Wednesday, March 19, 2008

Viewpoints









News everyday on the major network obsess with the Reverand Wright and Barack Obama controversy. Obama gave a complex and eloquent speech yesterday. He touched on many subjects. He outlined his firm disagreement with Wright’s extremist statements like America is the Number One killing in the world, he praised Qaddafi, he praised the dictator Castro, him disrespecting Natalie Holloway, and saying G-d America. Barack Obama outlined that many of the older generation of black Americans have been sensitive and angry because of the over discrimination and humiliation of the past. Yet, he also have black fathers to be involved in families, responsibility to reign, and improvements to be made in the community. He touched on some poor, blue color white people as having legitimate greivances in their displacement of jobs. He admonish them that culprits weren’t black people, but the corporate interests creating these problems for them. It was a historical speech, but it wasn’t on the level of Dr. King’s oratory. Although, it was one of the best speeches in the 21st century whether you agree or disagree with his words. Obama refused to disown Jeremiah Wright (of the Trinity United Church of Christ in Chicago, Illinois). Some still don’t view it as a sincere response. In my opinion, a certain segment of the population that will never respect him or his responses regardless of what he says. The truth is that I don’t subscribe to Obama’s vision of gun control, abortion on demand, TRILATERAL FOUNDER ZBIGNIEW BRZEZINSKI being his foreign policy advisor, and warfare in Afghanistan. Obama at least was correct to disagree with the waging of the Iraq War. I wouldn’t use my grandmother in a political speech like Obama did. I would be more private about my family’s business. He said he didn’t recall the videos of Wright’s controversial statements, but in this speech Obama admits to hearing controversial statements from Jeremiah Wright in the pulpit. This is a contradictory statement which either implies ignorance or lying on Barack Obama’s part. Barack Obama’s speech was a defensive move to counterreact the criticism against him. Some say that this might not be recieved by some blue collar Democrats since some of them don’t want to hear a speech about race. Although, to judge a man like Barack Obama totally by his preacher is just as illogical as omitting the errors of Jeremiah Wright. Wright possesses some extremism. This doesn’t mean he’s wrong on every issue. Jeremiah Wright is right that the Tuskegee Experiment was a government experiment, that the government lies (governments lie for thousands of years), the government ships and tested poisonous drugs before, and America performed terrorism before (i.e. Abortion is terrorism, the slave trade is a form of terrorism, and Operation Phoenix was terrorism. The CIA praticipated in terrorism for decades). These facts can’t be omitted. The mainstream media doesn’t want to talk about this since they usually promote the lie that the government is only good. The truth is that government should be limited in what it can do and can’t do. Government shouldn’t be abolished, but government ought not to be treated like God. It is no doubt that Obama’s speech raised the discussion of race to another level. John McCain must be sitting confortable (in spite of his error of saying that Iran trains al-Qaeda members in Iran), because no massive media scrtunity is on him lately. The scrtunity is primarily directed toward Hillary Clinton and especially Barack Obama. Thousands of pages of Hillary Clinton's schedules and records are finally being released to the public. Hillary claimed that nothing new will be retrieval in the revelation of the records. The real point is that Hillary Clinton , John McCain, and Barack Obama (whose wife named Michelle Obama is a puppet) are puppets of the establishment. Distracting issues like Wright's comments ought not to consume our lives or what we should do. We should help people, while expose evil in the world. Shubha Krishnappa from The Money Times at March 18, 2008 described on how China in their own nations has blocked Youtube clips. They achieved this for the purpose of blocking videos and images of Tibetan protests against the oppressive nature China had done against Tibet. Other nations have blocked Youtube to a degree like Burma, Brazil, China, Iran, Morocco, Thailand, Turkey, and Pakistan. In 1959, Tibet had an uprising for indepedence. This has led the Dalai Lama to escape into exile. Chinese authorities accuse the Dalai Lama of provoking protests and violence in China. The Dalai Lama deny such accusations and continued his call for no violence in the struggle for Tibet's independence. Once again, the leadership of China (not all of the Chinese people) have continued its policies of censorship of the Internet, free speech suppression, forced abortion, human organ harvesting, and other sick attributes. David Rockefeller is quoted as loving the violent Chinese Revolution. Numerous citizens of Americans plus globally really don't understand our 3 branches of government of the executive, legislative, and judicial branch. Some praise the U.N. as an alternative to national government. Yet, they fail to see that the Elite (found in the Vatican/Jesuits, the Bilderbergers, high level bloodlines, high level Freemasonry, and the Pilgrim Society) who are responsible for such more evil help invent the United Nations in 1945. The UN is responsible for supporting billions of dollars in population control actions and they are complicit in not doing enough to end the Rwandian genocide. Groups like the United Nations was part of a plan among many to create a new age in the world. They wanted a global system or order to rule the policies of the planet. That's one quintessential definition of the new world order (which is supported by Walter Cronkite, David Rockefeller, and George H. W. Bush). It's interesting to note the huge power of groups like the Knights of Columbus. The K of C own Yankee Stadium and conduct a Blue Mass (These Knights were created by a Jesuit-trained of St. Mary's College in Montreal man named Michael J. McGivney. Their purpose is to institute Papal dominance in the world. Historically, Papal decrees centuries ago condemn the freedom of religion, the freedom of the press, and the freedom to print the Bible in whatever language you wish. That's why martyrs like William Tyndale were murdered when it was taboo to print the Bible in your own language). Their logo has a fasces emblem. That was used for fascism in Nazi and Mussolini's logos. The Bush family especially 3rd Degree K of C Jeb Bush are in league with them. Many Knights of Columbus are police officers. That's why the truth is getting out and the time of ignorance is getting a vigorous backlash from real patriots plus truthseekers. That's why I will not equivocate or back down from my core belief system. I will stand firm in what I subscribe to in my life. Marti Oakley from OpEdNews on March 19, 2008 reported on something very extreme. Oakley wrote that DNA of babies born from parents for about 10 years have their newborn babies' DNAs harvested, tested, stored, and experimented on in all 50 states. All 50 states now are regularly sending these results to the Department of Homeland Security. They wish to do this for tests for genetic disorder or traits that can occur later in their lives. Marti wrote that in Minnesota false results occurs in 1/3 of these genetic tests for diseases or traits. Many parents don't realize that some of the newborns are retrieved of their genetic material. Forms exists for the have privacy concerns, but they don't exist for pre-natal care. In some cases, parents randomnly signed these documents to just gain admission to the hospital. The courts and federal law are clear that the concept of human DNA can't be patented. In January 2007, a lady named Twila Brase president of the Citizens Council on Healthcare, issued a written testimony to the Minnesota legislature describing unethical and hidden uses of harvested DNA by the state. The reality is that there should be no secret genetical retrieval of newborns' DNA whatsoever. Why would the DHS need this information if only for controlling citizens. The state should has no right to own DNA of anyone especially infant babies. Human beings have a right to their privacy and individuality.










