| QUOTE |
| I believe all the Reserve Banks including New Zealand has a person who is loyal to the pope and some Jesuits in there to report to Adolfo Nicolas |
They don't need to. All that is necessary is to have these national central banks be completely integrated into the Swiss Bank for International Settlements system - which they are - & to have the Prime Minister defer to the Queen of England who is also the head of all Commonwealth countries armed forces.
For more on the BIS see "Global Banking: the Bank for International Settlements":
PART 1:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick4.htm
PART 2:
http://www.newswithviews.com/Wood/patrick5.htm
For a photo on the top guy at the BIS (plus his two assisants) & some basic biographical info see:
http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/10/15...ments-chairman/
The Queen will be replaced by the occult high pseudo-materialist Communist/Fascist Chinese who defer to the masters of the Babylonian Mystery Religion Continued in Rome - who's black arts are second to none - when the Asian-Pacific Union has one currency & military, in the lead up to the Global Government with a Global single currency, Global military & ultimately Global religion.
Apostate Protestant New Zealand & Australia will be destroyed either physically or mentally & spiritually by the Chinese under Jesuit orders, as were the Japanese at the end of the Second World War. The colour footage of Japanese being humiliated by (ultimately Jesuit-directed) US Forces in 1945 made me weep with bitter sorrow (which is rare for me, despite feeling aggrieved at the apalling things done by the Powers That Be to pursue their "Great Work") when I saw it a few years ago. Completely & utterly mentally & spiritually raped & a warning to all of what Man can do to Man (men, women & children all included of course).
Also consider the treachery of the Anglican Church, with its Archbishop of Canterbury being a Papal-loyal Knight of the Duke of Castro's Royal Order of Francis I (the Duke of Castro also controlling the French/Italian Constantinian Order). Combined with the fact that the Sovereign Grand Commander of the Supreme Council 33° Ancient & Accepted Rite of Freemasonry in England & Wales (which is known as the Scottish Rite in most other countries) is none other than an Anglican Reverend Canon from the Church of England! That Romanist bastion of false Protestantism!
What's his name?
Rev. Canon Richard Tydeman
Confirm it for yourself at:
http://www.srmason-sj.org/council/journal/oct00/cioct.html
No wonder they don't have a website unlike many other major Supreme Councils. This is a strict hierarchy in England. Most Rose-Croix (the other name for the Ancient & Accepted Rite in England) Freemasons never get past the 18° (the Rose-Croix degree). Unlike in the US. Note too that this still afillated with the United Grand Lodge of England (UGLE) of the Prince Edward, Duke of Kent.
Also note the presence of the Scottish Rite Sovereign Grand Commander for New Zealand's Supreme Council 33° at that special meeting for English-speaking nations' AASR SGC's & (friends).
The following page reveals that NZ's Scottish Rite's SGC is John E. Harwood. Perhaps someone local could do a background check on this guy? & perhaps find out those of the rest of the NZ Supreme Council 33° & what their connections are to politics, hierarchical religion, the military & intelligence if possible? It should be easier to find that out in a place with such a small population compared to most other nations.
http://www.sc33.org.br/members-sc33-05.html
My point here is that if the Archbishop of Canterbury defers to Rome, then anyone beneath him (in New Zealand, Australia & Canada for example) does by default. & if anyone goes: "Oh he's old & will be replaced & the next guy might not be in the same mould", consider that the previous Archbishop of Canterbury is also a member of the Papal-loyal Royal Order of Francis I!
The Scottish Rite was devised by the Jesuits & though there are reports of swings between intimacy & animosity with Rome (no doubt due to Rome's varying ability to maintain infiltrational influence within the Rite over the years via their Jesuit Coadjutors - often via Anglican & [false] "Protestant" Masonic Ministers - see Pat Robertson & Billy Graham for starters), my gut feeling is that they are hand-in-glove with Rome's agenda at the present moment. I've seen & heard nothing substantial to suggest otherwise & seen plenty that has led to my assessment of the climate of the current state of the Vatican/Masonic relationship.
Once again, Rome does not need to have Jesuits somewhere like New Zealand - which has a relatively small Roman Catholic population & no Jesuit Provincial's base, unlike Australia - if it has the right place people co-ordinating the Scottish Rite in the Northern hemisphere & if the military & Prime Minister (who I contend must either be Masonic - Order of the Eastern Star if female - & thus a witting agent or mind-controlled or easily blackmailed & thus a manipulable pawn - although I don't entirely agree with Greg Hallett, whose theory that everyone from Stalin to Mao was a love child of some Rothschild or other & had a hard time answering some very basic questions challenging him during his Red Ice interview.
Going back to how the Commonwealth nations are controlled, as I posted at:
http://troyspace2.wordpress.com/2008/10/07...nada-australia/
| QUOTE |
| Please go to the following URL to view this absolutely essential three minute clip: http://uk.youtube.com/watch?v=L8YwJC_nBgw Who’s in charge? “Stephen Harper copies Australian Prime Minister John Howard In 2003, Stephen Harper and Australian Prime Minister John Howard deliver largely identical speeches urging their nations to join George W. Bush’s Coalition of the Willing to go to war with Iraq. Some people are under the impression that Canada and Australia are sovereign countries. This video shows the heads of both these states reading the same exact statement - word for word - supporting the invasion of Iraq. Who wrote this thing? Who distributed it? Who compelled these obvious puppets to read it?” Dear friends These are some blurbs that I have pasted from two sites. Only the completely Profane would not know how this came to pass. The idea that George W. Bush ultimately controls anything outside of his ranch is a nonsense. Who’s in charge & how is their power defined: “Elizabeth the Second, by the Grace of God, of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland and of Her other Realms and Territories Queen, Head of the Commonwealth, Defender of the Faith.” These are her military positions: In her position as sovereign of multiple states, Elizabeth automatically holds the position of Commander-in-Chief in some of her realms, such as Canada, New Zealand, and the United Kingdom. In the latter, she also serves as Commandant-in-Chief of the Royal Air Force and Lord High Admiral of the Royal Navy. Since before she ascended to the throne, however, Elizabeth has also been installed as Colonel-in-Chief, Captain-General, Air-Commodore-in-Chief, Commissioner, Brigadier, Commandant-in-Chief, and Royal Colonel of at least 96 regiments throughout the Commonwealth. Who does she manifest her power through throughout the Commonwealth?: Through the Governor-Generals, the vice-regal representatives of the Monarch in the “independent” Commonwealth realms. In former British colonies which are now independent Commonwealth realms, the Governor-General is constitutionally the representative of the monarch in his or her state, and may exercise the reserve powers of the monarch according to their own constitutional authority. The Governor-General, however, is still appointed by the monarch, and takes an oath of allegiance to the monarch of their own country. Executive authority is also vested in the monarch, though it can be placed with the Governor-General on behalf of the sovereign of the independent realm. What are some known examples of this power being manifested? In 1926, when Canadian-Governor General Lord Byng refused Prime Minister Mackenzie King’s request for a dissolution of parliament; and in 1975, when the Governor-General of Australia, Sir John Kerr, dismissed the Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam. Who wrote the document? That’s irrelevant, although where it was decided I shall leave up to your own discernment. |
Of course we need to remember that the Queen is the Head of the Order of St John & wears a Regal version of the patented robes of the Order of Malta & that she has been photographed in deferential countenance in the presence of more than one Pope over the decades & that the history of Britain's monarchy & aristocracy is very much entwined with Jesuit intrigue. Does anyone seriously think that she doesn't curtsy to the Papal Caesar, if not kiss his ring (which she probably does). She is covertly (if not officially) the Princess of the Holy Roman Empire, while the Pope is not only a Prince, but Supreme Primate of the Holy Roman Empire.
Who the frontman Emperor will be, come the throwing off of the European Union's secular sheep's clothing is open to speculation, although the Hapsburg's may make a reappearance, as speculated by a certain infamous trio of authors whose most famous work also contained large amounts of diversionary material that had been fed to them, possibly to discredit their overall thesis, while still allowing for the Jesuit/Masonic elite to study the public reaction in the early stages of a prepared multi-stage, multi-pronged, controlled, partially-true, partially false esoteric disclosure project, preparing the way for their desired control of the Aquarian Age.
Jacob Rothschild (4th Baron Rothschild) is a Knight of the Queen's Order of the British Empire & Order of Merit & his father Victor Rothschild (3rd Baron Rothschild) was a Knight of the Queen's Order of St John (this can be found on one most excellent aristocratic who's who website though curiously is absent from Wikipedia, so here is a sign of possible info suppression & makes me wonder if his son might too be a Knight of St John as well, I'll have to find that site again) & the Order of the British Empire. The Queen defers to the Pope & so it is neither here nor there if the Rothschilds are directly Knights of Malta. Ultimately they are still submissive to the Queen & she to the Pope & he to the Jesuit Superior General.
One must always bow before one arises (Sir Knight)!
No comments:
Post a Comment