Thanksgiving in 2007
So much information is spanning wildly. Thanksgiving existed for thousands of years and I consider it to be a legitimate celebration. From times past, we need to reconnect with other human beings, especially our families. There is nothing wrong with expressing thanks for our situation. Thanksgiving has been exercised among the 4 corners of the Earth. It's biblical too: "...Offer unto God thanksgiving; and pay thy vows unto the most High..." (Pslams 50:14). Modern American Thanskgiving tradition originated from the Native Americans and the Pilgrims. A joyful, tranquil feast transpired in New England. The Pilgrims by all means weren't perfect, but most of them legitimately desired the proposition of the inherit right of religious freedom (i.e. All human beings have a right to believe in what they want to). On the shores of the Mayflower inspired religious liberty, that citizens richly cherish in America today (though our religious liberties has been suppressed by groups like the CFR-run ACLU, etc.). With all that is happening, you have to be blind to ignore that something is wrong with the world. From the evils of eugenics to immoral wars, the truth is all around us. Just now, The Pakistani President General Pervez Musharraf declared martial law in Pakistan. He arrested tons of lawyers, the media is being suppresed (it's now state-controlled), lawyers have been assaulted, and other protestors have been arrested. Pakistan is more of a dictatorship than a freedom filled nation as compared from years ago. The Pakistani Constitution has been suspended, yet Pakistan is supposed to be our ally. Pervez claims that these duties are necessary to stop Islamic extremism. I condemn his anti-freedom proclomations. He should deter from his radical courses of action.
Before, I carry forward in my prose, one truth has to be expunged. It is that our liberty has been depleted. Here's some examples. On October 2006, the USA Military Commissions Act was signed into law by President George W. Bush. This new law eliminated habeas corpus (i.e. the right for a citizen to defend themselves in court). The reason is that it calls someone an "unlawful enemy combatant" as a result of a review tribunal under the authority of the President or the secretary of defense. It doesn't exempt American citizens since it says "person." Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution only eliminates habeas corpus unless there is a rebellion or invasion. Even Yale Professor Bruce Akerman states in the LA Times that this law allows the President to classify Americans as enemy combatants. It has a "pillaging" section that turns all theft into terrorism. The White House also signed the NDAA (or the National Defense Authorization Act of 2004). It eliminates Posse Comitatus Act of 1878 (this prevents the Military to act in police actions or law enforcement against American citizens). How is that? It's that, because NDAA modified Section 334 of the Insurrection Act. The revision allows the President to deploy troops or the military as a police force without the consent of a governor or local governments in cases of emergencies (according to Dr. Daneen Peterson). Violations of our rights are plenty from the government confiscating guns from innocent people days after Katrina (which violated the 2nd Amendment) to the arrest of Philadelphia 11 for peaceful preaching (in violation of the First Amendment). For years, SWAT units have hurt people and used tanks plus militarized weapons. An Oregon trooper harrassed peaceful protestors against the Iraq War. The protestors were anmaed Brownlow, Suzanne, etc. Frankiy, these developments outline a clear agenda of centralizing power more into the federal government plus the distortion of our legitimate rights. Most people I know want change. Most people don't want the Iraq War, don't want warrantless wiretaps, don't want our border non-secured, and don't want our rights and freedom depleted.
The Right to Bear Arms
Since humans existed on this Earth, self defense was always a part of our existence. In ancient Egypt, Babylon, China, Greece, Rome, etc. suppression of self defense whether from knives or swords were common place. Even Cicero (a Roman political thinker) supported self defense as a means to lower the risk of the threat of tyrannical government. In America, we were founded in part when certain Americans refused to give up their weapons to British imperalists. The Second Amendment gives the people the right to own weapons and the organization of a militia. This is expressed by the Founding Fathers in these quotes:
"As civil rulers, not having their duty to the people duly before them, may attempt to tyrannize, and as the military forces which must be occasionally raised to defend our country, might pervert their power to the injury of their fellow citizens, the people are confirmed by the next article in their right to keep and bear their private arms."
Tench Coxe, writing as "A Pennsylvanian," in "Remarks On The First Part Of The Amendments To The Federal Constitution," in the _Philadelphia Federal Gazette,_ June 18, 1789, p.2 col.1
"Arms in the hands of individual citizens [may] be used at individual discretion...in private self-defense..."
