Emilio T. González - Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS); Under Secretary of Homeland Security; Executive Secretary Task Force on New Americans
| QUOTE |
| Emilio T. González Under Secretary of Homeland Security Director, United States Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS) Emilio T. González Emilio T. González, Ph.D, serves as Director of United States Citizenship and Immigration Services, an Under Secretary position within the Department of Homeland Security. Appointed by President Bush and confirmed by the U.S. Senate in December 2005, Dr. González leads an organization of more than 15,000 federal and contract employees responsible for the accurate, efficient and secure processing of immigration benefits. Prior to joining the Miami based international law firm of Tew Cardenas, Dr. González was Director for Western Hemisphere Affairs at the National Security Council, Washington, D.C. In this capacity he served as a key National Security and Foreign Policy advisor to President George W. Bush and Dr. Condoleezza Rice. An international affairs specialist, Dr. González has spent most of his professional career involved in foreign affairs and international security policy issues. He has served in or traveled to almost every country in the Western Hemisphere on numerous occasions, and has represented the United States Government on special diplomatic missions. Dr. González remains active in international politics. He often meets with Heads of State, Foreign Ministers, Trade Ministers, ambassadors and political leaders from throughout the hemisphere. Additionally, Dr. González is a noted commentator on Hispanic and international affairs and has appeared on local, national and international radio and television programs. Dr. González completed a distinguished career in the U.S. Army that spanned twenty-six years. During this time he served as a military attaché to U.S. Embassies in El Salvador and Mexico, taught at the United States Military Academy at West Point and headed the Office of Special Assistants for the Commander-in-Chief of the U.S. Southern Command. A graduate of the University of South Florida in Tampa with a B.A. in International Studies, Dr. González also earned MA degrees in Latin American Studies from Tulane University in New Orleans, Louisiana and in Strategic Studies and National Security Affairs from the US Naval War College in Newport, Rhode Island. He was awarded a Ph.D. degree in International Relations from the Graduate School of International Studies, University of Miami, where he also received the Graduate School Award for Academic Achievement. He has been awarded numerous decorations from the United States and has also been decorated by the governments of El Salvador, Mexico, Colombia, Guatemala, the Dominican Republic, Honduras and Nicaragua. Dr. González is a Knight of Malta. |
http://www.whitehouse.gov/government/egonzalez-bio.html http://www.uscis.gov/portal/site/uscis/men...00048f3d6a1RCRD
(Proof Positive)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Emilio_T._Gonzalez
| QUOTE |
| [img]http://i264.photobucket.com/albums/ii186/DutchPhil/gonzalezchertoff.jpg/img] Homeland Security's Emilio T. Gonzalez & Michael Chertoff: The Bozos in Charge of Giving Away American Citizenship |
| QUOTE |
| Task Force on New Americans Members of the Task Force on New Americans, led by USCIS Director Emilio T. González, who also serves as Task Force Executive Secretary, formally announce first-year initiatives during a press conference at the Treasury Department in Washington, DC, June 12, 2007. The Task Force on New Americans is an inter-agency effort to help immigrants learn English, embrace the common core of American civic culture, and fully become American. Objectives of the Task Force on New Americans include:
Created by President George W. Bush in June 2006, the Task Force was established within the Department of Homeland Security. Secretary Michael Chertoff serves as Chair of the Task Force and Emilio T. González, Director of U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services (USCIS), serves as Executive Secretary. Task Force membership includes representatives from 12 Cabinet-level departments and a technical working committee of eight additional federal agencies.  Members of the Task Force on New Americans, led by USCIS Director Emilio T. González, who also serves as Task Force Executive Secretary, formally announce first-year initiatives during a press conference at the Treasury Department in Washington, DC, June 12, 2007. |
http://www.dhs.gov/ximgtn/committees/details.shtm
<No Social Network Diagram>
<No Social Network Diagram>
____________
Baron Luigi Gedda - Rightwing Idealogue; Head of CIA Funded Catholic Action; Served o/t Advisory board of Gayre and Pearson's Mankind Quarterly
Sporting the Knight of Malta Insignia in front of Pope Pius XII in the year 1944 (Proof Positive)
http://www.csi-net.it/contenuto.php?sezion...nostra%20storia
Sporting the Knight of Malta Insignia in front of Pope Pius XII in the year 1944 (Proof Positive)
http://www.csi-net.it/contenuto.php?sezion...nostra%20storia
| QUOTE |
| How to Fight Communists In 6,000 Italian towns and villages last week workers attended "feasts of liberty." Fireworks and oratory popped triumphantly. Two thousand anti-Communist soapboxers, doorbell ringers and pamphlet carriers crowded into Rome's shiny, modern Cinema Metropolitan, hoarsely chanting the name of Luigi Gedda. Finally, a brawny, firm-jawed man rose from his seat in the first row and brusquely acknowledged the cheers. He was the chief strategist of Italy's Catholic Action movement; he had just led his followers to a notable victory. Plan S. Last winter, Luigi Gedda called on Catholic Action's comitati civici (citizens' committees) for a major effort. He named it Plan S (for syndicalism). He wanted to build up the Free Federation of Italian Labor, to rival the Red-run Italian Confederation of Labor (C.G.I.L.) through which the Communists have kept an iron grip on four million of Italy's workers. Gedda's goal was to enlist two million members for the Free Federation. Last week's reports from half of Gedda's provincial headquarters showed more than a million enrolled. When all the returns are in, Gedda is confident that the two million goal will be exceeded. His fingertips casually joined, his eyes on the ceiling, Gedda last week sat behind his cluttered mahogany desk and reviewed the campaign. "It went as we planned," he said calmly. "There was a lot of hard work . . ." |
| QUOTE |
| According to previously classified State Department memoranda, Angleton rec-ommended that the CIA fund Catholic Action, an Italian lay organization headed by Luigi Gedda, a prominent right-wing ideo-logue who had also been honored by the knights. Gedda was a key operative in an effort undertaken by the CIA and the Vatican to "barricade the Reds" in the 1948 Italian elections. |
| QUOTE |
| According to declassified documents from the American Department of State, in February 1948, in anticipation of the upcoming elections scheduled for April 18, the Vatican created organizations called 'Civic Committees' under the leadership of Luigi Gedda, a 45-year-old doctor from Turin who was also the leader of the rightist 'Catholic Action'. By March 17, 1948 Gedda became a Knight of the Grand Priory of Lombardy and Venice. The liaison to Gedda was through an Ecclesiastical Assistant, Mgr. Fiorenzo Angelini, a member of the National Executive of the Civic Committees, who had become a ranking member of the Rome Priory of SMOM also on March 17, 1948.11 At that time the Grand Priory was headed by Ferdinando Thun Hohenstein, Director of Ceremonies of SMOM, a member of the all powerful five-member Sovereign Council of the Order, and nephew of a former SMOM Grand Master. Page 32 On March 22, 1948 the New York Times reported that Gedda had appealed to American Catholics to provide financial assistance to Italian Catholics in their fight against communism. On April 5, it was reported that "Myron C. Taylor arrived from Madrid for what Catholic circles described as an 'important mission' closely related to the Italian general elections." By April 13 the paper reported that Taylor would meet with Pius once a week, and that based on the information recently received, the Pope was "considerably more optimistic'' about the outcome of the elections. Page 33 Two days later with the Italian military staging massive parades and as fascist gangs attacked leftists in the streets, C. L. Sulzberger reported from Rome that Catholic Action "is armed, active, and tough." The State Department documents cite Angleton as "feel[ing] quite strongly that Gedda can be effectively used to further our interests in Italy in the political, labor and social fields," and that the Civic Committees were to receive CIA funds. The Pope had allegedly met with Gedda three times during the month after the elections. One of those reported to have loeen involved in interference in the April 18 election was Baron Luigi Parrilli. Parrilli, son of an Italian admiral, and who had reportedly worked for the American firm Kelvinator before the war, was a fascist and had extensive industrial interests in Italy. He was made a Knight of Malta on December 7, 1942 and by early 1945 had excellent contacts with the top Schutzstaffel (SS: elite guard) and Sicherheitsdienst (SD: secret service) German officers in Northem Italy. By April 1945 he became a representative of SS General Karl Wolff to Allen Dulles and U.S. Gen. Lemnitzer during the period that the latter two were involved in private negotiations to recruit top Nazis before the end of the war. It has been rumored that Parrilli also had "concocted a plan to transport ex-Nazis from Germany to Paraguay."12 (See article by Peter Dale Scott in this issue.) [...] 11. Declassified documents of May 17, 1948 and October 11, 1948. Gedda was listed as a member of the "Comite de Patronage" of the French neo-Nazi 'Nouvelle Ecole' in April 1982 along with Robert Gayre. Gedda also served on the Advisory board of Gayre and Pearson's Mankind Quarterly from at least the mid 1960s until 1979. |
| QUOTE |
| ITALIAN ASKS HELP OF U.S. CATHOLICS; Religious Leader Says Funds Are Needed to Counteract Communist Propaganda Special to THE NEW YORK TIMES. March 22, 1948, Monday Page 4, 684 words ROME, March 21 -- Luigi Gedda, a Catholic leader and head of the "Civil Committees," a nation-wide organization composed of many nonpolitical Catholic bodies, appealed to American Catholics today to help Italian Catholics in their fight against communism. |
http://select.nytimes.com/gst/abstract.htm...uigi+gedda&st=p
Social Network Diagram:
Sources:
http://www.namebase.org/cgi-bin/nb06?_GEDDA_LUIGI_
| QUOTE |
| GEDDA LUIGI Italy 1948 * Covert Action Information Bulletin 1986-#25 (31, 33) * Dorril,S. MI6. 2000 (438) * Hersh,B. The Old Boys. 1992 (293) * Lernoux,P. People of God. 1989 (289) * Lobster Magazine (Britain) 1990-#19 (6) * Mother Jones 1983-07 (23) * National Reporter 1986-W (57, 59) * Parapolitics/USA 1981-05-30 (47, 51) * Parapolitics/USA 1982-03-31 (32, 36) * Willan,P. Puppetmasters. 1991 (33) pages cited this search: 14 |
_________________
-1892 Canon Law index
I think we can take the Testimony of Sister Charlotte seriously with some corroborating evidence.
As of 1892, Torture was actually listed in the Index of Canon Law.
- Trevor Kokotylo
tkra@honesty.org
As of 1892, Torture was actually listed in the Index of Canon Law.
- Trevor Kokotylo
tkra@honesty.org
________________
THE INCOMING ELECTIONS IN ITALY FORECASTED BY BERLUSCONI IN AUGUST.
From the daily of Trieste, "Il Piccolo", day: Friday, 31st August, 2007:
Title: "Berlusconi, elections in Spring".
The article report the visit of Berlusconi made the day before, Thursday the 30th, in the meeting of the Udeur party of Clemente Mastella. The town: Telesa Terme, Campania region (capital: Neaples). Berlusconi stated clearly that at the beginning of 2008 the goverment would be falled with consequent Spring 2008 elections.
Interesting pictures on the page, the page number two. You have four pictures, one of the major of Florence related to an article about the polemics on the foreing workers on the streets. The other three pictures are showing....:
1) Berlusconi (who now appears as the opposer N. 1 against a short time goverment and the N. 1 of the supporters for immediate elections): Silvio is the Star of the Italian Papal Comedy. He is my 'favourite', Mastroianni and Gassman were nothing compared to him;
2) head of the Senate Franco Marini (who now appears in every moment in the media as President Napolitano charged him as possible Prime Minister for an eventual short time goverment - Franco, an actor who is staging efforts to find supporters for his govt.; Robert de Niro is a pale amateur, in front of Marini);
3) Clemente Mastella, the 'responsible' of the fall of the goverment and of the crash of the left wing coalition majority. Another actor of the "Papal Universal/Catholic Studios". If for a mistake he goes in Hollywood during the awards night, he wins everything and Tom Hanks, Jack Nickolson, Donald Shuterland can quite return home. And to work in provincial theaters.
Italy is always the best, is Mussolini the one who created "Cinecittà" (remember Sofia Loren?). Mussolini is important because he ordered to write on the walls of the Cinecittà/papal Italian Studios, a famous phrase, which condensates the inner deep core of the reality, like it or not, and the sense of what is happening in the Italian parliament in these days:
"LA CINEMATOGRAFIA E' L'ARMA PIU' FORTE"
i.e.
"THE CINEMATOGRAFY IS THE STRONGEST WEAPON"
(ops, I forgot,....and this is the reason for which they transformed the skies in a giant screen full of subliminal lines....Mussolini/Tarchi docet).
Best regards from a North Adriatic Anti-catholic isolationist
avles
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“We don’t teach to honour and venerate the virgin Mary and the saints…Or to make out of them images of idols and gods, to pray them for clemency and mercy for the sins in every disgrace, to build them churches, donation offer, all that God, angels and saints severely forbid.
But demons, which assume the image of angels, goddess virgin Mary and saints and appear to ignorant popes, bishops, parishes and monks, to old witches and to the prostitute of the parishes and of the monks, impose them to be bigot, to torment themselves, to fall to the ground,… and to all these people the demons announce that now on this, now on a different mountain, on the field, or in the forest, churches have to be built, in order to bring there donations and to celebrate masses, in order to bring there wealth from everywhere, and every kind of cattle; and if they don’t do that, the goddess Mary and the saints will destroy with lightning all the corn-fields and the vineyards and will kill them with the plague.”
Father Primoz Trubar (father of the modern Slovenia and founder of the Slovenian Protestant Church, 1508 - 1586).
[B][/B]
[I][/I]
From the daily of Trieste, "Il Piccolo", day: Friday, 31st August, 2007:
Title: "Berlusconi, elections in Spring".
The article report the visit of Berlusconi made the day before, Thursday the 30th, in the meeting of the Udeur party of Clemente Mastella. The town: Telesa Terme, Campania region (capital: Neaples). Berlusconi stated clearly that at the beginning of 2008 the goverment would be falled with consequent Spring 2008 elections.
Interesting pictures on the page, the page number two. You have four pictures, one of the major of Florence related to an article about the polemics on the foreing workers on the streets. The other three pictures are showing....:
1) Berlusconi (who now appears as the opposer N. 1 against a short time goverment and the N. 1 of the supporters for immediate elections): Silvio is the Star of the Italian Papal Comedy. He is my 'favourite', Mastroianni and Gassman were nothing compared to him;
2) head of the Senate Franco Marini (who now appears in every moment in the media as President Napolitano charged him as possible Prime Minister for an eventual short time goverment - Franco, an actor who is staging efforts to find supporters for his govt.; Robert de Niro is a pale amateur, in front of Marini);
3) Clemente Mastella, the 'responsible' of the fall of the goverment and of the crash of the left wing coalition majority. Another actor of the "Papal Universal/Catholic Studios". If for a mistake he goes in Hollywood during the awards night, he wins everything and Tom Hanks, Jack Nickolson, Donald Shuterland can quite return home. And to work in provincial theaters.
Italy is always the best, is Mussolini the one who created "Cinecittà" (remember Sofia Loren?). Mussolini is important because he ordered to write on the walls of the Cinecittà/papal Italian Studios, a famous phrase, which condensates the inner deep core of the reality, like it or not, and the sense of what is happening in the Italian parliament in these days:
"LA CINEMATOGRAFIA E' L'ARMA PIU' FORTE"
i.e.
"THE CINEMATOGRAFY IS THE STRONGEST WEAPON"
(ops, I forgot,....and this is the reason for which they transformed the skies in a giant screen full of subliminal lines....Mussolini/Tarchi docet).
Best regards from a North Adriatic Anti-catholic isolationist
avles
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
“We don’t teach to honour and venerate the virgin Mary and the saints…Or to make out of them images of idols and gods, to pray them for clemency and mercy for the sins in every disgrace, to build them churches, donation offer, all that God, angels and saints severely forbid.
But demons, which assume the image of angels, goddess virgin Mary and saints and appear to ignorant popes, bishops, parishes and monks, to old witches and to the prostitute of the parishes and of the monks, impose them to be bigot, to torment themselves, to fall to the ground,… and to all these people the demons announce that now on this, now on a different mountain, on the field, or in the forest, churches have to be built, in order to bring there donations and to celebrate masses, in order to bring there wealth from everywhere, and every kind of cattle; and if they don’t do that, the goddess Mary and the saints will destroy with lightning all the corn-fields and the vineyards and will kill them with the plague.”
Father Primoz Trubar (father of the modern Slovenia and founder of the Slovenian Protestant Church, 1508 - 1586).
[B][/B]
[I][/I]
-Avles
_____________
From Hyksos
Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. He writes and speaks for the arm of Tell the Word called “Speaking Truth to Power.”
http://inquestiraq.org/McGovern.html
| QUOTE |
http://www.fordham.edu/campus_resources/public_affairs/inside_fordham/june_29_2007/ news/alumnus_says_activis_25964.asp his Jesuit education at both Fordham Preparatory School and the University. in the U.S. Army as an infantry and intelligence officer before moving to the CIA. McGovern’s duties included chairing National Intelligence Estimates and preparing the President’s Daily Brief." |
Ray McGovern works with Tell the Word, the publishing arm of the ecumenical Church of the Saviour in Washington, DC. He writes and speaks for the arm of Tell the Word called “Speaking Truth to Power.”
http://inquestiraq.org/McGovern.html
| QUOTE |
| Jesuits involved in the President's daily intelligence brief. Brother Eric |
____________________
COLEMAN'S "COMMITTEE OF 300" - FACT OR FRAUD?
my take on coleman's "committe of 300" assertions:
i studied & analyzed his "conspirators' hierarchy: the story of the committee of 300" about 3 years ago. it became clear while reading it that it's got some real factual problems, not least the fact that coleman may not even have read an actual copy of a book that he repeatedly quotes from throughout the book. zbigniew brzezinski's "between two ages: america's role in the technetronic era" (1970). i was fortunate enough to track down this quite rare book.
coleman refers to the title & subtitle as 2 separate books & even lists them as such in his bibliography. david icke's provider of much info, brian desborough, arizona wilder'smind-control "deprogrammer" does the same thing in "they cast no shadows", thus exposing his source as coleman who made the same inexcusable mistake. this is a glaring error that no-one who actually read the book would make. i can only surmise that he's quoting from 2 different sources, w/out naming those intermediate texts.
at there's a critique on the "theodore adorno wrote all the beatles material" claim of coleman's that is hard to get passed. this is 1 of alan watts fave stories & really undermines his other invaluable info (as does his wordology on the origin of the word "israel", lifted straight from jordan maxwell & provably fraudulent, now maybe maxwell & watt are acting in good faith but both should scrutinize their sources a little better).
my copy of coleman's book has many annotations that i made, among them:
coleman claims that the beatles were an integral part of "the aquarian conspiracy" which sprang from "the changing images of man" SRI (stanford research institute)document only 1 problem: that document was from 1974, not 1964! the beatles were past-tense several years before.
"teenager" "rock", "cool' & "pop music" according to coleman were disguised codewords signifying the acceptance of drugs in mid-60s youth culture, arriving w/ the beatles. chronologically unsound to sat the least. cool was a jazz expression since time, teenager was coined in the late 1940s in a famous article, frank sinatra had been pop music way before rock & roll came round in the mid 1950s...
these are examples that may be dismissed as having little importance on the bigger picture, but they illustrate that coleman's information is not always as he presents it. as a serious researcher of popular culture and as someone who has put in much time studying postwar jazz culture and 50's/60's pop culture including the beat, mod & psychedelic eras, these examples raised suspicions of the accuracy of the rest of his information.
it's a fascinating but very flawed book & i'm not convinced by the committee of 300, or at least coleman's spin on it. is he a deliberate disinfo agent working for the CIA, british intell (as he claims he formerly was?) or directly under the jesuits?
coleman's book has a handful of passing references to the jesuits and he mentions the knights of malta & the vatican once each (and even then only stating that the knights own a certain bank & a reference to "vatican intelligence"). this is a blatant whitewash. on Pp. 184-185 coleman states unequivocally his assertion of who's controlling things, and it's not the vatican-jesuit-SMOM power-nexus:
* "Committee of 300 corporations, banks, and insurance companies operate under the unified command covering every conceivable matter of strategy and cohesive action. Th Committee is the ONLY organized power hierarchy in the world transcending all governments and individuals, however powerful and secure they feel themselves to be. This covers finance, defense matters and political parties of all colors and types.
There is no entity the Committee cannot reach and control, and that includes organized religions of the world. This then, is the all powerful OLYMPIAN GROUP whose power base is in London and the City of London's financial centers with its grip on minerals, metals and precious gems, cocaine, opium and pharmaceutical drugs, rentier-financier bankers, cult promoters and founders of rock music. The British Crown is the control point from which all things radiate. as the saying goes, "They have a finger in every pie."
even the origin of the term "the committee of 300" appears to be fraudulent (see the reference below), although i'll not dismiss it entirely as an entity, as leo zagami has referred to this body and has proven to be a source of much rare and reliable information in my researches.
some of coleman's more questionable assertions regarding structure of the committee of 300 and more are to be found in the quotes below, excerpted from an internet review of the book, including the possible origin of the term:
* "Although a very articulate and knowledgable on the American Constitution in his speeches, I couldn't find information on him personally; Education, MI6 employment or any additional bio. The book itself is, what I consider, a work of fiction. Although my copy is the 4th edition I had expected that the numerous mis-spelling, gramatical errors and factual distortions, like 4 million homeless people in the US, would have been corrected or stricken before final publishing especially when at the supposed Ph.D. level."
* "Coleman misquotes Walter Rathenau on page 200 in that he states the "quote" to be made in 1921: "There is a Committee of 300 men whose identity is known only to each other who rule the world" who didn't say there was a "Committee of 300" whatsoever. On page 63, Coleman again quotes Ratheneau true statement: "Only 300 men, each of whom knows all others, govern the fate of Europe." Ratheneau actually said this in 1909, as stated by Carroll Quigley in his massive work "Tragedy and Hope" on page 61. Coleman states that Rathenau's murderers were murdered while other souces state they were arrested and set to trial? Coleman states that Ratheneau was the only man who disclosed the existance of "The Committee of 300" while later stating M. Gorbechov was apparently had too stated it but couldn't get the video tapes....."
* "I most definately agree with the masses of unconstitutional expansions over the State Republics Coleman very articulately states in his speech on GoogleVideo, but there are just far too many inaccuracies within this work to accept it as "fact", sort of comparable to the mass one sided agenda/propaganda with Global Warming."
* "Coleman mentions that Alister Crowley was a member of the Committee amongst others by leaves them out of the list. Coleman claims that all members of the Committee are drawn from the Anglican Church but then lists Baron DeRothschild, Chaim Weismann, Ben Gurion, Rockefeller, Bush, Cicirini etc. at the back of the book who are not Anglican at all."
* "It is a good story containing many facts but many distortions to prove his goal what I believe to be personal sales. When one reads it and catches one after another misquotes, distortions and little to no supporting documentation the work looses its credibility. It is my personal opinion that he either took the misquote by Ratheneau and built his story around that specific quote and used the Queen's Privy Council, of 300 members, to solidify his story. Good Story but I feel Antony Sutton, James Perloff, Cleon Skousen, Stanley Monteith and even Carroll Quigley are far more accurate and credible to be 100% honest in my opinion. I would have given Coleman's book a much higher rating if it didn't have so many misleading "facts" and unfounded statements...."
OK, that's just what 1 other person noticed & some solid stuff to consider. if you do a search on the internet you'll find much more info that shows many of the "facts" in the book to be fallacious.
so what's coleman's game: disinformer or misinformer? blatant B.S. or shoddy research & duff intell sources? of course many of his textual sources are very informative books, but none of the above bodes well 4 coleman's claim of the existence of the committee of 300 or those of the people who endorse his work.
coleman's endorsers include alan watt (in many of his radio interviews), fritz springmeier ("bloodlines of the illuminati"), brian desborough ("they cast no shadows"), stewart swerdlow ("blue blood true blood") & david icke ("and the truth shall set you free...." - to his credit icke does mention in "the biggest secret" that many people question coleman's authenticity as a former brit intell operative, but then says he believes coleman's claims are correct, all of which seems like a sidenote considering that this was the book which demonstrated the successfulness of the international intell psy-ops sting, controlled IMO by brian desborough, that convinced icke of the reptilian shape-shifting nature of the illuminati elite). even the most accurate and indepth writer/ researcher focussing on the true nature of the power structure of the new world order, eric jon phelps, author of "vatican assassins", gives credence to coleman's apparently dubious "committee of 300". zagami's passing reference to the committee of 300 should be brought up with him if possible, as he hasn't stated whether his knowledge of such an entity is from a more direct source. coleman definitely has more than a few questions to answer.
if coleman is less than genuine, then what is his game? several of his more disputable claims seem to be read off the same song-sheet that lyndon larouche & his executive intelligence review sing from. the enigma of the exact role played by larouche & co has perplexed me for a while, but the the john birch society "belmont brotherhood" expose articles posted on the internet may shed some light on the roles of both larouche & coleman.
all of which begs the question: did the committee of 300 exist before coleman's book came out in 1992?
APPENDIX 1:
The Beatles and the Aquarian Conspiracy (from John Coleman's "Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committeee of 300").
An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population group in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent" of the BEATLES. The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a social experiment which would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which they were not even aware.
When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake. The Beatles were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)-2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report pre-pared by SRI Center for the study of Social Policy, Director, Professor Willis Harmon.
The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to introduce by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against its will. New words and new phrases--prepared by Tavistock(1)-- were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have been accomplished without the cooperation of the media, especially the electronic media and, in particular, the scurrilous Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role he was to play. Nobody would have paid much attention to the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music" that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press exposure. The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern" flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee of 300.
Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger words created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new targeted group, the youth of America.
The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting like trained robots "with a little help from their friends"--code words for using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became a highly visible "new type"-- more Tavistock jargon--and as such it was not long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and language usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended. This was part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out by Willis Harmon and his team of social scientists and genetic engineering tinkerers and put into action.
The role of the print and electronic media in our society is crucial to the success of brainwashing large population groups. Gang wars ended in Los Angeles in 1966 as the media withdrew its coverage. The same thing will happen with the current wave of gang wars in Los Angeles. Street gangs will wither on the vine once media saturation coverage is toned down and then completely withdrawn. As in 1966, the issue would become "burned out." Street gangs will have served their purpose of creating turbulence and insecurity. Exactly the same pattern will be followed in the case of "rock" music. Deprived of media attention, it will eventually take its place in history.
Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music." I hate to use these beautiful words in the context of "Beatlemania"; it reminds me of how wrongly the word "lover" is used when referring to the filthy interaction between two homosexuals writhing in pigswill. To call "rock" music, is an insult, likewise the language used in "rock lyrics."
Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from main-stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles before them.
The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions of young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical revolution without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by helplessly, unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting in a maladaptive manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all types, marijuana, and later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided for them by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic ergotamine, a powerful mind-altering drug. The Committee of 300 financed the project through one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.
The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample" size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.
With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving in the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calendar of American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of drugs among the youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy beat sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it." Peer pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received maximum coverage from the jackal media, which cost the conspirators not one single thin dime.
Great anger was felt by a number of civic leaders and churchmen over the new cult but their energies were misdirected against the RESULT of what was going on and not against the CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the same mistakes that had been made in the prohibition era, they criticized law enforcement agencies, teachers, parents anybody but the conspirators.
-TROY
my take on coleman's "committe of 300" assertions:
i studied & analyzed his "conspirators' hierarchy: the story of the committee of 300" about 3 years ago. it became clear while reading it that it's got some real factual problems, not least the fact that coleman may not even have read an actual copy of a book that he repeatedly quotes from throughout the book. zbigniew brzezinski's "between two ages: america's role in the technetronic era" (1970). i was fortunate enough to track down this quite rare book.
coleman refers to the title & subtitle as 2 separate books & even lists them as such in his bibliography. david icke's provider of much info, brian desborough, arizona wilder'smind-control "deprogrammer" does the same thing in "they cast no shadows", thus exposing his source as coleman who made the same inexcusable mistake. this is a glaring error that no-one who actually read the book would make. i can only surmise that he's quoting from 2 different sources, w/out naming those intermediate texts.
at there's a critique on the "theodore adorno wrote all the beatles material" claim of coleman's that is hard to get passed. this is 1 of alan watts fave stories & really undermines his other invaluable info (as does his wordology on the origin of the word "israel", lifted straight from jordan maxwell & provably fraudulent, now maybe maxwell & watt are acting in good faith but both should scrutinize their sources a little better).
my copy of coleman's book has many annotations that i made, among them:
coleman claims that the beatles were an integral part of "the aquarian conspiracy" which sprang from "the changing images of man" SRI (stanford research institute)document only 1 problem: that document was from 1974, not 1964! the beatles were past-tense several years before.
"teenager" "rock", "cool' & "pop music" according to coleman were disguised codewords signifying the acceptance of drugs in mid-60s youth culture, arriving w/ the beatles. chronologically unsound to sat the least. cool was a jazz expression since time, teenager was coined in the late 1940s in a famous article, frank sinatra had been pop music way before rock & roll came round in the mid 1950s...
these are examples that may be dismissed as having little importance on the bigger picture, but they illustrate that coleman's information is not always as he presents it. as a serious researcher of popular culture and as someone who has put in much time studying postwar jazz culture and 50's/60's pop culture including the beat, mod & psychedelic eras, these examples raised suspicions of the accuracy of the rest of his information.
it's a fascinating but very flawed book & i'm not convinced by the committee of 300, or at least coleman's spin on it. is he a deliberate disinfo agent working for the CIA, british intell (as he claims he formerly was?) or directly under the jesuits?
coleman's book has a handful of passing references to the jesuits and he mentions the knights of malta & the vatican once each (and even then only stating that the knights own a certain bank & a reference to "vatican intelligence"). this is a blatant whitewash. on Pp. 184-185 coleman states unequivocally his assertion of who's controlling things, and it's not the vatican-jesuit-SMOM power-nexus:
* "Committee of 300 corporations, banks, and insurance companies operate under the unified command covering every conceivable matter of strategy and cohesive action. Th Committee is the ONLY organized power hierarchy in the world transcending all governments and individuals, however powerful and secure they feel themselves to be. This covers finance, defense matters and political parties of all colors and types.
There is no entity the Committee cannot reach and control, and that includes organized religions of the world. This then, is the all powerful OLYMPIAN GROUP whose power base is in London and the City of London's financial centers with its grip on minerals, metals and precious gems, cocaine, opium and pharmaceutical drugs, rentier-financier bankers, cult promoters and founders of rock music. The British Crown is the control point from which all things radiate. as the saying goes, "They have a finger in every pie."
even the origin of the term "the committee of 300" appears to be fraudulent (see the reference below), although i'll not dismiss it entirely as an entity, as leo zagami has referred to this body and has proven to be a source of much rare and reliable information in my researches.
some of coleman's more questionable assertions regarding structure of the committee of 300 and more are to be found in the quotes below, excerpted from an internet review of the book, including the possible origin of the term:
* "Although a very articulate and knowledgable on the American Constitution in his speeches, I couldn't find information on him personally; Education, MI6 employment or any additional bio. The book itself is, what I consider, a work of fiction. Although my copy is the 4th edition I had expected that the numerous mis-spelling, gramatical errors and factual distortions, like 4 million homeless people in the US, would have been corrected or stricken before final publishing especially when at the supposed Ph.D. level."
* "Coleman misquotes Walter Rathenau on page 200 in that he states the "quote" to be made in 1921: "There is a Committee of 300 men whose identity is known only to each other who rule the world" who didn't say there was a "Committee of 300" whatsoever. On page 63, Coleman again quotes Ratheneau true statement: "Only 300 men, each of whom knows all others, govern the fate of Europe." Ratheneau actually said this in 1909, as stated by Carroll Quigley in his massive work "Tragedy and Hope" on page 61. Coleman states that Rathenau's murderers were murdered while other souces state they were arrested and set to trial? Coleman states that Ratheneau was the only man who disclosed the existance of "The Committee of 300" while later stating M. Gorbechov was apparently had too stated it but couldn't get the video tapes....."
* "I most definately agree with the masses of unconstitutional expansions over the State Republics Coleman very articulately states in his speech on GoogleVideo, but there are just far too many inaccuracies within this work to accept it as "fact", sort of comparable to the mass one sided agenda/propaganda with Global Warming."
* "Coleman mentions that Alister Crowley was a member of the Committee amongst others by leaves them out of the list. Coleman claims that all members of the Committee are drawn from the Anglican Church but then lists Baron DeRothschild, Chaim Weismann, Ben Gurion, Rockefeller, Bush, Cicirini etc. at the back of the book who are not Anglican at all."
* "It is a good story containing many facts but many distortions to prove his goal what I believe to be personal sales. When one reads it and catches one after another misquotes, distortions and little to no supporting documentation the work looses its credibility. It is my personal opinion that he either took the misquote by Ratheneau and built his story around that specific quote and used the Queen's Privy Council, of 300 members, to solidify his story. Good Story but I feel Antony Sutton, James Perloff, Cleon Skousen, Stanley Monteith and even Carroll Quigley are far more accurate and credible to be 100% honest in my opinion. I would have given Coleman's book a much higher rating if it didn't have so many misleading "facts" and unfounded statements...."
OK, that's just what 1 other person noticed & some solid stuff to consider. if you do a search on the internet you'll find much more info that shows many of the "facts" in the book to be fallacious.
so what's coleman's game: disinformer or misinformer? blatant B.S. or shoddy research & duff intell sources? of course many of his textual sources are very informative books, but none of the above bodes well 4 coleman's claim of the existence of the committee of 300 or those of the people who endorse his work.
coleman's endorsers include alan watt (in many of his radio interviews), fritz springmeier ("bloodlines of the illuminati"), brian desborough ("they cast no shadows"), stewart swerdlow ("blue blood true blood") & david icke ("and the truth shall set you free...." - to his credit icke does mention in "the biggest secret" that many people question coleman's authenticity as a former brit intell operative, but then says he believes coleman's claims are correct, all of which seems like a sidenote considering that this was the book which demonstrated the successfulness of the international intell psy-ops sting, controlled IMO by brian desborough, that convinced icke of the reptilian shape-shifting nature of the illuminati elite). even the most accurate and indepth writer/ researcher focussing on the true nature of the power structure of the new world order, eric jon phelps, author of "vatican assassins", gives credence to coleman's apparently dubious "committee of 300". zagami's passing reference to the committee of 300 should be brought up with him if possible, as he hasn't stated whether his knowledge of such an entity is from a more direct source. coleman definitely has more than a few questions to answer.
if coleman is less than genuine, then what is his game? several of his more disputable claims seem to be read off the same song-sheet that lyndon larouche & his executive intelligence review sing from. the enigma of the exact role played by larouche & co has perplexed me for a while, but the the john birch society "belmont brotherhood" expose articles posted on the internet may shed some light on the roles of both larouche & coleman.
all of which begs the question: did the committee of 300 exist before coleman's book came out in 1992?
APPENDIX 1:
The Beatles and the Aquarian Conspiracy (from John Coleman's "Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committeee of 300").
An outstanding example of social conditioning to accept change, even when it is recognized as unwelcome change by the large population group in the sights of Stanford Research Institute, was the "advent" of the BEATLES. The Beatles were brought to the United States as part of a social experiment which would subject large population groups to brainwashing of which they were not even aware.
When Tavistock brought the Beatles to the United States nobody could have imagined the cultural disaster that was to follow in their wake. The Beatles were an integral part of "THE AQUARIAN CONSPIRACY," a living organism which sprang From "THE CHANGING IMAGES OF MAN," URH (489)-2150-Policy Research Report No. 4/4/74. Policy Report pre-pared by SRI Center for the study of Social Policy, Director, Professor Willis Harmon.
The phenomenon of the Beatles was not a spontaneous rebellion by youth against the old social system. Instead it was a carefully crafted plot to introduce by a conspiratorial body which could not be identified, a highly destructive and divisive element into a large population group targeted for change against its will. New words and new phrases--prepared by Tavistock(1)-- were introduced to America along with the Beatles. Words such as "rock" in relation to music sounds, "teenager," "cool," "discovered" and "pop music" were a lexicon of disguised code words signifying the acceptance of drugs and arrived with and accompanied the Beatles wherever they went, to be "discovered" by "teenagers." Incidentally, the word "teenagers" was never used until just before the Beatles arrived on the scene, courtesy of the Tavistock Institute for Human Relations.
As in the case of gang wars, nothing could or would have been accomplished without the cooperation of the media, especially the electronic media and, in particular, the scurrilous Ed Sullivan who had been coached by the conspirators as to the role he was to play. Nobody would have paid much attention to the motley crew from Liverpool and the 12-atonal system of "music" that was to follow had it not been for an overabundance of press exposure. The 12-atonal system consisted of heavy, repetitive sounds, taken from the music of the cult of Dionysus and the Baal priesthood by Adorno and given a "modern" flavor by this special friend of the Queen of England and hence the Committee of 300.
Tavistock and its Stanford Research Center created trigger words which then came into general usage around "rock music" and its fans. Trigger words created a distinct new break-away largely young population group which was persuaded by social engineering and conditioning to believe that the Beatles really were their favorite group. All trigger words devised in the context of "rock music" were designed for mass control of the new targeted group, the youth of America.
The Beatles did a perfect job, or perhaps it would be more correct to say that Tavistock and Stanford did a perfect job, the Beatles merely reacting like trained robots "with a little help from their friends"--code words for using drugs and making it "cool." The Beatles became a highly visible "new type"-- more Tavistock jargon--and as such it was not long before the group made new styles (fads in clothing, hairstyles and language usage) which upset the older generation, as was intended. This was part of the "fragmentation-maladaptation" process worked out by Willis Harmon and his team of social scientists and genetic engineering tinkerers and put into action.
The role of the print and electronic media in our society is crucial to the success of brainwashing large population groups. Gang wars ended in Los Angeles in 1966 as the media withdrew its coverage. The same thing will happen with the current wave of gang wars in Los Angeles. Street gangs will wither on the vine once media saturation coverage is toned down and then completely withdrawn. As in 1966, the issue would become "burned out." Street gangs will have served their purpose of creating turbulence and insecurity. Exactly the same pattern will be followed in the case of "rock" music. Deprived of media attention, it will eventually take its place in history.
Following the Beatles, who incidentally were put together by the Tavistock Institute, came other "Made in England" rock groups, who, like the Beatles, had Theo Adorno write their cult lyrics and compose all the "music." I hate to use these beautiful words in the context of "Beatlemania"; it reminds me of how wrongly the word "lover" is used when referring to the filthy interaction between two homosexuals writhing in pigswill. To call "rock" music, is an insult, likewise the language used in "rock lyrics."
Tavistock and Stanford Research then embarked on the second phase of the work commissioned by the Committee of 300. This new phase turned up the heat for social change in America. As quickly as the Beatles had appeared on the American scene, so too did the "beat generation," trigger words designed to separate and fragment society. The media now focused its attention on the "beat generation." Other Tavistock-coined words came seemingly out of nowhere: "beatniks," "hippies," "flower children" became part of the vocabulary of America. It became popular to "drop out" and wear dirty jeans, go about with long unwashed hair. The "beat generation" cut itself off from main-stream America. They became just as infamous as the cleaner Beatles before them.
The newly-created group and its "lifestyle" swept millions of young Americans into the cult. American youth underwent a radical revolution without ever being aware of it, while the older generation stood by helplessly, unable to identify the source of the crisis, and thus reacting in a maladaptive manner against its manifestation, which were drugs of all types, marijuana, and later Lysergic acid, "LSD," so conveniently provided for them by the Swiss pharmaceutical company, SANDOZ, following the discovery by one of its chemists, Albert Hoffman, how to make synthetic ergotamine, a powerful mind-altering drug. The Committee of 300 financed the project through one of their banks, S. C. Warburg, and the drug was carried to America by the philosopher, Aldous Huxley.
The new "wonder drug" was promptly distributed in "sample" size packages, handed out free of charge on college campuses across the United States and at "rock" concerts, which became the leading vehicle for proliferating the use of drugs. The question that cries out for an answer is, what was the Drug Enforcement Agency (DEA) doing at the time? There is compelling circumstantial evidence that would appear to indicate that the DEA knew what was going on but was ordered not to take any action.
With very substantial numbers of new British "rock" bands arriving in the U.S., rock concerts began to become a fixture on the social calendar of American youth. In tandem with these "concerts," the use of drugs among the youth rose in proportion. The devilish bedlam of discordant heavy beat sounds numbed the minds of listeners so that they were easily persuaded to try the new drug on the basis that "everybody is doing it." Peer pressure is a very strong weapon. The "new culture" received maximum coverage from the jackal media, which cost the conspirators not one single thin dime.
Great anger was felt by a number of civic leaders and churchmen over the new cult but their energies were misdirected against the RESULT of what was going on and not against the CAUSE. Critics of the rock cult made the same mistakes that had been made in the prohibition era, they criticized law enforcement agencies, teachers, parents anybody but the conspirators.
-TROY
No comments:
Post a Comment