There is an abortion situation. There was an unborn child in Italy who survived a failed abortion attempt and lived 2 days after doctors left him to die is raising questions about a law to prevent that in the United States. A nurse who discovered live birth abortions says she doesn't think the Barack Obama administration is enforcing the law thoroughly. Lifenews.com reported that a 22 week old disabled boy survived an abortion attempt in southern Italy, but doctors left him to die afterwards and he survived for 2 days before passing away. The boy's mother was pregnant for the first time but decided to have an abortion after prenatal scans suggested that the unborn child was disabled. Jill Stanek was a former nurse at Christ Hospital outside of Chicago. She knows something about these kinds of situations. She exposed the practice of live birth abortions, where doctors would purposefully birth an infant prematurely and allow the baby to die via medical neglect and lack of proper care. Stanek said that the case isn't limited to Italy. "The story was heartbreaking, more so because I know without a doubt babies his age are surviving their abortions every day across America and getting similar treatment," Stanek said. "I would even venture to say this is a worldwide epidemic." "For instance, only last week I spoke at length after a pro-life event with an L&D RN who told me babies survive their abortions at her hospital, and doctors pressure nurses to give them 0-0 APGAR scores," Stanek explained, "in other words, chart that the babies were born dead when they were not." Stanek complains that the Obama administration is not properly enforcing a national law President George W. Bush signed after she exposed the live-birth abortion practice that ensures doctors (and medical staff are required to provide proper medical care and treatment to babies who survive failed abortions or purposeful premature delivery). She is frustrated that the Born Alive Infants Protection Act isn't being enforced. Stanek commented that she has spoken with representatives of the Department of Health and Human Services who informed her the enforcement of the law is report driven. Also, federal officials according to Stanek will do nothing to enforce the law unless a report is receiving alleging its abuse. HHS officials "refused to proactively query" hospitals and abortion businesses to ensure enforcement. "Yet hospital and abortion staff won't report what they know. Even if they do, we saw with the baby Shanice case in Hialeah, Florida, that viability becomes an issue to prosecutors, when whether one would live or die if not murdered is absolutely irrelevant," Stanek said. Stanek condemned the fact in the Italian case that doctors diagnosed the unborn child as having a cleft palate and lip. This can be easily corrected via a surgery and not a legitimate medical reason for an abortion. So, real pro-life laws ought to be enforced in the USA.
Goldman Sachs has been in the news lately. Congress accused Goldman Sachs of economic fraud and corruption against citizens. Goldman Sachs of course denies the charges. The major charge deals with the accusation that Goldman Sachs misled clients or consumers on the mortgage securities business. Goldman Sachs has been been involved in economic, but they aren't the only ones involved in it. The FEDs are investigating Goldman Sachs for a criminal investigation. Meanwhile, Paulson & Company, the hedge fund linked to civil fraud charges against Goldman Sachs, has moved to head off investor concerns about its role in a deal that has scarred the reputation of the famous Wall Street bank and overshadowed blow-out quarterly earnings. There is irony in this since Goldman Sachs gave almost 1 million dollars in campaign contributions to the Barack Obama campaign. Goldman Sachs have done evil though, so I want to make that clear. This process is done to promote the bill on financial reform, which its supporters even admits have some good provisions, but it isn't perfect. The SEC case deals with the accusation that Goldman Sachs created a financial instrument based on mortgage backed securities that was designed to fail without disclosing that hedge funder Fabrice Tourre, who helped build the instrument, had bet on its failure.Insider emails released by Goldman at the weekend, showing executives bragging about making profits by betting against the mortgage market in 2007, provided more evidence. Both Tourre and Goldman CEO Lloyd Blankfein denies the charges made against them. Furthermore, other major Wall St Investment banks including JPMorgan Chase, Merrill Lynch (now part of Bank of America), Citigroup, Deutsche Bank and UBS were all doing similar deals to Goldman. Lloyd Blankfein has admitted that he believes Goldman Sachs has no moral obligation to tell clients it is betting against a product it is asking them to buy. Lloyd is wrong since transparency and honesty is great to develop economic growth. Critics of the financial reform bill say that the regulation don't go after big banks, but target traditional community banks, exempting most of the investment bank and broker dealer activities that were responsible for the financial collapse. Barack Obama according to Mike Whitney won't deal with OTC derivatives, off sheet balance sheet operations, securitization, ratings agencies, and CFPA. Smacking down Goldman Sachs does little if you won't tackle derivatives and other issues pertaining to the economy. Some people feel that the bill will empower the Federal Reserve, but it is true that financial reform should exist in America.
