New Era and a New Time

Fingerprints are everywhere in the world. CBC from May 8, 2009 reported on how the homeless in Canada have their fingerprints scanned. A Calgary shelter is scanning the fingerprints of its homeless clients. They cite problems with gang members and drug dealers sneaking into the facility as justifications for enacting this policy. Dermont Baldwin is the head of the Calgary Drop-In Centre. He said that people who have been barred from shelter use fake identification to get in. The homeless shelter is testing a new 150,000 security system that scans clients’ fingerprints. Additionally, Baldwin said he expects it will be fully up and running in a few weeks. Baldwin believes that this policy isn't a violation of privacy. The information the scanner takes is for the centre's use alone. This is a private system according to Baldwin. Brian Edy is a civil rights lawyer and obviously disagrees with Baldwin. He suggested that the centre rely on metal detectors or install lockers for people to leave their belongings outside as alternatives to the “intrusive” fingerprinting. "We can give that helping hand without requiring fingerprints before you get a bowl of soup," he said on CBC Radio's The Homestretch on Thursday. Edy said that they should not be treating all of the homeless citizens as potential criminals. There are many people who have done nothing wrong, but they are poor. He is concerned that this fingerprint policy could discourage homeless people from seeking shelter in frigid weather. The reason is that people might not want their privacy violated like that. The shelter started looking into beefing up security after a 2007 survey of its clients showed that they fear for their safety. Some people believe that they are not safe inside the centre, but this isn't an excuse for fingerprinting innocent people at all. There ought to be alternatives to fight against crime without fingerprinting innocent homeless people residing in Canada.

It's no secret that the Federal Reserve has too much power as it is now. Kevin Drawbaugh and Rachelle Younglai from Reuters on May 8, 2009 described about how President Barack Obama wants to give the FED even more power. He is expected to propose legislation by June to call for the U.S. Federal Reserve to pay a central role in regulating systemic risk in the economiy and trade association. The U.S. bank stress tests are here. The administration wants to tighten the regulation of banks and markets in their mind to prevent another financial crisis. We are presently having a crisis now and this financial complication is spreading globally. Systemic risk is about to the problems in the financial system that are large enough to damage the overall economy. For instance, the government last year bailed out insurer American International Group because its failure was seen as a systemic risk. Beyond that, there is little agreement among officials about the much-debated idea of setting up a government regulator to monitor and manage systemic risk. The administration left the door open to further discussion in remarks by a Treasury Department spokesman. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner is open to the possibility of a council to coordinate among bank regulators, including the agency overseeing the stability of the system as a whole, the spokesman told Reuters on Friday. The government is already trying to seize and resolve the problems of large, non bank financial firms. The government is using the auhtority of the FDIC or the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp. as a model for this policy. The Obama administration wants proposals to be made into law this year. Bilderberger Lawrence Summers (and a National Economic Council Director and senior adviosr to President Barack Obama) is expected to lead the effort on regulatory restructing. Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner said that he wants to act more swiftly. Financial restructuring is needed to help our economic system. It isn't by empowering the FED since the FED has too much power as it is. The FED has been complicit in hyperinflation, over spending, inflation, etc. that has damaged our economy for decades. Real solutions would be a back to basics approach where the FED is abolished, fair trade is created, the elimination of tax loopholes reigns, there are benefits to companies that perserve their jobs here in the U.S., and the investment in our society.

Alan Keyes was recently arrested. He protested abortion at Notre Dame. Keyes is a well known political activist, author, former diplomat, and was a Presidential candidate. On May 6, 2009, Keyes said that he would be present at the University of Notre Dame on May 17. He planned to be arrested as protesting President Barack Obama's invitation to speak and recieve an honorary degree at the cermeony. In a statement released earlier this week, Keyes said he “will go to South Bend. I will step foot on the Notre Dame campus to lift up the standard that protects the life of the innocent children of this and every generation. I will do it all day and every day from now until the Master comes if need be, though it mean I shall be housed every day in the prison house of lies and injustice that Obama, Jenkins and their minions now mean to construct for those who will never be still and silent in the face of their mockery of God and justice, their celebration of evil.” Randall Terry said that Keyes was arrested with other protestors. Terry is the founder of the pro-life organization called Operation Rescue. Keyes and the protestors pushed baby carriages with dolls covered in fake blood across Notre Dame. Terry said that the protests will continue. Keyes lost his bid to become the Constitutional Party President candidate, because he's a neo-con. I'm not fooled by Keyes at all. Keyes is right to oppose abortion as murder, which is true. Yet, he supports the war on terror, the Patriot Act, and the United Nations. He even supports the Fair Tax, which can tax the poor as high as 10% of their earnings. Keyes is a slick phony conservative that tried to promote his ideology under slicker means. Keyes is a friend of neo con Bill Kristol. Kristol was one of the architects of the PNAC Document. The PNAC Document or the Project for a New American Century called for preemptive war in the Middle East and more conflicts to make American hegemony more global. It was a disgraceful document in my judgment. Alan Keyes is a Roman Catholic Knight of Columbus member as well. The K of C is a Papal group that wants the Roman Catholic religion to rule society under the authority of the Pope plainly. Many police officers, business leaders, and politicans are in the Knights of Columbus. The K of C have been called the Vatican version of Freemasonry (since it has degrees). Why would a patriot be apart of an oath giving organization like the Knights of Columbus. The Vatican's leaders via Pope Benedict XVI have called for the establishment of the new world order. Terry is a recent convert to Catholicism as well. So, just because someone is right on many issues, doesn't mean we should follow them unconditionally. Keyes is right in being pro-life, but he is wrong on other critical points as well.

The Second Amendment is under attack like in years past. There is another sinister bill working its way through the House that can be a supplement to the Department of Homeland Security’s “Rightwing Extremist” report that labels veterans and advocates of the Second Amendment as dangerous terrorists. The bill is called HR 2159 or The Denying Firearms and Explosives to Dangerous Terrorists Act of 2009. It's being sponsored ironically by the Republican Rep. Peter King of New York. On April 29, HR 2159 was introduced in the House Committe on the Judiciary in a slick way (with little to no corporate media coverage). The bill would “increase public safety by permitting the Attorney General to deny the transfer of a firearm or the issuance of firearms or explosives licenses to a known or suspected dangerous terrorist.” The catch is that suspected terrorists isn't the same as a real terrorist. Therefore, the DHS or the government can label anyone a potential terrorist (whether they are innocent or not) and deny them their due process rights including their Second Amendment rights (if this bill is passed). Millions of Americans could have their rights violated completely. A similar bill was introduced in the Senate in 2007 but did not make it out of committee. Larry Pratt worries that the new bill will be used in conjunction with the DHS “Rightwing Extremism” report. “By those standards, I’m one of [DHS Secretary] Janet Napolitano’s terrorists,” Pratt continues. “This bill would enable the attorney general to put all of the people who voted against Obama on no-gun lists, because according to the DHS, they’re all potential terrorists. Actually, we could rename this bill the Janet Napolitano Frenzied Fantasy Implementation Act of 2009.” There is another DHS document called the “Domestic Extremism Lexicon.” It adds more suspected terrorists to the government’s list, including people working in the alternative media, anarchists, pro-life activists, skinheads, lone terrorists, members of the militia movement, “decentralized” terrorists, and others. To equate pro-lifers to skinheads is slander plain and simple. The DHS reports were sent in all levels of government in the aim of stopping terrorism, but it demonizes people who aren't even terrorists. The Attorney General now is anti-gun extremist Eric Holder. Even Stephen Halbrook exposed Holder's role in the Waco massacre's coverup, Rudy Ridge, etc. Eric Holder wrote a Washington Post op-ed entitled “Keeping Guns Away From Terrorists." In the article, he wants the BATF to be apart of a new law to have a record of every firearm sale. This is a violation of privacy of coruse. He wants gun owners to be in secret watch list controlled by government agencies. The government now possesses the appropriate “watch lists” and has designated specific categories of Americans as domestic terrorists. HR 2159 is so dangerous that if it's passed, the Barack Obama administration will go after potentially innocent Americans in disarmament. The disarmament of the people is one goal of many elitists and corporate bankers spreading for centuries in order to contain self defense in a nation.

Ted Turner is at it again. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on May 8, 2009 said that Ted Turner proclaimed the lie that China made a good example of population control, despite China having forced abortions. The billionare broadcast magnate Ted Turner is causing criticisms from observers with his latest comments on family planning in China. He praised China for its population control program. He said that it's a good example even though it is rife with forced abortions and sterilizations. Ted Turner admits that China had draconian policies. Diane Rehm interviewed Turner and didn't challenged him when Ted supported China's extremist anti-life policies. This policy has resulted in epidemics of forced abortions and sterilizations. The consequences of these human rights abuses rang from job loss and imprisonment to house arrest and threatening family members. In fact, new reports show the forced abortions have resulted in high infertility in China. A new report indicates this sparked infertility has also given rise to an underground network of surrogate mothers. Now, the Chinese government is kidnapping children from parents who don't follow the forced abortion rules in China. "The fines for having an illegal child are now three to five times the family’s income. The equivalent fine in the U.S. would be $150 to $250 thousand dollars. Couples have to mortgage their future for decades—literally—in order to be able to borrow enough money to pay off these fines," says Steven Mosher of the Population Research Institute. After the kidnapping, the government has excessive fees to send to the parents if the parents want the child back. This is a clear case of extortion. What happens to those who don't pay the fine? "In Guangxi province, what reportedly happens is that illegal newborns are taken into custody by government officials, who hold the infants until the parents are able to scrape together enough money to pay the huge fine. In other words, the babies are kidnapped and held for ransom," Mosher explains. Ted Turner either knows of this or just knows about the one child policy in China. Either way, Ted Turner wants the world's population to radically decline. This is similar to other globalists like Prince Philip wants more than half of the world's population to go down in population. This sick, Malthusian goal is one key of the new world order plan.

Anti-Sovereignity Threats are more common. There are at least 5 international treaties that are being poised to be passed by a new filibuster proof Senate. It's being pushed by the administration. Each of these proposes treaties can downgrade our American sovereignity even more (and make us bound to an international body governed by a majority of nations that despite the United States). Treaties are voluntary agreements among nations to prohibit certain actions to create certain objectives. Sometimes, they are enfoced by economic sanctions via the U.N, etc. The International Criminal Court isn't ratified by America (It can charge people of war crimes by the ICC). The Convention on Biological Diversity treaty calls for the government to control virtually all land use. The 16-page treaty is accompanied by a 1,140-page instruction book called the Global Biodiversity Assessment, which, on page 993, identifies the Wildlands Project as the "central theme" of the treaty's land-use management scheme. The Convention on the Law and Sea treaty will allow international bodies to control territorial seas even in nation boundaries. The Convention on the Rights of the Child give children right's under the authority of the government (and the United Nations) not the parents. There are other bad treaties being proposed as well. The United Nations wants also population control and the promotion of global warming hysteria (in order to have a more feudal world). The deal is that we should be careful about our laws. These wicked treaties are certainly a threat against our nation.

The Alternative media is something. A lot of lies are being promoted by shills and other. Now, James Bermas called many people false for just outlining dissent over Alex Jones. Just because people have legitimate dissent over Alex Jones, doesn't mean they are agitating for attention or distracting human beings. Alex Jones is friends with the racist Hutton Gibson, he interviews Knight of Malta Pat Buchannan, he supports the unbiblical Passion of Christ film, he won't expose elaborately the Vatican, and these are facts. Alex Jones even said that those who believe that the Vatican who controls the world are mentally ill. That is a blatant lie said by Alex Jones. Alex Jones claims to be a Christians, curses out Delaney (which I don't even agree with), curses about FOX's Geraldo Rivera, and appears on TV with Rivera on the Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch's FOX News. Jones publicly allies himself with Jesuit-trained John F. McManus, who is the President of the JBS. The John Birch Society is a Catholic/high-level Masonic front with links to the Pope's Knights of Malta & the CFR. Bermas and others like him have yet to provide a single refutation of these truths to anyone. So, we aren't intimidated at all by people like Bermas. We will continue to expose a wide spectrum of subject matter. We will continue to write information and outline detailed connections on historical events. We won't demonize all Catholics or all Jewish people unfairly (even Texe Marrs lied and called Esther a whore, which is slander of a saint of God. Marrs is into hatred of Jewish people by saying that George W. Bush is pro-Jew in a DVD. Actually, God is pro-Jewish since he created Jewish people and all people in human history. Marrs lied and said that that Eric Jon Phelps won't expose certain factions of Zionism. Of course, he doesn't say his name like a coward), but we will expose the Vatican leadership's connection to the new world order completely (with families like the Rothschilds, the Rockefellers, the Saxe Coburg Gothas, the Black Nobility families, etc.). Texe Marrs called Sarah Palin the Esther of America, which is another lie. Haman was an Iranian dictator who tried to enact genocide against Jewish people, so Esther is a Biblical heroine. The real overt shills are Daryl Bradford Smith, Michael Tsarion, the webpage of zionistchampions.com (which I and others have refuted completely about their lies), Al Gore (who is apart of the Club of Rome), Jordan Maxwell, etc. The big picture is that people like Alex Jones use fear mongering about the "Illuminati" without describing its leadership in a elaborate fashion. The truth is that the global elite have headquarters in the Vatican/Jesuit network and European centers.

By Timothy