Friday, February 29, 2008
The Kabbalah and the Great Seal
http://www.mystae.com/restricted/streams/scripts/kabbalah.html
http://www.thunderministries.net/Kabbalah/satanic.htm
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Great_Seal.htm
http://www.koshertorah.com/PDF/KabbalahMasonsandAmerica.pdf (I don't agree with this link agreeing with Freemasonry since Masonry is blatantly unscriptural, but it has an interesting take on the Greal Seal)
http://www.thunderministries.net/Kabbalah/satanic.htm
http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/Commentary/Great_Seal.htm
http://www.koshertorah.com/PDF/KabbalahMasonsandAmerica.pdf (I don't agree with this link agreeing with Freemasonry since Masonry is blatantly unscriptural, but it has an interesting take on the Greal Seal)
ATF Seizes Hundreds Of Guns From Business
ATF Seizes Hundreds Of Guns From Business
02-29-2008
From http://www.azfamily.com/news/homepagetopstory/stories/phoenix_local_news_022708_atf-guns-seized.239575b.html
GILBERT -- High-powered rifles and semi-automatic weapons were part of the hundreds of weapons seized after the ATF served a search warrant at Cavalry Arms, a licensed gun manufacturer in Gilbert. Authorities have only said that Cavalry Arms is accused of violating federal firearms laws. Reports reveal that Cavalry Arms does most of its business online, and neighbors in the area claim seeing little traffic in or out of the business.
But neighbors also said they were surprised by the actions, and described Cavalry Arms as a 'heads-up' business that didn't draw any suspicion in their opinion. The ATF did not go into any details as to exactly what firearms laws had been broken, only that they were processing and seizing all of the weapons at the Gilbert gun manufacturer. The ATF directed future inquiries to the US Attorney's office, whom said they wouldn't comment on an on-going investigation. PREVIOUS REPORT: The A.T.F. has seized hundreds of weapons after serving a search warrant at a Gilbert gun store. Right now it is not known why the ATF served the search warrant or why the guns were seized. 3TV has a crew on the scene and will report more details shortly.
_______________________
8 FEB 2008 - YOU'LL BE NOTICING THE INCREASING GUN CRIME IN THE U.S MORE AND MORE NOW. THIS IS NO DIFFERENT TO USUAL BUT IT WILL BE TRUMPED UP AS WORSE. WHY? THEIR ABOUT TO TAKE THE GUNS FROM U.S CITIZENS THEN HIT THEM WITH DOLLAR COLLAPSE FOLLOWED BY MARTIAL LAW. THEN WHAT? THE O.N.I WILL SPREAD THE AEROSOLIZED BIO-AGENT AND THE MEDIA WILL USE IT'S FALSE TRAIL BIRD-FLU AS THE COVER. THEY WILL SAY THE FLU CAME FROM THE POVERTY TIMES. YOU THINK I'M ONTO SOMETHING? YOU BET I AM FOLKS -CRAIG OXLEY
02-29-2008
From http://www.azfamily.com/news/homepagetopstory/stories/phoenix_local_news_022708_atf-guns-seized.239575b.html
GILBERT -- High-powered rifles and semi-automatic weapons were part of the hundreds of weapons seized after the ATF served a search warrant at Cavalry Arms, a licensed gun manufacturer in Gilbert. Authorities have only said that Cavalry Arms is accused of violating federal firearms laws. Reports reveal that Cavalry Arms does most of its business online, and neighbors in the area claim seeing little traffic in or out of the business.
But neighbors also said they were surprised by the actions, and described Cavalry Arms as a 'heads-up' business that didn't draw any suspicion in their opinion. The ATF did not go into any details as to exactly what firearms laws had been broken, only that they were processing and seizing all of the weapons at the Gilbert gun manufacturer. The ATF directed future inquiries to the US Attorney's office, whom said they wouldn't comment on an on-going investigation. PREVIOUS REPORT: The A.T.F. has seized hundreds of weapons after serving a search warrant at a Gilbert gun store. Right now it is not known why the ATF served the search warrant or why the guns were seized. 3TV has a crew on the scene and will report more details shortly.
_______________________
8 FEB 2008 - YOU'LL BE NOTICING THE INCREASING GUN CRIME IN THE U.S MORE AND MORE NOW. THIS IS NO DIFFERENT TO USUAL BUT IT WILL BE TRUMPED UP AS WORSE. WHY? THEIR ABOUT TO TAKE THE GUNS FROM U.S CITIZENS THEN HIT THEM WITH DOLLAR COLLAPSE FOLLOWED BY MARTIAL LAW. THEN WHAT? THE O.N.I WILL SPREAD THE AEROSOLIZED BIO-AGENT AND THE MEDIA WILL USE IT'S FALSE TRAIL BIRD-FLU AS THE COVER. THEY WILL SAY THE FLU CAME FROM THE POVERTY TIMES. YOU THINK I'M ONTO SOMETHING? YOU BET I AM FOLKS -CRAIG OXLEY
Jesuit News
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=46267 (I don't agree with all in this link. I don't agree with Eric Jon Phelps' views on race at all.)
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=46279
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=46277
____________
> I searched for proof to corroborate this claim that Barack Obama took> his oath as U.S. Senator on a Koran owned by Thomas Jefferson. I could> not find evidence of this. You and others have confused Obama with> Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota. It is imperative that we get our> facts straight and not join in disinfo campaigns! If Obama had sworn> on a Koran that would be too obvious I think, the devil and his> Jesuits are more clever than that!>> Here is a photo showing Ellison, the first elected Muslim of the House> of Representatives taking his oath on administered by Temporal> Coadjutoress Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi.> http://mnstories.com/images/ellison_koran.jpg>>
Obama took his oath on a Bible and it was administered by the then> President of the Senate Masonic CFR member Dick Cheney (there is the> Harry S. Truman Masonic Lodge in NYC which says Cheney is a Master> Mason and there is a picture of him giving the horned hand salute mano> cornuto from his limousine. This led me to conclude that in fact> Cheney is a Freemason.> http://i.a.cnn.net/cnn/2007/images/10/16/t1home.cheneyobama.gi.jpg>> It is very telling several men in this Jesuit-controlled government> trained by the Order have publicly endorsed Obama. I sent you a post> with a picture of him speaking at Jesuit Boston College and an audio> recording of his address to first year students in 2004 or 2005. Just> the other day Jesuit-trained CFR member Christopher J. Dodd of> Connecticut announced his support for Obama, add to that list Senators> Patrick Leahy, Dick Durbin, Bonesman John Kerry, Boston> College-connected Ted Kennedy, and CFR member Caroline Kennedy,>> I have not found proof Obama or Hillary are CFR members unless there> is an updated list available that confirms it. John McCain is> according to the 2006 CFR membership list. I did find Obama, in 2006> had an advisor on foreign policy who is a Harvard professor named> Samantha Power who is a CFR member. In fact, the CFR funded her stay> in Washington.> http://www.thecrimson.com/article.aspx?ref=508336>>
Obama may not be a member, but he has certainly been groomed by it for> the presidential selection by Cardinal Egan. I agree no candidate is> worth voting for because the national elections are rigged ala 2004> with Skull and Bonesman Knights of Eulogia (the Eucharist) Bush and> Kerry. It couldn't be more obvious!> These photos show exactly who was and is in control-the Jesuits and> their Order of the Illuminati! The symbolism is there... the Egyptian> obelisk, a map of the U.S. on ice with Prometheus holding his torch at> Rockefeller Center, and Democracy Plaza was sponsored by the Jesuit> Order's Bank of America!>> http://www.poynteronline.org/resource/73889/therock.jpg> http://www.enjoyradio.net/weblog/ny/img/democracy%20plaza.jpg> http://www.jetice.com/images/Democracy-Plaza-US-Election.jpg>>
-Brother Nick
________
Dear Brother Nick,
Thanks for the correction!Hillary's connection to the CFR is through Bill Clinton; Obama's connection to the Chicago CFR is through his wife, Michelle.
Brother Eric
Caught on tape: More deputies accused of brutally beating inmate and other news
http://www.tampabays10.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=75098
Global cooling crisis in China: Record winter exacerbates record inflation rates (http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2008/ea_china_02_29.asp)
The Fake State of Kosovo (http://infowars.net/articles/february2008/290208Kosovo.htm)
Sept. 11 redux: Videoshows jet vaporizing (http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57680)
Bureaucrats to Fleece Drivers in the Name of Stopping “Greenhouse Gas Emissions”
http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez02292008.html (I don't agree with all in this link)
_____________________
http://www.infowars.com/?p=526
From http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2040
Welcome to the North American Army
Judi McLeod
Canada Free Press
February 25, 2008
Will historians one day record that “It happened on Valentine’s Day” when chronicling the timetable of the North American Union (NAU)?
With no warning, a significant military agreement was signed by the chief Armed Forces commanders of both the U.S.A. and Canada on Feb. 14. The agreement allows the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency.
And as Jerome R. Corsi writes of the range of domestic civil emergencies, in WorldNetDaily, “even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.”
The Valentine’s Day pact got zero coverage in the mainstream media whose investigative reporters must have been out hunting down chocolate and posies.
Were it not for a USNORTHCOM photo that surfaced depicting a beaming U.S. air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, USNORTHCOM commander and Canadian Air Force Lt. Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, the public the media serve would have been left in the dark.
Perhaps the generals won’t get to tell North American Union suspecting citizens that the NAU is the province of only the conspiracy theorist.
Paperwork always comes in handy when bureaucrats cry “Conspiracy Theory”.
Defined by its architects as a “Civil Assistance Plan”, the agreement was never submitted to Congress for approval.
“Nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to heal epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.” (WorldNetDaily, Feb. 24, 2008).
Mind you, reporter David Pugliese, had the story published by CanWest News Service on Friday.
Imagine an agreement that paves the way for the militaries of the U.S. and Canada to cross each other’s borders to fight domestic emergencies not being announced by either the Harper government or the Canadian military.
“It’s kind of a trend when it comes to issues of Canada-U.S. relations and contentious issues like military integration,” Stuart Trew, a researcher with the Council of Canadians told the CanWest News Service. “We see that this government is reluctant to disclose information to Canadians that is readily available on American and Mexican websites.”
“This document is a unique, bilateral military plan to align our respective national military plans to respond quickly to the other nation’s requests for military support of civil authorities,” Renuart said in a statement published on the USNORTHCom website.
“The signing of this plan is an important symbol of the already strong working relationship between Canada Command and the U.S. Northern Command,” said Lt. Gen. Dumais.
“Our commands were created by our respective governments to respond to the defense and security challenges of the twenty-first century,” he stressed, “and we both realize that these and other challenges are best met through cooperation between friends.”
While Canadian citizens opened their homes to Americans stranded on September 11, 2001, there was no military aid sent to the U.S. from Canada, whose then Prime Minister Jean Chrétien remained silent.
In a program on the first anniversary of the deadly hijackings, Chrétien told CBC TV that a clear signal had been sent to all Western countries: do not abuse your strength or wealth.
“You cannot exercise your powers to the point of humiliation for the others,” Chrétien said. “And that is what the western world—not only the Americans, the Western world—has to realize. Because they are human beings, too.”
Truth is the Chrétien crony Liberals haven’t gone away. They are merely waiting in the wings to bring down the Harper minority government.
The same Liberals who join the Canadian New Democrat Party (NDP) whose mantra is to bring the troops home from Afghanistan.
Some Liberal and NDP MPs continue to hold anti-American sentiments.
That’s a strange environment from which to forge a plan whose “challenges are best met through cooperation between friends”, Lieutenant General Dumais.
U.S. Northern Command was established on Oct. 1, 2002, as a military command tasked with anticipating and conducting homeland defense and civil support operations where U.S. armed forces are used in domestic emergencies.
Canada Command was established on Feb. 1, 2006, to focus on domestic operations and offer a single point of contact for all domestic and continental defense and securities partners.
Meanwhile, since the North American Union is a three-nation initiative, when will the Mexican Army be brought in during a domestic civil emergency?
Global cooling crisis in China: Record winter exacerbates record inflation rates (http://www.worldtribune.com/worldtribune/WTARC/2008/ea_china_02_29.asp)
The Fake State of Kosovo (http://infowars.net/articles/february2008/290208Kosovo.htm)
Sept. 11 redux: Videoshows jet vaporizing (http://wnd.com/index.php?fa=PAGE.view&pageId=57680)
Bureaucrats to Fleece Drivers in the Name of Stopping “Greenhouse Gas Emissions”
http://www.counterpunch.org/gonzalez02292008.html (I don't agree with all in this link)
_____________________
http://www.infowars.com/?p=526
From http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/2040
Welcome to the North American Army
Judi McLeod
Canada Free Press
February 25, 2008
Will historians one day record that “It happened on Valentine’s Day” when chronicling the timetable of the North American Union (NAU)?
With no warning, a significant military agreement was signed by the chief Armed Forces commanders of both the U.S.A. and Canada on Feb. 14. The agreement allows the armed forces from one nation to support the armed forces of the other nation during a domestic civil emergency.
And as Jerome R. Corsi writes of the range of domestic civil emergencies, in WorldNetDaily, “even one that does not involve a cross-border crisis.”
The Valentine’s Day pact got zero coverage in the mainstream media whose investigative reporters must have been out hunting down chocolate and posies.
Were it not for a USNORTHCOM photo that surfaced depicting a beaming U.S. air Force Gen. Gene Renuart, USNORTHCOM commander and Canadian Air Force Lt. Gen. Marc Dumais, commander of Canada Command, the public the media serve would have been left in the dark.
Perhaps the generals won’t get to tell North American Union suspecting citizens that the NAU is the province of only the conspiracy theorist.
Paperwork always comes in handy when bureaucrats cry “Conspiracy Theory”.
Defined by its architects as a “Civil Assistance Plan”, the agreement was never submitted to Congress for approval.
“Nor did Congress pass any law or treaty specifically authorizing this military agreement to combine the operations of the armed forces of the United States and Canada in the event of a wide range of domestic civil disturbances ranging from violent storms, to heal epidemics, to civil riots or terrorist attacks.” (WorldNetDaily, Feb. 24, 2008).
Mind you, reporter David Pugliese, had the story published by CanWest News Service on Friday.
Imagine an agreement that paves the way for the militaries of the U.S. and Canada to cross each other’s borders to fight domestic emergencies not being announced by either the Harper government or the Canadian military.
“It’s kind of a trend when it comes to issues of Canada-U.S. relations and contentious issues like military integration,” Stuart Trew, a researcher with the Council of Canadians told the CanWest News Service. “We see that this government is reluctant to disclose information to Canadians that is readily available on American and Mexican websites.”
“This document is a unique, bilateral military plan to align our respective national military plans to respond quickly to the other nation’s requests for military support of civil authorities,” Renuart said in a statement published on the USNORTHCom website.
“The signing of this plan is an important symbol of the already strong working relationship between Canada Command and the U.S. Northern Command,” said Lt. Gen. Dumais.
“Our commands were created by our respective governments to respond to the defense and security challenges of the twenty-first century,” he stressed, “and we both realize that these and other challenges are best met through cooperation between friends.”
While Canadian citizens opened their homes to Americans stranded on September 11, 2001, there was no military aid sent to the U.S. from Canada, whose then Prime Minister Jean Chrétien remained silent.
In a program on the first anniversary of the deadly hijackings, Chrétien told CBC TV that a clear signal had been sent to all Western countries: do not abuse your strength or wealth.
“You cannot exercise your powers to the point of humiliation for the others,” Chrétien said. “And that is what the western world—not only the Americans, the Western world—has to realize. Because they are human beings, too.”
Truth is the Chrétien crony Liberals haven’t gone away. They are merely waiting in the wings to bring down the Harper minority government.
The same Liberals who join the Canadian New Democrat Party (NDP) whose mantra is to bring the troops home from Afghanistan.
Some Liberal and NDP MPs continue to hold anti-American sentiments.
That’s a strange environment from which to forge a plan whose “challenges are best met through cooperation between friends”, Lieutenant General Dumais.
U.S. Northern Command was established on Oct. 1, 2002, as a military command tasked with anticipating and conducting homeland defense and civil support operations where U.S. armed forces are used in domestic emergencies.
Canada Command was established on Feb. 1, 2006, to focus on domestic operations and offer a single point of contact for all domestic and continental defense and securities partners.
Meanwhile, since the North American Union is a three-nation initiative, when will the Mexican Army be brought in during a domestic civil emergency?
Welcome to Prison Nation
From http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/019675.html
Welcome to Prison Nation
Bill Anderson
LRC Blog
February 28, 2008
It seems that the USA continues to reach "great" milestones in the effort to subdue us. Here is the latest on those efforts:
"NEW YORK (CBS/AP) ― Don’t ask the U.S. prison system if this is indeed "the land of the free."
"For the first time in history, more than one in every 100 American adults is in jail or prison, according to a new report tracking the surge in inmate population.
"The report, released Thursday by the Pew Center on the States, said the 50 states spent more than $49 billion on corrections last year, up from less than $11 billion 20 years earlier. The rate of increase for prison costs was six times greater than for higher education spending, the report said.
"Using updated state-by-state data, the report said 2,319,258 adults were held in U.S. prisons or jails at the start of 2008 — one out of every 99.1 adults, and more than any other country in the world.
"By contrast, in mid 2002 the ratio was 1 in 142, with the prison population surpassing 2 million for the first time."
Just one more thing for Bush Nation, another "point of pride."
Welcome to Prison Nation
Bill Anderson
LRC Blog
February 28, 2008
It seems that the USA continues to reach "great" milestones in the effort to subdue us. Here is the latest on those efforts:
"NEW YORK (CBS/AP) ― Don’t ask the U.S. prison system if this is indeed "the land of the free."
"For the first time in history, more than one in every 100 American adults is in jail or prison, according to a new report tracking the surge in inmate population.
"The report, released Thursday by the Pew Center on the States, said the 50 states spent more than $49 billion on corrections last year, up from less than $11 billion 20 years earlier. The rate of increase for prison costs was six times greater than for higher education spending, the report said.
"Using updated state-by-state data, the report said 2,319,258 adults were held in U.S. prisons or jails at the start of 2008 — one out of every 99.1 adults, and more than any other country in the world.
"By contrast, in mid 2002 the ratio was 1 in 142, with the prison population surpassing 2 million for the first time."
Just one more thing for Bush Nation, another "point of pride."
A New Day
A new day is here. Linda S. Heard from Online Journal at February 28, 2008 described the extremism residing in our government in terms of civil liberties. The world is much different than it was 10 years ago. Once years ago, some would ridicule those speaking against the massive anti-freedom threats that's antithetical to our privacy that is exemplified by Big Brother. Now, we witness all too often Big Brother's unfair grib it holds in society. In America, it's bad in terms of the amount of liberty we have. You can't fly a plane here without a harrasing X-Ray picturing your naked body. You can't have a passport with RFID. Many on the no-fly lists aren't even convicted terrorists. The military regularly engages in domestically drills in cities plus various law enforcement, which is a violation of Posse Comitatus. There are checkpoints and cameras all over the nation. We have a sick fetish with RFID chips and the promotion of the Real ID Act (which requires adult citizens to have in the future if they want to go into a federal building or get on a plane in the USA). Amtrak is proposing militarized police to conduct random searches on people (that's against the Fourth Amendment. The 4th Amendment dictates that warrants must exist or probable cause must occur for a search by the government). There is police brutality all over the place. It isn't just happening unto minorities like African Americans and Hispanic Americans (we realize this and that's wrong obviously). It's happening against a wide spectrum of people using tasers, etc. Recently shown for a while is Project Endgame. That is about to endorse a plan to "remove all removable aliens," including "illegal economic migrants, aliens who have committed criminal acts, asylum-seekers (required to be retained by law) or potential terrorists." A "potent terrorist" isn't a terrorist, so why are they required to be deported? This also relates to the concentration of concentration camps built by Halliburton and supported by the DHS. If this isn't an execessive Big Brother nation, I don't know what is. In Great Britian, it's much worse. They have a DNA database of about 4.5 million people (even those accused of minor crimes). The UK government want biometric ID cards required on UK citizens above 16 by 2012. In 2010, the British government lust to have a RFID chip in passports (carrying vast personal data on travellers). Stranger border procedure exist to this day. The US even requires European airliners to hand over 19 pieces of information on travelers before leaving the USA (en route to the Caribbean or Central America). Prouncements once again by William Jefferson Clinton fully intrepret him as a first class deciever. In Austin, a man named Matt Dayton help up an "Investigate 9/11" sign above the crowd. This was a fundamental expression of his First Amendment rights. Bill Clinton became aminated and commented to Matt that he was afraid of the truth. On the other hand, the truth was quite the opposite. Bill Clinton is the Jesuit-Georgetown trained puppet who's scared of the following truths: Bill was not seriously taking on the CIA-funded man Osama bin Laden, The Clinton administration plagued itself with many scandals, Clinton and his ilk are complicit in the genocide at Waco, etc. Later, the pro-Hillary crowd grabbed and destroyed Dayton's sign. A violation of Matt Dayton's First Amendment rights is a cohorent definition of this act. These same establishment liberal hypocrites (not all liberals) lecture on tolerance and free speech, yet show none of it on those that they disagree with. Regardless of this cowardly act, the 911 Truth Movement will never extinguish into oblivion. Bill Clinton lately have come out of the hinges with unsubstantiated claims of Barack Obama formenting a hit job against Hillary. Clinton pictured Obama's campaign as the biggest fairy tale he's seen. William Jefferson Clinton lied about the Pro-Life Movement as well. This doesn't mean Obama is perfect. Barack Obama publicly propose a global tax, agrees with abortion on demand, and a form of socialized medicine (but his plan isn't as bad as Hillary is). Obama's foreign policy advisor is Zbigniew Brzezinski. Brzezinski ironically led the groundwork to create al-Qaeda, he's the founder of the Trilateral Commission, and he wrote books which called for a war on terror (and a technocratic state. He agrees with a new world order). Obama's economic advisor is named Austan D. Goolsbee , who is the member of the Skulls and Bones Secret Society. Secret Societies have huge influence in the world. They are traced to the ancient world. Many of the originators of Secret Societies (from the ancient Mystery Schools of ancient Babylon, Egypt, and Asia) wanted to keep mathematical knowledge including various secrets from the common man. That's why various buildings exist with such mathematical precision. They are here then and now like the Statue of Liberty (whose architect was a French Freemason), buildings in Manitoba, and especially locations in Washington D.C. Also, it's about pagan worship since Secret Societies praised the sun, planets, and the creation constantly. For example, the obelisk is based on the masculine influence of the male false gods. The dome, circle, and goddess images represent the feminine influence of the ancients. In numerous occultists' mind, the masculine and feminine (or the Yoni according to Masonic author, Albert Mackey) must merge to create generation (that's one of the interpretations of the "G" symbol in Freemasonry). Instead, they shouldn't worship the creation, but the Creator God Almighty only. In Secret societies then and now, they formet wars and revolutions. For example, the Boston Tea Party was admittedly orchestrated by a Masonic Lodge in Boston. This lead to the Revolutionary War and the creation of America (America is composed of many Bible-Believing Christians, but occultists exploitated America's greatness to try to invent it as a "New Atlantis"). A lot of Secret Societies like the Masons, the Jesuits, the Rosicucrians, those of the Bohemian Grove, some New Agers (like Tony Blair claiming to follow a "Light" ritual to make decisions. He recently converted to Roman Catholcism), etc. are in government and politics. Lower-level members of these orders are readily given lies about the truth in the higher levels. This was even admitted by 33rd Degree Freemason Albert Pike in his "Morals and Dogma" book. These Secret Societies have huge members (some are ruled by them) that are Saxe-Coburg Gotha family members, Merovingians, Vatican/Jesuit leaders, and those in high level political groups (like the Bilderberg Group and the Pilgrim Society). I don't need deception. Americans really want our soveriegnity perserved (without a NAU or LOST Treaty), unborn life promoted, and the environment improved upon without hysteria (we should focus on the real issues of animal extinction, conservation, nerve toxins, the chimeras or the wicked human/animal hybrids, dangerous genetically modified foods, the honeybee, rainforests, toxic waste, ocean pollution, etc.). Most America accept the belief that health care should be avaliable for all American citizens (but not at the expense of coercion or stealing wages from citizens. More choices, competition, and access ought to exist in our health care system along with more promotion of natural medicine. I don't believe that the government should control all aspects of our health care), our civil liberties should be preserved and our economics ought to be improved upon. That's real. Ananova from February 29, 2008 reported that a man was disqualified for becoming a police because he scored too high in an intelligence test. The man's name is Robert Jordan and he was trying out for the police job in New London, Connecticut. In 1996, he scored 33 points, which is equivalent to an IQ of 125. The New London police interviewed only candidates scoring between 20 to 27 points. He tried to sue for discrimination, but failed. It's clearly unfair and a stubborn system. If you score especially more than the required goal of any test, you are automically qualified for a specific job position off the bat. Writer and political commentator William F. Buckley died yesterday at the age of 82. It's interesting to note that he was a member of the Knights of Malta, the Bilderberg Group, and the Council on Foreign Relations. Hence, he was an intricate player of the Elite, though he wasn't abrasive in his personality most of the time. He is famous for his disputes with Gore Vidal, who is a liberal activist.
There is a John Hagee and John McCain deal. John Hagee is supporting John McCain. Alan Colmes from FOX oppose this union for the wrong. He claims that Hagee is anti-Catholic and anti-Jewish when Hagee is known for his support of his Israel. The real issue is Hagee's underlying words. In his book, "In Defense of Israel" he praises John Paul II as a best friend of the Jewish people. The Vatican was one of the most brutal murderers of innocent Jewish people in human history. Not to mention that John Paul II and Pope Benedict XVI are quoted as advocating a new world order. Therefore, Hagee's "supposed" criticism against the Catholic Church for years ring hollow. Hagee says that the Holocaust is blamed on Martin Luther and Romanism. The truth is that Hitler exploitated Luther to promote genocide. Yet, Romanism and the occult (Hitler was a member of the New Age, occult orientated Thule Society) had a more potent influence in the Nazi movement. For example, Hitler, Himmler, and other Nazi leaders were Roman Catholics (they were never excommunicated). The Nazis signed a concordat with the Pope in 1933, which was never revoked. Ustashis and other fascists which united with the Nazis were related to Romanists. Also, after the war, the Vatican allow fascist war criminals (some of them big time Nazis) to escape Europe as documented by many authors like Avro Manhattan and John Loftus. This doesn't mean all Catholics are involved with this, but their leadership are. It's similar to the following analogy. It's like not all Protestants are Masons, but many establishment Protestant leaders are Freemasons or infiltrated by the Jesuit Order. Hagee doesn't mention all of this. Hagee eschews strong support for Israel. I support the good people in Israel. I believe Jewish people have a right to live in Israel. John Hagee claims to be a Christian, but denies trying to convert Jewish people. In his "In Defense of Israel" book, he wrote that Jesus rejected the Jewish desire for him to be the Messiah. This is heresy since Jesus acknowledged himself to be the Messiah and the King of the Jews. He also wants to invade Iran, which I don't support. This is similar to John McCain aggressive comments in clamoring for preemptive warfare. John Hagee got caught into the deception of neo-conservativism even with his accurate views on the immorality of abortion, the decline of the family, the occult epidemic among the youth (the occult isn't about freedom at all, but withholding the truth and knowledge from the common man. That's why the word occult means secret), etc. Alan Colmes acts like disagreement with Catholic doctrine is equated to bigotry, which it isn't. I display disagreements with Catholic doctrine, but I don't hate Catholics personally. I would support righteous Israelis and righteous Arabic people (like the Palestinians) fighting for the truth and freedom. Since God is no respector of persons neither am I. It's a shame that Hagee would go that route of supporting McCain. McCain is someone for embryonic stem cell research, anti-gun laws, and the unConsitutional war in Iraq. John McCain was apart of the Keating Five. John McCain funded Charles Keating with thousands of dollars, yet Keating was a convicted criminal. He served time in prison, but his convictions were later overturned. FOIA (or Freedom of Information Act) show that Hamza Al-Ghamdi (an alleged 9/11 hijacker) had booked future flights to San Franscisco and Riyadh (for the future after 9/11 at September 20, 2001 and September 29, 2001). This may seem that he wasn't aware that the United Airlines Flight 175 was about to hit the South Twin Tower in NYC. This contradicts the 9/11 Commission report omitting this information. The FBI timeline also shows that that this information contradicts more components of the 9/11 Commission (like the movements of alleged Flight 77 hijackers Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdhar). Ex-CIA agent realizes this and calls for a new independent investigation of 9/11. Baer even believes that 9/11 could be an inside job. These documents retrieved via the FOIA outline that the Saudis had a bigger complicity in the attack than realized. Yet, the Saudis weren't the only ones involved (Research document how Western intelligence and Western governments facilitated the attack. Additionally, they funded many of the al-Qaeda and Muslim radicals via MI5, the CIA, and the ISI). Even Remy van de Wiel , a prominent Australian lawyer said that Osama bin Laden didn't orchestrate 9/11. He is the defense lawyer of Abdul Nacer Benbrika. Adbul is accused of planning terror attacks in Australia. Osama bin Laden in his Ummat interview denied any involvement in 9/11 by being against his religion of Islam. This was his first statement after 9/11 before all of the phony tapes and conjecture promoted by the CFR/CIA-sponsored mainstream media. Even the FBI's wanted poster makes no reference of Bin Laden's involvement in 9/11. FBI agent Rex Tomb was forced to admit that "the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11." Let's be real. Osama never made NORAD stop standard operation procedure, he never made Building Number Seven collapse, Osama bin Laden never made explosives in the Towers (as reported by many witnesses like William Rodriguez in the basement), etc. MIKE STOBBE from AP News at Febraury 27, 2008 at 19:30 EST reported that Pro-Quad Vaccine is linked to more convulsions than 2 other seperate shots. The Pro-Qaud vaccine was utilized as a deterrent to measles, mumps, and rubella. The CDC panel amends preference for Combo. Dr. Nicola Klein, who lead the federally funded study. Ironically, this vaccine came from the company called Merck & Co. This is the same Big Pharma company constantly promoting mandatory vaccinations from Gardasil. Not a word in the Constitution dictates mandatory vaccinations. It's just morally right to force vaccines on people period. Gardasil has killed girls. Mike Adams from Natural News have conclusively and concretely exposed the dangerous vaccine of Gardasil. This aren't suprising developments. The Jesuit Jenner popularized the manufacturing and utilization of vaccines in our modern world. Vaccines are known for their many risk factors. Some vaccines have mercury in them, which is a horrendous toxous substance. Aspartame, MSG, and sodium flouride are other poisons as well. I would keep living. I would try the best in letting the truth being known to individuals. Giving up isn't an option to me. No human on this Earth can intimidate me. I reject censorship, fear mongering, and hate for people personally. A new day is always a new oppurtunity to help others.
By Timothy
The Order of the Garter
From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=46272
MOUNTAINEER EDMUND HILLARY: AN ARGUMENT FOR HIM BEING “UNCONTAMINATED” BY THE ORDER OF THE GARTER “HONOUR”
Regarding Edmund Hillary, the pioneer Mt Everest-conquering mountainclimber & Order of the Garter Knight who died recently:
As both a non-Brit & non-Royal, Hillary would not have had full insider status, & my suspicion is that he was a “trophy” member.
I would like for the contributor [whose email this documentation is in response to is provided at the bottom of this entry] to provide his evidence on his allegations regarding Hillary’s connections with the Jesuits or the SMOM. The Jesuits do not have a provincial in New Zealand & Hillary was not a Roman Catholic. He had an Anglican funeral service.
My research below shows him to have been far more likely to have been the only member of the Order of the Garter to have been relatively uncontaminated by this Royal “honour”. In 2003 he declined an invitation to visit the Queen, preferring to socialize with Himalayan Sherpas & in January of this year, the British royals snubbed his funeral by not sending a member or British-based representative to his funeral.
Looking forward to either the presentation of some substantial supporting evidence or to the retraction of the allegations. We owe it to ourselves & each other not to be self-discrediting through unresearched smear jobs. If the evidence can be brought forward then I’m happy to be proven in error.
In truth & awareness -
Troy
EDMUND HILLARY’S KNIGHTHOODS:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Hillary
Hillary was created a Knight Commander of the Order of the British Empire (KBE) on 6 June 1953; a member of the Order of New Zealand (ONZ) in 1987; and a Knight of the Order of the Garter (KG) on 22 April 1995. He was also awarded the Polar Medal for his part in the Commonwealth Trans-Antarctic Expedition.
http://www.gazettes-online.co.uk/
ViewPDF.aspx?pdf=54017&geotype=London&gpn=6023&type=ArchivedIssuePage&all=&exact=&atleast=&similar=
London Gazette 54017, Page 6023, 25 April 1995
The London Gazette
Published by Authority
Registered as a Newspaper at the Post Office
TUESDAY, 25TH APRIL 1995
State Intelligence
HONOURS AND AWARDS
CENTRAL CHANCERY OF THE ORDERS OF KNIGHTHOOD
St. James’s Palace, London S.W.I.
25th April 1995
The QUEEN has been graciously pleased to appoint the undermentioned to be a Lady Companion and a Knight Companion of the Most Noble Order of the Garter:
(To be dated22nd April 1995)
Sir Edmund Percival HILLARY, O.N.Z., K.B.E.
The Right Honourable Margaret Hilda, Baroness THATCHER, O.M., F.R.S.
(1 SI)
EDMUND HILLARY THE ONLY NON-POLITICAL ORDER OF THE GARTER OUTSIDE BRITAIN:
http://www.cnn.com/2008/WORLD/asiapcf/01/1...y.ap/index.html
Hillary remains the only non-political person outside Britain honored as a member of Britain’s Order of the Garter, bestowed by Queen Elizabeth II on just 24 knights and ladies living worldwide at any time.
He reached the summit of Everest four days before Elizabeth was crowned Queen of Britain and the Empire on June 2, 1953. She immediately knighted the angular, self-deprecating Hillary, who was just 33.
He was at times controversial. He decried what he considered a lack of “honest-to-God morality” in New Zealand politics in the 1960s, and he refused to backtrack when the prime minister demanded he withdraw the comments. Ordinary New Zealanders applauded his integrity.
EDMUND HILLARY DECLINED THE QUEEN’S INVITATION:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/asia-pacific/3740536.stm
Sir Edmund was apparently so shy that he even proposed to his wife with a message via her mother.
In the years that followed his famous ascent, he shunned the celebrity that had become his overnight.
On the 50th anniversary of his achievement, he even turned down an invitation from the Queen, so that he could instead travel to Kathmandu to be with lifelong Sherpa friends. He was made an honorary Nepalese citizen in 2003. Sir Edmund was far happier exploring. During the next two decades, he led expeditions to the South Pole, searched for the fabled Yeti, and completed six Himalayan ascents. And he became increasingly concerned by the plight of the Sherpa people he had met on his expeditions.
ROYALS SNUB HILLARY’S FUNERAL:
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1811
Outrage in New Zealand as Royals snub funeral of Sir Edmund Hillary
Last updated at 21:47pm on 18th January 2008
The Royal Family has caused outrage in New Zealand by not sending a representative to Sir Edmund Hillary’s state funeral.
Hillary was one of only 24 knights of the garter appointed by the Queen and his success as the first man to reach the summit of Mount Everest was proclaimed on the morning of her coronation in 1953.
Internet message boards have carried comments such as “Shame on Britain” and demands for Prince Charles to change his engagements.
Lewis Holden, a leading republican, insisted the Queen should attend as New Zealand’s head of state.
“The absence of the Royal Family shows plainly they are not able to do the job for New Zealand,” he added.
Anand Satyanand, the Governor General, will represent the Queen at the funeral in Auckland on Tuesday.
New Zealand Prime Minister Helen Clark said, “This exceptional arrangement reflects the personal and historical associations of the Queen with Sir Edmund from the beginning of her reign.”
The Queen had also offered the Hillary family a memorial service at St George’s Chapel, Windsor Castle, on a date to be set for April.
But New Zealand First MP Ron Mark said British royals did not understand the level of Kiwi reverence for Hillary.
“It is surprising. One would have thought some of the younger members could have been here.
“Maybe some of the officials have a lack of understanding as to how revered Sir Ed is by Kiwis.
“We would hold him with the same love as their people had for Princess Diana, but we would argue there is no comparison in substance between the two,” he said.
Mr Mark also said Prince Charles should attend the funeral rather than the Mutton Renaissance Campaign event scheduled in his official diary for Tuesday.
The absence of royals also set New Zealand online message boards alight with outrage, many suggesting it will hasten the country’s move to become a republic.
“Sir Ed helped make the Queen’s coronation year a huge success for Britain and the commonwealth.
“I really am speechless, Prince Charles should have been the one. Shame on Britain!” wrote one person on Trade Me’s message boards.
“I can’t believe that not one of those parasites couldn’t find a day or two to come out here,” wrote another.
Republican Movement of Aotearoa New Zealand chairman Lewis Holden said the “snub” showed the Queen was unfit for her role as head of state.
“Since Sir Edmund Hillary was personally awarded Knight of the Garter by the Queen, this decision is very disappointing.
“This national day of mourning is the sort of occasion where the presence of New Zealand’s head of state would be appropriate.
“The absence of the Royal Family shows plainly they are not able to do the job for New Zealand,” he said.
But former Prime Minister Jim Bolger and Maori Party co-leader Pita Sharples both felt it was for New Zealanders to pay respects to Hillary rather than the Royal Family.
“Sir Ed was a uniquely New Zealand figure and New Zealand will give him the farewell a New Zealander of his stature deserves,” Bolger said.
Sharples said: “I am not put out by that at all. It may be disappointing to many, but not to me because they (the British) have honoured him and he is our hero so it is our role to treat him as such.”
WHAT THE ROYALS ATTENDED TO INSTEAD:
http://inastrangeland.wordpress.com/2008/0...wind-in-public/
The Queen will visit the King’s Lynn Preservation Trust Limited to mark its Fiftieth Anniversary. Her Majesty will also open the new CT Scanners/Radiology Suite at the Queen Elizabeth Hospital, King’s Lynn.
The Duke of York United Kingdom Special Representative for International Trade and Investment, will attend the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland.
The Earl of Wessex will attend the Annual Banquet of the Worshipful Company of Pattenmakers at Mansion House, London EC4.
The Princess Royal Patron, Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies, will hold a Dinner at Palace of Holyroodhouse.
The Princess Royal will Launch the Lothians and Edinburgh Abstinence Programme at Malta House, 1 Malta Terrace, Edinburgh.
The Princess Royal Patron, Silver of the Stars, will open an Exhibition at the National Museum of Scotland, Chambers Street, Edinburgh.
The Duke of Gloucester Colonel-in-Chief, The Royal Army Medical Corps will receive Colonel David Morris upon relinquishing his appointment of Representative Colonel Commandant and Colonel Peter Roberts on assuming the appointment at Kensington Palace.
MY THOUGHTS ON HILLARY'S INTEGRITY:
Below is an email that I sent to friends & family when I read about Hillary’s death. I knew that he was a Knight of the Garter but could find nothing on him that would put him in league with the British agenda. The following seemed to typify who he was:
Dear [NAMES REMOVED] & anyone else reading this who might have heard of Edmund Hillary & still have the remains of a mind & soul left,
While looking up Edmund Hillary’s biography on free internet encyclopedia Wikipedia, I found the following article. You might be familiar with it, but I’d never come across it before. This is a perfect example of how desensitized, idiotic, callous & even murderous the braindead/souldead zombies of the paradoxically herd-like me-me-me western “culture” have become. Just as sad is the lack of moral integrity & the lack of respect shown by the parents of the dead man, no doubt “worried about people might think”. Truly pathetic.
I’ve got no idea whether or not Hillary was always a saint, we’re all human after all, but he hits the tragedy of the current state of humanity on the head with these comments. Over 40 climbers left this man to die? No wonder people don’t even have the strength of character to defend the destruction of civil liberties, national sovereignty & cultural identity, squandering the remains of autonomy, mutually-supportive individuality & freedom from increasingly invasive state control for empty, useless & ultimately self-destructive false “goals”. These “adventurers” won’t even stop to help a fellow in such dire circumstances. Nice one guys!
Feel free to repost this to anyone on your email lists. Our thoughts & actions are the future that we leave to upcoming generations. And if anyone thinks that sticking up for the kind of integrity that Hillary represents here is “just knocking the younger generation, like all the generations before have done”, then I strongly suggest chucking the TV mind-control machine out the window & flushing your i-pod down the toilet & wake up. This is a classic case of preprogrammed auto-response serving as both a short-term copout & as a long-term coverup for the ongoing mass-media channelled social-engineering. It is also a classic case of “dumbing down”. We’ve been dumbed down emotionally & spiritually as well as intellectually. It’s up to all of us to regain lost ground.
In truth & awareness,
With love -
Troy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Edmund_Hillary
Hillary spoke of his disdain for the attitudes displayed by many modern mountaineers. In particular he publicly criticized New Zealander Mark Inglis and 40 other climbers who, in various groups, left British climber David Sharp to die in May 2006. He said:
“I think the whole attitude towards climbing Mount Everest has become rather horrifying. The people just want to get to the top, it was wrong if there was a man suffering altitude problems and was huddled under a rock, just to lift your hat, say good morning and pass on by.”
He also told the New Zealand Herald that he was horrified by the callous attitude of today’s climbers:
“They don’t give a damn for anybody else who may be in distress and it doesn’t impress me at all that they leave someone lying under a rock to die.”
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Sir_Edmund_Hil..._climber_to_die
Sir Edmund Hillary angry with mountaineers who left British climber to die
May 24, 2006
Sir Edmund Hillary, the New Zealand mountaineer and explorer, is angry with 40 mountaineers, including Mark Inglis, the first double amputee to reach the summit of Mount Everest, who left a British climber to die. Sir Edmund was the first person to climb Mount Everest, in 1953.
David Sharp, 34, who had reached the summit of Everest after two other unsuccessful attempts, ran out of oxygen on his way back. Sharp was found 305 meters below the summit, in a cave. He had apparently climbed alone.
According to Inglis, he was the first of 40 people to pass David Sharp, and his party was the only one that offered help. He radioed in to his base camp, but his expedition manager, “Russ,” said, “Mate, you can’t do anything. He’s been there X number of hours without oxygen, he’s effectively dead.”
“The trouble is, at 8,500 metres it’s extremely difficult to keep yourself alive, let alone keep anyone else alive,” Inglis told Television New Zealand.
Hillary faulted commercialisation of the mountain for the climber’s death, saying that had a fellow climber been in distress he would have helped him even if it meant abandoning his own summit quest. “I think the whole attitude towards climbing Mount Everest has become rather horrifying,” The New Zealand Herald newspaper quoted him as saying. “The people just want to get to the top. They don’t give a damn for anybody else who may be in distress.”
Hillary said that heading for the summit and letting people lie dying is not pleasant and he hopes it is not repeated.
Sharp’s parents, for their part, said that they do not blame Inglis, or anyone else for their son’s death; the other climbers had to look after themselves.
Sources
* RNZ/One News “Hillary angered by lack of help”. tvnz.co.nz, May 24, 2006
* “Edmund Hillary blames climbers for Everest death”. Reuters, May 24, 2006
* Deutsche Presse-Agentur “Hillary says Everest climbers should help dying men”. Monsters and Critics, May 23, 2006
Retrieved from:
http://en.wikinews.org/wiki/Sir_Edmund_Hil..._climber_to_die
THE ABOVE DOCUMENTATION IS PROVIDED IN RESPONSE TO THE FOLLOWING ALLEGATIONS FROM A CONTRIBUTOR TO ERIC PHELPS’ MAILING LIST REGARDING EDMUND HILLARY HAVING ANY S.M.O.M. OR JESUIT CONNECTIONS:
—– Original Message —–
From: [NAME REMOVED]
To: Eric Phelps
Sent: Wednesday, February 27, 2008 10:57 PM
Subject: Would I be hated along with Craig Oxley and you since I have done a lot of exposing on the Jesuits?
Dear Eric Jon Phelps
I have been doing a lot of exposing on the Jesuits in youtube and last Sunday one of my friends invited me to St Mary’s Catholic church and I managed to question a few things in front of the person leading the mass and the person I qurstioned was also the main apeaker in the SMOM or Order of Garter Sir Edmund Hillary about his SMOM and Jesuit connection and now I am hated by lots of Roman Catholics in my area and also my Youtube profile named [NAME REMOVED] has also been banned just for exposing jesuits on Youtube as well
Regards
[NAME REMOVED]
Blame Clinton For NAFTA
From http://www.truthnews.us/?p=2035
Blame Clinton For NAFTA
Fred Gardner
Counterpunch
February 28, 2008
The Birth of NAFTA. It Took Clinton to Get It Ratified
The best defense, some say, is a good offense. Hilllary’s "Shame on you, Barack Obama" performance deflected attention from the fact that the Clinton Administration did indeed get NAFTA through a resistant Congress. NAFTA was conceived under Reagan and then pushed by Poppy Bush, who got an extension of fast-track negotiating authority from Congress. (Meaning Congress couldn’t revise the text, just vote yes or no.) Agreement with Canada and Mexico was reached in August ‘92.
As a candidate for president Bill Clinton supported NAFTA with the proviso that side agreements (that would not involve renegotiating the NAFA text) might be needed to protect the environment and the rights of workers. After taking office, Clinton negotiated the side agreements, ignoring the majority of Democrats in Congress whose preference was to scuttle the pact altogether.
In July ‘93, according to a National Association of Manufacturers’ chronology, "Lawmakers returning home to their districts in August were barraged by anti-NAFTA sentiment. Many supporters of NAFTA returned to Washington publicly undecided on the pact. Convinced that NAFTA’s passage was contingent upon a strong push by the White House, dozens of House Republicans–led by Minority Leader Newt Gingrich–said they would withhold their support until the President demonstrated his commitment to the issue.
"That commitment came September 14, 1993, when President Clinton accompanied by former Presidents Ford, Carter and Bush, issued a strong statement of support for NAFTA." At this point the Archvillain of the American Century, David Rockefeller, weighed in with a Wall St. Journal op-ed explaining why passage was so important to him, personally:
"I can’t help seeing the current debate over NAFTA in the context of my own half century of work with the people of Canada and Latin America, an interest I shared with my late brother, Nelson. It seems ironic that many of the things we had hoped to witness in Latin America–and worked hard to accomplish–are threatened by a rejection of NAFTA by the U.S."
The Archvillain’s brother Nelson had toured Latin America at Nixon’s behest in the late ’60s and was greeted by riots in every city. At the time the Rockefellers owned a ranch in Venezuela five times the size of New York City and controlled Creole Petroleum.
The entire hemisphere, the Archvillain wrote in the WSJ, now has "a whole new vision of economic organization … This revolutionary process started with the profound economic transformation undertaken by Chile [under Pinochet]. It accelerated rapidly with Mexico’s decision to join the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade; to unilaterally reduce tariffs; and finally to work toward a radically new trading system with the signing of NAFTA. This not only brought Mexico into the game … it also held out the promise of extending the new trading system to the entire hemisphere." [Rockefeller used the word "revolutionary" four times and "radical" twice to describe the move towards One Big Market. No wonder the Birchers mistake him for a Communist!]
The Archvillain singled out some faithful lieutenants for special praise: George Bush, Carlos Salinas de Gortari ("a young, Harvard-educated economist"), the Peronist Menem in Argentina, Perez in Venezuela … Rockefeller must have wanted to credit Pinochet for turning around "the game" in Chile, but he refrained from doing so by name: "Under what were special circumstances, Chile had already moved in the direction of a market economy under the military government that replaced President Allende’s disastrous Marxist experiment in the early 1970s … " Rockefeller gloated that there was no longer opposition to privatization in Latin America: "Traditional ‘labor’ parties carried out the economic revolution because they felt that the changes being encouraged would result in economic growth and job creation …
"I never expected to see such a transformation in my lifetime. It would be a terrible pity to see such a historic opportunity pass by us now because of a failure on our part to ‘grasp the moment … ‘ I truly don’t think that ‘criminal’ would be too strong a word to describe an action on our part, such as rejecting NAFTA, that would so seriously jeopardize all the good that has been done –and remains to be done– to improve the lives and fortunes of so many people."
Rockefeller’s lifelong gopher, Henry Kissinger, weighed in at the same time with a piece in the LA Times calling NAFTA "the single most important decision that Congress would make during Mr. Clinton’s first term … . the most creative step toward a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the Cold War … not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system."
Meanwhile, on the legal front, Public Citizen, the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth had sued the Bush Administration for not completing an environmental impact statement on NAFTA. On June 30, 1993, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Richey ruled that the White House did indeed have to complete an EIS before sending NAFTA to Congress. The Clinton Administration asked a U.S. appeals court to reverse the decision. Solicitor General Drew S. Days III argued that the Environmental Protection Act applies to federal ITAL agencies, END ITAL not to the president, who would be in charge of implementing NAFTA. (George W. Bush’s advisors didn’t invent the imperial presidency.) A three-judge panel overruled Richey and Clinton sent an implementing bill to Congress in November ‘93.
According to the NAM history, "Anti-NAFTA forces claimed they had enough votes to defeat the bill in the House, but as the House vote scheduled for November 17 approached, intense lobbying efforts by the White House and by the NAM and its members proved successful … In the end, the House approved NAFTA by a 234-200 vote."
The difference between the Democrats and the Republicans, some say, is that the Democrats do it to us with lubrication. Poppy Bush probably could not have forced NAFTA through Congress. It took the Clinton side agreements to slide it through.
Blame Clinton For NAFTA
Fred Gardner
Counterpunch
February 28, 2008
The Birth of NAFTA. It Took Clinton to Get It Ratified
The best defense, some say, is a good offense. Hilllary’s "Shame on you, Barack Obama" performance deflected attention from the fact that the Clinton Administration did indeed get NAFTA through a resistant Congress. NAFTA was conceived under Reagan and then pushed by Poppy Bush, who got an extension of fast-track negotiating authority from Congress. (Meaning Congress couldn’t revise the text, just vote yes or no.) Agreement with Canada and Mexico was reached in August ‘92.
As a candidate for president Bill Clinton supported NAFTA with the proviso that side agreements (that would not involve renegotiating the NAFA text) might be needed to protect the environment and the rights of workers. After taking office, Clinton negotiated the side agreements, ignoring the majority of Democrats in Congress whose preference was to scuttle the pact altogether.
In July ‘93, according to a National Association of Manufacturers’ chronology, "Lawmakers returning home to their districts in August were barraged by anti-NAFTA sentiment. Many supporters of NAFTA returned to Washington publicly undecided on the pact. Convinced that NAFTA’s passage was contingent upon a strong push by the White House, dozens of House Republicans–led by Minority Leader Newt Gingrich–said they would withhold their support until the President demonstrated his commitment to the issue.
"That commitment came September 14, 1993, when President Clinton accompanied by former Presidents Ford, Carter and Bush, issued a strong statement of support for NAFTA." At this point the Archvillain of the American Century, David Rockefeller, weighed in with a Wall St. Journal op-ed explaining why passage was so important to him, personally:
"I can’t help seeing the current debate over NAFTA in the context of my own half century of work with the people of Canada and Latin America, an interest I shared with my late brother, Nelson. It seems ironic that many of the things we had hoped to witness in Latin America–and worked hard to accomplish–are threatened by a rejection of NAFTA by the U.S."
The Archvillain’s brother Nelson had toured Latin America at Nixon’s behest in the late ’60s and was greeted by riots in every city. At the time the Rockefellers owned a ranch in Venezuela five times the size of New York City and controlled Creole Petroleum.
The entire hemisphere, the Archvillain wrote in the WSJ, now has "a whole new vision of economic organization … This revolutionary process started with the profound economic transformation undertaken by Chile [under Pinochet]. It accelerated rapidly with Mexico’s decision to join the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade; to unilaterally reduce tariffs; and finally to work toward a radically new trading system with the signing of NAFTA. This not only brought Mexico into the game … it also held out the promise of extending the new trading system to the entire hemisphere." [Rockefeller used the word "revolutionary" four times and "radical" twice to describe the move towards One Big Market. No wonder the Birchers mistake him for a Communist!]
The Archvillain singled out some faithful lieutenants for special praise: George Bush, Carlos Salinas de Gortari ("a young, Harvard-educated economist"), the Peronist Menem in Argentina, Perez in Venezuela … Rockefeller must have wanted to credit Pinochet for turning around "the game" in Chile, but he refrained from doing so by name: "Under what were special circumstances, Chile had already moved in the direction of a market economy under the military government that replaced President Allende’s disastrous Marxist experiment in the early 1970s … " Rockefeller gloated that there was no longer opposition to privatization in Latin America: "Traditional ‘labor’ parties carried out the economic revolution because they felt that the changes being encouraged would result in economic growth and job creation …
"I never expected to see such a transformation in my lifetime. It would be a terrible pity to see such a historic opportunity pass by us now because of a failure on our part to ‘grasp the moment … ‘ I truly don’t think that ‘criminal’ would be too strong a word to describe an action on our part, such as rejecting NAFTA, that would so seriously jeopardize all the good that has been done –and remains to be done– to improve the lives and fortunes of so many people."
Rockefeller’s lifelong gopher, Henry Kissinger, weighed in at the same time with a piece in the LA Times calling NAFTA "the single most important decision that Congress would make during Mr. Clinton’s first term … . the most creative step toward a new world order taken by any group of countries since the end of the Cold War … not a conventional trade agreement but the architecture of a new international system."
Meanwhile, on the legal front, Public Citizen, the Sierra Club and Friends of the Earth had sued the Bush Administration for not completing an environmental impact statement on NAFTA. On June 30, 1993, U.S. District Court Judge Charles Richey ruled that the White House did indeed have to complete an EIS before sending NAFTA to Congress. The Clinton Administration asked a U.S. appeals court to reverse the decision. Solicitor General Drew S. Days III argued that the Environmental Protection Act applies to federal ITAL agencies, END ITAL not to the president, who would be in charge of implementing NAFTA. (George W. Bush’s advisors didn’t invent the imperial presidency.) A three-judge panel overruled Richey and Clinton sent an implementing bill to Congress in November ‘93.
According to the NAM history, "Anti-NAFTA forces claimed they had enough votes to defeat the bill in the House, but as the House vote scheduled for November 17 approached, intense lobbying efforts by the White House and by the NAM and its members proved successful … In the end, the House approved NAFTA by a 234-200 vote."
The difference between the Democrats and the Republicans, some say, is that the Democrats do it to us with lubrication. Poppy Bush probably could not have forced NAFTA through Congress. It took the Clinton side agreements to slide it through.
Pro-Life news from Barack Obama to other information
http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2008/02/planned_parenth_30.php#comments
http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=875
http://vitalsignsblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/barack-obama-abortions-consummate.html
http://christiannewswire.com/news/848045840.html
http://thepoint.breakpoint.org/2008/02/oprah-winfrey-t.html
http://federaljack.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=310 (Operation Endgame)
http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/02/29/planned-parenthood-accepts-donation-from-racist/
http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/004265.html
http://www.operationrescue.org/?p=875
http://vitalsignsblog.blogspot.com/2008/02/barack-obama-abortions-consummate.html
http://christiannewswire.com/news/848045840.html
http://thepoint.breakpoint.org/2008/02/oprah-winfrey-t.html
http://federaljack.com/modules.php?name=News&file=print&sid=310 (Operation Endgame)
http://lashawnbarber.com/archives/2008/02/29/planned-parenthood-accepts-donation-from-racist/
http://www.evangelicaloutpost.com/archives/004265.html
Planned Parenthood of Idaho Backtracks on Apology for Racist Abortion Donation
From http://lifenews.com/state2963.html
Planned Parenthood of Idaho Backtracks on Apology for Racist Abortion Donation
Email this article Printer friendly page
RSS Newsfeed
by Steven ErteltLifeNews.com
Editor
February 29, 2008
Boise, ID (LifeNews.com) -- After news surfaced earlier this week that Planned Parenthood of Idaho had accepted a donation from someone pretending to want it to go towards abortions on black babies, the abortion business initially apologized. Now, its main spokeswoman is criticizing the pro-life students that organized the investigation.
As LifeNews.com initially reported, pro-life students at UCLA organized a probe to find out if Planned Parenthood offices in seven states would accept racist donations.
PPI was one of the affiliates to accept it and Autumn Kersey, Vice-President of Marketing and Development for the pro-abortion group, laughed at the racist intent and called it "understandable."
Yesterday, Planned Parenthood of Idaho CEO Rebecca Poedy released a statement to the media apologizing.
"Planned Parenthood firmly and unequivocally denounces racial bias in the delivery of health care," the statement read.
It continued: "A fund raising employee violated the organization's principles and practices when she appeared to be willing to accept a racially motivated donation. This employee made a serious mistake. We apologize for the manner in which this offensive call was handled."
However, Poedy appeared to backtrack from the apology in comments to the Boise Weekly, a liberal publication.
She painted the calls as misleading and said PPI was a victim of race-baiting.
"It's an extremist, anti-choice group that has manipulated a 25-minute conversation," Poedy said. "It's not an accurate representation of the transcript."
"They're all designed with an intent to bait someone into a conversation they can then manipulate," she added.
Poedy told the Boise newspaper PPI never accepted money from the call and reported it immediately to the national Planned Parenthood office for an internal probe.
She also admitted that her staff mishandled the call, but said PPI wasn't prepared for it.
"We need to train our staff to handle calls from people that are coming with offensive agendas," she said.
Planned Parenthood of Idaho Backtracks on Apology for Racist Abortion Donation
Email this article Printer friendly page
RSS Newsfeed
by Steven ErteltLifeNews.com
Editor
February 29, 2008
Boise, ID (LifeNews.com) -- After news surfaced earlier this week that Planned Parenthood of Idaho had accepted a donation from someone pretending to want it to go towards abortions on black babies, the abortion business initially apologized. Now, its main spokeswoman is criticizing the pro-life students that organized the investigation.
As LifeNews.com initially reported, pro-life students at UCLA organized a probe to find out if Planned Parenthood offices in seven states would accept racist donations.
PPI was one of the affiliates to accept it and Autumn Kersey, Vice-President of Marketing and Development for the pro-abortion group, laughed at the racist intent and called it "understandable."
Yesterday, Planned Parenthood of Idaho CEO Rebecca Poedy released a statement to the media apologizing.
"Planned Parenthood firmly and unequivocally denounces racial bias in the delivery of health care," the statement read.
It continued: "A fund raising employee violated the organization's principles and practices when she appeared to be willing to accept a racially motivated donation. This employee made a serious mistake. We apologize for the manner in which this offensive call was handled."
However, Poedy appeared to backtrack from the apology in comments to the Boise Weekly, a liberal publication.
She painted the calls as misleading and said PPI was a victim of race-baiting.
"It's an extremist, anti-choice group that has manipulated a 25-minute conversation," Poedy said. "It's not an accurate representation of the transcript."
"They're all designed with an intent to bait someone into a conversation they can then manipulate," she added.
Poedy told the Boise newspaper PPI never accepted money from the call and reported it immediately to the national Planned Parenthood office for an internal probe.
She also admitted that her staff mishandled the call, but said PPI wasn't prepared for it.
"We need to train our staff to handle calls from people that are coming with offensive agendas," she said.
Who is John Hagee?
http://www.adullamfilms.org/NewsUpdateNov112007.html# (This link shows my personal opinion on the John Hagee issue)
http://www.pfo.org/jonhagee.htm
http://theexpositor.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/the-john-hagee-controversy/
http://www.therefinersfire.org/challenging_ted_pike.htm
http://www.christiansstandingwithisrael.com/replacement_theology_debunked.html
http://www.pfo.org/jonhagee.htm
http://theexpositor.wordpress.com/2007/11/13/the-john-hagee-controversy/
http://www.therefinersfire.org/challenging_ted_pike.htm
http://www.christiansstandingwithisrael.com/replacement_theology_debunked.html
Corporate Fascism’s Greatest Ally
From http://robalini.blogspot.com/2008/02/corporate-fascisms-greatest-ally.html
Corporate Fascism’s Greatest Ally
Craig Lee Merrihue
The Knoformist Blog
February 28, 2008
Few political animals are more nauseating and deleterious to liberty than the good liberal who’ll vote for any democrat to avoid “giving” the election to a republican. To boot, this fear bunny has been brainwashed to irrationally demonize the very world “conspiracy”, a word which connotes the actual bedrock of political reality. The behavior, and lack of backbone branching from these limbs is allowing the perpetuation and consolidation of the corporate fascist state. By lining up in lock-step behind phony alternatives and mock-dissent, the liberal democrat is the greatest ally to this corporate fascism.
The liberal democrat has no courage, no integrity, no functioning intellect. If they even perceive the corporate fascist media blackout (a term I’m sure they find “radical”, if not offensive) of ALL non-corporately funded candidates, they immediately assess it as “just“ since those candidates “didn‘t have enough public support“ In 2008 such candidates included Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, and Mike Gravel. Not only were these the only 3 clearly anti-war candidates, but 2 were sitting Congressmen and one was the former United States Senator who filibustered to end the draft. A corporate media which can ignore candidates of this stature has surely devolved into mere stenographers to the powers that be.
Hillary Clinton is a monster and Barack Obama is at best a puppet and prostitute. Strong language sure, but in no way unjust or hyperbolic. Hillary Clinton’s monstrousness is in plain evidence in her disingenuous protestation that she voted for this murderous war because the Bush administration misled her. Funny, the 10 million of us who took to the streets in an attempt to head off this war knew better than this corporately funded shill of a New York Senator. Unfortunately, most of us are as dumb as she thinks we are.
Anybody who has done any serious level of work knows that 9/11 was an “inside job”, with key operatives in the Bush family circles, but undertaken with the active or tacit consent of the entire American ruling class bent on New World Order since Adam Weishaupt founded the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776.
Hillary, too, knows the truth of what took place on 9/11/2001 in her latest opportunistically adopted state. The thousands dead that day, and in the ensuing war, cry out vainly for justice to the deaf ears of New York’s Senator. As do the millions of Iraqis, half a million children among them, dead from sanctions enforced during a Clinton administration Hillary now claims as her own experience. Well, unelected, though she was, let’s give the devil her due. And surely that due includes the blood of innocents in Kosovo, Serbia, Bosnia, Somalia — all places the dope trade is now thriving, as it “coincidentally” does in all places of American intervention since Sicily at World War II’s end — but the realities of the global drug trade are almost certainly off the radar of the good liberal-who, like all her other beliefs, swallows hook, line and sinker the fictions purveyed by Hollywood of organized crime kingpins in pony tails carrying millions in briefcases.
The liberal democrat refuses to acknowledge the reality of power in the world at this time: that the bottom line of politics is money and murder. It’s not some sporting event, or horse race in which the amount of money is the headline raised, while pertinent issues are not — unless the opposite is more convenient to our plutocratic oligarchy - in the 4th quarter Ron Paul raised more money than any other Republican, all from ordinary people driven only by true conviction, not greed — this could easily have been the lead story for weeks — but I didn’t see a single article — and THAT is why fascism is a “soft” term for the reality in which we live.
Neo-Cons & born-again arch conservative knuckle-draggers are easier to forgive than you, liberal democrat - who figures they’ve done their civic duty by writing their name on something-or-other put forth by “MoveOn.org.” You pretend to care, but you always shut-up and never put-up-you are vilely lazy and living on intellectual welfare - you hold opinions that were doled out to you, not earned by the honest and respectable sweat of your own brow.
Rush Limbaugh’s knuckle-draggers are pathetic and sad, and they have bought into the demonization of the words “liberal” and “socialist”, which are interchangeable for these loutish morons, embarrassingly dumbed-down by their insistence on viewing reality through a single prism, distorted toward their own take on “FAH-PIG“ - Fear, Apathy, Horniness, Prejudice, Ignorance and Greed the prime motivator’s of most’s public behavior.
But YOU, liberal - you fancy yourself “educated”, “enlightened”, not as easy a prey for FAH-PIG. And yet you allow yourself to be herded into one of the 2 major pre-approved pens from which the public animal’s may bray at one another — and vote for one of their pre-approved and already severely corrupted corporate whores.
Corporate whores like Barack Obama. Who has a Washington D.C.’s biggest Big Pharma lobbyist running his campaign, & has the chutzpah to crow about being for “change”. Who’s foreign policy advisor is the notorious Zbigniew Brezinski, servant to the Rockefeller’s and their New World Order, the architect who brought together and secretly armed and trained the “Islamic fundamentalists” in Afghanistan to fight the Russians in the late 70s-this included Osama bin Laden.
And of course Obama has naught to say on 9/11 Truth.
So many well-intentioned liberal democrats are climbing aboard that Obama train-which of course is one of the choices pre-ordained by the ruling class. Most of my own family is black, and by that I mean African-American, who unlike Obama, have a shared historical experience of American slavery, Jim Crow, as well as many positive African-American traditions. Obama’s father of course is from Kenya, and in the illogical racism of Americans, one drop of “black blood” makes you a “black person” , not the half-black, half-white person you really are (for what that’s worth). Race is unscientific at best, culture a series of individually made choices without significant genetic components.
The liberal democrat Kennedys are all on board. They want themselves and their loved ones to stay alive, unlike President Jack and his son, John Jr. - so they join in lock-step behind the pre-approved Barack.
So you silly liberal democrats get to feel good about yourself by voting for a black (man) or a (white) woman. Aren’t you all just so open-minded?
Well, no you’re not. Just mention “conspiracy” or “9/11 Truth”. You can watch the mind close up tighter than a bulls-ass at fly time.
So be like the putrid Bill Maher. Now THERE’S a liberal democrat for you. He and that rich slob Michael Moore, blind siding one of the few REAL candidates we’ve ever had the opportunity to vote for, falling on their knees before the cameras and an unsuspecting Ralph Nader, begging the great man NOT to run again in 2004, and “give” the election to Bush. Bill Maher, who arrogantly chased a person with REAL integrity, a 9/11 Truther from his audience, shouting for security. Well, you can’t expect a corporate whore like Bill Maher to even seriously consider what might threaten the flow of cash he gets for being an unconscionable suck-butt. Activist Jock Doubleday has issued Bill Maher a challenge to study 9/11 for 4 hours a day, 7 days a week, for I believe 6 months, and NOT come to the conclusion that it was an “inside job” by the Cheney gang. Jock’s offered something like $10,000 to boot.
I’d like to issue that same challenge to all liberal democrats, without the $10,000
On the Nader issue, liberal democrats, please forgive me for raising my voice above the wearisome din of your bleating and moo-ing: THERE ARE PERHAPS A FEW MILLION OF US WHO DID OR WOULD VOTE FOR RALPH NADER, AND WOULD NEVERNEVERNEVER VOTE FOR AN AL GORE, HILLARY CLINTON, JOHN KERRY, BARACK OBAMA, ETC. WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR WHOEVER APPROXIMATES OUR VIEWS WITHOUT YOU CORPORATE-FASCIST-TOOL-FEAR BUNNIES HECKLING US. WE ARE WELL AWARE YOU LACK ALL INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL INTEGRITY, SO PLEASE SHUT THE FUCK UP ON THIS ISSUE!
And please, at least consider having a little integrity and substance. We really feel your insistence on voting for the lesser of 2 evils is precisely what corporate fascism is counting on to perpetuate itself, and endless war, and the drug trade, and poverty, and assassinations, murders, and the lies that stem the tide of 9/11 Truth. Really, how much innocent blood are you willing to drip with before you actually take a stand AGAINST evil, instead of slavishly choosing the so-called “lesser evil”.
The voting system itself is totally corrupted-from the pre-approved and corporate money driven choices to the computerized machines. This is the system devised by your “lesser evil”. Stand up and be somebody for a change.
Sphere: Related Content
Corporate Fascism’s Greatest Ally
Craig Lee Merrihue
The Knoformist Blog
February 28, 2008
Few political animals are more nauseating and deleterious to liberty than the good liberal who’ll vote for any democrat to avoid “giving” the election to a republican. To boot, this fear bunny has been brainwashed to irrationally demonize the very world “conspiracy”, a word which connotes the actual bedrock of political reality. The behavior, and lack of backbone branching from these limbs is allowing the perpetuation and consolidation of the corporate fascist state. By lining up in lock-step behind phony alternatives and mock-dissent, the liberal democrat is the greatest ally to this corporate fascism.
The liberal democrat has no courage, no integrity, no functioning intellect. If they even perceive the corporate fascist media blackout (a term I’m sure they find “radical”, if not offensive) of ALL non-corporately funded candidates, they immediately assess it as “just“ since those candidates “didn‘t have enough public support“ In 2008 such candidates included Dennis Kucinich, Ron Paul, and Mike Gravel. Not only were these the only 3 clearly anti-war candidates, but 2 were sitting Congressmen and one was the former United States Senator who filibustered to end the draft. A corporate media which can ignore candidates of this stature has surely devolved into mere stenographers to the powers that be.
Hillary Clinton is a monster and Barack Obama is at best a puppet and prostitute. Strong language sure, but in no way unjust or hyperbolic. Hillary Clinton’s monstrousness is in plain evidence in her disingenuous protestation that she voted for this murderous war because the Bush administration misled her. Funny, the 10 million of us who took to the streets in an attempt to head off this war knew better than this corporately funded shill of a New York Senator. Unfortunately, most of us are as dumb as she thinks we are.
Anybody who has done any serious level of work knows that 9/11 was an “inside job”, with key operatives in the Bush family circles, but undertaken with the active or tacit consent of the entire American ruling class bent on New World Order since Adam Weishaupt founded the Bavarian Illuminati in 1776.
Hillary, too, knows the truth of what took place on 9/11/2001 in her latest opportunistically adopted state. The thousands dead that day, and in the ensuing war, cry out vainly for justice to the deaf ears of New York’s Senator. As do the millions of Iraqis, half a million children among them, dead from sanctions enforced during a Clinton administration Hillary now claims as her own experience. Well, unelected, though she was, let’s give the devil her due. And surely that due includes the blood of innocents in Kosovo, Serbia, Bosnia, Somalia — all places the dope trade is now thriving, as it “coincidentally” does in all places of American intervention since Sicily at World War II’s end — but the realities of the global drug trade are almost certainly off the radar of the good liberal-who, like all her other beliefs, swallows hook, line and sinker the fictions purveyed by Hollywood of organized crime kingpins in pony tails carrying millions in briefcases.
The liberal democrat refuses to acknowledge the reality of power in the world at this time: that the bottom line of politics is money and murder. It’s not some sporting event, or horse race in which the amount of money is the headline raised, while pertinent issues are not — unless the opposite is more convenient to our plutocratic oligarchy - in the 4th quarter Ron Paul raised more money than any other Republican, all from ordinary people driven only by true conviction, not greed — this could easily have been the lead story for weeks — but I didn’t see a single article — and THAT is why fascism is a “soft” term for the reality in which we live.
Neo-Cons & born-again arch conservative knuckle-draggers are easier to forgive than you, liberal democrat - who figures they’ve done their civic duty by writing their name on something-or-other put forth by “MoveOn.org.” You pretend to care, but you always shut-up and never put-up-you are vilely lazy and living on intellectual welfare - you hold opinions that were doled out to you, not earned by the honest and respectable sweat of your own brow.
Rush Limbaugh’s knuckle-draggers are pathetic and sad, and they have bought into the demonization of the words “liberal” and “socialist”, which are interchangeable for these loutish morons, embarrassingly dumbed-down by their insistence on viewing reality through a single prism, distorted toward their own take on “FAH-PIG“ - Fear, Apathy, Horniness, Prejudice, Ignorance and Greed the prime motivator’s of most’s public behavior.
But YOU, liberal - you fancy yourself “educated”, “enlightened”, not as easy a prey for FAH-PIG. And yet you allow yourself to be herded into one of the 2 major pre-approved pens from which the public animal’s may bray at one another — and vote for one of their pre-approved and already severely corrupted corporate whores.
Corporate whores like Barack Obama. Who has a Washington D.C.’s biggest Big Pharma lobbyist running his campaign, & has the chutzpah to crow about being for “change”. Who’s foreign policy advisor is the notorious Zbigniew Brezinski, servant to the Rockefeller’s and their New World Order, the architect who brought together and secretly armed and trained the “Islamic fundamentalists” in Afghanistan to fight the Russians in the late 70s-this included Osama bin Laden.
And of course Obama has naught to say on 9/11 Truth.
So many well-intentioned liberal democrats are climbing aboard that Obama train-which of course is one of the choices pre-ordained by the ruling class. Most of my own family is black, and by that I mean African-American, who unlike Obama, have a shared historical experience of American slavery, Jim Crow, as well as many positive African-American traditions. Obama’s father of course is from Kenya, and in the illogical racism of Americans, one drop of “black blood” makes you a “black person” , not the half-black, half-white person you really are (for what that’s worth). Race is unscientific at best, culture a series of individually made choices without significant genetic components.
The liberal democrat Kennedys are all on board. They want themselves and their loved ones to stay alive, unlike President Jack and his son, John Jr. - so they join in lock-step behind the pre-approved Barack.
So you silly liberal democrats get to feel good about yourself by voting for a black (man) or a (white) woman. Aren’t you all just so open-minded?
Well, no you’re not. Just mention “conspiracy” or “9/11 Truth”. You can watch the mind close up tighter than a bulls-ass at fly time.