Pat Bertoche is the Iowa GOP candidate. He wants microchips in illegal immigrants. I don't agree with that at all since personal privacy is a paramount concept to protect. Pat promoted an extreme policy. He is in Iowa's Third District. He had an unique approach to the nation's illegal immigration policy. This policy is similar to how we catch, tag, and release wild animals for monitoring. So, Bertroche said that he wants to round up illegal immigrants and stick a microchip in them. He wants to microchip people and treat human beings as animals. This is extreme and Big Brother overload. This system can allow the government to monitor human beings at every location they reside in potentially. He wants to use that policy for humans. The immigration debate in Arizona is still going on. The law in Arizona has been controversial. Some groups are challenging the legal parameters of the law. This law does nothing to protect our borders have have ambiguous wording that can be exploit to harm the civil liberties of Arizona citizens, especially among those of Hispanic descent. Does this law make people guilty until they are proven innocent and illegal until proven innocent? It believe it does and it agitates racial profiling. This law makes anyone can be stopped by the police at any time and for no reason other than the color of their skin. They can be questioned about their immigration status and forced to carry papers 24 hours a day. They can be questioned about their immigration status and forced to carry papers 24 hours a day. The Constitution never mentions that we carry out papers 24/7 in public at all. Fascist and Communist dictatorships have had this policy though. They must prove they are in the state legally; in other words, police will now consider them illegal until they prove that they are legal residents, with all the proper papers.
"It 'sounds a lot like the old 'driving while black' law', Smith correctly pointed out, referring to a time when African-American drivers were allegedly stopped by New Jersey State Police in inordinate numbers. The new law forces the local police to question people about their immigration status if they suspect they are in the U.S. illegally. That's the same as saying if you 'look foreign," you can be asked for "your papers, please'. Certainly this agitating law has nothing to do with protecting our borders, allowing illegal immigrants to be punished before granting legal status, or other reforms. It's about using anti-liberty rules under the guise of opposing illegal immigration. There has been a spring snowstorm in New York. This snowstorm hit New England. This has been a boon for skiers and ski resorts in a region largely spared by the massive storms that blasted the rest of the nation this winter. Snow fall on Tuesday across the Adlrondacks and the St. Lawrence and Champlain valleys. Higher altitudes were expected the most accumulation. There was foot or more by midday last Wednesday at ski resorts and other spots above 2,000 feet. Snow flew in the Adirondacks and the St. Lawrence and Champlain valleys. Higher altitudes were expected to see the most accumulation, with a foot or more by midday Wednesday at ski resorts and other spots above 2,000 feet. Snowstorms in April are unuusal and they don't happen often (except in places of higher elevations). Some places are recieving 5 or 6 inches at 500 feet and more at higher elevations. Some people are shocked by the weather and skiiers are loving it.
Secret Societies exist all of the time. There is a former Nazi Bank that want to rule the global economy. This bank was called Bank for International Settlements. This BIS bank financed Hitler's war machine and have been a financial arm of the new world order after WWII. There is the European Central Bank chief Jean-Claude Trichet. Trichet announced that the BIS is to become the primary engine for global governance is a shocking admission given the fact that this ultra-secretive menagerie of international bankers was once controlled by the top Nazis. These Nazis worked with global central banks, funneled money via the institution, which directly financed Hitler's war machine. During a speech to the elitist CFR organization earlier this week. ECB head Trichet said that the Global Economy Meeting (GEM), which regularly meets at the BIS headquarters in Basel and has: "...Has become the prime group for global governance among central banks..." The GEM works under the BIS as a policy steering committee. The BIS today isn't accountable to any national government. It's made up of banking chiefs from global central banks. Most of these banks are private and have no responsibility to their nation states or their citizens. The board of directors have links to the Pilgrims (they include Federal Reserve chief Ben Bernanke and Bank of England head Mervyn King, as well as Trichet himself). The Bank for International Settlement was created in 1940 by Montague Norman (the Governor of the Bank of England) and his German colleague Hjalmar Schact (He was once Adolf Hitler's finance minister. He was a Freemason). The bank at first want to facilitate money transfer related to German reparations that existed out of the Treaty of Versailles. Nazis then controlled the leadership of the BIS by top Nazi officials like Walter Funk (who was appointed Nazi propaganda minister in 1933 before going on to become Hitler’s Minister for Economic Affairs). Another BIS director during this period was Emil Puhl, who as director and vice-president of Germany’s Reichsbank was responsible for moving Nazi gold. Both Funk and Puhl were convicted at the Nuremberg trials as war criminals. The Director of IG Farben Herman Schmitz was a BIS director (Herman's subsidiary company created Zyklon B or the pesticide used in Nazi concentration camps. This devices murdered in gas chambers Jewish people and political dissidents during the Holocaust). John D. Rockefeller's United States based Standard Oil Co. worked with IG Farben during the 2nd world war. Higham wrote that Hitler controlled the BIS in the outbreak of World War II. Higham wrote that: "...Among the directors under Thomas H. McKittrick were Hermann Shmitz, head of the colossal Nazi industrial trust I.G. Farben, Baron Kurt von Schroder, head of the J.H. Stein Bank of Cologne and a leading officer and financier of the Gestapo; Dr. Walther Funk of the Reichsbank, and, of course, Emil Puhl. These last two figures were Hitler’s personal appointees to the board.” Higham described that gold was looted from countries invaded by the Nazis was packed into vaults controlled by the BIS and how the Nazis controlled the bank and forbade any discussion of the theft. “The BIS was an instrument of Hitler, but its continuing existence was approved by Great Britain even after that country went to war with Germany, and the British director Sir Otto Niemeyer, and chairman Montagu Norman, remained in office throughout the war,” writes Higham, explaining how Washington State Congressman John M. Coffee objected to American money being invested with the bank in 1944. Coffee said that the Nazi government has 85 million Swiss gold francs on deposit in the BIS. The majority of the board is made up of Nazi officials. In 1948, the BIS was finally compelled to hand over a mere £4 million in looted Nazi gold to the allies, and thanks to people like Harry Truman and the Rockefeller family, the bank was not dissolved. One of its most influential directors, Nazi banker Emil Puhl was later invited to the United States as a guest of honor in 1950. Today, the BIS is a crucial bank of the global elite. The BIS controlled about 7% of the world's available foreign exchange funds. They own 712 tons of gold bullion. This is the size that was presumably stolen from occupied countries by the Nazis who controlled the bank during the war. Controlling foreign exchange currency and gold can determine the economic conditions of a nation. The BIS board can influence an interest rate hike according to Doug Casey. The BIS is a slush fund for the agenda of global government where money is handed to the IMF. Casey wrote that: "...U.S. taxpayer monies can be passed through BIS to the IMF and from there anywhere. In essence, the BIS launders the money, since there is no specific accounting of where particular deposits came from and where they went..." We don't need a global central banking organization that top Nazis were involved in. This BIS is a powerhouse group that have international economic influence. We see moves to global government existing rapidly. Historically, numerous Nazis were key in establishment some of the same groups that seek to manage the imposition of global government. Even Nazi fingerprints existed in the pre-European Union like organizations. The BIS is wrong since its policies consists not of a humanitarian, progessive, or benevolent clique. The BIS deals with centralizing power into the hands of the few. This is definitely and inheritely anti-freedom ,elitists, and a detriment to the people. The Nazis gave life into a framework of another level of global authoritarianism. This is apart of a long goal that elites promote that includes globalization (via ancient banking dynasties), and a world government system either in one way or another.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment