More on Bill O'Reilly

From http://69.73.163.60/oreillysucks/viewtopic.php?t=4581


Lets cut the horse___. I will say it publicly and for the record. O'Reilly does not believe in the "Official Story" of 9-11. If he did, then why would he go on National TV with Michelle Malkin(of all people) and diuspute the official version of the crash of Flight 93? What would be the point of doing that? Also, remember that Bu$h has twice publicly stated that he watched the first hit on the WTC live in the hallway at the Booker School. O'Reilly has never mentioned this. He will never talk about it. If Bu$h is so innocent as O'Reilly says he is, then why won't O'Reilly discuss this? And I am still wondering what exactly was it that O'Reilly edited out of the infamous Jeremy Glick interview. Whay was said that O'Reilly could not allow "the folks" to hear? O'Reilly will never play the Booker School video on his program. Because O'Reilly knows that the tape is all the evidence we need to hang Bu$h & Co. for murder and high treason. I f you have watched the video, you know that after Andy Card informs Bu$h of the second hit on the WTC, he backs away from him immediately. Card did not bother to wait for any kind of response from the CiC. There is only one explanation for this. Card already knew that Bu$h was going to do nothing but continue his stupid little photo-op. How could Card know this? He could only know that if the decision to remain in the classroom had been made before Bu$h had even arrived at the school. Which means that they must have known in advance that the "President" would be safe there. And they could only know that if they already had knowledge of the terrorist's plans and what the actual targets would be. They knew. And O'Reilly knows it.