Donkey and Elephants: Globalism is the Elite's agenda

From http://www.infowars.com/?p=935


Donkey and Elephants: Globalism is the elite’s answer to our problems

Edward Peters
Daily Titan
March 20, 2008

Whether it’s the war on terror abroad for democracy’s preservation or trade among other nations guised under the mantle of “free trade,” or even “illegal immigration,” the underlying, prevalent principle is globalism.

This unprecedented, enthroning ideology stands as the new face of rule worldwide.

Under one flag, currency and leader, the peoples of the world will forcefully be united under a common banner.

What must be understood is this: though different rhetoric and propaganda is used in different instances, the basic method behind toppling and replacing regimes abroad is best understood by comprehending the ideals of the globalist elite.

This evil, severe approach greatly damages America’s own constitutional republic because globalism undermines both sovereignty and so-called democracy.

What’s to come in the future is an America no more.

Speaking on “Larry King Live” awhile back, former Mexican President Vicente Fox confirmed very enthusiastically the coming merger between Mexico, America and Canada.

He was quick to confirm that he and President Bush had already “agreed” to create a common currency, the Amero, and that a North American Union is inevitable. Just east of Austin, Texas, the Trans-Nafta Highway is being constructed that will stretch from Southern Mexico through the U.S., ending in Northern Canada.

This is not all the American president had in plan.




Since the attacks of 9/11, Bush took on a “crusade” against evil, quite possibly seeing himself fulfilling the very prophecy he believed in. Early on in his terror campaign, the president had the view that “this war would be fought on many fronts” and that we were to “rout terror wherever it exists.”

The implication is clear - Every last terrorist on the face of this earth is to be taken out until there is no more terrorism to threaten us, and so the world would finally be terror-free.

And so would begin the globalist movement.

With an everlasting war, the ruling elite would have the support of a terrified population begging for security, even if that meant giving up personal liberties.

Through this everlasting turmoil, the ruling elite is able to offer up its own personal solution. And through rhetoric and propaganda, they will have successfully united the globe against a common enemy.

Soon, globalism will be the answer behind every problem.

Want to eliminate illegal drug and arms sales? Destroy the common currency and use plastic money provided by the globalists instead.

Want to deter illegal immigration? Destroy all borders and unite the peoples of the world under one rule.

They have systematically created chaos in order to establish an iron rule. Though it seems they have benign solutions to every problem, the reality is much worse.

Throughout history, man has wanted nothing more than absolute power, even if that meant manipulating the common man.

There is no way better to maintain and enforce absolute power than through a common rule - globalism.

This dark curtain of global dominance is the destroyer of sovereignty.

Soon, the United States of America will be no more, inevitably paving way for the “United Nations of the World,” a predetermined fact of history that sadly, will enforce globalism on all.


________________________

From http://www.infowars.com/?p=934

White House Papers Expose Lies of Clinton, Emanuel & Gergen On NAFTA

David Sirota
OpEdNews
March 20, 2008

Finally, the dishonesty is being unmasked. Finally, we see just how much we’re being lied to when it comes to economic policy. Finally, we see it hasn’t just been Hillary Clinton lying about her role in championing NAFTA, but we see it is the entire Clinton machine.
For the last few weeks, Hillary Clinton has been claiming that she never supported the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). She has explicitly claimed "I have been a critic of NAFTA from the very beginning."
Clinton’s record of speeches over the last decade, of course, tells a much different story. In 1996, she toured Texas to promote NAFTA. In 1998, she visited Davos, Switzerland to thank corporations for mounting "a very effective business effort in the U.S. on behalf of NAFTA." In her memoir a few years ago, she touted NAFTA as one of her husband’s big successes. In 2004, she told reporters that "NAFTA has been good for New York and America."

And yet, despite all of this evidence, Clinton has worked to confuse voters by insisting that she has always been fighting against NAFTA. As I’ve written in another post, it is a tactic reminiscent of Joe Lieberman denying he supported the Iraq War in the lead up to his 2006 election contest with Ned Lamont. And it is a tactic that Establishment shills have tried to embolden. As just one example, the esteemed David Gergen has used his television platform to back up Clinton’s historical revisionism - and Gergen has been cited by others as "proof" Clinton’s claims are true - despite, of course, her very own words.

But now with the release of Clinton’s White House schedules, the veneer has been torn off, and the brazen dishonesty is finally on display for everyone to see. As Reuters reports:
"Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton now argues that the North American Free Trade Agreement needs to be renegotiated, but newly released records showed on Wednesday she promoted its passage…Among the thousands of details of daily life for Clinton, there was a November 10, 1993, entry — a ‘NAFTA Briefing drop-by,’ in Room 450 of the executive office building next door to the White House, closed to the news media. Approximately 120 people were expected to attend the briefing, and Clinton was to be introduced by White House aide Alexis Herman for brief remarks concluding the program."
ABC’s Jake Tapper digs even deeper, noting that at one of the meetings, Gergen "served as a sort of master of ceremonies as various women members of the Cabinet talked up NAFTA." In other words, Gergen has been on television deliberately lying for the Clinton campaign, as he was actually running these NAFTA-promoting events with Clinton. Tapper goes on to interview people who were in the room.

This revelation comes just as the other appendages of the Clinton machine attempts to revise history even further. This week, Rahm Emanuel - the chief White House lobbyist who rammed NAFTA through Congress - authored a Wall Street Journal op-ed praising candidates for indicting NAFTA and claiming "I share their concern for Americans who have lost their jobs to global competition." To quote my book Hostile Takeover, this is "the same Rahm Emanuel who penned an op-ed in the conservative Wall Street Journal pressuring Democrats to capitulate and pass the 2000 China trade deal - a move perfectly timed to help secure the critical votes that ultimately passed the deal."
The facts are clear: The Clinton machine joined with K Street to manufacture the very international economic policies that are destroying the economy. And yet, this same machine now claims to have had nothing to do with those economic policies - at the very moment, the machine is pushing a NAFTA-style Colombia Free Trade Agreement in Congress. We are, in short, experiencing the renaissance of "Clintonism" - an ideology that treats Americans like we are stupid and treats basic undebatable facts as commodities to be manipulated and perverted for personal gain. And that renaissance should make everyone question all the recent promises by Clinton about changing NAFTA.

Had she simply acknowledged she was for NAFTA and that now she’s not for NAFTA, that might give her some credibility. But, then, this is a candidate who just a few months ago laughed at a serious question about NAFTA, claiming "all I can remember are a bunch of charts." In other words, this is a candidate and a campaign machine that is absolutely uninterested in how these policies have devastated the middle class - and hostile to an honest discussion about those policies. So the question now is simple: Can a Wall-Street backed candidate who denies the undeniable past be trusted with the future?


____________________


http://www.911blogger.com/node/14451 (Montreal and 911 Truth Movement)