Free Speech is threaten on many levels in the world. The U.S. and Egypt join to agree with the United Nations Human Rights Council. The proposal claims to promote the freedom of opinion and expression. Yet, it would crackdown on free speech and ensure that: "...that relevant national legislation complies with … international human rights obligations" – a clear threat to the First Amendment, according to critics..." The resolution was sent recently by the U.S. and Egypt. It was approved by the U.N. Human Rights Council as a first step in its process through the international organization. It wants all nations to condemn and criminalize "any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence." This can be ambigiously utilized to ban free speech that criticizes the religion of Islam according to Steven Groves of the Heritage Foundation. The Organization of Islamic Conference that national legislatures pass laws to protect defamation of religious. This ban wouldn't stand legal scrutiny in America, because we have the First Amendment right to criticize a religion even if its offensive or insulting. Jay Sekulow, who is the chief counsel of the American Center for Law and Justice" said that he is fighting the UN plans and the free speech resolution itself incites discrimination. Likewise, in paragraph 6, the U.N. writing stresses "that condemning and addressing, in accordance with international human rights obligations, including those regarding equal protection of the law, any advocacy of national, racial or religious hatred that constitutes incitement to discrimination, hostility or violence is an important safeguard to ensure the enjoyment of human rights and fundamental freedoms of all, particularly minorities." Words that are offensive in America are protected by the First Amendment. Ironically, the Organization of the Islamic Conference have called for rights in their nations to be subjected under Shariah law, which is a theocratic empire. So, threats to free speech are evil in the world.
A site called Prevent Disease said that immune suppressing carcinogenic hand sanitizers in schools are trying to prevent H1N1 flu. Rinse free hand sanitizers are used to get rid of germs without rinsing soap and water. This has gained popularity in schools and public facilities to prevent the flu. Now, the risk of using such hand sanitizers far exceed the benefits as most have carcinogenic and immune suppressing compounds. There are health agencies globally that want an immediate need for immediate and persistent protection from harmful microbes and viruses (especially those considered by the world health officials as imminent threats like H1N1 flu). Sometimes the solutions are sometimes more dangerous than the diseases themselves and at detriment to long term health. Many sanitizers have more than 60 percent of alcohol similar to the ones in alocholic drinks. Some are made with isopropyl alochol that can be deadly for children who inject it. “As kids return to classrooms it is more important than ever that we take steps to slow the spread of influenza-like viruses, including the novel H1N1 virus,” said Dr. Mark Horton, who is the director of the California Department of Public Health (CDPH). An alcohol-free hand sanitizer, like Soapopular recently launched in the UK, can be the first line of defence against the spread of swine flu, claims its Canadian manufacturers. Soapopular has been popping up all over the U.K., Canada and U.S. child care venues, schools and health care facilities. It carries FDA approval in the U.S., Health Canada approval in Canada and MHRA approval to market in the UK. The soapopular product doesn't use alcohol like other products in its main ingredient. Yet, similar products that contain Benzalkonium Chloride, there are alarming toxic effects which are a far greater risk to our health than any prevention benefits they tout. Benzalkonium chloride is an allergen, carnciogen, and immunosuppresive chemical. In toxicology, BAC is also used as the median lethal dose, LD50 (abbreviation for “Lethal Dose, 50%”), required to kill half the members of a tested population. So, BAC is toxi and it's integrated in schools plus health facilities. We shouldn't trust Big Pharma using deceptive science to promote dangerous H1N1 flu vaccines. We should embrace natural medicine.
Pro-Life students ignore ridicule and speak up for the unborn. They also are preventing their friends' abortions. Hundreds of thousands of students from thousands of schools in the world refused to speak in order to protest abortion. They silently stood up for the unborn with red tape on their months or red armbands they helped prevent at least 22 abortions on their friends and their babies. The Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity is a product of Stand True Ministries. It has grown since it started. It tries to find pro-life people form around the Earth. Last year, Stand True heard back from participants about 59 girls who canceled their abortions on the day of the event due to the efforts of the students (and the number now stands at 22 with the event ongoing and only initial reports in so far). "By refusing to speak the students create a huge buzz and abortion will be the most talked about subject on campus," said Bryan Kemper, president of the group, shared with LifeNews.com. "This generation is fed up with the senseless violence of abortion as is determined to bring an end the abortion holocaust." Students will not only be silent, but show educational flyers to anyone who asks why they are silent. Some home-schooled students will also be involved in event. They will visit local mills and other public areas to distribute flyers. One homeschool student shared her story about overcoming scorn and ridicule to stand up for the pro-life perspective. "I am homeschooled but I go to the local community college for credits. I had the tape on my mouth and clothes and bracelets on and wore almost all red," Shell Vargo said. "My teachers were all kind of upset but I think they got over it. It was weird to have everyone looking at me and ridiculing me but it was worth it." "We had a lot of people ask us what we were doing and we handed out fliers, quite a few of them wanted tape as well luckily we had some. So we handed out tons of fliers, bracelets and tape," she said. Shell said that she helped 3 women to decide not to have abortions that they were initially planning to have. Rachel talked about her Pro-Life Day of Silent Solidarity. She said that some women repented of their abortions to Jesus Christ. Liz Lenihan said that white people and Hispanic people united to support the pro-life causes. Many people of every background are pro-life even. ADF Senior Legal Counsel David Cortman said that pro-life students are discriminated against for expressing their beliefs. This is true. The ADF have made lawsuits against people who have done this evil discrimination against pro-life people in schools. Kristan Hawkins, the director of Students for Life, one of the sponsors of the effort, talked about the impact it can have. So, the Pro-Life day of Silent Solidarity is a non-violent display of the First Amendment among studnet to express opposition to the murder of abortion.
9/11 was a terrible event. CNN reported on their poll claiming that Americans believe that Muslim in caves pulled off 9/11. The CNN poll shows that most Americans believe that the occupation of Afghanistan is turning into another Vietnam (in 52% to 48%). Older Americans see the parallels, because they remember the Vietnam War instead of reading it in history books according to CNN Polling Director Keating Holland. The Vietnam War was of course based on a hoax. It all started with the Gulf of Tonking incident in 1964. That was when the government said that North Vietnam attacked U.S. warships in the Gulf of Tonkin. In response, LBJ ordered air strikes against North Korea. Congress passed a joint resolution to do it under Johnson, but it was done without a congressional declaration of war. In 2005, the National Security Agency declassified a number of documents revealing the Gulf of Tonkin incident was a fabrication. “The parallels between the faulty intelligence [sic] on Tonkin Gulf and the manipulated intelligence used to justify the Iraq War make it all the more worthwhile to re-examine the events of August 1964 in light of new evidence,” writes National Security Archive research fellow John Prados. The Iraq War had worse faulty intelligence and deception that the government used to justify a military strike in Iraq. The New York Times supported the invasion of Vietnam and Afghanstan in 1964 and 2001. Even researcher and scholar David Ray Griffin admitted that the U.S. government created and exploited the attacks of September 11, 2001. Inside jobs existed for thousands of years. One was Operation Himmler that occured after the Reichstag fire (which the Nazis used a false flag operation to create the appearance of Polish aggression against Germany). Operation Gladio was a series of bombings sponsored by the CIA/NATAO in Italy to fight against suspected "leftist" or Communist groups in Europe. There was USS Liberty, the Lavon Affair, Operation Northwoods, and KGB Bombings in Russia to justify the war against Chechyna. Even the suspicious bombing of the battlefiled of Maine in the Havana Harbor caused the Spanish American war (with exploitation from the Hearst Press). The sinking of the Lusitania — a passenger ship secretly carrying 6 million pounds of artillery shells and rifle ammunition — was used to get the U.S. involved in the First World War, even though the vast majority of Americans opposed Europe’s war. FDR and the U.S. knew about Japan trying to invade Pearl Harbor. They allowed it to happen since they created an embargo against Japan, they refused of the Panama Canal and access to Venezuelan oil. The U.S. found that the Japanese were going to strike when the U.S. broke the Japanese encryption codes. Covert acts by the leaders of Taiwan, South Korea, and the U.S. military industrial complex caused the Korean under (under Eisenhower's Secretary of State John Foster Dulles). Some Americans don't know these events, but they are suspicious about the government when it pertains to war. New World Order minion and Obama foreign policy adviser during the election, Zbigniew Brzezinski, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee in 2007 that “major strategic decisions seem to be made within a very narrow circle of individuals — just a few, probably a handful, perhaps not more than the fingers on my hand. And these are the individuals, all of whom but one, who made the original decision to go to war, and used the original justifications to go to war.” The CNN poll says that 60 percent of Americans want some troops to stay in Afghanistan as a response to 9/11. This is strange since Muslims in caves didn't make NORAD stand down or defy the laws of physics in the collapse of Building Number 7. Polls have been manipulated by networks before on issues. A CNN online poll conducted in November, 2004, reported that 90% of people responding believed there was a government cover-up surrounding 9/11. In 2006, a Scripps Howard/Ohio University poll revealed that “[m]ore than a third of the American public suspects that federal officials assisted in the 9/11 terrorist attacks or took no action to stop them so the United States could go to war in the Middle East.” Also in 2006, a New York Times/CBS News poll reported that only 16% of Americans think the government is telling the truth about 9/11 and the intelligence prior to the attacks. So, we shouldn't trust polls 100%. We should trust the truth 100% alone. The truth ultimately is God. Life is an Unique thing. We should cherish it.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment