On the advent of November 4th

DAPRA is continuing its big surveillance policies full speed ahead. Wired Magazine reported on the Pentagon wanting to peer inside your apartment building. This is achieved in order to pick out where all the major rooms, stairways, and dens of "where evil-doers" are. The U.S. military is trying to spot enemies in the streets as apart of the goal of DARPA. They want to go into homes, since they are more difficult to monitor. DARPA, which is apart of the Defense Department, is using tools for "external sensing deep inside buildings." This goal ultimately is apart of the Harnessing Infrastructure for Building Reconnaissance (HIBR) project. This project deals with what DAPRA calls: "reverse the adversaries' advantage of urban familiarity and sanctuary and provide U.S. Forces with complete above- and below-ground awareness." In other words, they want to monitor urban areas in a great way. By the end of the project, DARPA desires a set of technologies that can see into a 10 story building with a two level basement in a high density urban block. Subsequently, this monitoring will produce a digital blueprint of the place. Sensors are mounted on packpacks, vehicles, or aircraft to make the HIBR gear to pick out every room, wall, stairway, and basement in the building. It can also monitor electrical, plumbing, and installation systems. DARPA doesn't blatantly mention all of these goals at all. Why would HIBR devices be placed in places in order to track people as well. The Army already have a couple of hand held gadgets that can spot people just on the other side of a wall. Some scientists claim that can even catch human breathing and heartbeats beyond a barrier. A radar can scan structures. It's called DARPA's Visibuilding program. People are still trying to make sense of the data produced form all the reflected signals. Field trials of DARPA new device looking in walls are supposed to get underway this fall. Science fiction stories are readily being realized today. Unheard of technology even 10 years ago is reality today.










Presecution of Christians in India is occuring in high levels now. This new level of violence started in August. Not much have changed in order to stop it. Ramesh Landge outlined this persecution problem as religious genocide. Landge works with Partners International, which is a global ministry that creates growing Christian communities. These communities work in partnership with God's people in the least Christian regions of the world. Ramesh says that the UN definition of genocide is clearly being exhibited in India. This genocide is persistent and is systematically being planned. It hasn't stopped. Orissa is one Indian city where numerous Christians are being displaced via the attacks from Hindu extremists. Landge said that Hindus are intimidating people along with doing persecution. Hindus are trying to force Christians out of cities and are trying to reconvert them if they go back into their homes. Although, Ramesh said that Christians in India are standing strong. They have been living in refugee camps and haven't renounced their fatih at all. Ramesh said that the Hindu persecution is so potent, because the government is a silent spectator of it. Landge said that Partner International wants to help the suffering Christians, especially in the approaching winter. Some Christians even in India are sharing their faith even in spite of their tribulation. The reality is that the violation of religious liberty in India effects all of us since all human beings have a right to believe in whatever religion they want to. Ramesh said that we must pray for the suffering Christians over there and we should.





The SPP is real. The SPP agenda really promotes North American integration. You Tube from October 31, 2008 reported on TorontoChange.com (which is a local chapter of the We Are Change.org activists) confronting former Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin. Martin was at the Indigo Bookstore on October 28th, 2006 along with Bilderberger Heather Reisman. Ironically, Reisman is the founder and CEO of Indigo Books & Music Inc. Paul Martin was one of the three men who signed the March 2005 SPP (or Security Prosperity Partnership). This agreement of course promoted the integration and inter-dependence of Canada, the United States, and Mexico. Former MP Martin denies knowledge of fellow Security and Prosperity Partnership signatory Vicente Fox in calling for a regional union and his hopes for a unified currency. Later, a person from Toronto We Are Change was quickly escorted out as he proclaimed that Martin had signed Canada's death warrant calling Martin's support of the SPP treason. Vicente Fox on tape in the Larry King Live show and other places like Comedy Central advocated a long term goal of a North American currency. Vicente Fox also called for an one North American nation or union that is similar to the European Union. Fox says this in demonizing any criticism against illegal immigration as racist or xenophobic. That's false since I oppose illegal immigration and reject racism. I just want more legal immigration and compassion toward immigrants already living here in America. According to We Are Change Toronto, Paul Martin have had talks with the McCain and Obama camps to promote a new league of nations or Global Goverance (a slick way of saying global government). Martin wants to give these globalist goals a chance. Martin is a globalist through and through. Other leaders promote this North American Union agenda as well. Daneen G. Peterson, Ph.D. is one of the best scholars with sources and tons of evidence exposing the North American Union. So, we can't be ignorant of these devices.










The Ecumencial Movement is a real threat for religious liberty. It's antithetical to Biblical Christianity since its goal is to promote compromise and accept unbiblical union with even false religions. One of the biggest supports of this movement is of course Ecumencial Billy Graham (who is a suspected Freemason. He definitely is united with many Freemasons from Robert Schuller to Jesse Jackson). Ecumencialism existed for centuries (like through the organization of the Parliament of World Religions in the early 20th century). Yet, the modern face of it of course transpired at the advent of Vatican II. That is why Billy Graham accepts Roman Catholic dogma and even states that pagans can go into Heaven if they reject the existence of God completely. Christians should fulfill the aims of the Great Commission. Now, Vatican II existed in the 1960's to supossedly eliminate the harsh rhetoric of the Vatican calling non-Catholic Christians heretics or damned to Hell. Instead, the Vatican II Council called Protestants, Baptists, etc. as only seperated bethren. On the other hand, the Vatican II council never revoked the intolerant words of the Council of Trent (or even the Syllabus of Errors, which bashes modern civilization in general). These ecumencials encompass pagans, Muslims, Jewish believers, and a whole list of religious followers. It centralizes the power base of religions into the arms of the Vatican. One of the biggest agents carrying this agenda out is the Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, the CNP, the mainstream media, etc. The deal is that the Ecumencial Movement is promoted by the establishment (from Bonesman Henry Luce, Knight of Malta J. Peter Grace, and William Randolph Hearst in the past to CFR member Rick Warren, Oprah Winfrey, and the mainstream media in the present at late 2008). Dr. Cathy Burns wrote a book with hundreds of pages listing Billy Graham's apostacy and explosure of the Ecumencial Movement as well. Ultimately the ecumencial movement is apart of the one world religious agenda promoted by the United Nations, the Vatican, and other interests. We must not forsake our belief in God for the sake of sucking up to the Ecumencial Movement at all.










Certain groups still want to prevent pro-life citizens from expressing their First Amendment rights. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews.com on November 2, 2008 wrote about this issue. A leading pro-life attorney said that Protestants and Catholics who are pastors shouldn't worry about those who desire pro-life literature from being distributed around churches. Matt Staver form the Liberty Counsel made known of these words that dissemination of pro-life information is perfectly legal. Steve is also the dean of the law school at Liberty University in Lynchburg, Virginia. I'm from Virginia and Lynchburg is at the far west, mountainous part of the state. Catholics United is a front group from Barack Obama. They misled voters in saying that Barack Obama is pro-life on abortion when he isn't. Also, they urged its supporters to confront pro-life advocates this weekend, which is a propaganda tactic. Some folks like Frank Pavone threaten legal action against CU if they are restricted from showing their First Amendment rights to educate voters on pro-life issues. Barry Lynn, the head of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, has also scared pastors, priests and other church leaders with a letter saying they could face the loss of their nonprofit status for allowing the information. Barry Lynn is igorant of the fact that simple religious expression about pro-life issues is hardly a violation of the establishment clause of the Constitution. Lynn is trying to scare pastors on politics and Staver said he's trying to make them silent until after the election. "The truth is that pastors and church leaders do not need to violate IRS regulations on political activity in order to impact the 2008 election. There are a wide variety of permissible activities to activate voters and encourage them to vote their values," Staver said. Even the IRS rules violate churches' free speech rights since all churches have a right to endorse whatever candidate they wish. Churches may distribute nonpartisan voter guides, register voters, and hold candidate forums. Any individual church members or members of the public can place pro-life information on the windshield's of cars in the church parking lots. Staver says that, since 1954, only one church has ever lost its IRS letter ruling -- and even that church didn't lose its tax-exempt status. The church in question went as far as sponsoring ads opposing the election of a candidate. "It was sermons of pastors that fueled the American Revolution. America needs her pastors to once again speak up and address the religious and moral issues of the day," Staver concludes. Reality dictates that Barack Obama isn't pro-life. He wants the Hyde Amendment banned, the common sense Mexico City policy banned, the partial birth abortion ban eliminated (when partial birth abortion was condemned as not necessary to save the life of the mother by many unbiased doctors). Partial birth abortion is when the baby's head is delivered outside of the mother's womb, but not the rest of baby's body. A Doctor uses a scissors then to cut a hole in the baby's skulls. Then, the baby's brains is sucked out using a suction device. Sometimes the doctors can suck out the women's body parts in the process of this barbaric procedure. Later, the baby's dead body is retrieved and thrown in the trash (sometimes their body parts are sold in the black market. It's sick). Sometimes, a baby have survived such procedures. Obama wants the FOCA passed (which even NARAL has stated that the Freedom of Choice Act will nullify virtually all pro-life laws since Roe). The truth is here, abortion is still murder, and we shouldn't be intimidated by decievers at all.












The FDA has been legitimately criticized as of late. InjuryBoard from November 1, 2008 outlined this information. There is the BPA controversy. The BPA is a common product used in plastics, including hard plastic water bottles, baby bottles, and the lining of soda cans. It has been used for years. Now, they are under fire for their potential health problems, including the early onset of puberty and cancer. In August, the FDA claimed that BPA didn't pose an immediate health risk. The FDA's findings contradicted more than 100 studies. The FDA studies are even being criticized within the agency. Yesterday, the FDA’s Science Committee voted unanimously to accept a report criticizing any findings that BPA is safe and called upon the FDA to consider more studies. The report criticized the FDA for relying too heavily on BPA studies funded by manufacturers. Martin Philbert of the FDA's subcommittee said that the FDA didn't adequately study BPA. Even the Canadian government already banned BPA in baby bottles. Other U.S. states are considering similar measures. Walmart have pulled products containing BPA off their shelves. The FDA is starting to have additional tests to figure out the problems of BPA. Frankily, the FDA is apart of the establishment obsessively promoting allopatic foods. While, the FDA heavily regulates naturally foods that can harbor real treatments and cures for illnesses. The Rockefellers are keen in the modern medicial movement as well. Jesuit-trained people (ironically Jesuit Edward Jenner and Jesuit Francis Xavier popularized the activity of vaccinations upon people) and the Knights of Malta to this day are key elites in American medical services as well. For example, Dr. Andrew von Eschenbach was trained from St. Joseph's University. He was the Director of the National Cancer Institute at the National Institutes of Health. Today, von Eschenbach is the head of the FDA. The Jesuits have promoted disaster of Protestants and Baptists for centuries. That is why John Adams wrote to Thomas Jefferson in a letter to express his firm opposition to the doctrines and agenda of the Jesuit Order (which was founded by Ignatius Loyola).







The War on Terror is a wicked expression of murder, torture, and imperialism. There is no justification for it since this immoral war has attacked nations that has nothing to do with 9/11 like Iraq and Afghanistan. War crimes are occuring in Afghanistan also not just in Iraq. With the Bush administration almost ending, the global war on terrorism is only expanding into a wide variety of nations. This war on terrorism isn't about real freedom for the developing nations of the world. It's about Western nations trying to force nations to be apart of the globalized new world order. The U.S. had now conducted unwarranted attacks in Syria and Pakistan. Many people have been killed in these incidents. In Syria, the assault was on a farm. Of course the government claims that Al-Qaeda was using that region as a strategic region to launch attacks into Iraq. Yet, Al-Qaeda is known to be a Western intelligence asset when they were used by the US/NATO network during the late 1990's war in Serbia. The neo conservative agenda has been discredited. Bush has been criticized amd rightfully so. Maybe, the elites are using Bush as the only one to blame as the excuse to bash National Sovereignity and Conservative Christianity. That's one of the reasons (in my opinion) why the war on terror existed in the first place. The reason is that there is no way you're going to have global government or a new world order unless you create a crisis that causes a backlash against National Sovereignity (and real Christianity. The real Jesus Christ is loving, yet intolerant against sin. He is strong and fair toward all human beings) in order to form a new world order. That's why anti-Christ programs and the New Age Movement is promoted so heavily. Yet, things are of course promoted by the mainstream media (who was caught being utilized by the CIA and the Pentagon as a front to carry out their brainwashing agenda). There has been the false prosperity gospel that have been funded by TBN, Freemasons, SMOMs, big banks, etc. in order to control much of society (while, Christianity in general is unfairly demonized when some of these false preachers suffer trouble). Another agenda of this war on terror is murder and population control. The Rockefeller Foundation, NSSM 200 or the National Security Study Memorandum 200 (supported by Henry Kissinger), and other documents call for the extremination of much of the Third World (via eugenics, wars, and population control). Population control stagnates world growth while allowing the elite to control the world more easily (since less people are likely to resist them). The deal is that if the war on terror never existed and we use real trade, help, discussion, and other constructive solutions much of these present problems we witness wouldn't of existed. This war on terror is a drain on our resources and our economy as well. Also, population control is evil.











Voting fraud have occured for years. Vanessa Blum from the South Florida Sun-Sentinel on November 1, 2008 described that the campaigns (in the McCain and Obama campaigns) are deploying armies of lawyers in Florida to watch for voting problems. They want to handle any disputes at the polls and run to court if necessary. This election is the most heated election in a long time and the most important election since 1860. This is after the election problems of 2000 and the Ohio voting fraud deal that happened in 2004. People went into jail for the Ohio debacle provinh that fraud was for real. Jonathan Turley, an election law expert at George Washington University, predicted a “flurry of lawsuits” in swing states like Florida and Ohio if the margin of victory next Tuesday is slim. One reason so many lawyers have been deployed, he said, is to assemble any evidence of irregularities in voting or tallying that could be used in court. There could be about 5,000 lawyers and law students in Florida to monitor voting places to make sure voter suppression doesn't occur (especially in minority, Democratic, or elderly areas). They want Republican and Democratic voters to have the right to vote. We should all have the right to vote without our votes being suppressed indeed. Electronic voting systems have been known to not be fullproof. That is why reforms are promoted or paper ballot are seeked by many voters. I think that lawyers should help anyone whose rights are being violated. There should be freedom in America.






The economic problems are so bad in the world that some elites want a global currency. Other international bankers want a Bretton Woods II when it was some of their policies that caused the economic problems in the first place. Bretton Woods was an economic conference that occured just before WWII ended in 1944. It occured in Bretton Woods, New Hampshire. This group had their key meeting there to formulate the blueprint to invent the International Monetary Fund, the International Trade Organization, and the World Bank. Of course, critics opposed "Bretton Woods II" as doing little to assist working class Americans. Numerous Americans have seen their life savings vanish as a result of the collapse of financial markets. Most people including Americans comprehend why this crisis occured. It occcured because of the bad economic policies of overspending, risky loans, the unsound monetary policy of hyperinflation, the overprinting of low-valued dollar currency, constant interest rate cuts, little oversight, bad trade deals, and exploitation of our resources to fund illegal wars of aggression. Blame should be made upon both parties and the Federal Reserve of course. Another cause of the crisis is the dangerous financial derivatives that are estimated in costing $1 quadrillion (which has been traded repeatedly without any protection or oversight from federal regulators). Now, we see some pensions fail and businesses end. The bad news is that Bush wants internationalists to violate our soveriegnity and allow them to handle our economy with the promotion of a global meeting among global banking authorities (for November 15). One simple historical truth is that regardless of what you think of the Founding Fathers, they were right enough to decipher that banking elites shouldn't control our money supply at all. Thomas Jefferson, Andrew Jackson and Wright Patman abhored private banks controlling our country. The Constitution says that Congress and the Treasury should control our fiscal policy in America. Unfortuantely, the Federal Reserve Act in 1913 make private, international banks to control US money supply (and use creditalism as a policy or make booms plus busts of money by a stroke of a pen). This bailout is a pure representation of forcing taxpayers to pay their hard earn money to criminal bankers (when this law blacked out certain parts, it has millions of dollars of pork in it, it's worth at least $700 billion, judicial review is limited, bonuses are in it, and some are saying that banks aren't loaning anything to anyone now). The bailout law was a banker takeover of our economy, not a real assistance to folks suffering from home foreclosures, etc. The law was a sham by rejecting alternatives for real economic growth. Alternatives are cutting the money spent on the war on terror to save and invest in our nation, trying to balance our budget, build up our economy from the ground up in investing in our infrastructure, have fair trade deals, lower capital gains taxes, reform our Tax Code system, educating Americans on fiscal responsibility, punishing any banks convicted of corruption, and have a sound money policy where currency is based on real assets.









The Election of 2008 is almost over. Most of the mainstream media from CNN to MSNBC support Barack Obama's candidacy completely. There are also questions about John McCain in terms of his radical foreign policy position. One of the weaknesses of Barack Obama is his radical abortion position (even he called for a national civilian force and strikes in Pakistan if he finds "al-Qaeda" there). His position is so radical that he opposes the Illinois state born alive ban, wants to eliminate the Mexico City policy, and other common sense pro-life rules. Abortion has murdered many African Americans in a wicked way and ironically Barack Obama is an African American. Abortion has regularly been acted upon minorities for years. Now, the CFR dominated mainstream media are covering up the similarities among the puppets Barack Obama and John McCain. Zbigniew Brzezinski or his relatives are assisting each campaign (also the Rothschild family fund John McCain's campaign. Cardinal Egan made a Al Smith meeting in NYC with Barack Obama and John McCain in it. Both McCain and Obama are related to European Royalty as most US Presidents are). Each agreed with Georgia's aggression against South Ossetia along with the war in Afghanistan. Each support the destructive, non-treatment having embryonic stem cell research. Both love the trade agreement of NAFTA and the WTO. These trade agreements made clear violations of our national sovereignity and contributed to the millions of jobs being shipped overseas. Also, it's not real free trade, but a managed unfair trade agreement benefiting select multinational corporations. NAFTA have crippled much of the Mexican economy as well. Both agree with global warming hysteria when we have record cold temperatures and this agenda is exploited by elitists (from the CFR, Knight of Malta Trilateralist Lord Guthrie, the UN, and the Bilderberg Group) in order to promote a globalized society (that's why evil policies from mercury filled bulbs, carbon taxes, theft of private property, carbon credits which is impossible to enforce since all humans show carbon, and population control are promoted). The elite (as found in the Pilgrim Society, the Vatican, the Bilderbergers) promoting the global warming lies would love a feudal system of centralizing power unto them. Each agree with gun control. Both John McCain plus Barack Obama supported the destructive 700 billion+ dollar bailout law that was signed by President George W. Bush. On the economy, Barack Obama is right that we need to build the economy from the ground up and have middle class tax cuts (along with rewarding companies that perserve their jobs here in America). He is wrong in saying that raising taxes on people who make $250,000 or above (many of whom are small business owners) is great when we're experiencing an economic downturn. McCain is right that the capital gains tax cut is needed (since we have one of the high capital gains tax rates in the Western world), but he rejects out of hand the need to cut the huge spending into this war on terror in order conserve tons of money to build our nation up. There are differences among each of them on education and health care (each very important issues). Health care being avaliable for all Americans is needed along with reforms, but the government ought not to control all of our health care system (to their credit, both Obama and McCain don't support a total government run health care system). I believe in health freedom and I'm against Codexes restricting how natural/organic foods are sent unto people. As for education, scholarships should be more avaliable, states should be encouraged to have merit pay for teachers, small classes sizes is fine, a flexible curriculum is needed, and school choice is needed including homeschooling. Ultimately, the parents not the government should have the right to give their child or children whatever type of education they wish. This election is a test of our conscience. Don't let anyone pressure you into voting for anyone that is crippling to your conscience. You have a right to vote for whomever candidate you wish or not voting at all. The point is that we shouldn't have unconditional alliegance to Barack Obama or John McCain. Each are funded as puppets of the new world order establishment crowd. The Election of 2008 is one of the most interesting elections in American history. If these major Presidential candidates were offering real change, they would start to immediately call for the banning of the oppressive laws and executive orders that constantly violate our cherished civil liberties. In other words, the Patriot Act, the USA Military Commissions Act, the federal War on Drugs, the Protect America Act, many bad executive orders, bad signing statements, etc. ought to be banished in our country. You have every right to vote for a Third Party if you feel that represents your political views. The Presidency has already been controlled by the COG and the elite. We should have a watchful eye on vote fraud since electronic voting is horribly unreliable. Regardless of who wins, it will be historical. Like always, we must prepare for the worth, yet defend our beliefs and fight for the truth by doing good in this Earth.



By Timothy