Thursday, May 18, 2006

Levels

http://infowars.net/pictures/may2006/170506pentagon4-small.jpg


The Pentagon photos released by the government doesn't prove anything. Many inside of the media want to destroy the 911 Truth Movement, but their plan doesn't work. I personally believe that a plane hit the Pentagon, but I think that the government is covering up something. It's differently a cover up regardless if you believe that a plane hit the Pentagon or not. The video was very grainly and many of the mainstream media felt suprised. The video never showed a Boeing 757 hitting the Pentagon in my eyes. What's worse is that according to Steve Watson, at least another 84 surveillance tapes were still withheld about the Pentagon. I'm glad that they felt suprised, because the truth is still shown here. I heard Bill O'Reilly slander people who just disagree with the offical story on 911 as "nuts." In reality, O'Reilly is the guy who said that people in Camp X-Ray ought to be executed and he said that Jeremy Glick said that Bush was involved with 911 (which Glick didn't say in his interview). The media is drolling over the Pentagon in trying to say this is all that there is in the 911 Truth Movement. The truth is that 911 is bigger than the Pentagon (though it's very important to investigate). It involves wargames, Building Number Seven, the government funding Al-Qeada and the Taliban, war plans to invade Afghanistan and Iraq before 9/11, the Pakistani ISI head Mahmoud Ahmad giving Mohammad Atta $100,000 , the Project for a New American Century, and other subjects. They could never kill the movement. The media can also never sway my opinion on these events. In fact, a film called 911 Revisited is all about questioning the offical story.

The Eric Jon Phelps vs. Michael Collins Piper debate was fairly good. Both men didn't have enough time to discuss more about the issues. As expected, I wrote a long analysis of the debate. I got a lot of answers and refutations for Michael Collins Piper. I also wrote about the many omissions done by Michael Collins Piper. He omits the high level Freemasonry, the Knights of Malta, and the Vatican/Jesuit influence in world events. Piper is constantly talking about Zionists ruling the world, but this isn't so when you look at the evidence. The world is very complex and many of the elite abhor Israeli policies like James Baker and many Saudi royals. Brian Ross and Maddy Sauer from ABC on May 17, 2006 talked about how the Department of Justice (FBI) sought 3,501 people last year under a provision of the Patriot Act that does not require judicial oversight. The FBI believes it's all validated by the law. Those in power love a surveillance society, but I support nationalism and Constitutional oversight.



http://www.prisonplanet.com/images/may2006/180506cooper.jpg

Aaron Klein from World Net Daily on May 18 2006 wrote that Israeli Knesset Member Effie Eitam said that Israel will bomb Iran if the United States won't. I don't agree with that, because Iran isn't a direct threat to America. Also, it's a fact that even the CIA said that Iran would take years before it will create a viable nuclear weapon. Ray McGovern wrote about the police state-like policies in America. The truth is that it's a fact that secret CIA run prisons are going on in Europe. You have torture going on globally. The NSA, regardless of their justifications for it, monitors us citizens for decades. Echeleon is a program that proves it. I don't agree with this since it spies on citizens without any warrant or judicial oversight. Anderson Cooper from CNN is doing something shady. William Rodriguez said that he refuse to bash Charlie Sheen about 9/11 when asked from people in the the Anderson Cooper 360 show. I see Anderson 360 show from time to time at 10:00 pm. Really they talk about the border and the Warren Jeffs, who on the FBI's most wanted list. It isn't too suprising that Anderson Cooper hates opinions from the 911 Truth Movement. He used to be from Channel One in the 1990's. I saw that show back in Middle School in the 1990's. That was back in the day.



http://img131.imageshack.us/img131/5450/2d3dcodedavinci9lb.gif
Hype has come about the Da Vinci Code. What's the deal behind it? It's a real distraction. Dan Brown's film doesn't even remotely show the truth about religion, but show fabrications. The truth is the many occult Secret Societies are in the world today and actually have global power like the Skulls and Bones, Freemasonry, and others. In truth, the real secret is that many in occult Secret Societies actually worship Lucifer or Satan. Aliester Crowley who was a member of the OTO worshipped the Devil. Manly P. Hall and Albert Pike wrote about Lucifer. According to Craig Craig Heimbichner's book called Blood on the Altar, 33° Freemason Albert Lontaine sent a letter to the Pope in 1937 where he called himself a servant of Satan (later he called him a servant of Lucifer). Cutting Edge Ministries wrote tons of information on the occult nature of Freemasonry. The book is said to be fiction by Dan Brown, but he goes on and says that many of the rituals, secret orders, and other things are facts. He can't seem to make up his own mind.
The movie forces people to accept conspiracies centuries ago, while not focusing on the real conspiracy of globalization and forming international Unions (i.e. European Union, Asian Union, etc.) that are happening today. The above image is a strange logo for the film that is coming tomorrow. It has actor Tom Hanks.The All Seeing Eye symbol is transposed into Tom Hanks' right eye.

Hanks and Director Ron Howard said that the film is just a work to ask questions. If that's so, why do many Christians and non-Christians accept its views as fact? Why do many Christians either question or lose their religious faith after reading the book? If Hanks and the film crew believes that the film isn't anti-Christian, why is one of their websites promoting the thing is called "sodarkconofman.com?" (That is a blanket assault against people of faith). I tell you why. It's believe the world wants alternative views on religions, even if it's fabrications. Also, the film attacks the foundational doctrines of Christianity. I will expose more elaborately later on. Although, the truth is that the Gnostics gospels were found only in the mid 100's and early 200's A.D., the Bible has tons of copies (according to Dr. F. F. Bruce, was the former Rylands Professor of Biblical Criticism and Exegesis at the University of Manchester, the NT Bible has over 24,600 copies) , Plantard admitted that his Priory de Sion was a fraud, the Bible and early church leaders called Jesus Christ God, and there is no documented evidence whatsoever that Jesus married Mary Madgelene. The Da Vinci Code is influenced readily from Gnosticism. Gnosticism is a belief that physcial matter is evil and spiritual matter is good, so Jesus appear as a spiritual being and not physical to people. The Gnostics believe that gradual, secret knowledge will lead into salvation. Gnosticism is more complex than this belief, but that one of its main tenets. The good news is that film critiques have called the film boring.

Unfortunately, it's likely, that that the Da Vinci Code's opening will have a high turnout. Numerous folks want to see what the fuss is all about. Christians should protest and resist the movie if they want since that's Constitutional and legal. I feel though the best way to respond to this film is answering it with logical information. It's more than protesting, but presents facts to counterract lies. I don't agree with Dr. Henry Makow on some issues, but he's right that tons of Christians are acting like wimps and letting the Christian faith being slandered all over the media. In my opinion, if a film like this was about Islam, Judaism, Hinduism, the New Age Movement, or even Buddhism, the criticisms and protests would be overwhelming.

http://www.theresistancemanifesto.com/images1/cops_black_masks.jpg


You can see me continiously talking about religion, popular culture, abortion, doctrines, Big Brother, and government corruption. That's my M.O. and my duty. I just thought about this. If Bush wants to solve the immigration problem, why hasn't he got rid of NAFTA. NAFTA isn't just against our national soveriegnity. NAFTA further crippled the Mexican economy causing a flow of millons of illegal immigrants into America. NAFTA clearly sent American jobs overseas and ruined the economy of Mexico. I will still live my life. Bye for now. In life, we come from one level into another level of problems and victorious contributions.

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)






No comments: