Saturday, March 21, 2009

Eric on Issues about the Jesuits, etc.

QUOTE
Dear Eric,

i wonder if i could ask you for your view on something as you have a greater understanding of the sons of loyalas operating manouvres.
I lived with a brother for five years. He is Irish from dublin born and bred and he seems to be born again. However whenever i brought up the subject of Rome as being the whore of revelation 17 he would get very angry and his bias was greatly against this understanding. Also he would try and encourage me to laugh about it and make light of the subject, which i find hard to do as it is indeed satans destructive creation against Christ and His chruch. He told me that he when he was young he was sent to the holy ghost fathers school and he said he rebelled against it and was sexually abused by one of the priests there. He has an intense hatred for the english and cromwell and Ian Paisley which he claimed caused all the trouble in Ireland. He on a number of times also accused me of having a proud protestant spirit and of imperialism (I assume because i am half english (other half welsh)). I recently finished a degree in accounts and finance and saw the correlation of dates and vested interest related to the sinking of the titanic. I shared this information with my friend who assumed that i had seen you on u tube (which i hadnt at that time) and he stated that you had a demon. Also he has a very good rich friend who i have visited a couple of times that was taught in a jesuit school. Also he has caused alot of disruption in the fellowship where i used to attend and always seemed to have a very contentious attitude. And whenever he talked in reltion to catholics he always said 'we'. Also he would get angry with me for no good reason and would rebuke me for the slightest thing i did that he did not approve of. Which i believe is because of my stedfastness in what i believe concerning the vatican and so forth..
I have tremendously difficult time getting on with him and whenever the said subject comes up it is like a demon manifests.
Could I ask what you think? I hope i am not taking too much of your time. His name is O'Dwyer.

Thanks
Bro David



Dear Brother David,

Thank you for contacting me.

Your friend is obviously a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor. He secretly works for the Order in neutralizing any true Protestant and Baptist Calvinist resistance to the designs of the papacy. His utter hostility towards Cromwell and his Protestant and Baptist Independent English army makes this obvious. For Cromwell would never have invaded Ireland had not the Jesuits murdered at least 300,000 Irish and English Protestants from 1641 to 1649, the year Oliver besieged Drogheda.

Ian Paisley, for all the good he has done in the past against Rome, has now compromised away the liberty of Protestant Northern Ireland. Sharing political power with Irish Jesuit murderers Martin McGuiness and Gerry Adams (both are MI6) is the end of Protestantism for all of Ireland. Protestant Bismarck made a similar compromise in 1874 when he revoked the righteous Falk Laws born out of Protestant Germany's "Struggle with Culture" against the Jesuits who were expelled from the Second Reich in 1872.

The Coadjutor charges you with "imperialism," yet it is the Irish Roman Catholics which, as tools of the Jesuits, took over America by 1900, including America's Roman Hierarchy, New York banking, the Stock Market, and both political parties. The Irish were also hired by Rome to murder Protestants during the First Thirty Years' War (1618-1648) and the Second Thirty Years' War (1914-1945), WWI in particular when they helped to destroy the Protestant Prussian Empire. In 1922 Ireland was given its "independence" from England by a Jesuit-ruled King and British Parliament controlled by the Jesuits via the Labor Party. The Irish Catholics then worked with the Nazi Roman Catholics against the Protestant English peoples during WWII. Ireland was a haven for German U Boat-refueling and repair. Obviously this Coadjutor is a devout slave of the pope believing no nation on earth has the right to its own national sovereignty apart from Vatican dictates.

If I were you, I would sharply rebuke him as a heretic and then after the second admonition reject him, he being condemned of himself (Titus 3:10). I Timothy 6:3-5 also applies. Separation is your only solution if he does not repent.

I trust this is helpful.

Sincerely in faith,

Brother Eric



______________________


QUOTE
Eric,

What are your source(s) for the names and order of authority for Obama's White Papal Masters? Also, how do you know Fr. Ciancimino S.J. is an occultist? Are you
suggesting that this man is a"go between" between the powers and principalities
that are assigned to NYC, Wall St. etc. If so, that's a pretty wild assertion
without some evidence!

Thanks.

CB.



Dear CB,

Thank you for contacting me.

For a full picture of the basis of my charges, see my book Vatican Assassins III. Until that time, consider this:

Jesuit Father of the Fourth Vow Joseph A. O'Hare was the past president of Fordham University. He is today yet a presider at Cardinal Egan's Council on Foreign Relations in New York City and the real power behind Masonic Court Jew of the pope, New York City mayor Michael Bloomberg. Trace the financial power of the Knights of Malta ruling the finance and government of the city. It will lead to their master, Archbishop Egan, who defers to his immediate overseers, the high Jesuits at Fordham in the Bronx. It is of these high Fordham Jesuits of whom G. Gordan Liddy stated that "they ruled the world, and they enjoy it." These Fordham Jesuits who are submitted to their New York Provincial, Fr. Ciancimino who is indeed a worshipper of the Egyptian trinity Isis, Horus and Osiris masked under the names of Rome's pagan trinity, God the Father (Osiris), God the Son (Horus-Jesus) and the Virgin Mother Mary co-redemptrix (Isis).

Lord Bless,

Brother Eric

2 comments:

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Wow,

I was a little shocked by reading Eric's response; all of it. He's never met this poor guy that is being criticised, in his entire life. All he knows about him, is what someone he has never met, writes to him, about someone else.

And from this one little letter, with not one word, or not providing the person being criticised with his words, or his perspective or his opinion: Eric finds enough information (how he confirmed it's impartiality -- if he is remotely interested in impartilaity), and condemns the poor guy.

I'm sorry, I dont think anyone who decides to judge another, purely on hearsay, and without giving the other person any opportunity to state his case; IS SPEAKING ON BEHALF OF ANYTHING REMOTELY HONEST, ETHICAL, HONOURABLE OR ON BEHALF OF JUSTICE.

Perhaps Eric, may wish to think about his response to this man, and against another, he has never ever met, nor heard anything from his perspective. Perhaps Eric was busy or in a rush. I don't know. I just think that his response was not impartial, not honourable, not ethical and not in line with antyhign remotely encouraging justice.

Imagine what this man so severely criticised, without any opportunity for any hearing of his opinons, may think about the honour and integrity of those who have done him such a disservice? Should this man so criticised consider such unethical and dishonourable criticism of him, to come from people whose religion encourages them to hear another's point of view, before throwing him to the lions?

Eric's perceptions of the issue, may be correct; but a hypothesis is different than a belief of certainty. Perhaps Eric's views were a hypothesis, and he forgot to say so. I don't know. I just found them to come across about as certain as the belief of the Pope that the Pope is infallible? Is htat what Eric believes, that he is infallible?

Lara

Timothy said...

Who is the person you are referring to?

You can email Eric at:

eric@vaticanassassins.org




P.S. No one is infallible except for God.

By Timothy