Wednesday, March 01, 2006

My Own Thoughts


http://cache.boston.com/resize/bonzai-fba/Reuters_Photo/2006/02/23/1140739515_8316/300h.jpg

Some folks want to figure out my own thoughts. Here's some of many. I realize that many people want to question my sincerity and test me out. This is part of life and I'm cool with it. It's a good thing that I have an oppurtunity to respond and rebut these people indeed. If these people want to bring it, then I will bring it. Real events are occuring now. Today is the first day of March. A lot of people are still discussing about the Dubai port controversy. It's about many people in Congress and probably most of the American public not seeking to allow Dubai to control some operations of many ports throughout the nation. I don't oppose the port deal because of race or nationality. Me personally, I think no nation should control the ports except Americans, not the British, Finnish, Chinese, or any other people. Some people in the establishment left are omitting that right now China own a major port in the West Coast. Also, David Sanborn (who is the number 2 man of Dubai Ports World) owns all of the major ports in the U.S. under Maritime Administration. The key issue here is not race, but perserving national sovereignty. I really could care less if Arabic Americans own a port as long as they are Americans. Even Snow had a deal with the DuBai port company. It's really a distracting issue utilized to steer Americans from the real problems in the world. Steering into another issue, Dan Brown was sued for copyright infringement of the "Holy Blood Holy Grail" book. I think that very ironic since both books are false.

Dan Brown wrote the book called "Da Vinci Code", but most of it is false. For example, the early church has foundational doctrines before 325 A.D., there is no evidence that Jesus married Mary Magdalene [or each had children forming the Merovingian bloodline], and the Priory de Sion is almost mythical in its history. Authors have readily wrote book rebutting Brown's thesis, yet he still believes that most of his book is accurate. Erwin W. Lutzer refutes Dan Brown with his book called "The Da Vinci Code Deception, " and recently Cutting Edge Ministries' "Da Vinci Decoded: Truth or Myth" outline strong rebuttals to the Da Vinci Code. Books like the Da Vinci Code takes much of its influence from Gnosticism. Gnosticism is a religious sect that believes that God never directly created the Universe, but his emanations did. Also, they view Christ as humanistic and denied that Christ had a physical body. It's contrary to Biblical Christianity. A movie about the Da Vinci Code might take place in May 2006. There was a movie called "Angels and Demons" talking about Da Vinci Code and other issues about the Vatican and Galileo. I've seen some of the movie. It claimed that the Illuminati was fighting against the Vatican.



http://sacredearth.org/images/iraq_war_II/palace.jpg

Recently, I've been thinking about this Sunni/Shia conflict. I know about Islam and the Sunnis make up the vast majority of Muslims in the world. The Sunnis believe that the rightful claim to Muhammad's legacy are to his immediate supporters. The Shia believe that Muhammad's immediate relatives ought to have his legacy and control of the Islam faith. People call the recent clash as a Civil War in Iraq. As many folks know, Saddam (a secularist who abhored pro-Wahhabi Osama Bin Laden, a sheik funded by the CIA in the late 1970's and beyond. His family are interwined with the Carlyle Group and the Bush Family for many decades) persecuted the Shia for many years. It's only recently when the Shia is trying to have some political power
. Paul Watson makes his view known that this "Civil War" was contrived to further divide the country of Iraq. According to embedded journalist,
Dahr Jamail, both the Shia and Sunnis mostly didn't want any conflict nor destroy their religious shrines. Council on Foreign Relations member and New York Times editor Leslie Gelb is disagreeing with the Sunni resistance to the occupation. Now, why is this happening? Could it be that the Elite want this to occur, so they can control Iraq into a hardcore, dictatorship like setting to control its resources? See, the Constitution of Iraq has sharia law. There is constant fighting among the Kurds, Shia, and Sunnis on the outline of the laws of Iraq. Who benefits, but the Secret Societies and the rest of the Globalists. Bashing national sovereignty is another agenda of the Elite. Sophia Sadek seems to not talk about this issue. For example, UN Biospheres are controlling much of the land in America and many American farmers are having trouble controlling their own lands. Even the NAFTA and GATT treaties have provisions in it that supercede our laws. The vast majority of the Iraqis don't want this choas. Now, I just heard John Conner talking to Sean Hannity, a Bush clearleader except on issues of illegal immigration. Sean Hannity mocked the truth about the Bohemian Grove having the Cremation of Care ritual (with a mock human sacrifice, an 40 ft. old statue of Molech, and other weird & occult activities). Hannity is hilarious. Big Brother has went into a whole new level. China Daily on March 1, 2006 talk about how scientists from Belgium used a RFID chip in a human tooth. Guy Poelman was a member of the team that successfully achieved it.


http://www.cnn.com/interactive/entertainment/0302/gallery.simpsons.characters/gallery.simpsons.family.jpg

The BBC on March 1 2006 cited a poll that more Americans know at least 2 characters from the Simpsons than the 5 main rights mentioned in the First Amendment (i.e. freedom of speech, religion, press, assenbly, and the right to petition for redress of greivances). This was from an opinion poll. The Simpsons is a show bashing religion and constantly showing family dsyfunction. It's part of the corporate-owned Popular Culture shown to distract citizens from the truth. It's apparent that many Americans are ignorant of true American heritage and law, but it's our responsibility to help our fellow men, women, and children to fight evil and stand up for our Constitutional laws. Concentration camps in America exist after all. The Alternet website mentioned a project allowing Homeland Security to give Halliburton subsidiary Kellogg, Brown and Root $385 million to build detention centers. This is for so-called dissenters and "Muslim terrorists" if another terrorist attack occured. Knight of Malta Oliver North once was in support of the 1980's Rex 84 plan making illegal immigrants (about 400,000 people) from Mexico to come into concentration camps in case of an emergency. Even before that, many innocent Japanese, Italian, and German Americans were placed in concentration camps during World War Two. It's very ironic that Halliburton is involved with this since Cynthia McKinney and others exposed Dyncorp and Halliburton officals covering up Dyncorp's involvement in the international sex trade industry. The Pentagon's Civilian Inmate Labor Program is a plan today about sending civilians to camps. If John Yoo (a White House advisor) said that torturing a child by crushing it testicles is fine, then a serious torture problems residing not only in the Bush Administration, but across the globe.



http://images.killermovies.com/s/superman/poster.jpg

Superman is a word that most people assign with a cartoon. Is there something bigger here? Yeah, it is. For thousands of years, human beings wanted to be better physically and intellectually. The concept of a superman existed from many New Agers like Madame Blavatsky in the late 1800's and the Theosophical Society. The logo of the Theosphical Society is a six pointed star, a swatika, a serpent, and other symbols. Madame Blavatsky wrote much about this and her praise of Satan in the book called "The Secret Doctrine." The racist Nazis picked this up greatly in their view of the Supermen. They thought that Atlantis possessed many Aryan Supermen. Sophia Sadek needs to know that Hitler and his Nazis were always anti-gun, pro-abortion, not just anti-civil liberties. When Atlantis fell, they claim that some of them escaped to Tibet and other locations. That is the reason why many Tibetans came to Germany and some of the Nazis went into Tibet to investigate so-called evidence of Aryans (which wasn't found). To this day, pro-eugenicists still want to exterminate tons of populations of all colors (it's doesn't matter) and decrease the world's population.

