Ironically, by his 40s, Freud had fears of dying including being consumed with other phobias. In this time, Sigmund Freud research the relationship of dreams, memories, and his personality development. During this self-analysis, he came to realize the hostility he felt towards his father (Jacob Freud), who had died in 1896, and "he also recalled his childhood sexual feelings for his mother (Amalia Freud), who was attractive, warm, and protective" (Corey 2001, p. 67). Sigmund in 1930 earned the Goethe Rpize for his contribution to psychology and German literary culture. Carl Jung originally supported him, but split from him over differences of ideologies. Freud has an overbearing personality, but Jung rejected more of Freud's extreme sexual (and unconscious) views. Jung saw Freud's theory of the unconscious as incomplete and unnecessarily negative. According to Jung (though not according to Freud), Freud conceived the unconscious solely as a repository of repressed emotions and desires. Jung believed that human beings' unconscious also relate to archetypes (or concepts based on mythologies) that can develop the human psyche. The Rosicrucians loved Jung as having an illumined mind. Carl Jung believed that a spirit guide or demon gave him information about mental health issues. Jung was definitely into astrology and the occult.
Sigmund believed that personality was developed by a person's childhood experiences. Freud used cocaine and was a proponent of it. He wrote several articles on the antidepressant qualities of the drug and he was influenced by his friend and confidant Wilhelm Fliess, who recommended cocaine for the treatment of the "nasal reflex neurosis." He called cocaine his "magic carpet" and thrust it on all and sundry, including his sisters, friends, patients, colleagues - everyone. This is extremely wrong. Sigmund Freud was known for being hostile toward Christianity. Freud rejected mainstream religion. I will never use cocaine myself. That is my personal choice and cocaine is highly dangerous. Freud argued that children then passed through a stage in which they fixated on the mother as a sexual object (known as the Oedipus Complex) but that the child eventually overcame and repressed this desire because of its taboo nature. Of course, I and many scientists reject this theory. In a candid and insightful chapter "The Shadow of Dr. Freud" Dr. Gross goes on to show how Freud's theories were all extrapolations of his own personal hang-ups:
"The Oedipal love triangle is a prime example of how Freud's personality has distorted psychology and psychiatry. During his self-analysis, Freud learnt that he felt passion for his mother and jealousy against his father. As an adult, he had a recurring thought in which he visualized his 'beautiful and slim' mother, Amalie. Judging from his belief in the trauma of the primal scene (seeing one's parents during intercourse) Freud as a boy must have watched his attractive mother having sex. What might have been overlooked by a less driven child seemed to dominate Freud. "Freud obviously experienced Oedipal lust, a disturbance which non-Freudians, such as child psychiatrist Dr. Stellar Chess of New York University, believe affects only a small number of children. He then suffered the delusion that his abnormality was normal and universal..."
"The Oedipal love triangle is a prime example of how Freud's personality has distorted psychology and psychiatry. During his self-analysis, Freud learnt that he felt passion for his mother and jealousy against his father. As an adult, he had a recurring thought in which he visualized his 'beautiful and slim' mother, Amalie. Judging from his belief in the trauma of the primal scene (seeing one's parents during intercourse) Freud as a boy must have watched his attractive mother having sex. What might have been overlooked by a less driven child seemed to dominate Freud. "Freud obviously experienced Oedipal lust, a disturbance which non-Freudians, such as child psychiatrist Dr. Stellar Chess of New York University, believe affects only a small number of children. He then suffered the delusion that his abnormality was normal and universal..."
With the 1905 publication of Three Essays on the Theory of Sexuality, Freud wrote that children go through stages to develop his identity (these stages include repulsive acts). Freud accepted the idea that all human beings come into the world as potential bisexuals. Of course, this is false on so many levels. Some criticize Psychitatry as disregarding the human soul and treating humans as mere animals to be trained. Others view it as a form of brainwashing. Psychiatric techniques have been exploited by the CIA, the FBI, and other agencies to do psy ops programs even on innocent people. These programs are LSD experiments, MK ULTRA mind control program, and the CIA's STARGATE program. These programs are admitted by experts like this one:
"We need a program of psychosurgery for political control of our society. The purpose is physical control of the mind. Everyone who deviates from the given norm can be surgically mutilated. "The individual may think that the most important reality is his own existence, but this is only his personal point of view. This lacks historical perspective. "Man does not have the right to develop his own mind. This kind of liberal orientation has great appeal. We must electrically control the brain. Some day armies and generals will be controlled by electric stimulation of the brain."(Dr. Jose M.R. Delgado Director of Neuropsychiatry Yale University Medical School Congressional Record, No. 26, Vol. 118 February 24, 1974)
In the early 20th century, Sigmund Freud and Carl Jung were SPR Corresponding Members and contributed to the S.P.R.Journal of Proceedings. The SPR was the occult Society for Psychical Research. Members of the SPR studied the mind, did seances, and studied spiritual phenomena. Some researchers are trying to link Feud to the Kabbalah. David Bakan's (1957) Sigmund Freud and The Jewish Mystical Tradition, that an attempt was made to draw parallels between psychoanalysis and Jewish mysticism. Bakan attempted to show that Freud was a "crypto-Sabbatean", a follower of the heretical Shabbatai Sevi (a false "messiah" in seventeenth century Poland). Yet, Bakan's book was extreme in its claims. Whether Freud was influenced by the Kabbalah or not is up for debate. "THIS IS GOLD”: FREUD, PSYCHOTHERAPY AND THE LURIANIC KABBALAH" is an article that was created SANFORD L. DROB, Ph.D.* that tried to makes such claims that Freud had a reported interest in Lurianic Kabbalah. Ironically, Dr. Drob is a psychologist based in NYU Medical School. He was formerly the director of Psychological Assessment at Bellevue Hospital in New York, and currently a Supervising Psychologist there. It is said that Freud said that "this is gold!" to describe the Lurianic Kabbalah 16th century work given unto him by Luria's disciple Chayyim Vital. Yet, Freud soon never embrace Orthodox Judaism. He didn't even believe that Moses was Jewish. He blamed Jewish people for the death of Moses. What is true is that Feud's father was from a Hasidic background. Freud turned into a total Jesus Christ rejecter and an atheist. Freud taught that the "Mind is omnipotent." Yet, Jeremiah 17:9 perfectly states that: "The heart is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked: who can know it?" In other words, man's heart is constantly wicked and can't be like unto God. Freud falsely believe that our sexual instincts was the driving force in our actions. All of our actions are not a product of our childhood experiences. We have responsibility and we are responsible for tons of our mistakes in our lives. Sigmund Freud certainly embrace unbiblical, Modernist thought that is still popular to this day. Ironically, Freud was inspired by the work of Charles Darwin to explain behavior in evolutionary terms. He committed suicide by a physician-assisted morphine overdose in London on September 23, 1939. Psychology to this day doesn't explicitly condemn sin as immoral. Sin is a violation of God's Laws. The Messiah Jesus Christ is the only person that can forgive us of our sins.
A Recap of the Iraq War
Now it’s been more than 6 years after the invasion of Iraq by the United States/United Kingdom coalition with other nations (46 and some militarily small or with no military like the Solomon Islands and Tonga). I came out against the war in August 2003 and I’m fully validated by time. It was illegal and immoral since there was no Constitutional declaration of war, no Iraqi involvement in 9/11, no massive quantities of WMDs or nuclear weapons inside Iraq, no collaborative link to al-Qaeda, plus Iraq was not an immediate or direct threat to America (Iraq was effectively contained for 12 years by the no-fly zone and destructive U.S./U.N. sanctions/embargo). This crushes any justification for a pre-emptive war. It’s as simple as that. Plans for the war existed way before 9/11 even admitted by former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill and Richard Clarke (the former White House Counter Terrorism Chief and author of “Against all Enemies”). Neo-conservatives like Richard Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Colin Powell, Paul Woosely [who is a Rhodes Scholar], Condoleezza Rice, and others just assented with the Iraq plot. Saddam is indeed an evil criminal, but illegitimate means must not be used to carry out a positive end. With him being a tyrant, the invasions of Sudan, Iran, China, are needed since those nations have genocide of millions of human beings with despotic dictators.
The CIA used Saddam Hussein himself in 1959 in the attempted assassination of Iraqi leader Qasim. The United States sent Iraq weapons of Mass Destruction. One example of this is when U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld came to Baghdad in December 12th-14th, 1983 to arrange for billions of dollars in loans and supplied Iraq with chemical and biological weapons (as well as cluster bombs) to be used against Iran.
Now it’s been more than 6 years after the invasion of Iraq by the United States/United Kingdom coalition with other nations (46 and some militarily small or with no military like the Solomon Islands and Tonga). I came out against the war in August 2003 and I’m fully validated by time. It was illegal and immoral since there was no Constitutional declaration of war, no Iraqi involvement in 9/11, no massive quantities of WMDs or nuclear weapons inside Iraq, no collaborative link to al-Qaeda, plus Iraq was not an immediate or direct threat to America (Iraq was effectively contained for 12 years by the no-fly zone and destructive U.S./U.N. sanctions/embargo). This crushes any justification for a pre-emptive war. It’s as simple as that. Plans for the war existed way before 9/11 even admitted by former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill and Richard Clarke (the former White House Counter Terrorism Chief and author of “Against all Enemies”). Neo-conservatives like Richard Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Colin Powell, Paul Woosely [who is a Rhodes Scholar], Condoleezza Rice, and others just assented with the Iraq plot. Saddam is indeed an evil criminal, but illegitimate means must not be used to carry out a positive end. With him being a tyrant, the invasions of Sudan, Iran, China, are needed since those nations have genocide of millions of human beings with despotic dictators.
The CIA used Saddam Hussein himself in 1959 in the attempted assassination of Iraqi leader Qasim. The United States sent Iraq weapons of Mass Destruction. One example of this is when U.S. Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld came to Baghdad in December 12th-14th, 1983 to arrange for billions of dollars in loans and supplied Iraq with chemical and biological weapons (as well as cluster bombs) to be used against Iran.
Donald Rumsfeld shook hands Saddam Hussein’s hands in a photo at 1983. War commander General Tommy Franks secretly began the war on March 13, 2003 (according to the DEBKA file Special Report). March 13 is exactly 18 months after 9/11 (18=6+6+6) near the Ides of March (Ides=Roman false god of war). On March 17, 2003, President George W. Bush sent a 48-hour ultimatum to Iraq for a show since this battle was in the making for years. Friday on March 19, 2003 at 9:33 pm. EST was the date Bush publicly ordered the invasion of Iraq. The early warfare (from March 13th-April 5th, 2003) was very easy to defeat the Iraqi military, but the reconstruction is the main problem that the American troops are dealing with. Just months after March 2003 at November 2003, the U.S. executed “Operation IronHammer” launched by the 1st Armored Division’s 3rd Bridage into the roughest areas of Baghdad to ferret out attackers who murdered scores of U.S. troops since April 2003 (when Hussein was ousted) A Pentagon offical denied any Nazi operation connection by outlining that “Old Ironsides” was the nickname of the 1st Armored Division. The truth is that there is a Nazi relationship with Eisenhammer, the German word for Iron Hammer. This was a Luftwaffe code name to destroy Soviet generating plants in 1943 at Moscow and Gorky. That plan was postponed on many occasions and ended in 1945 when Allied air assault destroyed many German planes on the ground. The war in Afghanistan was originally called Operation Infinite Justice then changed to Operation Enduring Freedom (for the reason of not offending Muslims who view Allah as providing infinite justice according to the Koran). The majority of the fighting is at the Sunni Triangle, a 100-mile swat of land from Baghdad north to Tikrit where 80% of the guerilla attacks occur.
The Iraq war is a major step to place more power within the United Nations leading to global government. All of the procedures to fight were bounded by U.N. Resolutions, which is wrong because the U.S.A. is a sovereign nation. The U.S. can fight in wars without the U.N. approval if the U.S. is truly threatened. The complex question of how to give Shiites, Sunnis, Kurds, and Christians' liberty will have to answer as well. Now, the U.S./U.K. alliance is attempting to plant WMDs receiving them from the southern ports of Iraq recorded in the March 13, 2004 article at the Tehran Times. Over 4,000+ American G.I.s died with 100,000+ Iraqi civilians killed for lies. 130,000 U.S. troops plus 25,000 troops from other nations are in Iraq now and this occupation costs $1 billion a week totally in around $673 billion. Our soldiers are just stretched too thin in 70% of the world’s countries with 74,796 troops even in Germany. Thousands of troops in Iraq are being shipped into Afghanistan in 2009. The American Empire’s “Shock and Awe” theatrics is still causing problems in Iraq. This is the truth and firm, concise developments of “Operation Iraqi Freedom.” President George W. Bush mislead the American people and we will have to face up to it.
General Tommy Franks Desires to Abolish the U.S. Constitution/War Crimes
Former Central Command commander General Tommy Franks warned in the Cigar Aficionado Magazine that:
“It means the potential of a weapon of mass destruction and a terrorist, massive, casualty-producing event somewhere in the Western world – it may be in the United States of America – that causes our population to question our own Constitution and to begin to militarize our country in order to avoid a repeat of another mass, casualty-producing event. Which in fact, then begins to unravel the fabric of our Constitution. Two steps, very, very important.”
Wow, Franks clearly said that if an attack occurs in the USA, the scrapping of the U.S. Constitution is in order. When will the Bush followers learn that folks who give up essential liberty for temporary security deserve neither. The neo-cons are just salivating at this. These individuals seek endless, fake terror ale rts (i.e. Code Orange) so they can have time to create their possible next terror attack in America or pass the Victory Act. Franks wants martial law to reign with a militarized police state.
Today, he’s a Retired U.S. Army General who oversaw military operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. He recently received Knighthood at May 2004. Britain’s Ministry of Defense said that Defense Secretary Geoff Hoon will make Franks a Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire in a private ceremony (His name has the KBE after it since ‘sir’ is a distinction reserved for British citizens). The Associated Press on May 25, 2004, 5:27 am. EDT presented this information. Now, Franks is charged with war crimes in Brussels by 20 victims in:
“-The use of cluster bombs
-Attacks on the civilian population including journalists
-Acts of aggression against health services and other Iraqi infrastructure
-Looting protected by or under orders from the U.S. army.” (From http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article3449.htm)
Halliburton
One of the greatest war profiteering companies in this generation has to be Halliburton. Erle P. Halliburton whose headquarters were originally in Duncan, Oklahoma, founded this oil company in 1919. By 1961, it moved to Dallas, Texas. Its most infamous head was Richard Cheney, a member of the Bohemian Grove. From 1997-2000, Cheney’s Halliburton sold $73 million (according to the Newsmax Article “Halliburton Iraq Ties More than Cheney said” from June 25, 2001) worth of oil equipment and services to Iraq through subsidiaries Dresser-Rand and Ingersoll Dresser Pump to help rebuilt Iraq. This violated the embargo with Iraq, therefore Cheney is a criminal. Cheney also presided over his company’s job cuts including ca. 11,000 workers in 1999 giving Halliburton $438 million in profits. Since the layoffs, Halliburton was on a new plateau.
Lt. Robert B. Flowers of the Army Corps of Engineers mentioned that Halliburton’s no-bid contracts (without competition) was worth up to $7 billion over 2 years. This will give Halliburton a net profit of $490 million including control over operation distrubition, put out potential oil fires in Iraq, and run all phases of Iraq’s oil industry according to CNN Money. If that’s not bad enough, problems are arising with this corrupt member of the military, industrial complex. Even in January 17, 2004, an article of the NY Times by Eric Schitt outlined that Halliburton restricted $174.5 million to feed our troops in meal planning, food purchasing, and meal preparation until a dispute was settled. Recently in 2004, an audit proved that Halliburton overcharged the U.S. Army for fuel and the overcharge cost is $61 million. Again, Army Corps of Engineers Lt. General Robert Flowers signed the waiver listing Halliburton subsidiary, Kellogg Brown and Root as a sole source even though there are many competitors. Well, it isn’t just Halliburton exploitation wars, but other select companies such as Bechtel Group, Flour Corp, Parsons Corp., and the Louis Berger Group. All of this was pre-determined. According to the Wall Street Journal, the Iraqi reconstruction plan includes economically important roads, and about 1,500 miles of roadways within 18 months.
Bechtel is important as well being a private construction firm from San Francisco. It was award a State Department contract worth up to $680 million (i.e. 34.6 million of 18 month Iraqi reconstruction contract). They will be involved in rehabilitation, expansion, and key elements of Iraq’s infrastructure [i.e. electrical grids, water, and wast e water system]. Bechtel wanted an oil pipeline in Iraq and illegally gave weapons into Iraq like cluster bombs (1 out of 24 companies that did this reported in http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1381.htm) during the 1980’s. This as when Hussein was committing atrocities against the Iraqi people.
New evidence points to a Bechtel-bin Laden connection. The New York magazine article called “The Contractors” from May 5, 2003 reported that the bin Laden family invested $10 million in a private equity fund operated by a former subsidiary of Bechtel (The Fremont Group) before 9/11. The Fremont Group is a San Franscisco private investment firm including Bec htel CEO Riley P. Bechtel and former Bechtel President George P. Shultz (Bohemian Grove member) with other Bechtel directors. Kellogg, Brown and Root was also awarded $33 million to build the detention camp at Guantanamo Bay to house so-called “al-Qaeda” suspects. This is reported in the Mail and Gaurdian Online from http://www.mg.co.za/Content/l3.asp?ao=11956 on April 14, 2004, Corporate Watch on April 24, 2003 at http://www.corporatewatch.org/news/halliburton.htm , and other sources.
While this globalist neo-con war is occurring, Cheney is having fun. He received $1 million per year plus a $20 million retirement bonus by Halliburton (Cheney claims the $20 million goes to charity). Halliburton even has political contributions as high as $1.2 million to mostly Republican candidates. The oil belongs to the people of Iraq not select cor porations in this phony, crony capitalism.
U.S. Military Support/Iraqi Civilian Deaths/Uranium
I love the troops. I live with a family consisting of a military background. I truly respect all of the sacrifice our soldiers gave to this country. Supporting the troops is not what Bush is doing; he’s killing them in an illegal war. The best way to support the troops is just tell them the truth about the Iraq War being fought for lies. The troops should be praised but told the truth and use their resources to improve the country of Iraq and no longer join in wars unless for a just and legitimate reason. George W. Bush hasn’t even given the milita ry body armor, veteran benefits, or sending our troops home from the National Guard. That’s isn’t patriotic. For almost 13 years, the United Nations Security Council imposed an all-encompassing embargo in Iraqi imports and exports. This was utilized to force Hussein to destroy his WMDs (which were nearly gone by the late 1990s) and it killed:
“…According to UN aid agencies, by the mid-1990s about 1.5 million Iraqis - including 565,000 children - had perished as a direct result of the embargo, which included "holds" on vital goods such as chemicals and equipment to produce clean drinking water. Former assistant secretary general of the United Nations, Dennis Halliday, quit in protest in 1998 after one year at the helm as the UN humanitarian coordinator in Iraq. He described the sanctions as genocidal…" (From Sanctions killed 1.5m Iraqis: UN agencies by Rob Kennedy at http://dawn.com/2003/06/12/int13.htm)
The embargo even withheld vital goods like chemicals and equipment to produce clean-drinking water. John Pilger, an award-winning journalist exposing also the U.S./U.K. folly by producing “Paying the Price: Killing the Children of Iraq” outlined that up to July 2002, the U.S. backed by Britain obstructed $5.4 billion in vital humanitarian supplies for the people. Even the UNICEF admitted in October 1996 that 4,500 Iraqi children under 5 died every month by a product of sanctions inducing starvation and disease. You can’t really talk about Iraq without knowing about Depleted Uranium. Depleted Uranium is a product of nuclear power plants.
All forms of uranium (whether natural, depleted, or enriched) are a toxic, radiological element. Exposure to this leads to problems with your lungs, kidneys, bones, and etc. resulting in genetic damage, cancer, and even death. 375 tons are used in the 1991 Gulf War. In fact, the Gulf syndrome is most probably a product of D.U. (Deplet ed Uranium) irradiation, vaccines, plus local biting insects (parasites). 120,000 Gulf War veterans are chronically ill (The government is complicit in this). A U.S. Department of Veterans study of251 veteran’s families found that 67% had children with severe illness or birth defects. In this 21st century Iraq war, experts from the U.S. and U.K. estimated that 1,100-2,200 tons of Armour piercing shells was made of D.U. during the attack of Iraqi forces in Baghdad. The U.S. in 2004 dropped 10 times more of D.U. than the Gulf War on the entire land. Iraqi civilians are affected as well.
The higher weight of D.U. shells allows U.S. tanks to shoot twice as far and gives them a range of 2 miles. According to Dutch Laka Foundation, the U.S. left 800 tons of radioactive waste from all over Kuwait and Iraq-poisoning the air, land, water, and the people everywhere. 1,000s of Iraqis babies have birth defects. The first Fullujah massacre (in the conservative Sunni town of Fallujah, 35 miles west of Baghdad) was the 82nd Airborne Division randomly opened fire on a crowd of demonstrators. Even a 13-year old body was dead by troops which mistaken them as the enemy. More than 1,000 Iraqi boys are jailed or detained by the U.S. according to Al-Jazeera in March 7, 2004. They are given no rights, or lawyers, and mostly denied visits. Many Iraqi p risoners have suffered through obscene torture exposed at Abu Ghriab by http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/04/29/1083224523783.html and http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/3672901.stm in the BBC News, UK Daily Mail, NY Times, Washington Post, and Reuters all reported in April 30, 2004. American soldiers suffered death, P.O.Ws, terror, and other negative acts by Muslim extremists, Ba’athist remmence, Fedhyadhen, and al-Qaeda, etc. In March 31, 2004, insurgents killed American soldiers. Their bodies were mutilated and dangled on a bridge, which is also sick and wrong.
The Iraq War is not over yet. "Why suicide bombers are back in Iraq: War far from over" is an article that was written By Steve Niva, for the Asia Times, on May 7, 2009. The suicide bombings are still in Iraq in 2009. So, the war in Iraq has a long time before it is finished. Recently, there was a significant downturn of these suicide bombings with only 6 suicide attacks between December 2008 and March 2009. Yet, there have been 25 suicide bombings in Iraq in the last two months, contributing to the worst spate of violence in Iraq in nearly a year. In President Bush's time, Iran ordered the Mahdi Army under the Shia cleric al Sadr to have a ceasefire. It occured with only a Sunni bloc there to fight the West They were mostly defeated. The new bombers have more sophistication in their weapons. Some accuse Iran of supplying them bombings. The new wave of suicide bombings culminated in a coordinated series of four bomb blasts across Iraq on March 23, three of them suicide bombings. The bombings spiked in April, with attacks on Iraqi army bases and police stations in Shi'ite enclaves and holy sites. Attacks also targeted US-backed Sunni militia leaders and US forces, including a massive suicide truck bomb in Mosul that killed five US soldiers, the deadliest strike on American troops in a year. The nearly 20 suicide bombings in April have made it the deadliest month in 2009 for Iraqi civilians, with nearly 300 dead according to Iraqi Interior Ministry officials, compared with only 51 killed in February and 70 in January. The future is uncertain for Iraq. Iraq could be more freedom embracing or it won't for many years to come. One thing is for sure. The elite want to control Iraq into making that nation into being a Western puppet nation (since it has tons of oil resoucres and the West wants to promote the Secret Society goal of a world democracy. If this can occur in the heart of the Middle East like Iraq, it can occur globally in the minds of the globalists).
The Order of the Jesters
The Royal Order of Jesters is a strange Secret Society. Few people know about its existence even to this day. Some accuse the Order of the Jesters of having control of leadership positions in the Shrine Temples in America, Canada, and the Imperial Shrine leadership. They are a faternal group that is affilitated with Freemasonry and the Ancient Arabic Order of the Nobles of the Mystic Shrine (or the Shiners). The Order of the Jesters want to outline themselves as a fun degree (in other words they want to have fun which is contrary to the overt charity aims of the Shriners). Their motto is "Mirth is King." Mirth is a synonym for gladness and gaiety, especially when expressed by laughter. So, the Jesters want to promote laughter in their clique. The Royal Order of Jesters feel that there are times, after their hard work and dedication to family and mankind, everyone should remember to laugh and appreciate the good work they have done. They were formed in a meeting whih was held in February 20, 1911 by Shriners. This was in the Captain's office of the S.S. Wilhelmina on a pilgrimage to the Aloha Temple in Hawaii. Noble A.M. Ellison of San Francisco, California, was responsible and the original cast included a Director and thirteen members. It was organized June 25th, 1917, at an informal meeting. A high level of Shriners are in the Jesters. They claim that members in good standing from the Shriners can join the Order of the Jesters. They want peopel to laugh after hard work. Thye even own a museum with items related to William Shakespeare. The Jesters claim to desire mirth and merriment. Its members include movie stars, judge, businessesmen, 2 Presidents, et. They are a tax-exempt organization as well. This group isn't without controversy. People have accused the Order of the Jesters of being involved in sexual abuse of people. There are testimonies from ex-Jesters about the Jesters sexually abusing women. “I quit the Jesters more than 20 years ago, and this kind of thing has been going on at least 40 or 50 years,” said Malcolm “Mutt” Herring, 90, of Montgomery, Ala. “I quit because I don’t drink, and I don’t mess around with other women, other than my wife. Going to one of their events was like going to a whorehouse.” Like in Freemasonry, the Jesters have a code of secrecy with rare exceptions.
Buffalo News from May 4, 2009 has an article from Dan Herbeck talking about how a federal proble of the Jesters existing. The reason is that some Jesters are suspected of being involved in human trafficking. The deal is that the Buffalo chapter of the Jesters were on probation. The reason was that investigations (from a human trafficking task force) learn that these Buffalo member took prostitutes (some of them are illegal immigrants) to Jesters' weekend gatherings. They are called "books." 3 individuals were implicated in the affair. Other accusations in the case include bizarre activities including routinely hiring prostitutes for gatherings, sex competitions and degrading initiation rites for new members — at many Jesters outings, with off-duty police hired to keep nonmembers away. These are some sick actions. The federal authorities are expanding their investigation and are looking into allegations that illegal activities occurred at outings sponsored by more of the Jesters’ 191 chapters. This is especially evident when the 3 accused people in Buffalo have all pleaded guilty (and have cooperated with the feds by providing information about the Jesters' events in other cities). The President of the 22,000 members Gary N. Martin commented that he is disturbed by the allegation. Martin of course said that this conduct was extremely isolated and was never condoned by the organization. Retired State Supreme Court Justice Ronald Tills; his former law clerk, Michael R. Stebick of Orchard Park; and retired Lockport police Capt. John Trowbridge all pleaded guilty to transporting prostitutes across state lines. A Jesters spokesman said a chapter in Big Sandy, Ky., also was put on probation because of incidents uncovered in the same federal probe.
By Timothy
14 comments:
"Non-Jewish actors and actresses include: Tom Hanks, Morgan Freeman, Jon Voight, Meryl Streep, Clint Eastwood, Robert Duvall, Tony Curtis, Tim Robbins, etc."
Tony Curtis IS of Jewish origins; his birth name was Bernard Schwartz and he was from the Bronx.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tony_Curtis
"This is extremely wrong. Sigmund Freud was known for being hostile toward Christianity. Freud rejected mainstream religion. I will never use cocaine myself. That is my personal choice and cocaine is highly dangerous."
To condemn cocaine but not its perversion (think of the form, using caffeine as an analogy, of snorting or smoking or injecting ground up Vivarin tablets) is jesuitical; please see my Coca info at my blog "Freedom of Medicine and Diet", including my manuscript "Coca Forgotten Medicine" and such articles as Drug Warriors Ignore Pharmakokinetics. You seem to forget that the drug war is a Vatican atrocity that perverts drug use and makes the govt guilty of human rights violations that make nations liable for billions in civil rights claims.
Freud drank highly diluted cocaine which was NOT problematic.
What was though was his stupid subsequent recommendation for taking it by injections.
Tony Curtis is a mistake that I will edit soon, yet this doesn't refute my major argument at all.
I have every right to condemn dangerous substances. Just because I don't agree with using these substances, doesn't mean I would restrict a person from making bad choices (as long as no one is violent toward another person). If someone is violence toward another person, they should be punish. Discerning right from wrong is not Jesuitical.
That's common sense. Being Jesuitical is seeing no discenment in life or making no distinction between good and evil (which is the essence of the New Age Movement). I realize that much of the Drug War's history and I've read some of literature before. So, I know about the Vatican's connection to the drug war. You need to be reminded of also the evils of drug addiction and real solutions being necessary in order to fight against that. Also, for many years I've known and written down how the Drug War have been exploited by governments in violating people's rights and harming individual liberty.
So, I don't agree with a federal Drug War. Yet, I have every right to criticize poisons like flouride, aspartame, etc. If you disagree with that, I will respond to the nth degree and I will never back down from opposing flouride in our water supply at all.
By Timothy
I will respond.
Also, Curtis being Jewish still proves my point of most actors and actresses being non-Jewish. Just for that I will list more non-Jewish actors, etc.
Agreed on your point with Tony Curtis I was only pointing out the error about him, and not your overall thesis, which with I agree.
I do not object to criticizing hard drug use, defined by the TYPE OF DOSAGE. Rather it are the over-generalizations such as that against "cocaine" rather then "cocaine in highly concentrated forms and doses" (as seen under the drug war).
Please note the effect of prohibition on just HOW drugs are perverted, particularly with the alkaloid cocaine from Coca to crack. Imagine a law banning say caffeine or nicotine, and mandating horrific penalties based upon a substances' TOTAL weight, rather then that of the actual banned substance, hence shifting markets in the fashion of replacing Coffee drinking with caffeine HCI sniffing or smoking or injection! It would be totally absurd to say that "caffeine" is wrong, rather then "caffeine in concentrated doses" akin to snorting, smoking or shooting pulverized NoDoz or Vivarin.
http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/03/criminal-mercantilism-public-health.html
http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/03/drug-war-promotes-drug-abuse-over-drug.html
As with Marijuana, it was economic -- market protection -- with Coca being suppressed through the demonification of "cocaine" for protecting the rise of cigarettes of Virginia Bright Leaf, breed to promote addiction with the removal of the more psychoactive components that were put there by God.
In my observations, its the Romish-Masonic that promote the hysterical overly simplistic ways of seeing certain things that cleverly works things to certain economic advantages.
http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/search/label/Tobacco%20Versus%20Coca
http://freedomofmedicineanddiet.blogspot.com/2008/03/it-was-criminal-mercantilism-to-protect.html
I absolutely agree with you about fluoride; I think the government;'s attitudes are most telling.
That 'Jesters' groups sounds like a blackmail racket to control its influential members.
I see your points about over simplifying concepts.
By Timothy
I have found your blog very interesting and thought provoking, but at the same time very skewed. What I'd like to see is you delve into the biggest conspiracy of all, the authority of the Bible. Your opening statements on "Discernment 3" mentioned sin and how real it is. From that opening, It is clear where your bias lays in the totality of your world view. You, like most christians, including myself for tywenty plus years, never questioned the authority of the Bible. It was enough that we were taught it's message from people who were taught it's message...ad nauseum. We didn't question it. That would open the door to doubt and nobody wants to think they are/were wrong. But you have an excellent oppurtunity here. The Bible has been around for thousands of years. Everyone has one. Some of us even memorize certain passages to bolster our beief in it or explain our world view. But if you can take time to scour the web and literature for, what you call 'conspiracy facts' (an oxymoron if there ever was one), then you can take the time to REALLY look in depth in a book that holds the key to your salvation. Was it written by God, or did God just influence it? Is it to be taken literaly or adapted to our times? Is it really infallible? My challenge to you is short and simple. The first two chapters of the Bible, Genesis 1 and 2. Two seperate and distinct versions of the creation story. We all know the first one, but the second is VERY different, especially in the Craetion of Adam and Eve, and the timeline of the creation of everything else. Grab a pencil, because you're going to need it. I'm very interested in reading your thoughts on this, and I applaud you on your blog. I'll be keeping an eye on it and will go public later, Greg
I apologise, but, in my opinion, you are mistaken. Let's discuss it. Write to me in PM.
I’m a very good debater, so here is my response to you. My blog intrigues you and I’m fine with that. I show a wide spectrum of views. In this generation, there are certain people that accept moral relativism and desire a discrediting of spirituality. The authority of the Bible isn’t the biggest conspiracy of them all. Bigger conspiracies have existed in human history from the Holocaust to the Operation Paperclip. You can make a case that there is a conspiracy to bash Christian theology in order to promote a New Age spirituality (that is a throwback from the old Mysteries. Alice Bailey and others have promoted this agenda). Sin is very real. This view of believing in the existence of sin isn’t skewed to promote an authoritarian or oppressive society. This view of the reality of sin is meant to allow people to peacefully embrace moral absolutes and give people to achieve improvements in their own social behavior. For the reality of sin negates any justification for humans to act in any fashion in an anarchical fashion. People have questioned the Bible for a while. I have questioned the authority of certain false Bible and the religious establishment for years. What you are mentioning is nothing new. It’s an old skeptic tactic that seeks to with either take things out of context or deny the Bible of any form of valid merit. Your skepticism has been answered by religious scholars for generations. Yes, the Bible has existed for thousands of years. Yet, the phrase “conspiracy fact” is not some oxymoron. That simply means that certain conspiracies have existed for real throughout human history. These conspiracies existing are therefore facts of history. Your false assumption is to believe that people like me haven’t taken the time to read the Bible for critical examinations.
Even religious scholars have discussed questions and dealt with issues pertaining to the Bible for years. The reality is that the authorship of the Bible is made up of many human beings in the Middle East spanning thousands of years. Its copies are very numerous and the Bible has the most ancient copies in the history of the ancient world. The Bible does mention a lot of scientific and historical facts as well. Human beings have written the Bible in its entirely. The NT mentions that the scriptures were created by humans by the inspiration of God. The Bible is a clear book and its words have literal words and idioms in it. Therefore, some parts of the Bible are literal and some parts of it are to be taken symbolically. We find distinctions in what parts we taken literal or not via comparing scriptures, studying history, and studying the true meanings of the words in the Bible. We have to study Hebrew, Greek, Aramaic, etc. in order to receive the gist of the verses in Scripture. The Genesis 1 and Genesis 2 controversy is a very old argument that New Agers use in trying to discredit the Bible. Now, Genesis 1 refers to the Creation, while Genesis 2 refers to the time of the Creation of Adam and Eve. Genesis 2 isn’t in reference to some separate human creation as New Agers and skeptics maintain. The reason is that Genesis 2 is chronologically after the events from Genesis 1. Also, Genesis 1 never mentions Adam and Eve by name.
I’m not mistaken about my core convictions of believing in equality, believing in moral absolutes, and believing in the view that since no evidence disapproves God’s existence, it’s certainly legitimate to believe in one God (among other vital reasons).
Post a Comment