Tony Mauro from The New York Law Journal at March 19, 2008 reported that the decision for the D.C. vs. Heller case is historic. It seems that Justice Kennedy is open to outline an individual right view of the Second Amendment. This is the first time that the Supreme Court will give a detailed account of the meaning of the 2nd Amendment. It is expected that the Court will give an individual right to the 2nd Amendment rather soon. The Jesuit Order has known for its opposition to people having the right to bear arms. The DC gun ban is proof that some in government are coming for people's guns. The Founding Fathers like Noah Webster notoriously supported gun rights (they wrote of this in the Federalist Papers and other documents) as part of individual rights to be a bulwark against tryannical government. They classified the militia as the people since the National Guard never was invented until 1903. Some of the cities in the USA with the highest crime rates have the most anti-gun laws like Chicago, Washington D.C., Detriot, Los Angeles, and Baltimore. My concern is that the Supreme Court would say in a majority decision that the Second Amendment is an individual right, but restrictions are still necessary for law abiding citizens. That's very slick. Larry Pratt is correct to point out that the Second Amendment is an individual right and should have no restrictions among American citizens. Antifascist Calling from March 18, 2008 wrote that the White House consolidates the National Security State. The Washington Post revealed Friday that the FBI is continuing its systematic violation of Americans’ Fourth Amendment guarantees against "unreasonable searches and seizures." This article mentioned that the Justice Department report concluded that the FBI abused its intelligence gathering procedures by creating bogus NSLs (or national security letters) from 2003 to 2006. On at least one time, the FBI relied on an illegally issed NSL to circumvent a ruling by the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court to obtain records the secret court said was protected by the 1st Amendment. Justice Department Inspector General Glenn A. Fine said that 60% of the almost 50,000 security letters issued in 2006 by the FBI targeted Americans. Charlie Savage wrote that the White House has stripped the IOB (or Intelligence Oversight Board) of its authority to root out illegal spying activities by the intelligence community. This involved a huge problem of unwarranted surveillance of America that the NSA was caught doing in a data mining procedure. Numerous Neo-Cons support this anti-liberty nonesense. These Neo-Con hypocrites condemn Jeremiah Wright, but won’t condemn the epidemic of police brutality, tasers, the abortion genocide (Planned Parenthood was caught in another racism scandal), and various evils in government (which have a far more destructive consequence than the words of Wright). That’s why I don’t agree with the Neo cons (or fake conservatives) or the far left crowd. I believe in free speech. Hence, a pastor can support any political agenda they want. If you don’t like it, you can good into another church. It’s a simple solution. I have a right to express anger at time, learn about my history, and fight for the truth. Some may try to deny me that right, but I will strong and express my right. The Stock market has gone up in up yesterday. Some although have condemned the Fed for not adequately perserving the value of the dollar. Expert investor Jim Rogers is one person doing it. He said they are disregarding the value of the dollar in an attempt to bail out Wall Street (for example, Fed chariman Ben Bernake approved of giving $230 bilion in financial assistance to banks including $30 billion to Bear Stearns bank. The Knights of Malta, the CFR, and the Pilgrim Society are big players in Wall Street). These problems doesn't mean that socialism is the answer. There need to be some solutions in investing in building jobs, the elimination of the privately run Federal Reserve (since the Constitution only gives Congress not the Fed the power to regulate the output of currency), giving incentives to businesses who stay in America, etc. Today is the 5th Anniversary of the Iraq War. Some violence has decreased in Iraq. Problems like infrastructure being underdeveloped in Baghdad like running water problems and violence still remain an issue. It is true that Saddam shouldn't rule in Iraq, but that responsibility is mainly among the Iraqi people to handle. America had no Constitutional or moral right to use preemptive war which wasn't a declaration of war via Congress to attack the nation of Iraq. The justifications put out by the government like al-Qaeda having a firm, concrete connection with Iraq, Iraq posing a direct threat to America, and Iraq having massive qunatities of weapons of mass destruction were proven to be false. Five years in, the Pentagon tags the cost of the Iraq war at roughly $600 billion and counting. As for conspiracies. I put them into context. I have no issue with exposing real conspiracies. They exist from the Operation Ajax to the Gulf on Tonkin incident. Yet, I wouldn't make exposing conspiracies the only part of my life. Life is complex, so as human beings we should be apt to be in a wide spectrum of subject manner. It's important to be well rounded, so we can explain the world in a concise way. That's why I'm Pro-Life, I'm pro-gun, I believe in national sovereignity, I'm against government corruption, I'm against GM foods, and I love our legitimate civil liberties protected as found in the Second Amendment. Viewpoints are apart of human existence and experience fundamentally. I reject the new world order.





By Timothy






No comments: