| QUOTE |
| > Dear Brother Eric, > I found this photo yesterday of Michael King and Theodore M. Hesburgh > from this webpage > http://www.gvsu.edu/hauenstein/index.cfm?i...D39E38D5BAFC6CB > Photo: http://www.gvsu.edu/images/hauenstein/Hesb...esburgh_mlk.jpg > > Here's a wider shot from Notre Dame's website (same photo showing King > hand-in-hand in "solidarity" with Hesburgh and another Romanist priest > very likely a Jesuit) > According to this article, SMOM Dwight D. Eisenhower appointed > Coadjutor Hesburgh to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. > http://newsinfo.nd.edu/content.cfm?topicid=24746 > http://newsinfo.nd.edu/assets/Hesburgh_mlk_rel,.jpg > > I sent you a 1964 picture of MLK in the Vatican with his master Paul > VI and his bodyguard Paul Marcinkus. This is the same photo only this > one is a more complete photo showing King's right-hand man Ralph > Abernathy was there as well. > http://www.catholiccincinnati.org/tct/CT%2...sary/week7.html > http://www.catholiccincinnati.org/tct/CT%2...ary/week7-1.jpg > > I recently learned Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh was one of the nine members > of Masonic Harry S. Truman's Advisory Committee on Universal > (Military) Training (UMT). > http://www.trumanlibrary.org/photographs/s...%2C+1947&page=1 > http://www.trumanlibrary.org/photographs/70-2456.jpg > http://www.trumanlibrary.org/photographs/59-1371.jpg > > This passage from this book "The Awesome Power" gives a concise > description of what this would entail. > http://books.google.com/books?id=nzRtzNNgl...R_0KM7IdeHeNtTM > See page 139 of "A Cross of Iron" which basically says Jesuit Walsh > was a commissioner of the Compton Commission calling for an expansion > of U.S. citizenship in preparation for the Cold War hoax to include > universal military training. He said "Every city and every town is now > involved in ANY global conflict." This means he wanted to send young > men to the slaughter and force them to be potential soldiers to fight > the Pope's foreign wars. > http://books.google.com/books?id=8VGZb3zh0...n8pbU#PPA139,M1 > > I find it very interesting that Roman Catholic CFR member and Skull > and Bonesman John Kerry and Roman Catholic Patrick Leahy, Ted Kennedy, > CFR Caroline Kennedy, and several other publicly support Barack Obama! > Obama has spoken at the Order's Boston College which has a history of > active implementation of the Jesuit-led Civil Rights Movement. In > fact, there is a photo on the BC website of A. Philip Randolph talking > to the president of the time. > > http://at.bc.edu/thewaywewere/ (I sent this link to you awhile back, > but I didn't mention there is a 1969 photo of Masonic Randolph with > then Boston College president W. Seavey Joyce SJ) > http://at.bc.edu/slideshows/thewaywewere/14.jpg > > Barack Obama was keynote speaker for Jesuit Boston College's > First-Year Student Convocation in 2005. > http://frontrow.bc.edu/program/obama/ > Quote from the webpage: > "University President William P. Leahy, SJ, welcomes the Class of > 2009 and introduces the senator, whom he holds up as a model of "a > contemplative in action," whose career illustrates the oft-cited ideal > at Boston College of "men and women for others." > > Photo: http://www.greatdreams.com/2008/Barakobama.jpg > > 2005 Boston College Chronicle article > http://www.bc.edu/bc_org/rvp/pubaf/chronic...my27/obama.html > > Brother Nick |
Dear Brother Nick,
Another masterpiece!
Brother Eric
____________________
Note by Me: I dont' agree with Eric Jon Phelps on race (I believe all humans are equal in worth. We may not be identical in every respect, but I do believe in equality of all humans in worth, value, and respect), but he is right to say that every state has a right to secede. America seceded from the British Empire. That's how the United States of America was created. As for Reconstruction, much of it was good like giving African Americans real freedoms. The Black Codes during and after Reconstruction was really wicked denying gun rights of black people and oppressing African Americans. God is no respector of persons, so we shouldn't devalue a man based on their skin color or ethnic group.
By Timothy
_______________________________
Eric: It is correct that the Vatican wants to destroy us Bible believing Christians.
Correct.
After reading the section on the Civil War, is it correct 1.they baited the North into fighting for the preservation of the Union and to free the slaves?
Correct. In fact the war was first a war to prevent the dissolution of the Union, forgetting this was a Union by consenting sovereign states that reserved the right to secede if necessary. After the wicked Emancipation Proclamation, the war was converted into a Crusade to free the slaves and thus to destroy White Protestant Southern culture. General Stonewall Jackson called it a Yankee war of annihilation.
2.Key Generals on both sides were controlled and were ordered to bleed both sides as long as possible?
Correct. Grant, Meade and Sherman were three northern Generals given to this policy. On the confederate side were Lee and Longstreet along with a few others. The plan was to kill as many Northern Protestants in the Federal Army while killing as many White Southerners, military and civilian, as possible. It was for this reason that a Jesuit ordered Meade not to pursue Lee after Gettysburg. Lee escaped having lost half of his betrayed army and thus the war continued for another two years that involved the destruction of the Southern culture in addition to the wicked Reconstruction that lasted until 1876.
3.The outcome was the 14th ammendment-which the south fought and finally gave in-with a gun held to their head?
Correct. It was this plot of Centralization and Empire that the South fought to prevent from becoming a member. Alexander Stephens makes this clear in his masterpiece A Constitutional View of the War Between the States reprinted by Sprinkle Publications in Harrisonburg, VA. The South did not fight to keep their slaves as Virginia had already embarked on a gradual emancipation of the Blacks and repatriation back to Africa for which reason Monrovia was built by American Presbyterian Protestants during the presidency of James Monroe.
4.All of us born since are now citizens of the Federal Govt. first and then secondly to the State?
Correct. I document this in VAIII.
4. What ticked off the South prior to 1861?
It was first the tariff 82% of which was paid by the South. Those monies were then spent by Congress in the North building the South's future Roman Catholic invaders. The other agitation was the anti-slavery agitation on the part of the North which in turn birthed the radical secessionists in the South, Freemason John C. Calhoun being one of them.
The Southern states had the right to secede as did any Northern state. By denying that right, Washington became a tyranny under Jesuit control.
Thanks, Tim Cook
Brother Eric
Correct.
After reading the section on the Civil War, is it correct 1.they baited the North into fighting for the preservation of the Union and to free the slaves?
Correct. In fact the war was first a war to prevent the dissolution of the Union, forgetting this was a Union by consenting sovereign states that reserved the right to secede if necessary. After the wicked Emancipation Proclamation, the war was converted into a Crusade to free the slaves and thus to destroy White Protestant Southern culture. General Stonewall Jackson called it a Yankee war of annihilation.
2.Key Generals on both sides were controlled and were ordered to bleed both sides as long as possible?
Correct. Grant, Meade and Sherman were three northern Generals given to this policy. On the confederate side were Lee and Longstreet along with a few others. The plan was to kill as many Northern Protestants in the Federal Army while killing as many White Southerners, military and civilian, as possible. It was for this reason that a Jesuit ordered Meade not to pursue Lee after Gettysburg. Lee escaped having lost half of his betrayed army and thus the war continued for another two years that involved the destruction of the Southern culture in addition to the wicked Reconstruction that lasted until 1876.
3.The outcome was the 14th ammendment-which the south fought and finally gave in-with a gun held to their head?
Correct. It was this plot of Centralization and Empire that the South fought to prevent from becoming a member. Alexander Stephens makes this clear in his masterpiece A Constitutional View of the War Between the States reprinted by Sprinkle Publications in Harrisonburg, VA. The South did not fight to keep their slaves as Virginia had already embarked on a gradual emancipation of the Blacks and repatriation back to Africa for which reason Monrovia was built by American Presbyterian Protestants during the presidency of James Monroe.
4.All of us born since are now citizens of the Federal Govt. first and then secondly to the State?
Correct. I document this in VAIII.
4. What ticked off the South prior to 1861?
It was first the tariff 82% of which was paid by the South. Those monies were then spent by Congress in the North building the South's future Roman Catholic invaders. The other agitation was the anti-slavery agitation on the part of the North which in turn birthed the radical secessionists in the South, Freemason John C. Calhoun being one of them.
The Southern states had the right to secede as did any Northern state. By denying that right, Washington became a tyranny under Jesuit control.
Thanks, Tim Cook
Brother Eric
_______________________
Pope Benedict XVI to visit US in April
02/15/2008 11:21 Source: Pravda.Ru
http://english.pravda.ru/news/world/15-02-2008/104077-Pope-0
By Anastasia Tomazhenkova: Pope Benedict XVI plans to visit the White House during his first visit to the United States as pontiff. The approximate date of his visit - April 16.
Scott Stanzel, White House spokesman, reported the president and the pope would continue discussions they began during Bush's trip to the Vatican in June 2007 on the importance of faith and reason in reaching shared goals.
Stanzel claimed the goals include advancing peace throughout the Middle East and other troubled regions, promoting interfaith understanding and strengthening human rights and freedom.
The pope also was expected to address the United Nations. While in New York City, he is to visit the site where the twin towers of the former World Trade Center stood before they were brought down by terrorists on September 11, 2001.
Benedict also will celebrate Mass in New York and Washington during his visit.
02/15/2008 11:21 Source: Pravda.Ru
http://english.pravda.ru/news/world/15-02-2008/104077-Pope-0
By Anastasia Tomazhenkova: Pope Benedict XVI plans to visit the White House during his first visit to the United States as pontiff. The approximate date of his visit - April 16.
Scott Stanzel, White House spokesman, reported the president and the pope would continue discussions they began during Bush's trip to the Vatican in June 2007 on the importance of faith and reason in reaching shared goals.
Stanzel claimed the goals include advancing peace throughout the Middle East and other troubled regions, promoting interfaith understanding and strengthening human rights and freedom.
The pope also was expected to address the United Nations. While in New York City, he is to visit the site where the twin towers of the former World Trade Center stood before they were brought down by terrorists on September 11, 2001.
Benedict also will celebrate Mass in New York and Washington during his visit.
_____________
The North American Union Mexico Style
02-15-2008
Canada Free Press
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=6683
American and Canadian patriots scouring the Internet for the latest on the North American Union (NAU) may be missing a huge resource.
Politicians and the mainstream media still brand as conspiracy theorists those who suspect a European Union style NAU is destined for Canada, the United States and Mexico.
A Canada Free Press (CFP) reader reminds us “Mexico has its own Security and Prosperity (SPP) websites. Mexico’s SPP websites are called (ASPAN) (Spanish).”
“Just because we’ve been defending (and attacking) on so many other fronts doesn’t mean we’ve forgotten the North American Union a.k.a. the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP),” the reader wrote CFP. “The NAU’s “unelected presidente Jorge Boosh is plowing full steam ahead. One sign of his intention—announced in January’s State of the Union message—is to renew pressure for Amnesty for the 20 million or more illegal aliens now in the United States. Another sign is his choice to head the GOP in the 2008 election: Sen. John “Songbird” McCain, co-sponsor with Teddy Kennedy of the 2007 illegal alien Amnesty Bill.
The links below show the reality of the NAU in Mexican planning, where it’s regarded as permanent policy to bind three countries into a union that dissolves US sovereignty.
The Mexican equivalent of SPP presents a version much clearer on intent. Here is what they say in one question: “Que es la APAN?
. Es un proceso trilateral, permanente, para una mayor integracion de America del Norte, que sera evaluado por los Mandatorios de manera semestral.
Translation:
“What is ASPAN?
“It is a tri-lateral process, permanent, for a major integration of North America, which will be evaluated by the representatives periodically.”
Please note there is a very clear agenda that makes use of the world “PERMANENT”.
This is not a NAFTA or CAFTA which can be reversed if the government so directs. In Mexico, this is a permanent union.
02-15-2008
Canada Free Press
http://www.roguegovernment.com/news.php?id=6683
American and Canadian patriots scouring the Internet for the latest on the North American Union (NAU) may be missing a huge resource.
Politicians and the mainstream media still brand as conspiracy theorists those who suspect a European Union style NAU is destined for Canada, the United States and Mexico.
A Canada Free Press (CFP) reader reminds us “Mexico has its own Security and Prosperity (SPP) websites. Mexico’s SPP websites are called (ASPAN) (Spanish).”
“Just because we’ve been defending (and attacking) on so many other fronts doesn’t mean we’ve forgotten the North American Union a.k.a. the Security and Prosperity Partnership (SPP),” the reader wrote CFP. “The NAU’s “unelected presidente Jorge Boosh is plowing full steam ahead. One sign of his intention—announced in January’s State of the Union message—is to renew pressure for Amnesty for the 20 million or more illegal aliens now in the United States. Another sign is his choice to head the GOP in the 2008 election: Sen. John “Songbird” McCain, co-sponsor with Teddy Kennedy of the 2007 illegal alien Amnesty Bill.
The links below show the reality of the NAU in Mexican planning, where it’s regarded as permanent policy to bind three countries into a union that dissolves US sovereignty.
The Mexican equivalent of SPP presents a version much clearer on intent. Here is what they say in one question: “Que es la APAN?
. Es un proceso trilateral, permanente, para una mayor integracion de America del Norte, que sera evaluado por los Mandatorios de manera semestral.
Translation:
“What is ASPAN?
“It is a tri-lateral process, permanent, for a major integration of North America, which will be evaluated by the representatives periodically.”
Please note there is a very clear agenda that makes use of the world “PERMANENT”.
This is not a NAFTA or CAFTA which can be reversed if the government so directs. In Mexico, this is a permanent union.
______________
No comments:
Post a Comment