Versatility

The more things change, the more they stay the same. In Washington D.C., police officers are conducting searches of people's home to get all of their guns. The police claim these searchers are voluntary. The dispute is that they are searching their homes without a warrant. The good news is that there has been a backlash coming on against this tyranny by community activists. It started in Washington Highlands and it's spreading into other neighborhoods. Police Chief Cathy L. Lanier agrees with this "safe home" nonesense initiative. D.C. School Board member William Lockbridge says he opposes this injustice, because no officer can come into your house without a warrant. It's definitely a violation of the Second Amendment and the Fourth Amendment. Washington D.C. is one of the few locations in the nation that explicitly bans handguns from citizens. It was so immoral that the D.C. Court of Appeals ruled this D.C. gun ban as unconstitutional. The Supreme Court must decide on the D.C. vs. Heller case dealing with this subject. Maria Cramer who is writing for Boston Globe from Tuesday, at March 25, 2008 reported on similar duties (revolving around warrantless searches) done in Boston. So much opposition came as a result of these searches for guns, that Boston has scaled back some of the program. A Community group in Boston has circulated a petition against the plan since it violates the concept of having a warrant preceding searches by the police. Sarah Wunsch who is a staff attorney of the ACLU commented that residents of public housing could risk their homes if the police report finding firearms to housing authorities. Plainly, it's a disgrace, it's immoral, and it's anti-liberty. Back in the late 1700's, British imperalists tried to steal weapons from colonists. This was one of the reasons why the Revolutionary War commenced. Also, this is similar to what happened in New Orleans during the Katrina tragedy. Police authorities in New Orleans at 2005 blatantly stole innocent citizens weapons. They even assaulted an older woman like cowards to steal her gun, which was a violation of the Second Amendment. We have a right to bear arms if we so choose period, end of discussion. Lynn Stuter from March 25, 2008 at NewsWithViews.com exposed the SPLC (or the Southern Poverty Law Center). It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that the SPLC demonizes conservatives all of the time. Additionally, the SPLC compares them to neo-Nazis, racists, and other sick deviants. Now, I've seen their website myself and couldn't find any positive comment about sincere conservatives at all. She exposed the SPLC as it should be. For example, the SPLC calls the American Border Patrol as anti-immigrant, which is a lie. The reason is that American Border Patrol oppose illegal immigration not legal immigration. The SPLC refuse to expose the racism found in La Raza or the racist comments made by MALDEF's (or the Mexican American Legal Defense and Education Fund) co-founder Mario Obledo. Mario states these words: “California is going to be a Hispanic state and anyone who doesn't like it should leave." They don't record crimes committed by illegal immigrants against Americans of many colors and ethnic groups. Even Stephen Bright wrote a letter to Morris Dees (a co-founder of the SPLC) classifying him as fraud in a failure to use proper fund raising techniques. The SPLC even demonize Jerome Corsi and deny a North American Union (when the SPP calls for a unified community in North America). To them any strong criticism against illegal immigration is racist and nativist, which are lies. A lot of people in the far left SPLC dislike even sincere conservatives. Notorious liars is a fair description of the SPLC. Some like Ted Pike want everyone to believe that Israel was founded by terror? Is that true? No, since although many early Zionists and some Labor Zionists today were and are indeed terrorists and evil (like the King David bombing done by the Stern Gang, etc.), the vast majority of Jewish settlers in Isreal sincerely wanted a homeland. The majority of them paid money to settle in land and even had nice treatment toward Arabic people. For example, Arabic leader Emir Faisel wrote a letter in 1919 to Felix Frankfurter that "We Arabs..wish the Jews a most hearty welcome." Riots were committed among both sides and that is what Ted Pike omits. He omits the forced evucation of ca. 800,000 innocent Jewish people in mostly Muslim Middle Eastern nations (during WWII) for no reason other than them being Jewish (Ted Pike also omits that 2,000 Arabic people killing Jews praying at Kotel on the 9th of Av or the Hebron Jewish people being killed by Arabic militants in 1929). Despite what George Galloway saying about the Holocaust alone not justifying Jewish people to live in Isreal, which is true. Yet, Jewish people living in Isreal continously for thousands of years from the time of the Judges, the Assyrian Empire, the Romans, Byzantinum, the Crusades, the Muslim empire, the Ottomans, and the British Empire is justification enough for Jewish people having a right to live in Israel though. The anti-gun extremist Galloway forgotten about that historical truth. Hey, half truths is George's forte I guess. Therefore, Jewish people, Arabic people, and all people have a right to live in Eretz Yisrael. Even the Peel Commission in 1937 outline a partition between Jews and Arabs. Even the Yom Kippur massacre of 1973 was an evil preemptive strike in Israel by Egypt and Syria. Frankily, Britian and Western interests intangled themselves in the Middle East, which prevented real negiotations among both sides since the early 20th century.

Therefore, Jewish people or Arabic people aren't all to blame for the problems in the Middle East. The leadership in the Middle East are controlled by Europe and U.S. mostly. This is especially witnessed with the influence Knight of Malta Juan Carlos and the EU has in "peace" negiotations. Ted Pike believes in the misconception that because people like me support the existence of Israel, hence we must agree with the leadership of Isreal at every level or want Arabic people to die or feel oppression. That's a lie since I always don't have unconditional support for the government of Israel. I have unconditional support for the right of Jewish people and all people to live in Isreal. There's a big difference. Using Pike's logic, we should call for America to not exist and let God damn it (because America done more land theft, killing via abortion and terrorism, etc. than Israel did). Funny how people like Pike and Michael Collins Piper only do mostly is criticize Isreal. They could inspire Middle Eastern leaders and other people to change evil behavior there. In other words, they should inspire both sides to make a peaceful resolution to the conflict among Isrealis and Palestianians. God allowed America and Israel to exist for a reason. If God is all Mighty (I believe God is All Mighty), he could of easily eliminate Israel from existence if he wanted to. We have fascism in America when you see NY cops beating and arresting peaceful Tibetan protestors. Youtube is showing it. It occured in New York City at the March 14, 2008 free Tibet peace assembly. A police officer was pushing people as the group crossed the street. Another police identified as "Serano" was caught threatening to kill 2 protestors and later apologizes for it. When the Tibetan group near the UN building, police out of vans come out to beat the protestors for no reason at all. The cops clubbed people in their legs on the sidewalk. The American cameraman is shock and says that this isn't China. Serano tells the cameraman to shut up. This is what Nazis and Communists do. The police assaulting peaceful protestors must have forgotten about the right to protest and the freedom of speech. The American Society of Civil Engineers have been accused of covering up evidence about 9/11. The deal is the the ASCE believes that the skyscrapers couldn't withstand getting hit by airplanes (They were funded by FEMA to investigate the collapse of the Twin Towers on 9/11). Now, they are forced to have an investigative panel. Folks like Abolhassan Astaneh Asi, who is an engineer and forsenics expert believes that computer simulation refutes the findings of the ASCE. He said that the skyscrapers could handle jetliners. The ASCE did omit real architectural designs of the Towers (i.e. WTCs had core columns and cross sections). A February 27 1993 Seattle Times article entitled Twin Towers Engineered To Withstand Jet Collision quotes John Skilling, head structural engineer for the WTC, said the building can handle hits from aircraft. He believed that only explosives can collapse the Twin Towers. This cover up isn't new since Philip Zeilkow (the 911 Commission's executive director) has ties to the White House.












The Presidential Election is still coming forward. Hillary Clinton admitted that she made an error when she said that missiles were hitting her aircraft while visiting Bosnia in the 1990's. James Carville continued to criticize Bill Richardson for his support of Barack Obama. Carville said that he hope the Judas connotation is branded on him like a cow. I don't know what exactly that means, but it implies a multiple of interpretations and meanings to it. Maureen Fan from The Washington Post at March 25, 2008 talked about the China/Tibetan conflict. Maureen Fan wrote that China's security is calling for "patriotic education" for rebellious Tibetan monks. What this means is that some Tibetan are forced to be educated in the mold of approval with the Chinese government. I don't believe in that since there should be no coercion of any human being in the form of education. Education should exist in many forms and people ought to have freedom of choice in deciding their own educational patterns. The tensions would definitely decrease over there if Tibet is just granted their independence. Reuters from March 26, 2008 had a article about Miami cops. They are developing a hover drone flying in Miami for crime fighting purposes. It has electro-optic and infrared sensors making its debut possiblly in the Florida Everglades. This drone was created by Honeywell International. Homeland Security is creating a new device called the Security Baracelet. What is that? It's a wearable tag that authorities can implict pain compliance to suspects from a distance. Homeland Security potentially wants all passengers on airplanes to wear it. This is achieved to control people and law enforcement are also seeking "crowd control situations." The patents holders named Lamperd FTS support this wierd device. They call it "Electro-Muscular Disruption." A video about says that the shock instrument can disable a passenger for a few second or minutes. That's wild. If you don't want to experience the bracelet, you can easily remove it. That isn't explained as a possible problem with it. The problem with these crowd control devices is that there is no distinction between those arrested and those accused of a crime wearing it. In other words, those who aren't even charged can wear these Electronic ID bracelets in airport and other areas. You're treated as a criminal. It's stifies free speech, it eliminates our right to privacy, and it involves torture. I disagree with all forms of torture. The Free Republic on Tuesday, at March 25, 2008 described the present development of the Trans-Texas Corridor (Or TTC). It reported that TxDOT or Texas Department of Transportation that they were granted a 30 day extension for public comments on the TTC. There is an environmental investigation of the proposed road for I-69. The extension will last through April 18th. Now, many citizens oppose it since it infringes on the private property rights of citizens, it's strips too much land for transportation, and it's part of the North American integration agenda. Jerome Corsi has been one of the greatest journalists exposing the North American Union conclusively. I wanted to write about this. Alex Jones yesterday continued his demonization of anyone exposing the Vatican/Jesuits connection to the new world order. He said that those who believe that the Vatican rule are basically extremists and are insane. Whether you believe or don't believe that the Vatican rule the world, most aren't extremists or kooks. This character assassination is uncalled for an hypocritical on Jones' part since he tried to criticize those calling him names. Yet, he outlines pregoratives against his critics. If you're a man, you don't have to use name calling to back up your positions at all. Also, he demonized sources and histories about the Jesuits without any refutation. The truth is that many books accurately describe the evils in the leadership of the Vatican/Jesuits like the book entitled "The Transformation of the Republic." This literature was written by CT Wilcox describing tons of sources about Abraham Lincoln. Alex Jones, whether you like it or not, it's a historical fact that the Vatican were involved in the Ratlines sending Nazis across the world. The Vatican was involved in the Inquistion, the International slave trade, and other murderous deeds for centuries. Reinhard Gehlen (who was awarded the Knight of Malta cross) was a founder of the CIA and he was a Nazi. Many CIA leaders weren't only members of the Skulls and Bones like George H. W. Bush, but also Knights of Malta. The Blackwater company involved in murders in Iraq plus mercenary actions are influenced by the Knights of Malta and Opus Dei. Many Generals executing the Iraq were trained from Jesuit Gergetown University (The Jesuits were banned by many European nations in the 1700's. Even Pope Clement condemned them. John Adams wrote a letter to Thomas Jefferson criticizing the Jesuits strongly). Knight of Malta Michael Novak was a key diplomat during the administration of honorary 33rd Degree Freemason Ronald Reagan. Reagan was the one working with John Paul II (who promoted a new world order. "Billy Graham and Friends" is a classic written by Dr. Cathy Burns manifesting John Paul II's errors) and the CIA in order to end the contrived "Cold War." The Knights of Malta are known to have political and corporate power from the 1100's A.D. to now in 2008. Alex Jones claims to expose evil in the Vatican's leadership, but none of his videos, none of his books, and rarely his broadcasts touch strong on the Vatican, the Jesuits, the Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, the Knights of Columbus, or even the Pilgrim Society at all. Therefore, he omitting this issue for the most part. Also, real men call out names in their disagreements with people. I call out names all of the time. I guess Jones was talking about all of us from Eric Jon Phelps, Craig Oxley, and Thomas Richards. Using stereotypes and false accusations (about the solar system) against anyone exposing the Vatican's corruption is silly on Alex Jones' part. That's the truth. I will continue to show sources to back up what I say and then others whould yell plus scream in paranoia. Now, it's time to move on. It's a common lie on Alex Jones' part in that we don't discuss a variety of issues. In truth, I'm versatile in exposing the North American Union, sodium flouride, the Bilderbergers, the Pilgrim Society, eninent domain, etc. I just don't omit things like some do.

By Timothy