So be like the putrid Bill Maher. Now THERE’S a liberal democrat for you. He and that rich slob Michael Moore, blind siding one of the few REAL candidates we’ve ever had the opportunity to vote for, falling on their knees before the cameras and an unsuspecting Ralph Nader, begging the great man NOT to run again in 2004, and “give” the election to Bush. Bill Maher, who arrogantly chased a person with REAL integrity, a 9/11 Truther from his audience, shouting for security. Well, you can’t expect a corporate whore like Bill Maher to even seriously consider what might threaten the flow of cash he gets for being an unconscionable suck-butt. Activist Jock Doubleday has issued Bill Maher a challenge to study 9/11 for 4 hours a day, 7 days a week, for I believe 6 months, and NOT come to the conclusion that it was an “inside job” by the Cheney gang. Jock’s offered something like $10,000 to boot.
I’d like to issue that same challenge to all liberal democrats, without the $10,000
On the Nader issue, liberal democrats, please forgive me for raising my voice above the wearisome din of your bleating and moo-ing: THERE ARE PERHAPS A FEW MILLION OF US WHO DID OR WOULD VOTE FOR RALPH NADER, AND WOULD NEVERNEVERNEVER VOTE FOR AN AL GORE, HILLARY CLINTON, JOHN KERRY, BARACK OBAMA, ETC. WE HAVE THE RIGHT TO VOTE FOR WHOEVER APPROXIMATES OUR VIEWS WITHOUT YOU CORPORATE-FASCIST-TOOL-FEAR BUNNIES HECKLING US. WE ARE WELL AWARE YOU LACK ALL INTELLECTUAL AND MORAL INTEGRITY, SO PLEASE SHUT THE FUCK UP ON THIS ISSUE!
And please, at least consider having a little integrity and substance. We really feel your insistence on voting for the lesser of 2 evils is precisely what corporate fascism is counting on to perpetuate itself, and endless war, and the drug trade, and poverty, and assassinations, murders, and the lies that stem the tide of 9/11 Truth. Really, how much innocent blood are you willing to drip with before you actually take a stand AGAINST evil, instead of slavishly choosing the so-called “lesser evil”.
The voting system itself is totally corrupted-from the pre-approved and corporate money driven choices to the computerized machines. This is the system devised by your “lesser evil”. Stand up and be somebody for a change.
Sphere: Related Content
The US Dollar is Being Destroyed
From http://www.truthnews.us/?p=2034
The U.S. Dollar Is Being Destroyed
Lee Rogers
Funny Money Report
February 27, 2008
The global economy is falling apart all around us. We can expect a continued rise in the price of gold and silver as it is becoming increasingly apparent that the Federal Reserve, the U.S. government and even Alan Greenspan are doing everything they can to destroy the value of the U.S. Dollar. In fact, the policies currently being implemented by the establishment is criminal because by devaluing the U.S. Dollar they are indirectly robbing from the American middle class by destroying the purchasing power of everyone’s bank accounts that are denominated in U.S. Dollars. At this point it is becoming increasingly clear that the establishment wants a weaker U.S. Dollar considering some of the insane policies they are implementing and insane things that they are saying.
What makes this rise in precious metals particularly interesting is the fact that the IMF has been dumping gold on to the market and gold continues to move up in value. The manipulation of the gold market is starting to fail as is the policy of managing a slow decline of the U.S. Dollar without a parabolic rise in precious metals. The rise in silver has been particularly spectacular rising around $1 in price yesterday and it shows no signs of slowing down. At this point we could easily see gold at $1,000 an ounce and silver at $20 an ounce within the next month or two. So why is all of this happening? Let’s take a look at some of the news that has come out in the past few days.
First, Alan Greenspan actually told Arab nations in the Gulf to drop their peg to the U.S. Dollar. He actually said that the reason why they have so much inflation in their economies is because they are pegged to the U.S. Dollar. Greenspan is essentially admitting that there is inflation built into the U.S. Dollar and that’s why they are having problems with inflation. His statements also serve to undermine confidence in the value of the U.S. Dollar since many people pay close attention to what the former Federal Reserve chairman has to say. Even worse though, is that if these Arab nations decide to drop their peg to the U.S. Dollar this will further reduce demand for the currency. This will result in the U.S. Dollar continuing its move lower.
It is certainly ironic that Greenspan who actually created this economic mess through his easy money policies in the early part of the decade is now encouraging other countries to move away from the U.S. Dollar. Greenspan has done everything he could to destroy the currency both while he was the Federal Reserve chairman and he’s continuing to do it years after he quit the post. Even when Greenspan was the Federal Reserve chairman all he did was increase the money supply and reduce interest rates whenever there was an economic crisis. Greenspan is a criminal because his policies are responsible for the current housing crisis and many of the other problems we are seeing with the economy today. It is disgusting that Greenspan would actually make statements that he knows will facilitate a further destruction of the U.S. Dollar.
Second, the current Federal Reserve chairman Ben Bernanke shows no signs of reversing course and setting policies that will save the U.S. Dollar. Bernanke testified in front of Congress today and he indicated that they would continue to reduce interest rates to prop up the economy. This is also a criminal act. Bernanke would prefer to sacrifice the value of the U.S. Dollar just to make the stock market look as if it is treading water. It is much more destructive from a long term basis to destroy the monetary unit that the economy is based off of than it is to raise interest rates and defend the monetary unit. The Federal Reserve should be raising interest rates to defend the U.S. Dollar. This would cause an immediate economic slowdown but long term it would save the economy. Bernanke has decided to choose the wrong option and this could cause an inflationary collapse.
Third, the FDIC is predicting that we are facing a crisis. An article from the Wall Street Journal revealed that the FDIC is actually bringing on more people to deal with future bank failures. They aren’t hiring new people because it’s a fun thing to do. They are bringing people on because they believe things are starting to spiral out of control. This is without question an ominous indication that we could be on the brink of a major collapse.
Fourth, the government announced that they are lifting restrictions on Freddie Mac and Fannie Mae in terms of the amount of mortgages they are allowed to hold. As private banks fail, the government will need these two entities to take over more of these mortgages. This is another indicator that the government believes that we could see a ton of these private banks fail.
Fifth, the Russians are going to slowly start moving their oil sales away from U.S. Dollars and into Rubles. This will further erode demand for the U.S. Dollar and continue accelerating its slide downward. This combined with the Iranian oil bourse which has recently come online is going to increase pressure on the value of the U.S. Dollar. The Iranian oil bourse trades oil and other commodities for currencies other than the U.S. Dollar. It is certainly interesting that we’ve seen a huge decline in the U.S. Dollar since the Iranian oil bourse began operations.
Sixth, we are beginning to see an escalation in food prices. In particular, the price of wheat has gone through the roof and there have been reports of panic buying. This is not only a monetary phenomenon but it is also the result of the fact that there are government subsidies for biofuels. Biofuels are essentially the result of food being turned into fuel which means there is less food in the open market and this has resulted in the price of food moving up. The United Nations has already been warning of food shortages and there have been reports of food riots in different Middle East countries. This is something that could occur in the United States if the government continues to subsidize biofuels and the Federal Reserve continues to inflate the money supply.
As scary as this is, these are just some of the lowlights over a few days of economic news. To summarize, these news stories indicate that the U.S. Dollar is being destroyed on several different fronts and this is resulting in gold, silver and other commodities going up in U.S. Dollar denominated terms. We didn’t even get a chance to talk about the phony tax rebate scam and the out of control spending by the clowns in Washington DC which are also contributing to this disaster. The U.S. Dollar Index has dropped substantially and we now see a situation where the U.S. Dollar is at an all-time low versus the Euro. We are about to witness a financial calamity of epic proportions and the establishment shows no sign of wishing to implement policies to reverse this. The end game appears to be the continued destruction of the U.S. Dollar which will allow the establishment to implement the North American Union and a regional currency which will completely undermine the sovereignty of the United States. The crisis in the U.S. Dollar will be used to facilitate this phony solution which will give the big multinational corporations and central bankers even more power.
The only way to survive this coming economic disaster is to buy physical gold and silver. It also wouldn’t hurt to stockpile ammunition, firearms, storable foods and survival equipment. This is a very serious situation. We are going to see a substantial rise in gold, silver and other commodities and we should see a spectacular rise in the price of many junior mining stocks. The U.S. Dollar is being destroyed through inflation and those who own precious metals will be rewarded as precious metals serve as a fantastic defense against the criminal central bankers that set these criminal policies.
A Congressmen Calls for Defunding Planned Parenthood
From http://www.cnsnews.com/ViewNation.asp?Page=/Nation/archive/200802/NAT20080228b.html
Congressmen Call for Defunding Planned Parenthood
By Penny Starr
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
February 28, 2008(CNSNews.com) - After reviewing materials posted on Planned Parenthood's teenwire.com Web site at the request of Cybercast News Service, three House Republicans are calling for the termination of Planned Parenthood's federal funding. Among other things, teenwire promotes the use of pornography by teenagers.Rep. Doug Lamborn (R.-Colo.) said teenwire "is another reason we should pull all federal funding from Planned Parenthood," a group that also performs abortions."There should be no money that goes to any Internet site that promotes promiscuity or sexual license in any way," Rep. Steve King (R.-Iowa) told Cybercast News Service."I don't believe taxpayer funding should be going to groups that put sexually explicit material on the Internet targeted at minors," Rep. Joseph Pitts (R.-Pa.), chairman of the House Values Action Team, said.The congressmen spoke to Cybercast News Service after reviewing materials from Planned Parenthood's teenwire.com, which says its mission is to provide "medically accurate" information about sex to teenagers.As Cybercast News Service reported on Feb. 26, teenwire.com recommends viewing "sexy pictures or movies" as a way for young couples to enjoy "safer sex."
The Web site notes that federal law prohibits porn viewing by anyone under 18. "However," it says, "not everyone follows the rules, and you may run across some porn before you turn 18."It goes on to say that "many people enjoy pornography alone or with a partner as part of sex play. People have different ideas of what is arousing, and there are many different kinds of porn that appeal to people's different interests."The lawmakers reviewed other content from the site, including graphic illustrations from "Behind the Fig Leaf," a slide show depicting the differing "styles" of male and female genitalia. Rep. King told Cybercast News Service that he had heard of teenwire.com promoting safer sex. "What you've shown me brings it to my attention in a serious way," he said. "You go back to Margaret Sanger and in the beginning of (Planned Parenthood), she is advocating promiscuity. (Teenwire.com) is advocating promiscuity."We should shut off all federal dollars to any organization that provides abortion services or counseling," King added. "There should be no money that goes to any Internet site that promotes promiscuity or sexual license in any way. If there is going to be sexual license promoted, let that happen some place else. But the federal government should not be subsidizing it," he said."(Teenwire.com) is another reason we should pull all federal funding from Planned Parenthood," Rep. Lamborn (R-Colo.) agreed. "Time and time again this organization has used taxpayer dollars to promote interests that are not in step with the values of the American people.""I don't believe taxpayer funding should be going to groups that put sexually explicit material on the Internet targeted at minors," Rep. Pitts (R-Pa.) told Cybercast News Service. "Parents today already have their work cut out for them trying to keep their kids from viewing smut on the Internet."The federal government shouldn't be funding groups that produce this sort of material under the pretense that it is educational," he said.Rep. King said he thinks teenwire.com is evidence of the continued moral decline in America, a decline boosted during the Clinton administration, he said."
This is a progression of the kind of activity that came from President Clinton's surgeon general (Jocelyn Elders), who advocated masturbation, and Bill Clinton himself, who argued what sex 'wasn't,' and that has permeated our college campuses and our society. There are now probably millions of people who think [that] what went on between Bill Clinton and Monica Lewinski was not sex."King added that teenwire.com is part of Planned Parenthood's wider agenda, which he believes is damaging American culture. "I think it's part of its strategic plan to break down the moral order of our society so that the people on the other side of morality and integrity can take power in this country."Planned Parenthood and other family planning organizations get federal tax dollars under Title X of the Public Service Health Act. In its 2005-2006 annual report, Planned Parenthood Federation of America reported that $305.3 million, or 34 percent of its annual income, came from government grants and contracts.
Make media inquiries or request an interview about this article.
Subscribe to the free CNSNews.com daily E-Brief.
Government Flu Shots: From "Recommended" to Mandatory?
From http://www.lewrockwell.com/blog/lewrw/archives/019654.html
February 27, 2008
Government Flu Shots: From "Recommended" to Mandatory?
Posted by Karen De Coster at February 27, 2008 06:00 PM
The government has taken one step closer to realizing its dream of forcing people to get flu shots. Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices used to "recommend" that children from 6 months to five years get flu shots, it now recommends that all "children" from ages 6 months to 18 years old get them. In short time, this will become mandatory, as will all other medicinal "recommendations" of the State. The states are already doing this.
They decided against "recommending" the meningitis vaccination - but only because there is not yet a large enough vaccination supply to go around. I'm sure Big Pharma will change that.
As a side note, I am horrified how most people I know are so hell-bent on getting their flu shot every year because they are brainwashed to believe that it is a necessity because their government says so, and the media safety ninnies affirm this with their interminable "warnings" to the ignorant public.
February 27, 2008
Government Flu Shots: From "Recommended" to Mandatory?
Posted by Karen De Coster at February 27, 2008 06:00 PM
The government has taken one step closer to realizing its dream of forcing people to get flu shots. Whereas the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices used to "recommend" that children from 6 months to five years get flu shots, it now recommends that all "children" from ages 6 months to 18 years old get them. In short time, this will become mandatory, as will all other medicinal "recommendations" of the State. The states are already doing this.
They decided against "recommending" the meningitis vaccination - but only because there is not yet a large enough vaccination supply to go around. I'm sure Big Pharma will change that.
As a side note, I am horrified how most people I know are so hell-bent on getting their flu shot every year because they are brainwashed to believe that it is a necessity because their government says so, and the media safety ninnies affirm this with their interminable "warnings" to the ignorant public.
Thursday, February 28, 2008
You think you are free?
From
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=2030
You think you are free?
Linda S. Heard
Online Journal
February 28, 2008
Watching old movies makes me sad. I’m inevitably reminded of a kindlier, gentler world without cameras that spy on populations, where overseas travelling was pleasurable and privacy was an individual’s right.
Nowadays, states are usurping responsibilities that are rightfully those of their citizens. Western so-called democracies, in particular, are supposed to have governments that are servants of the people, whereas, in fact, the opposite is true. Under the guise of doing what’s best for us or ensuring our security, governments are exercising more and more control over our lives. And, tragically, we are facilitating this erosion of our own freedoms, mostly because we’re not even aware it’s happening.
The US and Britain are leading the pack in this encroaching Orwellian nightmare. "War is peace; Freedom is slavery; Ignorance is strength," wrote George Orwell in his book 1984. In recent years, they have waged wars in the name of peace, put entire populations under their thumb in the name of freedom while government spin and a compliant media serve to keep people ignorant about their leaders’ true motives.
If we only knew we are being indoctrinated to offer up our personal freedoms to save ourselves from a horrible fate at the hands of nicotine, calories and Al Qaida. We are being taught to fear asylum seekers, climate change, crazed terrorists and even each other. Western governments are perfecting the politics of fear because fearful populaces will do their bidding without question and willingly subject themselves to control.
Britain has become a master of this technique. It currently holds a database containing the DNA of 4.5 million people, arrested for both serious crimes and minor infractions. The police have found this tool so useful they are pushing to expand it to cover everyone in the country although the Home Office has rejected the idea for the moment.
By 2012 Britons over 16 will be required to hold biometric ID cards checkable by police, immigration and customs officials, as well as public and private bodies such as travel agencies, airlines, banks and even retailers.
By 2010, Britain is also expected to incorporate Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips in passports designed to carry a wealth of personal data on travellers.
Embedded
Further, there is a plan to embed RFID chips in vehicle number plates allowing authorities the capability of identifying any vehicle anywhere in all weather. RFID chips have been embedded on every packet of cigarettes manufactured in the UK since October last year, while others have been fitted to trash cans officially to boost the rate of garbage recycling. Pets entering Britain from abroad are also chipped.
Apparently, the government is also considering injecting prisoners with RFID tags. If that goes ahead it’s surely the slippery slope to babies being chipped at birth.
The US has forced European airlines to hand over 19 pieces of information on travellers prior to their departure and wants to extend this one-way data flow to passengers over-flying the US en route to Central America and the Caribbean. The UK wants the system to be used throughout Europe and domestically.
Not only do authorities want to control Britons’ movements, they are also after their thoughts. Remember the Orwellian Thought Police, who used surveillance methods and psychological profiles to interpret the future goals of potential dissenters and deviants? This is already happening in the UK where people can expect to be caught on camera up to 300 times per day and where their phone calls and Internet browsing is routinely monitored.
Earlier this month, three British appellate judges had the good sense to quash the convictions of five young Muslims prosecuted for simply downloading "extremist propaganda" from the Internet. There was no other evidence against them and no proof they intended to act on any message contained in such material. In other words, their initial conviction was purely based on thought crime. The judgment read: "Literature may be stored in a book or on a bookshelf, or on a computer drive, without any intention on the part of the possessor to make any future use of it all."
Big Brother Britain isn’t working. Indeed, the prisons are overflowing and violent crime is on the up-and-up, much of it fuelled by drugs and alcohol. You’ve surely heard the expression "give a dog a bad name . . ." Could it be that when law-abiding citizens are prejudged as criminals some of them might conclude, "What the heck"?
But Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four isn’t exactly where Britain is headed. The reality is a combination of Orwell’s theories and those set-out in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
As the American author Neil Postman wrote in his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, whereas "Orwell feared the truth would be concealed from us, Huxley feared the truth would be droned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture" consumed by "an almost infinite appetite for distractions".
In a way they were both right. Unless we tear ourselves away from our pretty toys and distractions just long enough to remove our rose-coloured specs, freedom will be obsolete except as a slogan above the gate of the Ministry of Truth.
Sphere: Related Content
http://www.truthnews.us/?p=2030
You think you are free?
Linda S. Heard
Online Journal
February 28, 2008
Watching old movies makes me sad. I’m inevitably reminded of a kindlier, gentler world without cameras that spy on populations, where overseas travelling was pleasurable and privacy was an individual’s right.
Nowadays, states are usurping responsibilities that are rightfully those of their citizens. Western so-called democracies, in particular, are supposed to have governments that are servants of the people, whereas, in fact, the opposite is true. Under the guise of doing what’s best for us or ensuring our security, governments are exercising more and more control over our lives. And, tragically, we are facilitating this erosion of our own freedoms, mostly because we’re not even aware it’s happening.
The US and Britain are leading the pack in this encroaching Orwellian nightmare. "War is peace; Freedom is slavery; Ignorance is strength," wrote George Orwell in his book 1984. In recent years, they have waged wars in the name of peace, put entire populations under their thumb in the name of freedom while government spin and a compliant media serve to keep people ignorant about their leaders’ true motives.
If we only knew we are being indoctrinated to offer up our personal freedoms to save ourselves from a horrible fate at the hands of nicotine, calories and Al Qaida. We are being taught to fear asylum seekers, climate change, crazed terrorists and even each other. Western governments are perfecting the politics of fear because fearful populaces will do their bidding without question and willingly subject themselves to control.
Britain has become a master of this technique. It currently holds a database containing the DNA of 4.5 million people, arrested for both serious crimes and minor infractions. The police have found this tool so useful they are pushing to expand it to cover everyone in the country although the Home Office has rejected the idea for the moment.
By 2012 Britons over 16 will be required to hold biometric ID cards checkable by police, immigration and customs officials, as well as public and private bodies such as travel agencies, airlines, banks and even retailers.
By 2010, Britain is also expected to incorporate Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) chips in passports designed to carry a wealth of personal data on travellers.
Embedded
Further, there is a plan to embed RFID chips in vehicle number plates allowing authorities the capability of identifying any vehicle anywhere in all weather. RFID chips have been embedded on every packet of cigarettes manufactured in the UK since October last year, while others have been fitted to trash cans officially to boost the rate of garbage recycling. Pets entering Britain from abroad are also chipped.
Apparently, the government is also considering injecting prisoners with RFID tags. If that goes ahead it’s surely the slippery slope to babies being chipped at birth.
The US has forced European airlines to hand over 19 pieces of information on travellers prior to their departure and wants to extend this one-way data flow to passengers over-flying the US en route to Central America and the Caribbean. The UK wants the system to be used throughout Europe and domestically.
Not only do authorities want to control Britons’ movements, they are also after their thoughts. Remember the Orwellian Thought Police, who used surveillance methods and psychological profiles to interpret the future goals of potential dissenters and deviants? This is already happening in the UK where people can expect to be caught on camera up to 300 times per day and where their phone calls and Internet browsing is routinely monitored.
Earlier this month, three British appellate judges had the good sense to quash the convictions of five young Muslims prosecuted for simply downloading "extremist propaganda" from the Internet. There was no other evidence against them and no proof they intended to act on any message contained in such material. In other words, their initial conviction was purely based on thought crime. The judgment read: "Literature may be stored in a book or on a bookshelf, or on a computer drive, without any intention on the part of the possessor to make any future use of it all."
Big Brother Britain isn’t working. Indeed, the prisons are overflowing and violent crime is on the up-and-up, much of it fuelled by drugs and alcohol. You’ve surely heard the expression "give a dog a bad name . . ." Could it be that when law-abiding citizens are prejudged as criminals some of them might conclude, "What the heck"?
But Orwell’s Nineteen Eighty-four isn’t exactly where Britain is headed. The reality is a combination of Orwell’s theories and those set-out in Aldous Huxley’s Brave New World.
As the American author Neil Postman wrote in his book, Amusing Ourselves to Death, whereas "Orwell feared the truth would be concealed from us, Huxley feared the truth would be droned in a sea of irrelevance. Orwell feared we would become a captive culture. Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture" consumed by "an almost infinite appetite for distractions".
In a way they were both right. Unless we tear ourselves away from our pretty toys and distractions just long enough to remove our rose-coloured specs, freedom will be obsolete except as a slogan above the gate of the Ministry of Truth.
Sphere: Related Content
BBC Health Website Deletes Complementary Medicine
http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=46125
_______
Comments by Craig Oxley:
Another example of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta protecting their corporate merchant interests. 'The Greatest Merchants on Earth,' fear the uprising of real healing. They need to continue their suppression of so-called alternative health. So just as they've jailed, murdered and suppressed the great healers of old and some new ones of today, the same motion carrys forward. Remember when a country no longer produces anything and becomes a debt nation as the United States and Great Britain has become then they need another source. Please note back in the nineties that in the United States that the medical quackery of SMOM Papal Knights/Dame, David Rockefeller, Prince Philip and Queen "Guelph" Elizabeth II was around 16% of the Gross Domestic Product. Imagine what it is now. This is why they continually low the goal posts in tests and hoodwink the people upon useless and poisonous medications. The profit off these poisons is incredible and at the same time they dumb down the people whilst helping with population control via that and also death. In the United States these cretins kill 2000 a day, work that one out and now do you still fear British Secret Intelligence Service's phony al-CIA-dah? I think not! Ask yourself why the Royals utilise herbalism and only utilse the quackery medical clowns when it comes to some bone works like a fractured hip? Many still stick to herbalism for these things in reality, an example of the BFC formulation. The BBC is controlled by British Secret Service and is nothing more than a propaganda arm of the intelligentsia working on behalf of the Royal Family and the new unholy Roman Empire.
_______
Comments by Craig Oxley:
Another example of the Sovereign Military Order of Malta protecting their corporate merchant interests. 'The Greatest Merchants on Earth,' fear the uprising of real healing. They need to continue their suppression of so-called alternative health. So just as they've jailed, murdered and suppressed the great healers of old and some new ones of today, the same motion carrys forward. Remember when a country no longer produces anything and becomes a debt nation as the United States and Great Britain has become then they need another source. Please note back in the nineties that in the United States that the medical quackery of SMOM Papal Knights/Dame, David Rockefeller, Prince Philip and Queen "Guelph" Elizabeth II was around 16% of the Gross Domestic Product. Imagine what it is now. This is why they continually low the goal posts in tests and hoodwink the people upon useless and poisonous medications. The profit off these poisons is incredible and at the same time they dumb down the people whilst helping with population control via that and also death. In the United States these cretins kill 2000 a day, work that one out and now do you still fear British Secret Intelligence Service's phony al-CIA-dah? I think not! Ask yourself why the Royals utilise herbalism and only utilse the quackery medical clowns when it comes to some bone works like a fractured hip? Many still stick to herbalism for these things in reality, an example of the BFC formulation. The BBC is controlled by British Secret Service and is nothing more than a propaganda arm of the intelligentsia working on behalf of the Royal Family and the new unholy Roman Empire.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)