The FED is soon to be protested by people. The reason is that the FED is a private system that is illegally controlling most of the American economy. It regularly promotes the bad policies of overspending fiat currency, dominating banks, cutting interest rates too much, and refusing to have sound money principles. Now, the government is considering to confiscate 401 (k)s and IRAs in order to have a mandatory savings tax. People are too taxed already and now some want more taxes on our savings. This is bad policy. Congress has raised this plan of an new income tax and stealing private pensions. Many Democrats want this to exist under the guise of combating the financial issues in America. They want to turn private retirement acounts in government controlled accounts which are managed by the Social Security Administration. Teresa Ghilarducci is one proponent of this plan. She is the professor of economic policy analysis at the New School for Social Research. She testified to Congress last month that 401 (k)s and IRAs ought to be confiscated. She also wants them to be changed into an universal GRAs managed by the Social Security Administration. GRAs is short for Guaranteed Retirement Accounts. The GRAs could be enforced by creating a mandatory savings tax of 5% of an individual's annual paycheck desposited to the GRA. Ghilarducci said that many Americans want this, but this is still against pure economic freedom. Even a Republican proposed mandatory saving accounts in 1999 by the name of former NY Fed chariman Peter Peterson. So, this isn't an one party deal. This is coming on the heels of the news that the Federal Reserve is refusing to identify where the $2 trillion of taxpayers have gone. That isn't consisting of a true representation of government accountability of the bailout at all or transparency. Bernanke and Paulson called for transparency, but it isn't occuring immediately. Even some of the bailout law has been blacked out in some places about who would pay for it. Even ex-Goldman Sachs executive Neel Kashkari has been appointed by Paulson to give out the bailout money. That is an apparent conflict of interest. Ghilarducci admitted that she wanted to share the wealth during a recession. The government stealing our savings and pensions is just as evil as oppressing the poor in our nation. This plan is similar to an ATM system that is runned by the government. Argentina has done similar things with stealing $30 billion worth of private pensions of citizens. Citizens have protested there thoughout the whole the country. Therefore, it is completely wrong for Democrats and Republicans to propose the confisication of 401(k) and IRA retirement accounts. Now, elites and politicans are constantly talking about wanting global goverance and new world order as a result of this economic crisis. This is mentioned in hundreds of newspapers worldwide. Now, some of the FED are saying that the bailout isn't meant to directly help those suffering from the crisis. The bailout law was bad already and Paulson wants the money to be sent into banks. That's why even CNN is reporting that the new G-20 meeting is signalling a new world order creation in the world.
The profanity police is a reality now in one place inside of America. WMC-TV from November 12, 2008 displayed this story. Martha Murphy Rhodes recently gave an interview with Action News 5. She was on her perch on a downtown planter. Rhodes lives in the streets for almost 10 years in Memphis, TN. She has seen and heard a lot of bad language including other things. She says that she doesn't cus. Now, there is a new policy to put people behind bars if they utilize profanity. Willie Norfleet - recently sited for aggressive panhandling, public intoxication, an open container violation, and fighting is arrested for something silly. He is arrested for cussing. That's fascism. I don't agree with using profanity, but I don't believe people should be locked up if they cus. Public safety coordinator Larry Bloom makes no apologies for policing profanity. “Everyone should be allowed to enjoy the public space, and when the language being used tends to incite or breach the peace, then it becomes against the law,” Bloom said. Bloom is silly since they are much more serious problems. Also, you still can disrupt the peace without using profane language at all. Profanity is a serious problem, but the solution is education and assistance not locking people up, especially if they aren't committed anyone crime at all. What's next? People use profanity on the Net, but these same people refuse to censor those words via the government (which I don't believe by the way. I believe in the freedom of speech). According the city of Memphis' Disorderly Conduct Code, it is illegal to use, "abusive or obscene language intending that it be heard by members of the public and uttered with the intention to disturb the hearer." This ambigious definition can view simple arguments as a violation of this Memphis code. Jacob Flowers of the Mid South Peace and Justice Center said that the private security force is going beyond its mission. They are handling calls (in more than 42%) that have nothing to do with aggressive panhandling at all. The Center City Commission opened its records upon an Action News 5 request. Critics of this policy say that it's another way to harass the homeless, when resources should be going to help them. The reality is that profanity is wrong, but people shouldn't be locked up for it alone.
GM foods have been proven time and time again to be dangerous for the world. The Earth Times from the November 12, 2008 reported on how genetically modified maize lowers fertility in mice according to a study. A study made by the University of Veterinary Medicine in Vienna presented this study on Tuesday. It found that the genetically engineered maize developed by the US-based Monsanto corporation led to lower fertility and body weight. Monsanto is a notorious company promoting poisons like GM foods for years. That study made mice to get with the NK603 x MON810 sweetcorn variety over a period of 20 weeks. In that time, the GM maize made mice to develop a smaller litter size and lighter offspring than mice feed with non-engineered maize. According to an abstract of the study (which was led by Professor Juergen Zentek and commissioned by Austria's Environment Ministry), the differences were statistically significant in the 3rd and 4th litters. An alternative set up of the study of the differences between the groups of mice were found to be less pronounced and statistically not significant. Even the Global 2000 environmental organization wants more further long term tests about the situation. The European Commission for a long time tried to force Austria to allow the use of genetically modified food. Austria resisted. Now, unfortunately, Austria have lifted its ban MON810 maize as animal feed last year. The tested born breed is a cross of MON810 and another variety. This is designed to be resistant against herbicides and insects. This hybrid was found in 2005 to be unsfare for human and animal health. An expert panel of the European Food Safety Authority (or the EFSA) admited to the danger of the hybrid. Following the release of the study at a conference in Vienna. Global 2000 and Greenpeace criticized EFSA’s approval of the variety. Each organizations have called for a ban of genetically engineered maize. “It is now vital to keep animal feed in Austria free of genetically engineered maize, and an immediate ban on the use of genetically engineered maize MON810 in Austria is the order of the day,” Global 2000 spokesman Jens Karp said. GM foods have no business being freely sold in the world without being labeled at all. Many GM foods have known to have dangerous risks. Flouride, apartame, MSG, and other substances are dangerous threats to our health as well.
The global warming hysteria is getting refuted badly as time rolls along. Michael Asher from Daily Tech at Wednesday on November 12, 2008 expressed that truth. There is a blogger who again finds an error in NASA climate data. The amateur team found the NASA error is similar to one they've discovered a year ago. NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies (or the GISS) is one of the world's primary sources for climate data. Regular updates on world temperatures are issued by them (which are based on the GISS's analysis of temperature readings from thousands of monitoring stations over the Earth). GISS' claims that their recent data orignally reported that last October was very warm (which was a full 0.78 C above normal). This would be the warmest October on record being a huge increase over the previous month's data. Steve McIntyre and his group at Baker Street irregulars (from Climateaudit.org) set off alarm bells in dealing with that data. They found that NASA's data didn't agree with the satellite temperature record. This record outlined that October is very mild and it's continuing the same trend of a slight cooling that has persisted since 1998. McKintyre, who is the same man who found errors last year in GISS’s US temperature record, quickly noted that most of the temperature increase was coming from Russia. A chart of world temperatures showed that in October, most of Russia, the largest nation on Earth in land size, was not only registering hot, but literally off the scale. Yet anecdotal reports were suggesting that October was actually slightly colder than normal. Even McKintyre's blog found that the readings individually at stations in Russia showed an anomaly. These locations have all been assigned the exact same temperatures from a month earlier (when September is much warmer than October). Russia cools very rapidly in the fall months, so recycling the data from the earlier month had led to a massive temperature increase. Steve McKintyre informed GISS of the error by email. According to McKintyre, there was no response. Yet, within “about an hour”, GISS pulled down the erroneous data, citing a “mishap.” GISS pointed the finger of the blame upstream to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Adminstration (NOAA). NOAA’s Deputy Director of Communications, Scott Smullens, tells DailyTech that NOAA is responsible only for temperature readings in the US, not those in other nations. Some fell that the error will affect other months, because of the complex algorithm that GISS uses to convert actual temperature readings into their output results. The values for August 2008, for instance, changed by 0.11C and the global anomaly as far back as 2005 increased by a hundredth of a degree. It's interesting to note that GISS is run by Dr. James Hansen. Hansen is one of the biggest global warming advocates in the world. He accused oil companies of committing crimes against humanity. Hansen also serves as science advisor to Al Gore (whose family ironically was deep in the oil business). The reality is that the sunspots are disappearing causing record cool weather worldwide. Climate change is a natural function of nature and it can't be fully impacted by mankind at all. Global warming hysteria is a means by the elite to promote carbon tax that will de industralize society, and harm economic development in the world. Real environmental issues that can really damage our biosphere include GM foods, chimeras, rainforest depletion, nerve gas, ocean pollution, and other issues.
The FDA has been involved in errors for a long time. David Gutierrez from NaturalNews on Wednesday, at November 12, 2008 made FDA errors more known. Now, a FDA advisory panel has recommended the approval of Amgen's immune suppressing drug Embrel. Its generic name is etanercept. This is done for the "treatment" of psorisasis in children, in spite of ongoing concerns that the drug may have lethal side effects. This recommendation existed only 2 days after an independent panel ironically recommend that the FDA strenghten Enbrel's label with warnings. These warnings are about Enbrel's potentially fatal side effects such as anemia, seizures, serious infections, cancer, or neurological problems. Ironically, the FDA is invesitaging on whether the entire drug family of which Enbrel is apart of will increase the risk of cancer in children (particulary lymphoma). The FDA is investigating 30 reports of cancer in children and young adults. These people have been treated with drugs in the family, known as TNF (or the tumor necrosis factor). Since TNF blockers can interfere with the functioning of the immune system, they are used to treat autoimmune disorders like Crohn's disease (or rheumatoid arthritis). On the other hand, TNF blockers can weak havoc in the body's defenses via exposing it to serious infection or other problems. Enbrel is currently approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in both adults and children. It's also approved for the treatment of moderate to severe psoriasis in adults only. Even children (who have moderate to severe psoriasis) can be recieve the Enbrel drug if the FDA follows its panel's recommendation. One day earlier, the same advisory panel recommended the approval of another adult psoriasis drug: ustekinumab. This drug was manufactured by Johnson & Johnson. Only the week before, however, the FDA had issued a warning on its Web site that ustekinumab may increase the risk of cancer in those who take it. People with psoriasis suffer from itchy or painful red, thick patches on the skin. The immune system is believed to play some role in mediating the disease. The deal is that Big Pharma and the FDA too often promote dangerous drugs like Enbrel and ustekinumab. Healthier alternatives to help our health is a whole lot better than just embracing allopatic, pill-filled drugs into our bodily functions.
The culture of life is important to promote always. Steven Ertelt from LifeNews on November 12, 2008 wrote about how a Chinese woman is worried about forced sterilization and abortion. She is being denied asylum from America. A Chinese woman is living in America now. She fears deportation to China. The reason is that she is afraid that her going back to China will result in a forced abortion or forced sterilization. A federal appears ruled that Xiu Mei Wei (who is the woman's name) didn't present enough evidence in her case for the court to confirm those fears would materalize upon her return. The 10th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled last Friday against Wei's request to re-open her case. The three judge panel declined to re-open her case even though Wei is pregnant a fourth time. China's family planning policies prevent women from having any more than one child. According to an AP report, Wei had a temporary visa that expired in April 1997. She stayed in the United States and eventually applied for asylum in November 2002. This was when she was pregnant with her third child. The appeals court sided with an immigration judge and the Board of Immigration Appeals, who both ruled that Wei did not file her asylum request within one year of having arrived in the U.S., as required by law. The court also ruled that she failed to show how her circumstances made it so she couldn't comply with the time requirement. Lorance Hockert (who is Wei's local attorney) in the application filed a formal notice. This notice indicated that population control officials in her hometown of Changle, City in Fijian Province sent a notice to her mother. That notice said that Wei and her husband would be forcibly sterilized if she didn't have an abortion of the child upon her return to China. The AP also indicated that Wei provided proof in the asylum application of her sister in law undergoing a forced abortion and sterilization when she became pregnant with her third child. That's evil of course. The forced abortion and sterilization policy is one of the sickest policies in the world. I would show compassion and give Wei asylum in order to escape some of the extreme policies in China. Abortion doesn't happen in China, but a lot in the West as well.
Rick Perry is a faux conservative and a globalist (as his meeting with the Bilderberg Group, promoting the TTC, believing in near amnesty in terms of immigration, he supported Rudy Giuliani for President, and other internationalist policies) as many understand. Now, Texas Governor Rick Perry says that he favor unconstitutional checkpoints. News 8 Austin from November 12, 2008 established information about this reality. Much of the police are going along with this wicked policy. The state's top law enforcement agency asked Texas Attorney General Greg Abbott for a ruling on the legality of setting up statewide driver's license checkpoints. The Houston Chronicle reported 15 lawmakers said that such a move would be unauthorized immigration policymaking. The proposed checkpoints would stop drivers to review their licenses, vehicle registrations and proof of insurance. Even some state legislators argue that the Department of Public Safety Commissin overstepped its authorty on August 25. That date made it clear of issuing new rules requiring applicants to prove they are legally in the U.S. before they can recieve a Texas drivers's license or identification. Two weeks later, lawmakers were further disturbed after learning the commission’s chairman, Allan B. Polunsky, wanted a ruling on the checkpoints. State Senator Leticia Van de Putte (who is a Democrat from San Antonio) and 14 other Texas lawmakers sent Abbott a letter. This letter asked him to ignore the commission's legal opinion request because the Legislature has not authorized a DPS checkpoint program at all. The state court of Criminal Appeals ruled in 1994 that checkpoints would exist in Texas. These checkpoints must be authorized by a “politically accountable governing body at the state level.” Spokeswoman Alliston Castle said that Governor Rick Perry favors the checkpoints. These checkpoints are illegal for many reasons. One simple one is that the government has no right to build checkpoints in interrogating innocent citizens at all. These actions are a blatant violation of the Fourth Amendment. The government can only investigate you either by warrant, due process, or by probable cause. These checkpoints not only exist in Texas, but they exist across the nation. Even the ACLU is disagreeing with the DHS having random searches of citizens over hundreds of miles inside of the Mexico border or inside of the Canadian border. There ought to be no intrusive government that violates the rights of American citizens at all.
Rahm Emanuel overtly promotes a mandatory civilian defense program in America. That's nothing more than a form of a draft like Freemason Chuck Rangel has promoted. There is a newly rediscovered 2006 audio clip, which Rahm admits to this. Even Barack Obama promotes a national civilian security force that is the same size as the military. Obama and his supporters deny that his version of a security force would be voluntary. That remains to be seen. The 2006 audio clip have Emanuel admitted that his civilian plan will be mandatory. Not only that, but Emanuel outlined the agenda for military style training and have a domestic draft in order to prepare Americans for a chemical or biological terrorist attack. Rahm Emanuel admitted this to Ben Smith of the New York Daily News. Rahm said that he wanted an universal service plan. Smith asked him if people would live in the military barracks. Emanuel laughed and said: "We’re going to have universal civil defense training, somewhere between the ages of 18 to 25 you will do three months of training….but there can be nothing wrong with all Americans having a joint similar experience of what we call civil defense training or civil service in service of the country, in preparation, which will give people a sense of what it means to be an American.” You don't get a sense of being an American by forcing us to have involuntary servitude (that's a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment, which condemns a draft system). You have it by understanding what our country is, helping people, and promoting real freedom. Rahm claims that we need to be prepared for a natural disaster or a terrorist attack. Rahm wants young people to have jumping jacks and 3 months of military training. He wants it required for people from 18 to 25 years old in his August 2006 interview at C-Span. The use of the word “required” is noteworthy, because this exact terminology was removed from Obama’s change.gov website when controversy over the program arose last week. Forced, Militarized domestic squads have been apart of fascist nations for centuries. It's wrong, it's authoritarian, and it's not apart of what is truly an American at all. There's no need for conscription either.
Sarah Palin is being used as a scapegoat by the mainstream media and even the John McCain campaign staff. She has been demonized for being pro-life and pro-gun. She isn't perfect. I don't subscribe to her tenets on every issue like her foreign policy beliefs. Yet, she is right on many issues. The media and now the John McCain staff is using lies and hate against her for McCain's defeat during the 2008 Presidential Election. The ultimate responsibility for John McCain losing the election is John McCain and his team. Even John McCain admitted to this, yet some of his staff refuse to admit to that reality at all. Frankily, I disagree with John McCain and Barack Obama on a host of issues. In a cowardly fashion, many of McCain surrogates were blaming Sarah Palin. Even unnamed McCain aides caled Pain a whack job who went into diva mode. If these cowards would be man enough to reveal themsleves, that's one thing. It's quite another when they don't. If McCain made a bad decision about picking a Vice Presidential candidate, what does that say about the staff's abilities? They won't say these things to Palin's face, so they are cowards. McCain is silent on these criticisms. With these attacks on her, Sarah Palin has my respect more than McCain. Also, it's been proven that Sarah not realizing that Africa was a continent not a country is shown to be a lie. Many of these secretive staff members are RINOs or Rockefeller Republicans. Palin was right to refer to these hacks as cowards. The deal is that we should be politically independent. We shouldn't have alliegance to the Republicans and the Democrats unconditionally at all. The lesson of Sarah Palin is that we shouldn't be ashamed of our beliefs if we believe in gun rights and if we are pro-life.
Secret Societies are real. People talk about Labor Zionists and the Rothschilds all day on the Internet. There is nothing wrong with, yet even in 2008, it's taboo for some in the alternative media to expose the Vatican/Jesuit network. There is a new book tying it together in a real way. Its title is called, "CODEWORD BARBELON - DANGER IN THE VATICAN: THE SONS OF LOYOLA & THEIR PLANS FOR WORLD DOMINATION." The author is named P.D. Stuart. He believes that both Democratic and Republican parties (including Barack Obama, John Mccain, George W. Bush, Bill Clinton , and Joe Biden) all have ties to the secret Order of the Jesuits. It's a groundbreaking book because it uses sources from beginning to end to make its points. It exposes the slick attack on our civil and religious freedoms. It has 48 chapters and hundreds of footnotes plus references. It covers history from the 100's A.D. to now in 2008. It deals with Secret Societies and their connections to the Vatican plus the Jesuit Order. P.D. Stuart cites a source exposing the Jesuit/Masonry link (according to the research of William Peterson and Charles Sotheran). This source P.D. Stuart cites says that: "...The Sovereign Prince of Masons, etc, etc., are nearly all the offspring of Ignatius Loyola… and worked under instructions from the General of the Jesuits.” Stuart wrote that the Jesuit Order, Freemasons, and globalists in both major parties want national boundaries gone in order for one world rule can be established. Even Walter Cronkite and David Rockefeller admitted they want an one world system or an one world government instituted in the world. This book name names and it isn't without great scholarship. He cites Emanuel Josephson's research about how a Jesuit advised Castro by the name of Armando Llorente. Stuarts writes about Jacques DeMolay, Adam Weishaupt, Hitler, Cecil Rhodes, Albert Pike, and others. He also makes links among the Illuminati, Skulls and Bones, Phi Beta Kappa, the CFR, and other secretive fraternities. He made a noticeable point of exposing the Vatican link to the Skulls and Bones Secret Society (i.e. There is a Pope figure and new members must bow before this figure. There is the pro-Roman Catholic Don Quixote figure in the Bonesman ritual as well including Hiram Abiff). In the Skulls and Bones people take an oath in a tomb ritual confessing their sexual secrets. Therefore all Secret orders should be exposed not just one as some people want to occur.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment