Easter 2009

Easter is coming up. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to witness that Satan and evil people want to prevert the things of God in order to defy the authority of the Word of God (along with brainwashing people). Any believer in God ought to be careful about deception, occult symbolism, occult dates, etc. Easter is found to have pagan origins. Easter refers to the pagan spring celebrations. This was the time when the Druids would worship Nature and vegetation. Merrill F. Unger's "New Unger's Bible Dictionary" (which was edited R.K. Harrison) and Moody Press published the work in 1957 and 1988. It is a good source. The source says that Easter comes from the Saxon word Eastra (Bede was a 7th century Anglo-Saxon theologian who wrote that the pagan fertility goddess Eostra or Eastra was the origin of the English word of Easter). Eastra was the Goddess of Spring where sacrifices were done in the time of the spring equinox. This time took place between March 19 and March 21 and marks the first day of true Spring according to witches. Easter has been recorded as coming from the Goddess of the ancient Middle East as well. The eggs of Easter comes from the Druids, the ancient Greeks, etc. as meaning the Goddess of Astarte. There is not a word in the Bible that calls us to celebrate the Lord's resurrection in a special way. There is communion and Passover, but there is no Biblical commandment to celebrate Easter at all. We should worship God in spirit and truth without pagan influences. That's certainly clear. Pagans, Satanists, and witches to this day do human sacrifice on the Vernal Equinox on March 21st or March 22nd (which is also based on the full moon, which is similar to Easter in its cosmology). So, we should intercede or pray for those held in bondage. So, we should not celebrate Easter. God doesn't command us to celebrate his resurrection. We are commanded to remember the death of Jesus Christ through the Lord's Supper. Also, Easter has pagan origins. We should wake up about the devises of evil. We should always remember these following words form the Scriptures: "...But the hour cometh, and now is, when the true worshippers shall worship the Father in spirit and in truth: for the Father seeketh such to worship him. God is a Spirit: and they that worship him must worship him in spirit and in truth..." (John 4:23, 24).



The Theosophical Society has promoted the one world agenda for decades now. Much of the societal distingeration didn't occur just by accident. The promotion of shifting morality has been promoted for ages from Plato and August Comte. Anne Besant and Madame HP Blavatsky were Theosophists. They believed that all religions had some truth in them and it is necessary for man to evolve into an unity (even when this unity is anti-God or against the Law of the Scriptures). Annie Besant teaches in her work called "WORLD THEOSOPHY" from , Sept., 1932. on pg. 668 that man can be a god via evolution and there are no barriers between a criminal and a saint. She denies that sin causes seperation. Chrisitanity teaches that sin seperates man from God and only Jesus Christ can save souls. It's also important to seperate evil and false religions from Christianity. The merging of ideologies even evil ones have been the plans of radical secular humanists and other occultists for generations. That is why even the Golden Rule is rarely taught in public schools and new world order concepts are especially taught there. That is why the demonization of militias, pro-life people, Third party candidates, conservatives, libertarians, etc. are abundant even in America. The Theosophical Society wants world government for the sake of "universal brotherhood." Yet, setting up a world government will break down cultures and national sovereignity of nations the world over. There is nothing wrong with respecting another person regardless of their race, gender, or creed. Yet, it is wrong to try to unite in an one world setting even against the will of the people for the sake of attempting to create some Utopian Society. Theosphist C. Jinarajadasa wants to form a World Organization to handle all affairs of nations and a World Economic Council to cater justice. The big picture is that a wide spectrum of elitists and occultists want the same goal of forming a world government. This threat is ever growing, especially in these economically dangerous times. It seems like Biblical prophecy is being fullfilled all of the time. Some like Gordon Brown wants a world regulatory system to handle the economies of the world. These goals have been planned for quite some time now.

