The Neo cons are defending the massacre of Iraqi journalists and chidren. Michelle Malkin's Hot Air website still claims that cameras and tripods were rocket launchers despite the U.S. military admitting otherwise. Some neo cons would defend barbecuing Arabic babies in the White House lawn if they were told it was apart of the war on terror. Now, some of them defend the video that was released by Wikileaks that shows U.S. Apache helicopters massacring Iraqi journalists and children in Baghdad. The troops there laughed about it. “The newly released video of the Baghdad attacks was recorded on one of two Apache helicopters hunting for insurgents on 12 July 2007,” reports the Guardian. “Among the dead were a 22-year-old Reuters photographer, Namir Noor-Eldeen, and his driver, Saeed Chmagh, 40. The Pentagon blocked an attempt by Reuters to obtain the video through a freedom of information request. Wikileaks director Julian Assange said his organisation had to break through encryption by the military to view it.” The video have journalists walking down the middle of the street with tripods and video cameras. They talked to other Iraqis and preparing to set up filming. The Apache pilots indiscriminately open fire on the group. They thought that the men were carrying RPG rocket grenade launchers, which isn't so. They fired again at people who tried to rescue the dying man. The rescuers' van, which is seen to contain at least 2 children. The soldiers laughed and said that: "...Hahaha. I hit ‘em,” and “Oh yeah, look at those dead bastards.” One of the men on the ground is believed to be Chmagh. He is wounded and tried to crawl into safety. He was shot too. A van tried to go next to the wounded man and Iraqis climb out. They are unarmed and try to assist the victims to go into the hospital. A helicopter opens fire with armour piercing shells. 2 children were wounded too. The U.S. Humvee drives over one of the dead bodies. One pilot said that: "...I think they just drove over a body." and he chuckles. The videos comes out in the same weeks as it was shown that U.S. special forces dug bullets out of victims following a botched raid in Afghanistan. They lied to their superiors about the incident in order to cover up the murder of innocent civilians (they are 2 pregnant women, a teenage girl, a police officer, and his brother). This proves that unprovoked and unreasonable abuse commonly occured against innocent Iraqis since the March 2003 invasion. There are apologists of this incident like CFR member Brett H. McGurk. He blamed the fog of war for the attack, yet he admitted the tradegy of the incident. Hot Air writer Ed Morriseey claims that the Iraqis were gunned down since they were aiming RPGs at U.S. troops: “It’s difficult to imagine any other purpose for an RPG launcher at that time and place. That’s exactly the kind of threat that US airborne forces were tasked to detect and destroy, which is why the gunships targeted and shot all of the members of the group,” Morrissey absurdly states, completely lying about the nature of the entire incident. This is false since the U.S. military (via Major Shawn Turner, who is a spokesman for U.S. Central Command) admits that none of the men were carrying rocket launchers. As the Guardian report clarifies, “One of the helicopter crew is heard saying that one of the group is shooting. But the video shows there is no shooting or even pointing of weapons. The men are standing around, apparently unperturbed.” The men were walking openly and causually down the street being no threat to hte military. 2 Apache attack helicopters attacked them. Morrissey tries to justify the slaughter in a sick way by saying if a vechile don't have a uniform, they should be attacked. The men used a photography lens and a camera. Morrissey lied and said that the victims were terrorists when they were civlians, journalists, and children. This is apologizing for war crimes. Michelle Malkin once claimed that a video showing U.S. soldiers throwing a puppy off a clip was a hoax and that the dog was a stuffed toy. This is false and she didn't retract this error at all. Lance Cpl. David Motari threw the dog was a disciplined including a second Marine. Neo con apologists are refuted again in their justification of barbarism. Blowing up vans that have little kids in it is not right. To them, “supporting the troops” means defending people who slaughter kids and murder little puppies. This isn't an act of good, this is an act of a war crime plain and simple.
Death panels are a serious controversy in the health debate. Supporters of the health care believe that these panels don't exists. Those who oppose this law believe that it does exist. Obama supporter Krugman have talked about this issue in an interview. He appeared in ABC's "This Week." Krugman claims that the cost/benefit board established over private medicine by the new health care program will be able to impose "more or less binding judgments" in refusing care. He said that these judgments will save a lot of money in the context of treating the elderly and people with disabilities and terminal illnesses. Krugment believed that the panel will prevent treatment that isn't "medically" useful. Wesley J. Smith is an author and attorney. He is a bioethics watchdog. He noticed the interview. He said that: "...No, the money won't be taken out of the hide of patients who want physiologically useless treatment, it will come at the lethal cost to patients whose treatment will be refused because it could work, based on the invidious judgment that the patient’s life is not worth the money to support," he said in response...In short, Krugman has admitted that contrary to the many mendacious denials by Obamacare supporters, the new regime will impose rationing,...This is akin to imposing a duty to die because when we reach a certain point in life, we will not be able to obtain treatment we want that could keep us going. Indeed, for me, this centralized federal control over what will and will not be provided in medicine–and to whom–is the biggest reason (among so many) why Obamacare is wrong..." as happens in the UK, Smith added. FRC and many pro-lifers were criticized for saying such thing. McClusky noticed the New York Times getting in on the rationing debate too. McClusky added: "Perhaps that is true – but the only evidence the NY Times offers is an article by the same author. It sounds more like when the federal government tried telling women not to get mammograms until you are much older then currently recommended – it might save money, but at the potential cost of a few lives that otherwise might have been saved by early detection (at least two of my family members would fit that category.)" "Now that the bill has passed President Obama supporters are saying similar things," he noticed. "Krugman is saying that Obamacare will lead to government rationing of health care, in order to save money in the system for healthier individuals." The debate is continuing too. What is true that health care reform in needed in America, but it should be the right kind of reform as well.
Wars are apart of history. The Vatican during WWI supported the Central Powers to destroy the Slavs and the mostly Orthodox Russian Monarchy. JP Morgan allied the Allied Powers financially. Also, the Rothschilds aided the Allied Powers. The allies of the Rothschilds called the Warburgs funded the Central Powers during WWI. ax was the head of the German secret police during WWI. The Warburg connection is reported to have helped the Axis powers financially. At the end of the war in 1919, the Treaty of Versailles meetings were attended by Rothschild or elite connected men like Paul and Max Warburg, John Foster Dulles (of Kuhn-Loeb), Colonel House, Thomas Lamont (of Morgans) and Allen Dulles (of Kuhn-Loeb). The harsh terms of the Treaty of Versailles totally set the stage for World War II. Said one delegate: ‘This is no peace; this is only a truce for twenty years." Sure enough, in 1939 the second World War started. During WWII, occultist and the international elite (or Illuminists) helped Hitler to gain power and assisted him to exterminate people of many backgrounds. These men were apart of the Knights of Malta, Pilgrim Society, high level Masonry, etc. One example of this is how the Knight of Malta Franz von Papen worked with the Center Party to give the Nazis the power base in Germany to ruin the 2nd Reich pro-civil liberties Constitution & laws. IBM head Thomas Watson worked with Hitler in his calculation machines to record Holocaust victims and kill them (or forced them to work in slave labor camps). Hitler borrowed the swastika image from the old Hindu religion. The swastika was used in Masonic Lodges before Hitler's reign. It's even found in the House of the Temple in D.C. The swastika in the occult was a sun symbol and even represented good luck until Hitler reveresed the swastika making it a sign of evil ever since. Also, Hitler intervened to prevent his tanks from destroying the British Expeditonary Force at Dunkirk. He even stopped the German invasion force from capturing Leningrad. Stalin prevented the Soviet military to protect itself when many intelligence sources were warning them of a German invasion. Adolf Hitler was a satanic individual that did double dealing. He talked peace with the Czechs and Poles, but preparing for war at the same time. This is precisely why why many historians believe that much of WWII was contrived in order to create that occult vision of the "new world" a reality so to speak. That is why Hitler made a temporary pact with Stalin. That is why despite the tensions between America and the Soviets after WWII, America covertly sent much of technology and materials to Russia (including means to create an atomic bomb). This is nothing new since the real elite of the world know all about this stuff. The good news is the truth has been revealed in such a high level in the 21st century, that some corrupt government officials want to ban (or heavily restrict the Internet). After WWII, the Cold War came about. The elite and the Vatican used agitation (via the CIA, the KGB, MI6, the Knights of Malta, etc.) to promote anti-Communist rhetoric to prolong the Cold War. After WWII, the cooperative bond of the Masons, the International financiers, and the Vatican was apparent even some wanted to deny this. Plans for a new world order or an Utopian society is nothing new. Plato and HG Wells believed that an elite made up of scientists or intellectuals were needed to rule the world in an Utopian society or a new world order. H.G. Wells doubted that a thoroughly communistic Utopia couldsurvive, (p.91) but a socialistic one that allowed individuality andindividual initiative would. The new Utopia needs to provide forinitiatiative.(pp. 92-3)Further, he writes in A Modern Utopia, "The World State in thisideal presents itself as the sole landowner of the earth. (p.93). In many wars, these occult secret societies and other groups use Hegelian Dialetics to get their Synthesis completed. That is why Secret Societies (and the corporate elite) have influenced or been behind numerous major wars and Revolutions spanning over 3 centuries as CFR member Billington wrote about in book "Fire in the Minds of Men."
Karl Marx was once a Christian and had religious parents. He wrote poem praising Jesus Christ and then he left his religion to become an atheist. Religious authors like Richard Wurmbrand in his book called Marx & Satan believed that Marx (and some radical Communists or Marxists) embraced anti-God and satanic views. Marx himself wrote, “I wish to avenge myself against the One who rules above …” Others like Mikhail Bakunin would write: “The Evil One is the satanic revolt against divine authority … Socialists recognize each other … In the name of [Satan] … Satan [is] the eternal rebel, the first freethinker … he emancipates [man], stamps upon his brow the seal of liberty and humanity …” Another Socialist, Pierre Joseph Proudhon wrote: “Come Satan, slandered by the small and by kings. God is stupidity and cowardice; God is hypocrisy and falsehood; God is tyranny and poverty; God is evil … I swear God, with my hand stretched out towards the heavens, that you are nothing more than the executioner of my reason, the scepter of my conscience … God is … antiliberal, antihuman.” (Source: Marx & Satan, by Richard Wurmbrand pp. 27-28). Wurmbrand, Fritz Springmeier, and others viewed Karl Marx as a closeted Satanist. So, it's easy to see that radical Communism and radical laissez faire captialism doesn't work to end oppression or poverty totally. It either makes more classes or centralizes wealth into fewer and fewer hands. Richard Wurmbrand is a credible source in exposing Communism. He lived in the then Communist government in Romania. He was persecuted for his religious faith in Jesus Christ. He wrote about Marx and his true roots. It's not a secret anyone that Communism was funded by the international elite to stagnant Third World nationalism, centralize wealth in monopolies, have class warfare, and promote the new world order system. Communism was a tool utilized to control human beings that restricted individual, political, and religious liberties. This is expressed in David Rockefeller's praise of Mao, but Mao was a dictator killing at least 60 million human beings in China. The banking elite or Illuminists aided the Communist Revolution is easily provable. Even Mason Albert Makcey admitted that the Keresnsky provisional government in Russia was isnpired and operated from Masonic Lodges. J.P. Morgan & Co, Lord Milner, and other bankers gave millions of dollars to Trotsky and Lenin. Skulls & Bones member W. A. Harriman and 32nd Degree Freemason Matthew C. Brush (who was a KT and a Shriner) explored managense deposits in the U.S.S.R. Masons in many number believe in human godhood. Freemason Benjamin Franklin states, "I conceive then, that theINFINITE has created many beings or Gods... It may be that thesecreated Gods are immortal; or it may be that after many Ages, they are changed, and others Supply their Places." Even Franklin's mother didn't want him to join Freemasonry.
Education issues are a serious problem in America. Authors from across the political spectrum like Samuel Blumenfeld pretty much proved that the Rockefeller Foundations and other elite group have infiltrated and "dumbed" down the capabilities of especially public education. This results in a high illiteracy rate even among Americans. In simple terms, the elite from the shift of the purpose of education to be from the development of understanding among a wide of spectrum of issues to education being solely about learning a skill. This isn't me writing these words down. Back in 1913, Rockefeller Foundation Director of Charity, Frederick Gates proclaimed that: "...In our dream, we have limitless resources, and the people yield themselves with perfect docility to our molding hand. The present educational conventions fade from our minds; and, unhampered by tradition, we work our own good will upon a grateful and responsive folk. We shall not try to make these people or any of their children into philosophers or men of learning or science. We are not to raise up from among them authors, orators, poets, or men of letters. We shall not search for embryo great artists, painters, musicians. Nor will we cherish even the humbler ambition to raise up from among them lawyers, doctors, preachers, politicians, statesmen, of whom we now have ample supply..." Now, the Rockefeller Foundation and their ilk wanted the common people to be controlled and trained without heavily expressing independent thinking or thought. A man or a woman has the freedom of conscience to believe in whatever they want to as free human beings. True education is bigger than about instruction, comprehension of subject matter, and experience. You experience life to develop your analytical abilities and education about the world around you even more succintly as a human being. You use personal creativity as a function of true learning (no pervasive distractions). The plutocrats used physiological, materialistic "psychologists" as Wilhelm Wundt, G. Stanley Hall, James McKeen Cattell, E. L. Thorndike, and others. Some of them believed that only things that can be measured, quantified, and scientifically demonstrated is worthy of pursuing, and that public education should limit itself to learn task to accept the commands of their superiors. This leads into an anti-intellectualism and a groupthink. Wilhelm Maximmilian Wundt was a professor of philsophy and later rector of the University of Leipzig in Germany. He died in 1920. G. Stanley Hall was a disciple of Wunt. He went into Johns Hopkins University in Baltimore. Hall was involved in the founding of the Psychological Association in 1892. The catch of him was that he is quoted as wanting the deemphasis of the alphabet, multiplication tables, grammar, scales, and biblioltary (even if it causes a child trouble to read information). Hall considered American working-class children as a "great army of incapables, shading down to those who should be in schools for dullards or subnormal children, for those whose mental development heredity decrees a slow pace and an early arrest." Hall was wrong of course. J. McKeen Cattel didn't want parents to teach a child the sounds of letters and phrases as the first step to learn to read. After WWII and now in the 21st century, education is turned into mostly training into a field. The reduction of education into training, neuron connection, and behavior modification is evil and it's crippling education. A solution to this is a return to criticial thinking, self awareness, and higher learning. Education as promoted even by the Founding Fathers should be avaliable to all people regardless of wealth, class, etc. Education facilities shouldn't be infiltrated by foundations, high level Masons (i.e. The President of the Oregon State Teachers Association was once Tom Powers, Jr. who was a 32 degree Mason) or Big Business at all. Some radical humanism believe that the state has supremacy over man instead of mankind have supremacy over the state. Hegel believed that people exist for the State, which is similar to John Dewey's views. Dewey was one of the founding fathers of the infiltration of the American educational system. John Dewey was by the way an original signer of the Humanist Manifesto in 1933, this idea man is his own god. He is officially on the record as anti-Christian (even the NEA has been infiltrated by New Agers, Masons, etc.). The Humanist Manifesto I of 1933 states that a new religion must be created, and the Manifesto describes a picture of their desired New Age religion that is "synthesizing", and for "the complete realization of human personality", etc. The state has a role in society, but rights don't come from the state. Human rights as JFK said comes from the hand of God. Education shouldn't be compuslory, but at the same time people have right to get public education or private education if they desire to.
By Timothy
No comments:
Post a Comment