I just discovered this new article from allheadlinenews.com. It's from February 28, 2006. It reads that Andrew Young will serve as a spokesman for Walmart. A child can even understand that this transnational corporation have hired illegal immigrants, been involved in low pay to its workers, and other forms of evil. Why would Young join it? He's supposed to be a civil rights leaders, but Wal mart tramples all over the civil rights of the workers. Let's not forget that Young was not only was the mayor of Atlanta and a Prince Hall Freemason, but he has been pro-United Nations for decades. Also, Dr. Cathy Burns' book exposing the apostate Billy Graham denote other globalist groups and causes that Young is aligned with. Sadek, not just me but people from across the political spectrum expose the agenda of globalism. Now, George W. Bush is disagreeing with South Dakota, because they banned abortion. Bush agrees with abortion for rape and incest (even though the unborn baby is just a victim and has committed no crime whatsoever).That tells me without question that he really not pro-Life. I don't care what anyone has to say. Mississippi is the next step proposing to ban abortions. I see no problem with that, because the ball is rolling. More young people are Pro-Life and the truth is our own side.

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)







10 comments:

Sophia Sadek said...

Timothy, you're in good company with your anti-globalism campaign. It was one of the hot buttons that Hitler used in his campaign.

The U.S. republic was founded by globalists. Thomas Paine, one of the preeminent founders of our nation, observed that the world was his nation and doing good his religion. The first world war wasn't fought in the beginning of the 20th century. It was faught in the beginning of the 19th century.

If you want to resign from the global community, you may want to reconsider your participation in the "world-wide web."

Timothy said...

This is silly sophia. I never called you a shill and I won't call you a shill.

Timothy said...

sophia: Timothy, you're in good company with your anti-globalism campaign. It was one of the hot buttons that Hitler used in his campaign.

Response: Really, Hitler was globalist since he invaded soverign nations and tried to create his New World Order for a 1,000 year reign if necessary. Globalism is combining all nations into one, not just exploiting the common man. An evil pro-globalist is also Ted Turner being quoted as wanting millions of people to die and Stalin.

Sophia: The U.S. republic was founded by globalists. Thomas Paine, one of the preeminent founders of our nation, observed that the world was his nation and doing good his religion. The first world war wasn't fought in the beginning of the 20th century. It was faught in the beginning of the 19th century.

Response: No one in their right mind denies the mistakes by many Founding Fathers. Some Founding Fathers owned slaves and mistreated Native Americans. I never supported that and I don't agree with that. That Being said, not all of the Founding Fathers supported slavery like John Jay, John Witherspoon, and others. Many of the concepts that the Founders subscribed to like separation of powers withing government, freedom of religion, freedom of the press, etc. are their just contributions to this society. There were many good and Christian influences in America, then and now. This isn't an issue that clear, but complex. You can interpret the First world War as you wish. The USA weren't all founded by globalists. The majority of the people who created the United States wanted freedom and wanted no influence from European monarchies. That isn't globalism to me.

Sophia: If you want to resign from the global community, you may want to reconsider your participation in the "world-wide web."

Response: This is funny. What global community are you talking about. The global community where national sovereignty is eliminated and people's rights are gone. That isn't my type of community. If a community mean nation states exist, people solve their own problems, and laws aren't broken to fight against evil, then that's the community that I want instead.

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)

Timothy said...

I will continue to fight for truth and if you persist in claiming that I'm insincere, then you are just wrong.

Timothy said...

Also, this has nothing to do with the Internet. People have the right to go on the Internet. On the other hand, it is wrong to endorse the agenda of global government. That's all I'm saying.

Timothy said...

I trust Dr. Cathy Burns exposing globalism.

Timothy said...

I will never resign from the internet and I never be intimidate by you or by anyone.

Sophia Sadek said...

I'm sorry, Timothy. I did not intend to be taken in an intimidating fashion. The allusion to resigning from the Web was purely tongue-in-cheek. Things would be awfully boring without you.

We can at least agree on local sovereignty. One of the most egregious problems with global capital investment is the defrauding local peoples of their local territorial rights.

One of the most recent examples of losing local rights occurred when MI-6 fabricated intelligence on Iraq's WMD program. Millions of Americans were defrauded of their right to abstain from British imperialism.

Timothy said...

I agree.

Timothy said...

I know that you are nice person and I didn't mean to be too aggressive to you.