John Adams, A Defense of the Constitution of Government of the United States of America, 1788
This doesn't mean that America is immune to corrupting that right. It's a historical fact that slaves and even free African Americans were prevented from adequately owning firearms even in the 1600's. For example, in 1640, a Virginia law banned blacks from owning any gun. As far as the Louisiana Black Code of 1754 forbid blacks to own guns in Louisiana, even a cane. In the early 1800's, North Carolina forbid blacks to own gun, even a knife, dagger, or sword without a license:
"...That if any free negro, mulatto, or free person of color, shall wear or carry about his or her person, or keep in his or her house, any shot gun, musket, rifle, pistol, sword, dagger or bowie-knife, unless he or she shall have obtained a licence therefor from the Court of Pleas and Quarter Sessions of his or her county, within one year preceding the wearing, keeping or carrying therefor, he or she shall be guilty of a misdemeanor, and may be indicted therefor." (State v. Newsom, 5 Iredell 181, 27 N.C. 250 (1844).
The Black Codes (in response to Reconstruction) have rules restricting even knives and guns to be owned by African Americans. Native Americans were told to give up their guns in the West during the late 1800's. Hitler passed the Weapons Law at March 18, 1938. That law banned all guns among Jewish people (only the Nazi party members and other "reliable people" owned guns in the evil Nazi empire). It didn't stop in the 1930's. Even in 2007, more anti-gun laws are proposed all of the time in America. It's worse in other nations like England like they banned all privately held guns from its own citizens today in 2007. This year the HR 2640 bill was promoted. It dictated that any veterans diagnosed with PTSD (or post-traumatic stress disorder) are placed on a federal gun ban list and can't own a gun. This bill is sponsorded by Democrats Carolyn McCarthy (from NY) and Senator Patrick Leahy (from VT). The reality is that most with PTSD aren't violent and should have access to guns if they want to. Even the Military order of the Purple Heart is opposed to the bill. Jesuits like Pfleger is opposed to gun rights. The Jesuits are a group headed by Jesuit General Hans-Kolvenbach. The Jesuits and the Vatican actively promote illegal immigration also. For example, Cardinal Theodore McCarrick supports it. On 1/22/2003, the US Conference of Catholic Bishops worked with Catholic bishops of Mexico to issue a Strangers No Longer proclomation encouraging illlegal immigration. Guns aren't toys, but people have a right to own them to protect their families. I do believe that education by individual ought to exist on the proper use of weapons and guns, but I never subscribe to getting rid of guns from citizens. Crime can be decreased by strictly punishing criminals using it, improving neigbhorhoods, education, and promoting citizens to protect themselves by having a gun if they want to. Stats back up the pro-gun position. According to the Florida Department of Justice in 1998, the homicide crime fell from 36% above the national average to 4% below the national average after Florida passed their concealed carry law. In Texas, citizens with concealed carry guns are 14 times less likely to commit a crime. Also, they are 5 times less likely to commit a violent crime (reported by the Texas Department of Public Safety and the U.S. Census Bureau, reported in San Antonio Express-News, on September, 2000).
Angels and Demons
I never heard of the Angels and Demons" book until recently. From research in months, I figured this was a carefully crafted disinformation book written by Dan Brown (again similar to the Da Vinci Code book) to ofscure the real history of the Illuminati, Freemasonry, and especially the Vatican (involved in murdering millions of people for centuries even in ca. 1000 AD. and before that time). The following will shows sources and other evidence rebutting the story. In a nutshell, "Angels and Demons" write that the Galileo and other scientists created the Illuminati to rebel against the Vatican and Freemasonry is apart of an anti-Vatican agenda. True history and true conspiracies are such more interesting and fascinating than Dan Brown's literature. Here’s the truth. Secret Societies existed for thousands of years. Some of their purposes were intelligence agencies, restricting the common man from learning about science and technology, perform occultism, and tons of other reasons. On occasion, high priests ruled these societies. They existed in Egypt, Greece, India, China, Rome, and England (i.e. the Celtic Druids, who are Indo-European Celts not Semites. It's true that Phoenicians traded in Britian, but the Celts are seperate people. Celts did influence Secret Societies though then and now). The early Celts didn't have a written language unlike the Semitic Hebrews. The Celts were called "Keltoi" by the Greeks and are related to the Cimmerians. The early Celts were also related to the Aryans found in India by: each having a caste system, burning the dead, a belief in transmigration of souls, and oak worship. The religious aspects of most ancient Societies accepted the existence of gods and goddesses, Modern Masonry existed in the UK at 1717 by a couple of men.
Masonry has a visible face and an inner core according to Mason Manly P. Hall:
" Freemasonry is a fraternity within a fraternity -- an outer organization concealing an inner brotherhood of the elect ... it is necessary to establish the existence of these two separate and yet interdependent orders, the one visible and the other invisible. The visible society is a splendid camaraderie of 'free and accepted' men enjoined to devote themselves to ethical, educational, fraternal, patriotic, and humanitarian concerns. The invisible society is a secret and most August [defined as 'of majestic dignity, grandeur'] fraternity whose members are dedicated to the service of a mysterious arcannum arcandrum [defined as 'a secret, a mystery']." [Hall, Lectures on Ancient Philosophy, p. 433]
Lying is promoted in Masonry:
"Masonry, like all the Religions, all the Mysteries, Hermeticism, and Alchemy, conceals its secrets from all except the Adepts and Sages, or the Elect, and uses false explanations and misinterpretations of its symbols to mislead those who deserve only to be mislead; to conceal the Truth, which it calls light, and draw them away from it." [Morals and Dogma, p. 104-5, 3rd Degree]
Dan Brown omits the extrme circumstances of Masonry and even the sinister history of the Jesuits. In truth, Galileo never invented the Illuminati. Illuminati-like groups commenced for a long time. The Bavarian Illuminati was created by Jesuit-Trained professor Adam Weishuapt (he accepted Pythagoras' philosophy of creating an "enlightened society." Adam modeled his group after the Jesuits. Even his ex-ally Freiherr von Knigge (according to the Catholic Encyclopedia) accused Weishaupt of being a closet Jesuit. Ironically, Adam Weishaupt died in good grace of the Catholic Church. The Vatican and Masonry have connections indeed. These links include: both are work-based for salvation groups, both are ecumencial, the Jesuits help create the Scottish Rite in the 1740's (proven by even Masonic authors), and have been ally (i.e. Cardinal Spellman is an ally of 33rd Degree Freemason J. Edgar Hoover. Jesuit priest and Knight of Malta Edmund A. Walsh was a friend of 33rd Degree Freemason General Douglas MacArthur). Dan Brown doesn't accurate expose the real history of past evil Vatican intrigue or the present. For example, Opus Dei member Robert Hanssen was a traitor and spy who sould secrets into Russia. Other extensions of the Vatican include the Knights of Malta and the Knights of Columbus. The Knights of Matla was created in the 1100's A.D. Today, they head many corporations, some are in Hollywood, etc. like Saxton (the head of Hollywood International), Edward L. Hennessy Jr. (the former director of NY Stock Exchange companies, ex-board of NY Fed bank, and he's part of Faliegh Dickinson University), Geoffrey Boisi (he's part of the Trilateral Commission, and a trustee of the Carnegie Corporation), Alexander Haig (related to COSCO), Thomas Monaghan, etc. Gnosticism is a common theme in Dan Brown's literature. Gnosticism is a religious view created around the time of Christ. Its tenets are that matter is evil and only spirit is holy, that the Creator God called the Deimurge is wicked and forced man to exist in matter, and that the Biblical Satan is the true God and redeemer of man. I don't believe in that.
National Treasure is having a new movie. The first National Treasure presented Freemasonry in a positive light. Like any movie some of it about Masonry was true (like many Masons involved in the American Revolution, the secrecy of Masonry, and it being a powerful group). Other things were false like Masonry creating a secret code in the Constitution, etc. The new National Treasure: Book of Secrets is more interesting. It's a movie starring Nicholas Cage about the belief that Masonry had something to do with the death of Abraham Lincoln. It's true that Masonry via Stanton covered up evidence, but the majority of the blame for Lincoln's death (proven by CT Wilcox's new book "The Transformation of the Republic") is found in the Knights of the Golden Circle (or KGC) and the Vatican/Jesuits. Even John Wilkes Booth (the assassin of Lincoln and whose brother was a Freemason) and many Confederate elites were members of the KGC. After Lincoln, Andrew Johnson was President. He was a Mason and pardoned the war criminal 33rd degree Freemason Albert Pike. Occult symbols like the All Seeing Eye (the eye of Horus or Osiris) are there according to Masonic writers like Albert Pike who wrote that: "...
"...the All-Seeing Eye, ...to the Egyptian initiates was the emblem of Osiris, the Creator."
"... His [Osiris] power was symbolized by an Eye over a Sceptre. The Sun was termed by the Greeks the Eye of Jupiter, and the Eye of the World; and his is the All-Seeing Eye in our Lodges."
Anti-New World Order Updates
Obscene distortion of our health and food supplies are unfortunately a common occurence in the globe, not just in the USA. Christian researcher David Meyer rightfully uncovered this situation by writing that professor Esmail Zenjani (he is of the University of Nevada) injected human cells into fetal animals (i.e. that resulted in sheep made with human organs that's 85% sheep and 15% human). Scientists created a drug called UO12 (which can eliminate memories. Some skimmed milk have been formed via genetic engineering. This is sick and most corporations involved with this are controlled by the Knights of Malta, CFR members, Pilgrims, the Bilderbergers, etc (these are elite pro- globalism groups). Some of the companies had ties to the Nazis like Bayer (that's why the Nazis used flouride and experiments to harm plus control populations). A bigger agenda behind this is that elite groups want to reign over independent health solutions. That's how they can increase profits plus rule over the massess. That is also why Codex Alimentarius is promoted. What is that? It's a plan of limiting the right of the people to recieve vitamins, supplements, and minerals to improve our health instead of solely relying on imperfect, allopatic drugs. It's also a means for depopulation where globalists & Big Pharma promoted toxins like aspartame, vaccinations (especially those in the Third World. Jesuits like Jenner and Francis Xavier revolutionarized if not invented the modern vaccine movement). Big Pharma's corruption should be opposed. Health freedom ought to spread free. This is in violation of the DSHEA law that permits health freedom of vitamins, etc. Susan Davis is promoting HR3156 which is an anti-vitamin bill. According to John C. Hammell (who is part of the The International Advocates for Health Freedom), the Trilateral Cooperation Charter wants to limit people's access to vitamins and supplements. Also, it's used to agree with the US FDA and FTC (or Federal Trade Commission). The Charter wants to harmonize U.S. law with Canada & Mexico (both nations not America call suplements drugs which they aren't). "Genetically Modified Foods Unsafe?" is an article written by Jeffery M. Smith writing that Soy allergies jumped 50% in the U.K. just after GM soy was introduced. GM foods are known to have many side effects and risks. Clean foods, organic foods, and other things can improve our health.
The Presidental Race of 2008: Part 2
In 2008, someone will be elected President. Tensions are rising in the races for both parties for the Presidency. 2008 will be an important year indeed. In that, the first President after George W. Bush will acquire the power of the White House. Now, Republicans, Democrats, and 3rd party candidates are battling for the spot of the Presidency. On the Democratic side, the mainstream media are picking Hillary Clinton (who endorsed driver licenses for illegal immigrants which over 70% of NY State citizens adamantly oppose), Barrack Obama (he's related to Dick Cheney), and John Edwards as the front runner. Yet, the media usually discount the legitimate anti-NAFTA, anti-Iraq War positions of Dennis Kuicinich and Mark Gravel (though I disagree with Mike's advocation of a global government). The so-called front runners of the Democratic side are either in the CFR or have ties to it (even Bill Richardson is a CFR member & Bohemian Grove praticipant). The CFR was a group formed in 1921 whose goal by CFR chief's Haas's own words is to weaken national sovereignity, promote internationalism, create a new world order, and have globalization. Haas said "..."Globalization thus implies that sovereignty is not only becoming weaker in reality, but that it needs to become weaker. States would be wise to weaken sovereignty in order to protect themselves, because they cannot insulate themselves from what goes on elsewhere. Sovereignty is no longer a sanctuary."(from February 21, 2006, on pg. 9, at theTaipei Times). What planet is he from? Frankily, our sovereignity weakened has caused great problems for America and it should be our great duty to strengthen and preserve our sovereignity. The Democrats are right that everyone should have afforable health care, we should protect the environment, we should build our jobs, education should improve, and we ought to fight against poverty. That isn't the question. The question is whether the government should solve these problems 100% of the time or incentives, creative solutions, better leadership, independent iniatatives, and more options should solve these issues. I choose the latter. Hillary Clinton is the most elite of the Democrats. She voted for the Patriot Act, voted for the resolution in favor of the Iraq war if necessary, and she's funded by CFR member and Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch (the head of News Corporation). John Edwards is a promoter against poverty and is speaking all over the country, but even he meet at a Bilderberg Group meeting. Obama is the most articulate of the Democrats, but many criticize his low experience and his errors of judgment (like wanting to attack Pakistan if "al-Qaeda" guarded Bin Laden, who is a known CIA asset).
The Republican side is more divided. Like the Democratic side, most of the so-called front-runners are members of the CFR or have ties to it like Rudy Giuliani (Rudy gave pro-New world order man David Rockefeller in 1994. Rudy is the most pro-establishment candidate of the Republican side), John McCain, Mitt Romney, and Fred Thompson. Frankily, most of the Republican candidates are obsessing with national security while not talking about the viligance of protecting our civil liberties. Without civil liberties, we have no authentic security to make manifest. Rudy Guiliani is the most sinister candidate in my mind. Neo-con Norman Podhoretz supports him. Norman was one writer of the PNAC document that sets up a plan for Western/US hegemony globally in war, bio-ethnic specific weapons, and other evil deeds. Norman wants Iran attacks also when Iran is not a direct threat to America. Guiliani (a friend of Roger Ailes from Fox News) even wants taxpayers to fund abortion and he supported anti-gun measures in NYC. Romney is a Mormon and changed positions on issues. John McCain is older and has many conservative views, but wants more Iraq surge actions. Fred Thompson claims to be pro-life, but said that starving Terri Schiavo to death is a family decision. It isn't since starving someone to death is murder. He's a member of the CFR and he's a lobbyist for decades. Mike Huckabee is the one who's most humorous. He calls himself pro life and pro-gun. Critics have talked about his tax hikes, eliminating a sentence of a felon criminal, and immigration as problems with him. Chuck Norris (a martial arts professional and actor) supports him.
Ron Paul is another candidate that's extremely popular on the Internet. Paul said that he's against the Iraq war, he's for civil liberties, and that he wants freedom for people. I agree with that. A lot of polls depict him as climbing higher into people's radar. Many from many perspective respect and support his candidacy. I agee with Ron Paul than the candidates of both major parties. Here's what some things that I disagree with Ron Paul. Ron Paul seems to have an ecumencial streak in praise of John Paul II as a "Pro-life figure." John Paul II was a man who yolked up Shiva worshippers and other occultists in promotion of a new world order. According to William Cooper's book, "Behold the pale horse", Pope JPII was a salesman of the chemical Zyklon B gas when he worked for IG Farben during WWII. That chemical was used to gas hundreds of thousands of Jews at Auschwitz. The image above shows Paul using an Canuto handsign. This doesn't mean he's a Satanist or occultist, but this is strange. We know that many election-electronic devices are controlled by select companies like Diebold. Election fraud occurs just recently all over the nation. The deal is to get peace with God and be prepared for whatever comes.
The End
This is the end of this prose, but not the end of my life. The establishment media demonize and use unfair stereotypes against certain movements. For example, Glen Beck of CNN called 911 Truthers insane and insulate that Timothy McVeigh would align with it. Beck further talked with ex-Marxist David Horowitz in demonizing legitimate libertarians, anti-war followers, and Ron Paul as trying to ruin America (and in league with "Islamofascists." Al-Qaeda and many Muslim "radicals" have been funded by Western government and intelligence agencies like MI6 and the CIA for decades). This is a lie of course. The truth is that real 911 Truthers aren't violent. Legitimate questions from the NIST fail to answer how the Twin Towers collapsed, Able Danger, the collapse of Building Number Seven, and other issues that discount the offical story. I would say Beck is right on exposing the North American Union plan, exposing illegal immigration (including gangs like Ms-13), and exposing the global warming hysteria (that's why Nazi SS officer Prince Bernard of the Netherlands and eugenicist Julian Huxley are founding fathers of the modern, controlled environmental movement, while real environmental issues are suppressed. These real issues are toxic waste, deforestation, posions in our water, evil mercury and evil aspartame issues, oceans polluted, exteme genetic engineering like splicing genes and putting it in foods, Gm foods, etc. Even the founder of the Weather Channel want a clean environment, but hates the man-made global warming myth. CO2 is a needed chemical to develop life. Warming in the Earth's history has caused boomed in civilization and writing. Helping environment is the promotion of independent clean technologies, the building of foods independently in a free market way, the banning of these poisons like asparatame in the globe period).
Yet, Glen Beck is a shill by denying much of the real issues going on and unfarily demonizing legitimate criticism of our government. Al Gore (the non-scientist promoter of global warming that's man-made) had meeting with Roger Ailes and his family owned a big oil company. Bill O'reilly constantly expose George Sors as far left and he's correct. The reason is that Soros funds far left groups like the Tides Foundation. He funds Democratic campaigns and other liberal interest group. Soros is pro-abortion (even partial birth abortion), enuthanasia, and hating conservative ideals. Yet, O'reilly omit his ties to the elite (in the CFR, Pilgrim Society, Bilderbergers, etc.). For example, George Soros is a CFR member, a founder of the ECFR, has stake in the Carlyle Group, and attended Bilderberg conferences. That tells me that establishment neo-cons and neo-liberals (like Soros) are controlled plus funded by the same people. I feel inspired to fight. I learned from heroic men like John Wycliffe, John Tyndale, and other promoting religious liberty and the freedom of speech against the authoritarian policies of Romanism. The deal with me that freedom should reign and corruption plus tyranny ought to cease.
By Timothy
More is coming
1 comment:
Call in and check out our interview tonight at 8pm EST with Ray Buchanan, founder and president of the Stop Hunger Now organization and veteran actor John Mahon on thirdrailradio.com
Post a Comment