The Right To Live
The first decade of the twenty first century is almost commenced. Topics like the Iraq War, the danger of numerous antidepressants, the Danger of mercury (plus Flouride & aspartame), the ineffective "Drug War" (that authors like the late Gary Webb via his book "Dark Alliance" have proven that certain people in the intelligence community shipped drugs into America), and the Bush adminstration comsume our daily lives. What motivated me to write more information? In recent times, the mainstream media is lecturing us to not talk about moral values and discount moral issues. The truth of the matter is that we have a fundamental right to talk about every issue from social to other political topics. Now, over a couple of years of research, I've discovered that some of the same individuals in support of infanticide (i.e. abortion) are into other causes ranging from globalism to population control. I wanted the world to know my opposition to these wicked, archaic, and idioitic philsophies (like population control, abortion, eugenics, etc.) once and for all. That's my motivation. So many new events are happening from Clarence Thomas writing his new book to the Nobel Peace Prize awarded to Al Gore. Gore is loved by the establishment and their CFR-run media. I made more comments about global warming later in this work. The Presidental race is heating up with the Democrats and Republicans battling for the White House. It's a shame that the leaders in the race have links to the CFR, but I will say that anything is possible.
Drama is spontaeneous and wild. It exists in the 4 corners of the Earth. It even occurs among some within the alternative media. How do we deal with it? The best way to do deal with it is continuing displaying the truth. I wouldn't let drama exist as an inherit distraction. That's great advice, but we ought to respond if false accusations come at you. Also, I subscribe to exposing all evil including evil folks in the Vatican and the Jesuits. Solutions to our education and health problems are vastly more important than "beefs" or "drama." There are also the need to speak out more for self defense, gun rights, and being for the Second Amendment. From ancient Rome, to the KKK, and dictatorships in Russia and China, these wicked entities promoted and enforced gun disarmament of innocent citizens. That's history. That's why man has a right to defend his or her self with guns if they want to. The Founding Fathers uniformily as mentioned in their Federalist Papers called gun rights as individual and reserved to American citizens. This is the drop in the bucket to what is happening in the world and how close we are into having a real total dictatorship in America.
Life is special. Eugenics is 100% evil. This issue for some reason is taboo in the mainstream media world. Eugenics is the belief that all human beings weren't equal in worth and value. Therefore, forcing certain people to live and the rest to die is justified. Eugenics existed for thousands of years. In 1763, the British used smallpox as a weapon to harm the Native American people. Modern eugenics is a recent phenomenon spanning a couple of centuries. It still occurs today with Peter Singer today wanting infants to die. Modern eugenics in my opinion existed from Thomas Malthus (an idol of Bill Gates. Bill Gates' father was in intelligence and was a President of Planned Parenthood. Gates is also a member of the Club of Rome, which is an organization dedicated to the depopulation of the Earth's human population) starting in the late 1700's. Malthus' "Essay on the Principle of Population" loved the sick idea that populations are so huge that they would get rid of resources (so population control was necessary). Mason George Drysdale and co-Mason Annie Besant (a friend of Theosophist and Lucifer/Satan worshipper Madame Blavatsky. Blavatsky wrote "The Secret Doctrine" and "Isis Unvieled", which are occult works. Blavatsky blasted Jewish people and Christians. Her work was one of many inspirations for Adolf Hitler's agenda for the Holocaust) advocated Malthus' population control agenda. Besant and the Malthusian League supported birth control as well.
One founder father of modern eugenics was Sir Franics Galton (he coined the word "eugenics"). He was a cousin of Charles Darwin. He is the founder of modern fingerprinting technology. In his 1865 article "Hereditary Talent and Character", then elaborated it further in his 1869 book "Hereditary Genius", Galton called for a way to improve the birth rate of the "intelletual superior" humans and lower the amount of others (like the poor, etc.). Galton, Malthus, and population control advocates today believe that the Earth is overpopulated today. That's a lie. In the Census Bureau's report, "Global Population Profile: 2002," the Census Bureau notes that the 74 million people added to the world's population in 2002 were significantly fewer than the high of 87 million people added in 1989-1990. The growth rate was a meager 1.2 percent, down from the high of 2.2 percent in 1963-64. Conservation International's own study revealed that 46% of the earth's surface was an untouched wilderness, that is land areas not including sea. The Fight Aging organization mention that Earth can fit as high as 100 billion people. Even the Un believe that population growth will level and decline by 2050.Now, Joseph D'Agostino wrote an article entitled "Population Sterilization's Efforts Work Too Well in Third World Countries" proving that we're having an underpopulation crisis. Too few people aren't only in Japan, Russia, and Western Europe. According to D'Agostino: "...Armenia, Georgia, Romania, Serbia and Montenegro, the Ukraine and Russia; with the exception of Serbia and Montenegro at 1.6, all have birth rates of 1.4 or less. The minimum reproductive rate for a population to simply replace itself is 2.1...." Even in South Africa, a net reproduction rate per woman of only 0.95. Underpopulation exists in Latin America and sub-Saharan Africa as well. All humans can fit in Texas given 1,000 sq. ft. each, so overpopulation theories are just plain lies. America had a big eugenics program before Nazi Germany came around. In fact, the Nazis mimiced and praised American eugenicists. In America, there were forced sterilization programs from California to VA plus North Carolina. Virginia's ex-Governor Mark Warner apologized for this immorality. Dr. Clarence Gamble (of Procter and Gamble) supported North Carolina forced sterilization of children with low IQs. This occurs in many locations like the Winston Salem-NC Medical School. Gordon Gray (Grays are friends of the Bush family), the Rockefellers, the Harrimans, and other promiment US families supported eugenics. Later, Margaret Sanger believed in birth control and sterilization via her Planned Parenthood group in the early 1900's. Sanger even called for a Plan for Peace Plan which includes sterilization and forced segregation of the "fit" and "unfit." Sanger herself had lectured on eugenics before the Ku Klux Klan of Silver Lake, New Jersey; at the invitation of the Woman's Branch of the KKK. Sanger and numerous early founders of Planned Parenthood said blatantly racist (like pro-Nazi Dr. S. Adolphus Knopf, a member of Margaret Sanger's American Birth Control League or ABCL), pro-eugenic, and anti-population comments. Here they are:
"Brownsville is the most thickly populated section of Brooklyn. Here the working people live. Here are the dwelling-places of the very poor, a whole city of Jewish and Italian inhabitants housed in the most assiduously investigated and frequently condemned type of tenement. Block after block, street after street, as far as one can see in every direction, there is an endless stretch of dreary walls bursting with their excess of wretched humanity. Unkempt children swarm the alley ways and fire escapes and you seldom see a woman without her inevitable baby." (Elizabeth Stuyvesant. "The Brownsville Birth Control Clinic." Birth Control Review, Volume I, Number 3 (March 1917), page 6.)
"I visited hospitals in this city, and found them lacking in the simple and most ordinary article of decency. No soap ) no cod-liver oil, no rubber sheets to protect the beds no linen to give clean bedding as required ) and even the babies must be all day in wet napkins, because of the inadequate supply for the proper change. This has given rise to skin trouble, and the poor little waifs are a sad, miserable lot. It would be a great kindness to let them die outright, I believe." (Margaret Sanger. "Women in Germany." Birth Control Review, Volume V, Number 1 (January 1921), page 9.)
"We prefer the policy of immediate sterilization, of making sure that parenthood is absolutely prohibited to the feeble-minded." (The Pivot of Civilization by Margaret Sanger, Brentano's Press, NY, 1922, p. 263)
Bernard Stacks, M.D., who wrote:"We must get rid of the inferior colored races: the Blacks, the Yellow and the Red races must be exterminated...The white race then may proceed as follows: Let the Christians exterminate all Jews and Moslems, then the Protestants kill all Catholics, then let the Ku Klux Klan kill everybody except the 100% [Nordic types]; then let the Nordic race with blond hair and blue eyes kill off all the dark complexioned..." (Birth Control Review, Sept, 1924, p.269)
MK-Ultra was a CIA project created in 1953. Its purpose was to experiment mind control drugs on human beings. The Tuskegee experiement was project of deception. African Americans were told that a drug was harmless by scientists. Yet, the drug had syphillis and many of them died. Few talked about it until the 1970's. The Bush family is involved with this population control movement. For example, George H. W. Bush in the late 1960's and early 1970's was apart of a population control group plus he was in support of the United Nations. Even Prescott Bush (George W. Bush's grandfather) was involved with the American Birth Control League as early as 1942 and served as the treasurer of the first national capital campaign of Planned Parenthood in 1947. Planned Parenthood exists to this day and they have committed evil acts even to this day. Planned Parenthood is a murderous group killing 244,628 babies in calendar year 2003 alone. Folks like Life Dynamics and even Michelle Malkin have exposed Planned Parenthood modern corruption now. . Life Dynamics also conducted an extensive undercover project by doing did an experiment by posing as a 13 year old girl (and Planned Parenthood still advised the fake "girl" to have an abortion without the parents' consent begin impregnated by a "fiction" 22 year old man). Black and Hispanic men sued PP for racism and sexual harrashment (many early PP members were already racist). There are other examples of Planned Parenthood's corruption. Modern eugenics is just as much a threat then as it is today. Now, intellectuals and other leaders are part of the eugenics crowd now. Today, geneticist James Watson (the Head of the Human Genome Project until 1992. He was partly responsible for the discovery of DNA, an achievement that won him the Nobel Peace prize in 1962), who told a Sunday Times newspaper interviewer that blacks are intellectually inferior to whites (when science proves that intervention can increase IQ levels irrespective of race). Watson wants genetic screening for babies and genetic purity (i.e. aborting babies if the baby is suspected of being a homosexual when many scientists believe homosexuality is a product of the environment of early childhood not genetics. No one should be murdered if people are heterosexual or homosexual. Even if you disagree with homosexuality, you shouldn't advocate killing those who are homosexual). So, these "elite" folks want folks dead basically. It's as simple as that. Truthfully, eugenics and population control ought to be exposed and opposed by all human beings. Instead of bashing humans, we ought to build up the human race by building up our education systems (incorporating more choices whether public, private, or homeschooling. Smaller class sizes can also be effective. More parental and state control should be involved in education). Also , investing in our infrastructure (which can increase the poductivity of the middle class), develop a culture of life, etc.
Globalist Land Grabs
For eons, certain individuals wanted to own most of land in empires. A perfect example was the feudal system in the Middle Ages as controlled by the Vatican. In the present era, big organizations (like the United Nations) and governments globally unfairly acquire lands constantly. Even the Supreme Court recently supported eminent domain restricting private property rights for individuals. It isn't a secret that the United Nations have taken over thousands of square miles in land (including national parks) via the Biosphere programs, Agenda 21 which was about the UN forcing many nations including America to allow government to futher control plus manage lands, and the Desertification Treaty (signed in October 18, 2000). Why would elitists lust after the control of land? The purpose is to construct a globalized world order (as outlined by Walter Cronkite, David Rockefeller, and other lumanaries). Also, it's a blueprint to implement the parts of the new world order to control humans better. A North American Union agenda is apart of this agenda. Of course, many elites deny a NAU agenda, but new evidence keep coming in confirming it since a NAU is about the merging of laws and infrastructure in North America. Even Vicente Fox admitted on national TV recently that he wants a North American union and a North American currency like the amero. CFR member Condolezza Rice wants a Pan American community as said in October of 2007. How much more proof do you need. That's occuring now. On March 2005, Presidents of Mexico, the USA, and Canada signed an agreement for the SPP or Security Prosperty Partnership agreement. The SPP is one of many groups leading the charge for a North American union. On August 20-21, 2007, the Security and Prosperity Parternship crew had a meeting in Montebello, Quebec. American and Canadian forces guarded the compound where the SPP crowd were meeting at. The Constitution says Congress only regulates foreign trade, yet the SPP is existing without Congressional approval at all.
Even the ex- Canadian Prime Minister Paul Martin admitted this by writing "on March 23, President Bush, President Fox and I SIGNED the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America that establishes the way forward on our continental agenda for security, prosperity and quality of life." A 2005 report entitled "Building a North American Community: Report of an Independent Task Force" written by Dr. Robert Pastor (a CFR member) advocated an amero North American currency (found in pages 111,115-115), a security perimeter for North America by 2010 (even World Net Daily reported on the North American Future 2025 Project headed by the CSIS to encourage labor and economic intergration in North America), and other plans. Also, he wanted: "North American economic and security community, the boundaries of which would be defined by a common external tariff and an outer security perimeter." Robert Pastor admitted that he believed in the sick notion that modern sovereignity is obsolete in his 2004 "Foreign Affairs" work found in the, January/February 2004 edition. Here's his own words:
"...Opponents of integration often attack such proposals as threats to national sovereignty. Sovereignty, however, is not a fixed concept. In the past, Canada used sovereignty to keep out U.S. oil companies, Mexico relied on it to bar international election monitors, and the United States invoked it as an excuse to privilege "states' rights" over human rights. In each case, sovereignty was used to defend bad policies. Countries benefited when they changed these policies, and evidence suggests that North Americans [i.e., Mexicans, Americans and Canadians] are ready for a new relationship that renders this old definition of sovereignty obsolete...."
North American highways aka North American Corridor, CANAMEX, more taxes for just driving our vehicles, microchips, etc. are all apart of this globalization plan admitted by the elite in their own words plus documents. Knight of Malta Juan Carlos of Spain is trying to fund North American highways as well. NASCO interrelates to North American highways. What is it? NASCO is short for the North American Super Corridor Coalition involving trying to build North American highways. Francisco J. Conde (an editor and publisher of the Conde Report on U.S.-Mexico Relations) wrote a June 10, 1998 letter to Tiffany Newson (an executive director of NASCO) that NASCO is the North American Superhighway Coalition. Newson wrote a note to Conde in June 10, 1998 that the TEA-21 (or Transportation Equity Act for the 21st century) funds trade corridors. Even the NASCO website admits that the I-35 interstate is the present NAFTA Superhighway. That's why they and other elitists promote the Trans-Texas Corridor (which is a planned 4 football field wide road with many lanes. There is also planned 200ft. ulility zone for oil, gas piplines, etc.). Another purpose of the Trans-Texas Corridor is to ship goods from all over the world (especially Mexico and China) into America more frequently with as little regulation as possible. That's why Bush recently allowed Mexican trucks to go into America with little regulation (even labor unions are opposing this measure, so something is wrong). Jerome Corsi and Dr. Daneen Peterson wrote tons of excellent literature about the North American Union issue. Today in 2007, there is controversy over the UN's control over some of waterways. This proposed law is called the U.N. Law of Sea Treaty.
What is it about? It's about the UN via the International Seabed Authority to govern rules among a lot of the world's oceans. Critics of this plan say that 70% of the world Earth's surface could be controlled by the UN. Also, President Bush is in support of the treaty. This is typical since Bush is anti-national sovereignty. That's why Bush supports the democratization of the world whether by their consent or not. Many of the Sea Treaty architects are Marxists like Elisabeth Mann Borgese who advocated a new world order. Cliff Kincaid wrote in September 30, 2007 that the proposed treaty will regulate U.S. economic and industrial activities on land, the ISA council will handle disputes with international input, and other problems with the treaty. This treaty is complex and harbors a control mechanism by one bureaucracy over millions of square miles of oceans. I believe it's a slick anti-sovereignity measure that's even opposed by Glen Beck. They are blatant. Really, those in control of the mainstream environmental movement (like the Sierra Club) aren't really trying to improve the environment now. They want to control as much lands as possible. There is nothing wrong with helping the environment (i.e. building trees, having clean air, promoting conservation, and having clean water) as long as it doesn't go into extremism. Michael Coffman wrote amazing information on this issue. Also, the media rarely discuss real envirnomental issues like GM foods, toxic waste, deforestation, flouride in water, etc. They obsess with global warming when natural forces have a huge influence in our climate, not only mankind (for example natural CO2 in the presence of plants can improve the Earth, and climate cycles exist throughout Earth's history. Other factors influence the environment include cosmic rays, sunspots that can raise temperatures, eruptions from volcanoes, magnetic fields, etc). Here's other information that dissents with man-made global warming. Atmospheric physicist Fred Singer and Denis T. Avery's book called "Unstoppable Global Warming" wrote that the sun and other natural factors are involved in warming every 1500 years in a cycle. In the Middle Ages, it was warmer than today with the Little Ice Age coming to end that without man's influence. Dr. William Gray found that there were more hurricances when the Earth cooled from 1900-1949 (being 101) than from 1957-2006 (being only 81. The elite in the CFR, Trilateral Commission, and the Bilderberg Group are in support of global warming hysteria). We see global warming and climate change on every planet and moon within the solar system. R. Timothy Patterson, professor of geology and director of the Ottawa-Carleton Geoscience Centre at Carleton University says that solar activity over shadow CO2 influence in the environment. Also, Patterson said that by 2020 the climate could cool since the sun will be at its weakest Schwabe cycle of the past two centuries. A British judge found errors in Al Gore's film about global warming as well. The National Center for Policy Analysis (ncpa.org) titled "A Global Warming Primer" reported that Humans contribute approximately 3.4 percent of annual CO2 levels" compared to 96.6 percent by nature. a new report from the U.N. Food and Agriculture Organization shows that the global livestock sector is responsible for a higher share of greenhouse gas emissions than transport. Livestock account for 9 percent of anthropogenic CO2 emissions, 37 percent of methane emissions, 64 percent of ammonia emissions, and 65 percent of global nitrous oxide. Many mainstream scientists dissent with man-made global warming. Michael Coffman PHd's "Global Warming or Global Goverance" accurately defines how global warming is used to promote globalism.
Transhumanism and Big Brother is another big goal of the new world order. (In my opinion, this is one of last goals of the new world order. Julian Huxley was a promoter of eugenics and coined the word "transhumanism"). In late 2006 and in 2007, I understand much more about this issue. Few even understand about it. Big Brother is real. DARPA invented the Internet in the late 1960's and now the Internet is real. Globally microchips are common and some are forcing others to get chips to recieve a job. Technological control of much of society has been increasing rapidly especially in the 21st century. Even the PNAC document (whose supporters inlcude Knight of Columbus Jeb Bush, CFR member Dick Cheney, Paul Wolfowitz, Donald Rumsfeld, etc.) called for "net centric" computing, a "technological revolution" in the "military revolution" plus a "a new Pearl Harbor event" to catayzle all before 9/11. The federal govenrment lusts after trying to control the Internet 100% via attempting to end net neutrality (or internet freedom via free speech) and Internet 2 (another government/corporate version of the Net that's controlled). Big Brother is huge even allowing the NSA to take over DARPA's TIA/MATRIX program. The feds passed the National ID or Real ID Act ready for 2008 in attempting to track citizens. The Council of Truth reported on new technology like trying to make thoughts to speech. The Methuselah Foundation (a group promoting nano-techology and life-extension technology) believes that by the 2030's, life extension techology exist merging with our biology with nanomachinery. Already many new cell phones and some new cars are tracked with GPS system (an article validating this was written by Jeremy Aber, Jerry Harvey, and John Inmon in December 10th 2003). ITS controls some street corner cameras in a federal program. The federal government's GIG (or Global Information Grid) is a military computer (that's why it's a project of the the United States Department of Defense) tracking tons of info. It's superior to Digital Angel. NASA said that its AI intelligence archive will be online by 2010. DARPA's 20t supercomputing cognitive Computer AI will be online by 2012. When you combine GIG, DARPA, and AI software, that's a huge amount of power by the government. What is transhumanism? It's a belief that man can evolve into a godlike being via technology (i.e. nanotechnology, etc.). Singularity another definition of transhumanism as well. Nanotechnology is basically microscropic machines which can be the size of molecules. IBM directly funded the Nazis and now are one of the biggest promoters of biometrics, microchips, and the like. *The whole land grab is a constant threat to America and the world. The real globalist one worlders want our land and are using technology in trying to control as many humans as possible. The elite want more power since they have most of economic wealth on planet Earth anyway. That's the truth.
Popular Culture is hitting rock bottom globally. Conservatives and even some liberals are outraged on the excess vile garbage coming out of Hollywood, music, and other outlets. You have Lindsay Lohan, Britney Spears, and others involved in bad lifestyles. It runs deeper than that certain people. For a very long time, Secret Societies and other elite groups exploit musicians to try to manipulate and change society. One easy example is how the Beatles and Lep Zepplin (on one of his albums he has the SOL symbol) praised Satanist Aliester Crowley. Elvis Preseley was a Theosophist who wanted New Age philsophies accepted in society. It extends from rap (with some artists promoting recreational drug usage, violence for violence sake, etc.), country music, and even some gospel music. I've been studying this issue for years, so a man can't convince me otherwise. Also, I'm not the type that blames music for all of the problems in the world. I'm not a fool, yet music can be used good or bad purposes. Hollywood and those in Popular culture had led degenerate lifestyles back in the 1920's and 1930's like Valentino (who performed automatic writing), Mae West, and others. Now, the TV/Hollywood crowd are more public about their acts. TMZ.com, Youtube,etc. display their behavior for much of the world to witness. Typically, they believe they are so "Free" yet some of them are enslaved to the evils of addiction, corruption, and political correctness. That's why in my opinion, most of them are far left like Whoppi Goldberg, Joy Behar, Manilow, Timbaland, Drew Barrymore, Alicia Silverstone, Tori Spelling, Matt Damon, Russell Simmons (who's 50 years old), Madonna, Hugh Hefner, etc. Other Hollywood liberals include Christinia Aguilera, Jennifer Aniston, Bea Arthur, Ed Asner, Alec Baldwin, Lynda Carter, Kristin Davis, Ellen DeGeneres, Fran Drescher, Melissa Etheridge, Jane Fonda, Calista Flockhart, Ben Harper, Salma Hayek, Ed Harris, Amy Jo Johnson, Ashley Judd, Carole King, Christine Lathi, Sanaa Lathan, Nathalie Maines, Camryn Manheim, Sarah McLachlan, Demi Moore, Julianne Moore, Susan Sarandon, Cybill Shepherd, Sharon Stone, Julia Stiles, Pink, Charlize Theron, Uma Thurman, Ted Turner, Kathaleen Turner, Steven Spielberg, David Geffen, and Alfre Woodard. I can list over 20 more names. There is the younger generation captivated by this brainwashing atmosphere. Today, folks like Venessa Hudgens of High School Musical, Beyonce, America Ferrea, and other stars grace the screen. The good news is that other young folks are seeing through the deceptive nature of the Hollywood/TV false glamour.
"The View" is an elaborate morning TV show that's part of not only popular culture, but the culture war. It seems like Elizabeth Hassebeck is the target of many liberal co-hosts like Joy Behar and the new co-host Whoppi Goldberg. Liberal singer Barry Manilow refused to go on the shows since Hasselbeck possessed pro-life views. That's cowardice since a human being can debate anyone including those who disagree with your viewpoints. Also, Whoppi tried to intimidate Hasselbeck by saying that we should revere women like that. I feel sorry for women who experienced that horrible procedure. Whoppi also said that Roe was about making abortionclean and safe, but no abortion is safe (proven by its side effects of depression, fertility issues, etc.) Whoppi said that very few people have abortions. That's false since almost 50 million abortion occured in America alone. Abortion (whom ancient Romans, Druids, the Nazis, Aztecs, etc. supported and acted on) is wrong and is never mentioned in the Constitution. Abortion violates the right to life. I don't agree with Hasselbeck on war on terror issues but she is 100% correct to be Pro-Life. I will never be intimidated by the far left citizens within popular culture like Whoppi, Behar, and the rest of them. Lies will forever be extinguished by the ultimate truth. More folks are becoming more blatant in having hatred for religious people. These hypocrites lecture us on "tolerance" yet they are really acting intolerant like Kathy Griffin telling Jesus to "Suck it" and Alicia Silverman mocking Jesus. Now, if said similar comments about other groups of people and claim that I was just "joking", the criticism would be unending nearly. There is a double standard here. Popular culture is one popular smokescreen that corporations and the elite use to not make the people focus on the real issues of the day.