Barack Obama's administration want to discuss the possibility use geo-engineering (via shooting pollution particles in the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays, etc.) as a way to stop global warming. This isn't new, because covert government programs have used geo-engineering programs (and testing poisons on the American people) for decades. KSLA reports that “239 populated areas were contaminated with biological agents between 1949 and 1969.” These plans are similar to proposals made by the elite from the Council on Foreign Relations. The AP report states that Obama’s science advisor John Holdren is pushing for radical terra forming programs to be explored such as creating an “artificial volcano." Despite Holdren’s admission that such measures could have “grave side effects,” he added that, “we might get desperate enough to want to use it.” In briefing notes (PDF) published in May 2008 from the CFR’s Geoengineering: Workshop on Unilateral Planetary Scale Geoengineering, the elite internationalist group lays out the exact same radical ideas now being touted by the Obama administration The document says that it wants geoenineering strategies. The documents wants to add dangerous aerosols in the atmosphere to help the "environment." They are hypocrites, because they want to claim to help the environment, but aerosols and other chemicals can damage the enviornment. One chemical proposed in geoengineering is sulphur dioxide, which can harm the immune system of humans, damage trees, etc. What is known about what happens when the environment is loaded with sulphur dioxide is bad enough, since the compound is the main component of acid rain, which according to the EPA “Causes acidification of lakes and streams and contributes to the damage of trees at high elevations (for example, red spruce trees above 2,000 feet) and many sensitive forest soils. In addition, acid rain accelerates the decay of building materials and paints, including irreplaceable buildings, statues, and sculptures that are part of our nation’s cultural heritage.” Even Greenpeace’s chief UK scientist - a staunch advocate of the man-made global warming explanation - Doug Parr has slammed attempts to geo-engineer the planet as “outlandish” and “dangerous." The CFR’s geo-engineering research program is directed by David G. Victor a Professor at Stanford Law School and an Adjunct Senior Fellow at the Council on Foreign Relations. CFR leaders support global warming hysteria obviously.

A military whistleblower claims that she witnessed the Flight 93 shootdown order. The woman claimed that she was stationed at Fort Meade on September 11, 2001 and has given an explosive interview. She said that she personally heard military commanders make the decision to shoot down United Airlines Flight 93 on 9/11. She used a psuedonym of Elizabeth Nelson. Nelson told The Project Camelot website that she personally heard officials agree on the order to shoot down Flight 93. The decision was apparently made because the plane was flying in a no-fly zone near to Camp David and heading toward Site R, a military facility in known as the “backup Pentagon." Nelson stresses that at no time was there any talk of “hijackers,” and the plane was shot down purely because communication had been lost and standard operating procedure mandated that the plane be intercepted and destroyed. She talked as if she was sincere and genuine. Nelson said that she was stationed at Fort Meade under the Kimbrough Ambulatory Care Center Hospital. She was training as a radiologic technologist. On 9/11, her rank was Private First Class. She saw one of the planes hit one of the Towers. President Bush once famously claimed that he had seen the first plane hit and thought that it was a case of pilot error, despite there being no live TV footage of the first plane strike. According to Wikipedia, Site R, otherwise known as The Raven Rock Mountain Complex (RRMC) or the Underground Pentagon, is a United States government facility on Raven Rock, a mountain in the U.S. state of Pennsylvania. The facility houses the ANMCC (Alternate National Military Command Center), JSSC (Joint Staff Support Center), OSD/DHS (Office of the Secretary of Defense/Department of Homeland Security), and the 114th Signal Battalion. RRMC also houses the emergency operations centers for the Army, Navy and Air Force.“I didn’t hear a thing about hijackers,” states Nelson, “We just heard that this plane was flying in a no-fly zone and they couldn’t make contact with the plane, or something like this. There was no communication. Protocol says it has to be taken out. And so I was in this room when the decision was mutually made by the people talking on the phone in the room that I was in, to shoot this plane down.” Nelson speculated that the plane of Flight 93 was headed for Washington, D.C. Whether her story is true or not, Flight 93 possibly being shot down has more evidence than her testimony. There is barely any debris in the area. The debris field of Flight 93 was eight miles wide. Investigators found a second debris field three miles away from the main crash site at Indian Lake, and a third debris field in New Baltimore, eight miles away. This is entirely consistent with the plane having been shot down. Several eyewitnesses described hearing explosions before Flight 93 crashed and others said they heard missiles. Donald Rumsfeld himself said that Flight 93 was “shot down” in an apparent slip of the tongue on December 24, 2004. Regardless of the truth of Nelson's testimony, 9/11 certainly has real questions that ought to be answered.





