Wednesday, November 19, 2008

Pro Life Manna

http://ppgi.blogspot.com/2008/11/executive-disorders.html

http://www.stoptheaclu.com/archives/2008/11/19/adult-stem-cells-create-first-lab-grown-organ/

http://lifenews.com/nat4585.html


http://www.prolifeblogs.com/articles/archives/2008/11/and_they_said_s.php

1 comment:

Andrea Muhrrteyn said...

Dr. Grant,

CC: Timothy TruthSeeker

Sorry to be so stupid, please can you answer the following questions:

CONTEXT OF QUESTION: I am 41 years old, I have no children, although more than a few men have wanted me to bear their children; they failed to pass my commitment test for how much they love children, as opposed to how much they just want a woman with good genes to spread their sperm around the planet without being willing to give their lives for the children they want to procreate.

So they failed the commitment test: a very simple kinesthetic learning test. You see it is my opinion most of the men on the planet have imaginary fantasies about what excellent fathers they are, and how much they love children, and are committed to their children; and that 'fatherhood' is nothing but a 'little boy toy soldier' fantasy. So as an educator (most people learn better kinesthetically, i.e. by action, than by reading, or listening, whereby they only absorb a theory in their HEAD, kinesthetic learning is learning a principle IN YOUR GUTS, IN YOUR BONES, IN EVERY SINGLE CELL OF YOUR BEING). So my test is not an intellectual test (intellectual tests don't help children to know they are loved by their fathers), it is a kinesthetic test.

The man has to play Russian Roullette with me, 3 bullets each, to demonstrate that he is willing to risk his life, to demonstrate his commitment to emotionally, psychologically and spiritually BE THERE FOR THE CHILD HE INTENDS TO PROCREATE.

QUESTIONS:

So, in that context; my questions are as follows:

Do you know of any pro-abortion or anti-abortion intellectual theory 'leader' who can answer me the following questions:

1. IF EVERY WOMAN ON THE PLANET WAS ENCOURAGED TO REFUSE TO CONCEIVE (NOTE SEX ONLY LEADS TO CONCEPTION BY THE AGREEMENT OF BOTH MAN AND WOMAN) A CHILD, UNLESS SHE KINESTHETICALLY KNEW (BY WHATEVER KINESTHETIC TEST SHE WANTED TO DEVISE FOR HERSELF) THAT THE MAN WAS COMMITTED TO THAT CHILD, BEFORE THEY DECIDED TO CONCEIVE IT; HOW MANY WOMEN WOULD WANT ABORTIONS?

2. If not one woman on the planet wanted an abortion, since every child conceived was conceived out of love: what would happen to Planned Parenthood's Abortion Factories?

3. Do Anti-Abortion and Pro-Abortion leaders, secretly prefer ABORTION to continue, since WITHOUT ABORTION (i.e. with a world of children who are conceived out of love), no 'Pro-Abortion' or 'Anti-Abortion' leaders would be able to get up on their bully pulpit calling the other side 'evil'... Doesn't this remind you of Thoreau's quote: "There are a thousand hacking at the branches of evil to one who is striking at the root, and it may be that he who bestows the largest amount of time and money on the needy is doing the most by his mode of life to produce that misery which he strives in vain to relieve."

4. If Pro-Abortion and Anti-Abortion people are so against abortions; what is stopping them from attacking the root of the 'abortion' issue: THE CONCEPTION OF UNWANTED AND UNLOVED CHILDREN

5. And so, if they continue to refuse to attack the root of the abortion problem (unwanted conception of children); are they really 'anti-abortion'; (since anyone can tell you, if you want to weed a garden, pull out the weed at the roots, don't just trim it's branches)?

Lara Johnstone (JMCSwan)
SQSwans Practicing Radical Honoursty