Extra Jesuit commentaries

Dear Eric,

I listened to your debate with Michael Collins Piper, and had a few questions pertaining to it. If you have time to answer them they are as follows:

1. Michael brought up a good point concerning Clay Shaw. You have said that he is a Knights of Malta. Where did you get that information from?

I received it from a private source. As you know, there is no listing of any Knights of Malta who were intimtatly involved with the assassination. The known Knights were all operating at a distance protected by the findings of the Warren Commission. William F. Buckley, Henry Luce, J. Peter Grace, Frank Shakespeare, Lee Iacocca, Martin F, Shea and others were involved but at a safe distance giving orders and not directly involved.Therefore I had to decide if Clay Shaw fit the mold. To begin with, the Knights of Malta have always ruled the Central Intelligence Agency, first known as the Office for Strategic Services. As you know the first head of the OSS/CIA was Knight of Malta William Donovan. Therefore the Archbishop of New York controlled the American Branch of SMOM and thus the CIA. At the time of the JFK assassination there were several SMOMs in the CIA including William Casey, James Angleton, Herman Kimsey, John McCone and the ex-Director, Allen Dulles---according to one of my advisors who was AF Intelligence for several years. Therefore, Shaw qualifies for being a Knight since he was a confirmed contract agent for the CIA---later admitted by DCI Richard Helms.Secondly, Knights are usually extremely wealthy cartel capitalists. Knight Elmer Bobst was the head of Warner Lambert pharmaceuticals and willed much of his estate to the Diocese of New York upon his death. Bobst was also a high financier of the Republican party and was the real power behind the election of Richard M. Nixon.

The same holds true for J. Peter Grace: he was a man of extreme wealth, a shipping tycoon for the western hemisphere, and also a contract agent for the CIA as was William F. Buckley, Jr. Again, Shaw fits the bill. He is probably the wealthiest man in New Orleans running the Trade Mart. He is a public man and a banker who rebuilt the French Quarter. His company was the pipeline for trade with Latin America and he was involved with United Fruit as was Dulles and Grace. I would love to know through which bank he conducted the business of the New Orleans Trade Mart and his relationship to Loyola University in New Orleans.

Thirdly, Shaw was a public figure and well known in the New Orleans business community. Knights can be public figures, men such as the former Nazi and music conductor Lawrence Welk; the commissioner of Baseball Bowie Kuhn; Rite Aid owner Louis Lehrman; Hollywood director Frank Capra; Hollywood entertainers Danny Thomas and Frank Sinatra, and America's first Black Knight of Malta, Sammy Davis, Jr.,---according to the most prominent Black SMOM in Africa. So, on this third point, Clay Shaw fits the bill.Fourthly, and most importantly, Shaw was in intimate contact with European nobility, nearly all of which are Dames and Knights of Malta. According to an article you can download off the internet, Shaw as a director of Rome's Centro Mondiale Commerciale ("World Trade Center") was an Agency (CIA) man in Rome seeking to bring back fascism to Italy. (The Knights are always openly backing losing fascism, although they also secretly back winning communism.) The CMC had originally been formed in Jesuit-ruled Montreal, Quebec, but then moved to Rome in 1961 later opening an additional office in Switzerland. Claw Shaw was on the Board of Directors as stated. Who were other directors of note? According to two sources, Prince Gutierez de Spadafora, Italian industrialist, cartel capitalist and large landowner whose daughter-in-law was related to HItler's banker, Hjalmar Schacht, acquitted at Nuremberg along with German Nazi Knight of Malta Franz von Papen. Spadafora was a member of the House of Savoy whence came Umberto, the last of Italy's kings. This royal, who had been Mussolini's secretary of agriculture was most assuredly a SMOM and personal friend of Shaw. Shaw as also a director of Permindex---a fascist assassinations group subject to CMC. And one of the purposes of CMC was that "Rome will recover once again her position as center of the civilized world."

This is purely a goal of the Jesuits ruling their Knights of Malta via the Pope.Fifthly, Knights can be admitted as secret members, mob bosses and others. I really believe Vito Genovese was an Italian Knight of Malta through his association with Mussolini's connection with the Knights at the Vatican. It is reported that some pay up to 200,000 dollars to join the Knights and remain secret members, never to be named on any known membership list. Martin Bormann is another prime candidate and fits the bill when examining his post WWII status and functioning in Buenos Aires protected by Knight of Malta Juan Peron. Here, Shaw fits the bill also. He could have been secretly inducted never to be listed on any membership roster---which seems to fit the situtation at hand.So, if the shoe fits, wear it. I shall maintain that Shaw was a SMOM based upon a tip and backround study. And if Piper claimes that the SMOM is merely another Rotory Club, then why make an issue of it? Stephen Birmingham in his Real Lace: America's Irish Rich, that the SMOM is the most exclusive club in the world! Piper knows the power of SMOM but did not push the issue too far so as to be able to make the comment as to its insignificance. Clever!

I am in no way trying to be disrespectful and I'm definately not trying to sound smart with you, but I was curious. I agree with your work and just wanted to ask this question. I myself also noticed on another situation like this that you seem to say that Walt Disney was a 33rd Degree Freemason if I am correct? From what I know Disney was not a Freemason, but rather a DeMolay. Am I correct to think that?

He was both DeMolay and a 33rd Degree Freemason. There are many sources for this including Cathy O'Brien in her Trance: Formation of America. Disney was a pedofile as are many masons of that degree.

2. Michael said that Eustace Mullins is a great anti-Zionist, but according to some websites I visited Mullins wrote an article entitled "Adolf Hitler: An Appreciation." Do you believe Mullins is an anti-Semite (whether he is a Temporal Coadjutor is a completely different story)?

Mullins stresses the Jewish connections to the Fed, but never clarifies the Gentile control of the Fed. He like many others claim that Warburg was the great mover of the Fed when that was not at all the fact. Thus, it appears that Mullins is dishonest for not fingering the White Gentiles of real financial power infolved with the Fed---Gentiles like J. P. Morgan who hated Jacob Schiff and Freemason John Davison who was Morgan's agent at Jekyll Island. Mullins never states that the Rothschilds are merely the keepers of the Vatican treasury but portrays them as the superpower ruling the world via the Illuminati. That is typical Jesuit rhetoric and Mullins knows better for he read my book and endorsed it personally when I met him at the Con Con in 2002. So in so far as Mullins does not attack the real power behind the Labor Zionists, he is indeed a promoter, though it may be indirectly, of anti-Jewish fury.

3. You mentioned John Loftus in the debate. I am sure you do not necessarily agree with everything John Loftus believes as Loftus feels that everything is "90% stupidity and 10% conspiracy" as he has stated before?

Loftus is an Irish Roman Catholic educated by Jesuits at Boston College. I am convinced by his defense of the Pope's Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists ruling Israel that he is a Jesuit Temporal Coadjutor. His explanation of JFK's relationship with Israel prior to the assassination was a complete lie that I repeated in VA, on which error Piper rightly corrected me. But Loftus was right about the CIA training the Mossad in 1951. That will remain in VAIII. This point is key, for if the CIA received SS Nazis through Spellman's Vatican Ratline, and the CIA trained the Mossad, then the Pope's Masonic Jewish Labor Zionists are as wicked as the Pope's SS protected by the Vatican after the war and throughout the Cold War. The SMOM Gehlen Org trained the Mossad---it makes me sick! And Loftus defends this.Lastly, another and anti-communist/CIA operative was Russian born noble George DeMorenschildt.

I am also convinced that he was another Knight of Malta by virtue of his associations with nobles in Rome including the Order's SMOM Chigi family and with SMOM's William F. Buckley and George H. W. Bush who entertained the Grand Master of SMOM at the White House in 1991. I have no name on a formal list, but I will name him as a Knight. Maybe this will provoke some Knight to share his secret lists with me since none of the Knights are safe from the assassination teams controlled by the Jesuit General in Rome.I trust this helps.

Sincerely in Faith,

Brother Eric


________________

From http://z13.invisionfree.com/THE_UNHIVED_MIND/index.php?showtopic=9518&st=30


smashstuff: I just listened to this debate the other day, and putting aside who is really in control, I found Piper to be just plain rude and arrogant towards Phelps. Also, I think he was playing dumb or is ignorant on a number of issues, such as 'if the Catholic church is against abortion, why is it still legal in America if the Jesuits are in charge?' My God, what a moron! Does he really think that the Catholic Church is going to outwardly support the war in Iraq and abortion, while maintaining a Christian facade? Do the Zionists out and out say we want control of the world? No.As Born pointed out, Piper concentrated on J.F.K., because this is what he knows, so this in itself is an admisssion of ignorance of the history of the Jesuit order. Piper used Eric's supposed errors in his investigation into the assassination to dismiss everything else in Eric's book.And what was that crap about the Zionists taking over the Vatican during Vatican II? So, the Vatican was a great and peaceful place until the 1960s?