Most Americans support abortion conscience clauses. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on April 8, 2009 described a poll that most Americans want Barack Obama to keep abortion conscience clauses in place. A national poll of Americans confirms this reality. The abortion conscience clause deals with the protections of doctors and medical staff from being forced to do abortions if it's against their will. The protections make it more clear and provide support for doctors or medical facilities that feel pressured to participate in abortions. The Bush administration adopted to enforce three federal conscience laws. Barack Obama is considering to remove the protections, because he is recieving pressure from Planned Parenthood (and other abortion radicals in claiming the lie that these protections deny women acces to birth control and contraception). The Polling Accompany conducted a poll from March 23-25 with 800 Americans adults and found 87 percent believe it is important to “make sure that healthcare professionals in America are not forced to participate in procedures and practices to which they have moral objections.” Support for this protection garnered considerable intensity as well, with 65% of respondents considering it very essential. The poll found out that a majority of men, women, adults of all ages, folks of different races, those who live in all regions, and various political affilitations all believe it's critical to defend the rights of healthcare providers to refuse to perform certain procedures on moral grounds according to the poll. The poll even found that 95% of pro-life people and 78% of pro choice people want the conscience protections intacted. The Polling Company survey also found 80 percent of people who backed Obama in the 2008 presidential elections support the conscience protections. So, this is common sense to have conscience protections. Why would someone want that policy rescinded is beyond me. Some 52% of self-identified Democrats, 67% of self-identified Independents, and 73% of self-identified Republicans, as well as 50% of liberals, 65% of moderates, and 69% of conservatives also opposed Obama's planned move to rescind the protections. Some 54 percent of Americans indicated they would be less likely to back their congressman, with 36 percent saying they would be much less likely and just 11 percent saying they would be much more likely to support their elected official. The freedom of conscience is one of the birthrights of America. If we lose that, we lose a key part of our liberties. Calling abortion murder and protecting the conscience clauses are key things to subscribe to. That's apart of real Change.



Spying is continuing under the Obama administration. The advocacy group called Electronic Frontier Foundation or EFF has warned that the Obama administration is seeking to expand the government's authority to carry out wiretapping under the auspices of national security. The EFF says that the dismissal of its own litigation against the NSA warrantless wiretapping and the defense of Obama's Department of Justice is wrong. EFF writer Tim Jones said that the arguments made by the DOJ in the Jewel v. NSA case talked about the state secrets privilege as a justification to support the NSA warrantless wiretapping program. DOJ claims that the U.S. Government is completely immune from litigation for illegal spying and that the Government can never be sued for surveillance that violates federal privacy statutues. Jones writes that the Obama administration claims that the Patriot Act renders the U.S. immune from a suit (under 2 remaining key federal surveillance laws: the Wiretap Act and the Stored Communications Act). The government doesn't want to be held accountable for illegal surveillance under any federal statutes. So, the Barack Obama administration is defending and protecting Bush officials over illegal wiretapping (and they don't want legal challenges). The present Director of National Intelligence Admiral Dennis Blair said that the NSA wants to expand its power. Blair wanting to have the NSA control more of electronic communications is a continuation of the policy under the Bush administration. Some want to give the government the authority to examine the content of any e-mail, file transfer or Web search. Critics of Barack Obama warned people about this issue. Instead of repealing the Patriot Act, the NSA warrantless wiretapping program, and rendition, Barack Obama is continuing to use these laws (and policies). Some of his cabinet members want to enhance the NSA's policies to monitor the Internet and electronic communications. The lesson here is that you shouldn't trust any politican 100%. We should only trust Almighty God 100% of the time.



The Left/Right paradigm is still effect today. Max Blumenthal, in the wake of Richard Poplawski's murder rampage in Pittsburgh, has falsely demonized conservatives yet again. Max is the son of former Clinton aide Sidney Blumenthal. He is well known as for publishing information on liberal website. He is even a research fellow for Media Matters for America. Media Matters is a website that was created by former neocon David Brock who calls himself a hitman for all things Democrat. This is silly by him, because sucking up to Democrats unconditionally is not being independent. A truly independent, free thinking man is beyond the labels of Republicans and Democrats. Ironically, globalist George Soros funds Brock and Media Matters to spew their propaganda. George Soros (a Bilderberger, a Carlyle Group member, and a pro-CFR agent), the hedge fund manager who is “dedicated to transforming our constitutional republic into a socialist hive,” according to the neocon Richard Poe. This socialism is bounded to the internationalist bankers' design not a recast of the SDS's agenda. Blumenthal says that since Poplawski posts on Infowars.com, then Alex Jones is tied to these people. I don't agree with Jones on many issues, but even I will say that Poplawski doesn't have a connection with Jones at all. Ironically, Poplawski was critical of Alex Jones for not blaming the Jewish people collectively for the new world order. So, Poplawski was a critic of Jones and he didn't support him. Blumenthal denies that FEMA camps are being built in America, denies that anti-gun policies are promoted where guns have been disarmed (despite guns being disarmed during Katrina and the BATF for over 2 decades), and denies that a dictatorship can come in these circumstances. He's wrong on all of these accounts since Barack Obama wants concealed carry laws even to be banned. FEMA camps have been built and a dictatorship is a possibility if we don't improve our nation. See, establishment liberals love Barack Obama (even if he is a puppet with an administration filled with CFR members, Bilderbergers, Jesuit-trained people, and Trilateralists). The reason is that these elite system now is being administered by Democrats. To them, forcing people to accept their lies are fine. Blumenthal goes on to demonize Tea parties and protests over the Barack Obama bailout plan. He is ignorant of the fact that Glen Beck denies the existence of FEMA camps. Beck is a shill who works for Knight of St. Gregory Rupert Murdoch (Murdoch once backed Hillary Clinton for President). FOX News is no different than CNN or MSNBC. The only difference is that these networks either promote the establishment left or the establishment right line on subject matter. They all support the ruling elite and focus on mundane topics (they even obssess with the shill Rush Limbaugh) in other to distract the public. Lawful tea parties is fine and many radical liberals (from ACORN and the Huffington Post) are trying to disrupt the Tax Day Tea Parties. That proves their Stalinist shill tactics of hating people with whom they disagree with. Blumental talks about Newt Gingrich, but he is a statist on certain issues. Gingrich supports the WTO, the UN, and the war on terror as a statist. People like Gingrich, Savage, Hannity, etc. talk somewhat about the new world order since they are utilized as controlled opposition. They haven't seen the light since they support torture, the Patriot Act, the war on terror, and other anti-liberty policies. The hypocritical neo cons blame Obama for increasing the debt when George W. Bush did so even worse than Barack Obama. While the phony neo liberals call Rush Limbaugh the head of the Republican Party and demonize conservatives as representative of the actions of the disturbed murder of Poplawski. This is going on and the international bankers are funding both sides. Some believe that this rhetoric is about the means to promote the Fairness Doctrine in order to censor speech over the airwaves (under FCC imposed regulations) in other to silence opposition. Let's hope that these occurences don't happen at all. It's apparently clear for us to escape that contrived left/right paradigm in order to be politically independent.

Secret Societies have a key relationship in history. the Vatican is accusing the Knights Templar of hidding the Shroud of Turn. They believe this explains the mystery of the relic's missing years. The Knights Templar was a Catholic order the protect Pilgrims on their travels into the Holy Land. They also were international bankers and fought in the Holy Land during the Crusades. The Pope disbanded them since they were accused of heresy and sexual debauchery. Later, many of the Knights Templars by the 1300's traveled into Scotland and other parts of Europe. Scholars believes that Rosicrucians and Freemasonry is a descendant of the Knights Templar. For certain, we know that Freemasonry is influenced by the Knights Templar. For example, the Demolay is a Masonic degree pertaining for male youths. There is the York Rite that relate to the Knights Templar as well in their rituals. The Shroud has an image of a man with a long hair and a beard. There are signs of assault on the image. Barbara Frale, a researcher in the Vatican Secret Archives, said the Shroud had disappeared in the sack of Constantinople in 1204 during the Fourth Crusade, and did not surface again until the middle of the fourteenth century. Writing in L’Osservatore Romano, the Vatican newspaper, Dr Frale said its fate in those years had always puzzled historians. Dr. Frale wrote that the Templars could of venerated the Shroud. The Vatican has not declared whether it is genuine or a forgery, leaving it to believers to decide. The Vatican stole all of the Templar's property and land after they were disolved (Some of the Knights of Malta gotten some of the money and power of the Knights Templars as well). A British branch also claiming descent from the Knights Templar and based in Hertfordshire has called for a papal apology for the persecution of the order. The Shroud is probably a forgery. There are debates on both sides of this issue. The bigger issue is that we should investigate these issues.



By Timothy