People have written about the Western agenda for Syria for years. Political analyst Mahdi Darius Nazemroaya wrote in November 2006 about this issue. The West wants a new Middle East in the globe. Back in 1997, Lt. Colonel Ralph Peters wrote about the new world order system. He wrote that the U.S. would do a lot of killing in the Middle East to keep the world "safe" for our economy, etc. Peters during that time was assigned to the Office of the Deputy Chief of Staff for Intelligence. He was responsible for future warfare. His plans didn’t work total fine for Iraq. William Roebuck is the Director for the Office of the State Department's Bureau of Near Eastern Affairs. He wants an end of year strategy for Syria. He made a study in the U.S. Embassy in Damascus where he had based between 2004-2007. He rose to Deputy of Mission. the report wanted to influence the end of the Syrian government in 2006. Roebuck wrote that: "...vulnerabilities and looming issues may provide opportunities to up the pressure on Bashar … some of these vulnerabilities “(including the complexities with Lebanon)"... "can be exploited to put pressure on the regime. Actions that cause Bashar to lose balance, and increase his insecurity, are in our interest.” He wanted to move quickly to change radically the policies in Syria. They want to play on Sunni fears of Iranian influence in Syria. That means that Roebuck desired to focus on Shia/Sunni differences in the Middle East in order to divide and conquer the Middle Eastern region. The West is using Adbul Halim Khaddam in order to promote propaganda for the overthrow of the Syrian government. He was the Vice President,1984-2005, and acting President in 2000, during the months between Bashir al Assad’s accession and his father’s death. Now, Khaddam is taking money from America and the EU as a means to overthrow the Syrian government. The ever creative Mr. Roebuck’s further plans included: “Encouraging rumors and signals of external plotting.” To this end: “Regional allies like Egypt and Saudi Arabia should be encouraged to meet with figures like Kaddamand Rifat (sic) al Assad, with appropriate leaking of the meetings afterwards. This … increases the possibility of a self-defeating over-reaction.” Rifaat al Assad (or Bashars uncle) murdered up to 30,000 people in them (as head of Defense Brigade) and flattened much of the city of Hama back in February 1982. Rifaat isn't in favor of human rights, but the West supports imperialists. Rifaat al Assad lives in London as an exile and Khaddam lives in Paris. So, the plan for a plan for overthrowing Assad of Syria is real. The Damascus cable comes courtesy Wikileaks. Lt. Colonel Peters called, on Fox News, for founder, Julian Assange, to be assassinated. Even Iraq has Iraqi children threatened if they didn't vote the right way.
Police state policies are still in America. These policies haven't stopped when the George W. Bush administration ended. The President feels that he has the right to kill or jail indefinitely anyone classified as a terrorist (or a threat to national security. Some of Obama's legal aides believe that this action represents the absolute power of the executive and it's not reviewable by any court of by Congress. People now realize that Eric Holder or the Attorney General of America utilized a speech to justify the assassination doctrine during his March 5, 2012 speech at Northwestern University Law School. He attempted to make a legal basis for the killing of Anwar Al-Awlaki or the U.S. citizen who was incinerated last September in Yemen by a missile fired by a CIA controlled drone. Eric Holder believes that the President can enact these policies, because there was a Congressional resolution passed in the immediate aftermath of the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 (that gives the President the right to execute extra-judicial state murder out of his own discretion even without judicial review). Holder doesn't believe that a judicial process is equated to the claim of the due process of law (as guaranteed to Americans via the Fifth Amendment). Eric Holder wants the U.S. to kill citizens overseas then if they are deemed a terrorist. The mainstream media isn't reporting on this story. The Presidential right to murder isn't questioned by mainstream news reporters either. Over decades, some Americans have lost their sense of democratic consciousness. The ruling class has stolen the 2000 Presidential election. Both Democratic and Republican Parties are in league with the interests of the oligarchy. This comes after the February 28 National Defense Authorization Act of 2011 can officially into effect (that could jail any person in the United State without a trial forever if they are non-citizen. The White House claims this only applies to non-citizens, but this is still immoral since even a non-citizen deserves human rights). Indefinite detention is always immoral. Finally, on Thursday, Obama signed into law HR 347, a bill that significantly expands on existing anti-democratic laws prohibiting demonstrations and civil disobedience at the White House or at any location being visited by the president, vice president or other officials under Secret Service protection. This includes three of the four remaining Republican presidential candidates, Mitt Romney, Rick Santorum and Newt Gingrich. This plan will encompass national conventions, debates, and rallies during the Presidential election campaign. So, protesters who are classified as "violent" can face up to 10 yeas in prison. The media is silent about this legislation called the Federal Restricted Buildings and Grounds Improvement Act of 2011. The House passed it within a margin of 388 to 3 and the U.S. Senate voted the legislation without a single dissenting vote. The President signed the bill without any further comment. Social inequality increasing can cause anti-liberty laws to be passed. "Anti-terrorism" is the tactic that the imperialists utilized in order to justify the passage of such attacks on our democratic values and human rights. See, the national security state's oppression won't effect terrorists the most. It will effect us or the people. Mass surveillance, detention without trial, state torture, and killings are the sin of not only America plus in the world. When you see slashing of jobs and economic problems, the Pentagon (and the rest of the national security state) use spies and thugs to control the citizenry. Even people from across the political spectrum are correct to order the ending of the police state apparatus (like the abolishment of DHS, the FBI, the CIA, the Patriot Act, NDAA, HR 347, and all other anti-liberty entities).
Maryland cops were found illegally arresting protesters. Pro-Life demonstrators (even teenage girls) were stripped, searched, and shackled by officers who said that they could rot in cells. Regardless of your views on abortion (people already know my views), this action is deplorable and immoral. The deal is that the group called Defend Life peacefully demonstrated on public property in Hartford County in August of 2008. This was part of their "Face the Truth" campaign. Soon, a dozen state officers came on the scene. They told the protesters that didn't have a permit. They were to be arrested unless they packed up and left. When asked what specific ordinance said the demonstrators needed a permit to protest, one officer responded “I’m not getting into it at five o’clock at night… I’m a State police officer, I know the law – THAT’S IT.” These events came about in August 1, 2008. There were pro-life attorney from the Alliance Defense Fund (ADF), the Thomas More Society of Chicago, and the American Catholic Lawyers Association that proved something. They proved that after the protesters' arrest, the protesters, including women and young girls, one as young as 14, were put into leg shackles and strip searched twice, while being denied the right to make phone calls, and make contact with lawyers. The protesters were kept in jail overnight.. Reports proved that the first strip search transpired in a parking lot in full view of male officers. The second strip search was conducted at Hartford County detention center. Lifesitenews reported that the Maryland Board of Public Works voted Wednesday to settle the lawsuit that has been ongoing ever since. In part of the settlement in the case, the state of Maryland will pay $385,000 to cover legal fees. When the county confirmed that there is no requirement for a “permit” as the protesters had been told, they were instead charged with loitering, disorderly conduct and failure to obey a lawful order. All the charges were dropped after one week. The attorney Tom Brejcha said that these events related to a heckler's veto or a violation of the First Amendment. Some of the public didn't like pro-life signs even though the protesters were completely legal in their basic actions. Brejcha also revealed that following the arrests, one police officer stated over the radio that as far as she was concerned the protesters could “sit in a cell for an hour… or three or four and rot.” “There was a lot of hard feelings and animus against the pro-life position on the part of many of these arresting officers, including at the supervisory level.” Brejcha said. Brejcha added that the case had taken four years to settle as it was “vigorously defended by the municipalities and the state police.” The town of Bel Air and Hartford county agreed to settlements with the protesters last year. The ADF has issued a statement noting “Under the terms of the settlement, Maryland State Police cannot issue countywide dispersal orders against peaceful pro-life speakers, cannot illegally arrest pro-life speakers who are exercising their constitutionally protected free speech and assembly rights, must provide acceptable reasons for asking any speakers to move, must provide speakers with the opportunity to move before threatening anyone with arrest, cannot censor constitutionally protected messages and images on signs, and must participate in training on rights protected by the First and Fourth amendments to the U.S. Constitution." This is good news to protect the rights of fellow human beings. It is still wrong for the police to act in that illegal display of police brutality. The First Amendment is one of the paramount rights that are found strongly inside of the Bill of Rights. It should be protected for pro-life human rights and all American citizens period.
People realize that WWI caused a lot of European young men to be killed basically. A whole generation of human beings were slaughtered as a product of World War One. International bankers and Secret Societies heavily benefited from the war. People realize that hegemonic competition, the hatred of the monarchy, nationalism, and other reasons contributed to the onset of WWI. Archduke Ferdinand was murdered by Princep (He worked with Masons and members of the Secret Society called Black Hand in order to achieve the evil deed). WWI started 5 weeks later. The assassination happened in June 28, 1914 and the Archduke was of the House of Habsburg. Karl Kothner of the Grand Lodge of Britain admitted that Lodges in Europe planned to assassinate the Archduke as a means to overthrow altars and thrones (So, an Universal Republic can transpire). The Vatican wanted to control Serbia via treaty and rule Europe. All people who killed the Archduke were part of Young Serbia and backed by the Masonic Lodge called the Black Hand (aka the Union of Death Brotherhood. Sound familiar, It is, because the Skulls and Bones in the states is called the Brotherhood of Death). Col. Dragutin C. Dimitrijevic or the Chief of Serbia's Intelligence Bureau created the Black Hand. The Masons and the Vatican elite competed for power when both are an enemy. Even enemies fight amongst each other for power. It happens all of the time. It is just for Serbians to have liberation from Papal rule, but it's wrong to execute assassination & terrorism in order for that goal to transpire. Soon, Germany invaded Belgium. Britain fought Germany, because Britain was committed to defend Belgium. France and Britain united to fight against the Ottoman Empire, Austria Hungary, and Germany. America joined after the Lusitania was blown up since the ship carried American people plus supplies. At first, Wilson wanted neutrality before the blowing up of the vessel. That changed by 1917. The Freemasons supported the Allies since they abhorred autocracy and promoted democracy. As a result of WWI, the monarchies of Germany, Austria-Hungary, and Russia were destroyed. I don't believe in a monarchy, but I do believe in peaceful means of reform without savagery & unjust violence. Sixty thousand Allies died in one day at the Battle of the Somme in 1916. The Commander of the British Army was the Freemason Douglas Haig. The Commander of the US Expeditionary Force in 1917 was the Freemason John Perishing. WWI caused WWII, because the German people couldn't pay the huge reparations given against them by the Allied Forces. Hitler exploited German economic complications and their other issues as an excuse to falsely blame all Jewish people for their suffering. Kaiser Wilhelm believed the Masons were responsible for the Great War. WWI was one of many genocides that came about against folks in Europe in a sick, unjust fashion. More people in the four concerns of the Earth will die via WWII, the Cold War, imperialism the 1918 H1NT pandemic, the crimes of Stalin, the evils of Mao, etc. The Masonic Treaty of Versailles made sure that WWII was inevitable, because it created a huge burden on the German people and it created more tensions in the world (including the weak League of Nations as conceptualized by former President Woodrow Wilson).
It's a new time. Many people feel as those that black conservatives are unfairly demonized. Here is my perception on this issue. In recent months, I have received words from those who try to defend people like Herman Cain, Allen West, and others. The pattern I see from those who debate with me on this issue is that they are pro-Tea Party and pro-Republican. They feel that a black person courageously expressing their black identity or publicly being thankful of being black is equated to bigotry or racism. Nothing can be further from the truth. The truth is that cultural identity is real and tangible in our existence. Therefore, a black person has every right to promote Black Love, Black Unity, and Black Power. This call precisely relates to admiring our manhood or womanhood (for female) without expressing a harsh, denigrating interpretation of non-blacks collectively. It's really pernicious for Arizona to deny course that teaches about different cultures. It's pernicious for the War on Drugs and the prison industrial complex to persist. It's definitely pernicious to witness folks using religious texts (with excellent historical values) as an excuse to advance discriminatory & divisive policies in the world. Now, the reactionaries are right that not all black conservatives are monolithic. Historically, black people from across the political spectrum have expressed legitimate love for their identity, a sense of fighting for justice, and a great sense of intellectual, social aptitude. The reactionaries are wrong in desiring black people to be Republican or mainstream conservative on every issue to prove our submission in society. See, they don't desire liberation. They use the imperfections of numerous Democrats as an excuse to try to con well meaning black people to accept their way of life (that deemphasizes Black Power and emphasize colorblindness and a denial of white supremacy). See, white supremacy is real in the world as expressed in the war on terror, false beauty standards, stereotypes, and other crimes in the world. The reactionary denies white supremacy since they deny racism being a serious problem in the world today. They obsess with liberal since they see politics in a monochromatic lenses. The reality is that a person wanting economic inequality to end, wanting justice for the poor, and loving to see peace without unjust war is a person enlightened. It's not about left vs. right. It's about right vs. wrong. I don't believe in being extremely judgmental against a black person that is conservative. I do believe that all people, regardless of political affiliation, deserves a legitimate critique of their views. I don't believe that a sincere conservative that loves his own people is lacking in blackness. I do believe that a person like Jesse Lee Peterson is a traitor since he praises the Maafa that harmed unjustly black people, he slandered the victims of Hurricane Katrina, and he made other outrageous comments as well. I say it to his face like a man. Blackness isn't defined by political affiliation. Yet, being black truly is a person that has undying love and commitment to help out their own black people (and that recognizes his or her own great culture, history, legacy, and ancestors) as Kwame Ture said. We who are black must have an undying love for our people and we shouldn't accept Republican talking points in order to blame the victims for all the circumstances of our daily ills. The oppressors uses the derivative crimes made by some of the victims as an excuse to escape their (or the oppressors') own responsibility. Fundamentally, it is the oppressor not the victim that created a corrupt system harming the world today. A man shouldn't be called an Uncle Tom if they have love for their people sincerely and do something constructively to assist their people (whether they are liberal, conservative, moderate, independent, libertarian, etc.). A person should be called an Uncle Tom if they love slavery against blacks (like Jesse Lee Peterson), if they promote the bashing of black men and black women (like Manning), and if they agree to love a white supremacist system harming black people even in 2012. One person sent me a video of Juan Williams. Juan Williams isn't a conservative. I believe in political freedom (as bigotry, the muzzling of free speech, and hatred is found in the Republicans and the Democrats), but Juan made the mistake of disrespecting the First Lady. Now, the fiscal conservative crowd needs to realize that laissez faire economics doesn't work. We tried it in Chile and in other parts of the world. It only breeds oppression and not true economic justice. That system of economics causes more of the super rich to gain more wealth, while the poor has no real radical improvement in their socioeconomic disposition. This doesn't mean that the liberal establishment (called the foxes by the brother Malcolm X) is perfect. On many occasions, the liberal establishment presumes to be intellectually superior and tolerant, but they are some of the very ones agreeing with the NATO war crimes in Libya (including other imperialist facets of the war on terror. The establishment liberals [as opposed to true progressive] are not saying one word on the black Libyans being tortured & killed by racist NATO-supported al-Qaeda related terrorists). Some of them refuse to expose Sanger’s once avocation of permits for parents and forced segregation plus sterilization of certain human beings because of their development. I am non integrative to oppression. I believe in separation from evil, while treating my neighbor as myself without malice nor apprehension. I am color conscious and ethnocentric (as in believing in promoting the interests of my people without showing bigotry or unjust antagonism toward non-black human beings) as that is not a sin. It is not bigotry to say that. Why is it that black people (in many instances) are not even allowed to say that we want our own businesses, our own culture, we want more black families, and our own human legacies? See, the supremacists want to dominate our thinking and social consciousness, so they can rule our thinking. We as blacks have the right to promote our own thinking outside of the box without submitting to the machine. We are fighting for our humanity and our humanity is reflected in our great black skin color. It is from the Lord. Respecting my color is my God-given right as a human being. Therefore, the gauntlet has been thrown. I submit to truth wholeheartedly.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment