – the politicians,” says a New York resident.
Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on May 1, 2009 wrote about Supreme Justice David Souter. He is going to retire in a few weeks. Souter was one of the most staunch abortion advocates. He gave the high court its pro-abortion majority. Souter will retire by the end of June. This retirement will cause a huge battle, because President Barack Obama is expected to appoint a pro-abortion advocate to replace him. Souter was elected to the Supreme Court in 1990. Souter had a lengthy career as an attorney, prosecutor, and a judge at various levels. Some people expected him to vote in overturning Roe V. Wade. The reason is that President George H. W. Bush promoted Souter to the court, although even back then, Bush 41 was a moderate on issues. He betrayed pro-life advocates by joining with pro-abortion Justices Sandra Day O'Connor (and Anthony M. Kennedy) to write a plurality opinion in a landmark abortion case, Planned Parenthood of Eastern Pennsylvania v. Casey. The Casey decision allowed state legislatures to enact any of the several pro-life laws to limit abortion. The catch was that Casey still upheld Roe and cemented virutally unlimited abortions across the country. The retirement of David Souter is a mix bag for the pro-life community. It's good that a pro-abortion Justice is stepping down. Yet, Barack Obama is expected to appoint a pro-abortion jurist who will potentially keep abortions in palce for decades. Barack Obama has made it clear that he will only appoint abortion activists to the court. Ginsburg will not retire anytime soon, despite undergoing treatment for pancreatic cancer. Ginsburg is 76 while Souter is 69 years old. Justice John Paul Stevens, who is 89, is another abortion advocate who has been mentioned as a possible retirement from the Supreme Court. The news media wants Barack Obama to have a radical pick that's liberal for the most part. Most of the mainstream media love abortion for women and agree with individual rights to be suppressed from law abiding citizens. That is why pro-life people will try to fight the nominee if that person is pro-abortion. These are interesting times in politics indeed.
Republicans are in a tight spot. The Republicans will probably cosign all of Barack Obama's appointments for the most part. They might even not talk about the potentially one of the most radical nominess in the history of the Presidency. This nominee is named Cass Sunstein. He wants to be the so-called "regulatory czar." He wants to propose to have a Fairness Doctrine for the Internet. This notion calls for a mandatory 24-hour cooling off period for sending angry e-mails. He believes animals have the right to life lawsuits, he thinks that hunting should be banned and see no limits to government's power to restrict the sale (and possession of firearms). Of course, the First Amendment protects the freedom of speech on the Internet. Kathleen Sebelius is the new Secretary of Health and Human Services. Her whole political career was built on supporting her extreme pro-abortion views. She even took money from the government-subsized killing industry via Tiller. Then there is Federal Communications Commission chairman nominee Julius Genachowski, an advocate of "Net neutrality," another step in imposing censorship and government control of the Internet. He would have the government be the final arbiter in determining the content suitable for your blog or website. Harold Kah is another legal adviser to the U.S Department of Justice (He was a former dean of Yale Law and he wants America to accept international law when deliberating cases at home). David Hamiliton is being picked for the 7th Circuit Court of Appeals. Hamiliton didn't want the name of Jesus Chist to be said in prayers in the Indiana House. So, both the Democrats and the Republicans have lied down in the face of extremists being elected to our government. The GOP believes in the deception that if they lie down and be "civil" they will gain power. They won't. The reason is that many Republicans lack the power to fight against Democrats and Republicans are promoting real anti-new world order values at all. The Republicans aren't being a real opposition and they refuse to listen to real Patriots about the truth. The truth is that we should expose the big picture of the expanding police state, the evil war on terror, threats to our 2nd Amendment rights, and the other dangers that the Obama administration are perpetrating.
Angles and Demons was a novel of Dan Brown. Now, it's a move that is coming out in May of 2009. Movies like this reflect deception in our world, but it can be a an oppurtunity of making unlikely people to wake up to God. One person waking up about things of God was a Palestinian named Yusef Hassan. He was once a member of HAMAS. When he discovered that HAMAS tortured and kill their own members, he decided to be an Evangelical Christianity (i.e. He started to read the Bible while risking his life). We do know that Dan Brown's Da Vinci Code has been refuted and discredited conclusively. Similarly, in the Da Vinci Code, Christ’s spiritual enlightenment allegedly results from sexual union with Mary Magdalene. Fruitful sex purportedly perpetuates royal bloodlines—his (Judah) and hers (Benjamin). Be sure, Professor of ancient history at Western Michigan University Paul L. Maier soundly debunks such lies. Indeed, there exists no record of Mary’s Jewish tribal affiliation, nor do members of the Tribe of Benjamin have rightful claim to royal blood. Dan Brown believes that early Christians never uniformed believed that Jesus Christ is God until 325 A.D. That's a lie of course. Fact is, the Emperor Constantine did not “fix” the Canon of Scripture, nor was Jesus’ divinity determined by vote at Nicaea. Parchments dating prior to AD 325 and fragments of John’s Gospel dating around AD 130 indicate no such embellishment (according to Nicky Gumbel, Alpha International). Composed of key Christian leaders of the time, the Nicaea Council actually confirmed longstanding belief in Christ’s divinity by an overwhelming vote of 316 to two. In other words, Hippoltyus, the Didache, Tertullian, and others sources of information way before 325 A.D. called Jesus Christ God. Angels and Demons is about trying to deify science and it promotes the belief that a subatomic device holds the secret to the origin of the Universe. Researcher Robert Langdon tries to fight against the Illuminati (Dan Brown describes these people as illumined scientists who were presecuted by the Vatican because their science research contradicted the teachings of the Roman Catholic Church) who wants to blow up the Vatican. The ironic thing that by the end of the film, the movie views the Illuminati as non-existent. The truth is that the Bavarian Illuminati existed from 1776 as rationalists and followers of enlightenment principles. The Illuminati were influenced by the Jesuits as Adam Weishaupt admit to. Weishaupt wanted enlightenment, which Adam said was similar to fire. The Illuminati's teachings still influence Western thought, revolutionaries, and other leaders to this day. This was admitted by Billington's book called "Fire in the Minds of Men."
Mathusians are still here with their deceptive philosophies. The Optimum Population Trust group believes that human population growth in general is the reason why we have environmental crisis in the world. They want the human population to radically decline in order to fulfill their goals. They promote paranoia about an "apocalpyse" and "tipping points." They accept the overpopulation lie. This OPT group was created in 1991. In her welcome address, Sara Parkin, a former leading Green Party activist and OPT patron, set the tone for the day by complaining: ‘There are no Nobel Prizes for preventing births, only for preventing deaths.’ This is sick, because births are always a signification of a future leader, inventor, or a great contributor to human civilization. So, you can see these extremists for what they are. They are Mathusian eugenicists. Birth is a blessing not a curse regardless of what they say. Not to mention that environmental problems occur, because of a multiple of reasons. Not all environmental complications are human driven. There is an underpopulation crisis in North Korea, Russia, Western Europe, and other regions of the world. These neo-Malthusian eugenicists range from Prince Philip to others. Prince Philip said that there are too many people in the world and that he wants to be reincarnated into a virus in order to kill people Philip is known to say degratory language against people of different ethnic groups as well. Even Malthusian Paul Ehrlich's false prophecies of climate doom never occured. The OPT omits that humanity can build up real solutions to help the environment. Humans can be a bane in cleaning up the water systems in our world, cleaning the air, and getting rid of toxins in our food supply. They haven't thought of that truth, but they are on an anti-human tirade. Their goal is the same as the new world order crowd. They want to decrease the human population and be involved in eugenics. That is why the Royals of Europe head up (or directly invented) the enviromental establishment found in the 1001 Club, the WWF, etc.
Calvinism has been a controversial issue for year, especially among Bible Believing Christians. Many Calvinists influenced the development of the Constitution and the Bill of Rights. We respect their contributions to those vital documents. This doesn't mean we agree with them on every doctrinal point. I've studied Calvinism for years and it was created by the reformer John Calvin. Calvin wasn't perfect as we know. He established a church-state theocracy in Geneva, Switzerland. Calvin was from France. Since the Papacy and the Jesuits wanted to kill him (because of his religious beliefs), he escaped into Geneva to set up his religious center of influence. He written a book entitled, "Institutes." He was young when he finished the work. Admittedly, John Calvin loved the philosophies of Augustine. Augustine was a 5th century church scholar who some accuse of embracing Papal doctrines. Calvin's major false doctrine was his embrace of Limited Atonement or the belief that God only saves the elect. The truth is that the Bible is clear that Jesus Christ died for the sins of the whole entire world (not just for the elect). Also, God is clear from the Bible that he doesn't want anyone to go into Hell, but some will: “The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance” (2 Pet. 3:9). Man by himself is depraved of getting salvation by himself, but that doesn't mean that man is inable to help the world after salvation. Man can even accept God's offer of salvation even though he or she is unable to contribute to his or her salvation. God offers human beings to accept or reject God's gift of salvation freely. The Bible is clear that: "...For God so loved the WORLD, that he gave his only begotten Son, that WHOSOEVER believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life..." (John 3:16). God is sovereignity, yet God is also merciful and kind. God never hates person because of their essence of their being. God does hate sin and evil. We should too, but not people because of their differences or inborn characteristics (like sex, race, etc.). Too many Calvinists embrace pessessism about human beings as well. All Calvinists aren't monolithic. Some of them refuse to submit to God's commandment of preaching the Gospel to all Creation. Some try to preach the Gospel to people. Like Luther, Calvin falsely tried to merged the sacraments into the Word of God. Calvin also followed the Papal, unscriptural concept of infant baptism. Many radicals that are Reformed hate Premillenialism or the view that Jesus Christ will return before the arrival of the Millennium. Today, Calvinism is trying to infiltrate Baptist churches, which is a shame. The good news is that folks are waking up about what Calvinism truly stands for. I believe in the Gospel of the Lord Jesus Christ, not the Five Points of Calvin or the T.U.L.I.P.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment