The Deception of the New Age NKJV Bible and more

From http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/barbara_aho_final_authority.html

Barbara Aho, Which Bible is Your Final Authority?

Kelly McGinley, host of the Berean Chronicles radio broadcast, launched a discussion forum in June, 2006. After receiving a forward of an email that Barbara Aho wrote to a friend of mine in response to the question, "Barbara, which Bible is your final authority?" I started a thread in the Berean Chronicles forum. This thread was begun in the hope that Barbara would respond publicly to me since she did not respond to the email forward that both she and Kelly received about her remarks about the King James Bible in the article, "Designer Marks of the Beast." I wanted to give her an opportunity to clarify her position in friendly territory before I made any further comments on my own site.

Kelly McGinley ordered the shut down of the Berean Chronicles Forum shortly after I posted the email that proves that both she and Barbara Aho were notified of my concerns about Ms Aho's KJV/mark of the beast doctrines on her website before I posted the "Barbara Aho, Which Bible is Your Final Authority" thread.

Was this a set up? The lady who forwarded the email to me is a friend but we did not conspire to have her write to Barbara and then forward her response to me. I believe she forwarded Barbara's reply to me because she was concerned for the people who are strongly influenced by Barbara's teachings. I also believe that God orchestrated these events. It is he who wanted us to know that the push is on to use corrupted Textus Receptus Greek/English interlinears to discredit the King James Bible.

QUESTIONS:

(1) Why is Barbara Aho (and now Kelly McGinley) sending the message that Christians should compare the King James Bible New Testament text with a Textus Receptus Greek/English interlinear to verify that each word has been correctly translated?
(2) Why is Barbara Aho comparing the NKJV New Testament text with a Textus Receptus Greek/English interlinear and stating that (so far) this corrupt 'version' (which must be substantially different from the King James Bible in order to have a copyright) matches the Interlinear?

Why did Barbara Aho of Watch Unto Prayer advise a woman via an email as follows:
"I have not stated this publicly (yet), but the New King James seems to follow the TR more closely than the KJV; at least we haven't found any instances where it differs from the TR."
Why did Barbara Aho communicate the same message to me on the Berean Chronicles message forum?
"Perhaps you can point us to verses where the NKJV ignores the Textus Receptus. We haven’t found any so far."

The Holy Bible does not promote New Age doctrine and neither does the uncorrupted manuscripts from which the King James Bible was translated from.
Any Textus Receptus Greek/English Interlinear that matches the words in the New King James Version that support New Age doctrine is corrupt.

Read the threads that Berean Chronicles removed regarding this matter of utmost importance. My remarks about David Bay's promotion of the Amplified Bible are here.

Also see: Which Greek and Hebrew Lexicons can you trust?; Corrupt Lexicons and Dictionaries: The Nazi Connection

The New World Order is using Evangelical church leaders to bring in the One World Religion. Their goal is to convince you to exchange your King James Bible for the New King James version. Why? The New King James Version promotes the doctrines of the New Age movement which is the religious arm of the One World Order.

The truth of the matter is that the New King James Version represents Satan's ultimate deception to oppose God's remnant in the closing days of the New Testament age.
(William P. Grady, author, Final Authority as quoted in THE NEW KING JAMES VERSION …1984)

The publisher of the NKJV has a hidden agenda. See: Thomas Nelson Rep Said NJKV is a Transitional Bridge

New King James Version Errors and Omissions
7/09/06
_____________________

From http://www.libertytothecaptives.net/nkjv_transitional_bridge.html

Thomas Nelson Rep: NJKV is a Transitional Bridge

"to eventually get your people to accept a more accurate Bible"

Pastor Kirk DiVietro' email, which was published to the internet by David Cloud of Way of Life Ministries, reveals the hidden agenda of the NKJV publishers:

Kirk DiVietro, Pastor of Grace Baptist Church in Franklin, Massachusetts, attended one of the Thomas Nelson planning meetings that prepared the way for the publication of the New King James. He testified to me that the Thomas Nelson representative plainly stated that their goal with the NKJV was to create a bridge to the modern versions, to break down the resistance of those who still revere the KJV. Following is Bro. DiVietro’s testimony as he gave it to me by e-mail on January 9, 2005:

“Over 20 years ago I attended a pre-publication meeting of the NKJV held by the Thomas Nelson People and hosted by the Hackman’s Bible Bookstore in Allentown, PA. I am personal friends with the owners who took great delight in seating me next to the brother of the main translator of the NIV. The meeting was attended by over 300 college professors and pastors. At the meeting we were treated to a slide presentation of the history of the English bible and in particular the King James Bible and its several revisions.

During the presentation of the NKJV the Thomas Nelson representative made a statement which to the best of my memory was, ‘We are all educated people here. We would never say this to our people, but we all know that the King James Version is a poor translation based on poor texts. But every attempt to give your people a better Bible has failed. They just won’t accept them. So we have gone back and done a revision of the King James Version, a fifth revision. Hopefully it will serve as a transitional bridge to eventually get your people to accept a more accurate Bible.’

Because of the years, and because I did not write it down, I cannot give you the speaker’s name and I cannot promise you that this is word for word correct, but the meeting so seared my spirit that I have never picked up and opened a NKJV. I can tell you that this is absolutely the substance and nearly the exact words of what was said.”

(Quote source: What About the New King James Version?)

New King James Version Errors and Omissions
THE NEW KING JAMES VERSION …1984)