On Illegal Immigration again.

When I look at the news yesterday, the vast majority of media was in favor of illegal immigration. Only a couple of people opposed it like Matthews, Scaraborough, O'Reilly, Dobbs, and others. The proponents don't want people to know that most Hispanic Americans by polls oppose amnesty and illegal immigration. Also, there has been plenty evidence exposing the racist rhetoric of Aztan and other groups. The media continually cite us as anti-immigrant. Nothing can be further from the truth. I'm not anti-immigration. I'm anti-illegal immigration and there's a difference.

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)

Moosedog: Somehow crossing over an imaginary line makes a person a criminal.

Response: If I trespass on someone else's land without permission, then I'm a criminal. That's similar to illegal immigration. Doing someone that contrary to the law is being a criminal. Stealing wealth without rightfully representation is being criminal. Acting out and promoting racist supremacist ideals and acting in violence against people (like some of these extremists did to peaceful Minutement in Chicago) is criminal. When people use fake documents to try to find work, that's criminal. When multinational corporations pay illegal low wages and exploit their talents unfairly, that's criminal. I'm more angry at companies exploiting people in that fashion. See the analogy. Laws exists, absolutes exists, and governments exists. I know where you're going and I don't believe in your anarchy views. I do agree with you about the JEsuits, etc.

You talk about Jesus, but didn't Jesus say Render unto Casear what's Caesar and what is Gods to God. I support legitimate government (as outlined by Paul in the book of Romans), not evil in government. I support protesting and changing things in government also. It's so funny that people talk about Jesus like Hillary. I don't need leftists (many of whom don't believe that Jesus existed) lecturing me about Jesus. Funny that Jesus never supported a no border planet. In fact humans are divided into nations for a reasons. It's funny that you talk about things that are imaginary, yet borders are respected by tons of nations. A border line may not be real in a literal since of a dotted line, but boundaries are important to stabilize society. Without any concept of borders=no explicit nations=one world=one world government possibly. Take it how you want it. Not to mention that in the books of Acts, the Bible says that God set the boundaries of this world.

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)

___________________________________

My Response to Bladestorm: You can write 3 million pages of information and it will never convince me of your opinion on this issue. Sending people to different locations isn't all physcial violence. For example, if someone moves me and I committed an evil act, that isn't violence. Also, people and I myself have read the previous article. I'm not silent on this issue. It is the Jesuits, CFR, and other groups that promote a break down of borders into one like the Pan American Union, the European Union, the Asian Union, etc. Illegal immigration involve racist groups, corporations, jobs, etc. that are real. It should be talked about. This is an important issue, because multinational corporations and big think tanks like the Ford Foundation are funding this and even Eric admitted that the Jesuits are supporting illegal immigration. I find it ironic that racist Aztlan and Hispanic supremacists bash the white man, yet the white men in elite groups fund their whole operation. Even Eric Jon Phelps said that the Jesuits are using illegal immigration to break down the stability of this nation. Nations do exist. Nations are more complex than citizens. Nations are a combination of citizens, a government, and more parts that work together which are bounded by laws. In this nation, we have a process to deal with problems. Laws are necessarily opressive. Laws that perserve moral principles can be good. Even the Bible in the OT and NT is a book of laws.

Be consistent and reject Jesus and Paul if you abhor all forms of laws since both of them supported various laws and legitimate governement. Not all laws existing now are evil. If you want no states, that's your business, but to have no states whatsoever is the essence of an one world. Globalists and new world order people want this as well. They want no nations and called nation states obselete. Even if there is no government, there could be choas on who recieve rights, how the poor would be treated, and how would people peacefully co-exist. No governments existing could have the survival of the fittest mentality, because legitimate government do create controls unto people and preventing oppression against citizens. No one here supports evil government. If the government is evil, people have a right and should change it or overthrow it to make it better. Even the Constitution mentions this. Choas is what the Jesuits want, peace and order is what the truth wants. Here's a link of a Libertarian that disagrees with anarchy. Man having no authority is to embrace no rules=no absolutes=moral relativism=doubt of moral principles=a license to do and justify evil acts. Without any concept of borders=no explicit nations=one world=one world government possibly.

By TruthSeeker24 (Timothy)