| QUOTE |
| Hi Eric, I will copy a small post I made in relation to Napoleons advances in Russia. I can guess you know this already, but some of it may be of some use: "More telling evidence of Napoleon having sabotaged his own armies efforts to defeat the retreating Russian army are found at Lubino-Valutina Gora. The French troops had the Russians at their mercy and Napoleons failure to order the attack is considered an "uncharacterisitic mistake", one of very many that he made during the Russian Campaign. Napoleon had a remarkeable military understanding, and once he started, it was very important to win this campaign and as quick as possible, considering the situation in Europe, and Wellingtons successes in Spain. Of course Napoleon would not have made "uncharacteristic mistakes" of that magnitude and a look at his Russian campaign versus his other campaigns can be an indication of his true intentions in Russia. The effect of Napoleons Russian campaign was to weaken his army to such an extent that it permitted the restoration of the monarchs of europe, without a revolutionary French army to prevent it. As for Lubino-Valutina Gora, even the russian army couldn't understand why the French army didn't smash them. Woldemar Von Lowestern said "Never had our army been in greater danger. The fate of the campaign and the army should have been sealed that day". Lieutenant Colonel Von Crady (of the French Armee) was to say "If we had attacked the Russians would have been routed, so all of us soldiers and officers were eagerly waiting the order to attack. Napoleons actions preserved the Russian army yet again in this campaign. Napoleon made so many "uncharacteristic errors" in that campaign that he must take all the blame for their defeat. In fact a study of the war in Russia will leave no doubt that Napoleon couldn't possibly have lost without such uncharacteristic errors. Of course we can assume those "errors" were so numerous and of such magnititude that there was another agenda at play. Napoleons astonishing treatment of Roman Catholic Poland and all his other potential allies before the war began all aided his downfall, but even still, he still should have routed the Russian army on more than one occasion before he ever reached Moscow. Napoleons attack on the religiously significant city of Smolensk also highlighted more "uncharacteristic errors" which cost the lives of many of his own troops, and all needlessly. There was no military advantage in making such an assault on Smolensk, and we can assume its significance to the "heretic" Orthodox Church played some role. Napoleon made another "uncharacteristic error" on August 13 when an energetic frontal attack would have annihilated the russian army that was in a state of confusion and all over the place. We must alwasy bear in mind that the Russian army was retreating and the French soldiers were chasing them and looking very every possible chance for an energetic frontal attack, but when those chances arose Napoleons decisions preserved the Russian army and prevented an early and easy success for his own side. Also bear in mind that the French destroyed the Russian army very quickly only a few years earlier. Napoleons "uncharacteristic" desicion to halt his troops when the Russians were crossing the river Luchesa, and his pointless delays in Vilna are further indicators of his decisions working very much against his own Armee" Best Regards |
Dear Tom,
Great post.
The Order, controlling Napoleon, never intended to defeat the Russian army. (HItler would do the same during Operation Barbarossa, the invasion of the USSR in 1941.) After all, the Jesuit General was residing in St. Petersburg and the Grand Master of the Knights of Malta, also resident in Russia, had just entered into an alliance and agreement with the Black Pope. Russia was to be a huge Jesuit-ruled Empire controlled from Moscow. But in 1820 the Company was expelled for which Alexander I was poisoned in 1825. His successor Nicholas I negotiated a concordat with Pius IX, the Jesuits making progress against Orthodox Russia. But then Alexander II broke off diplomatic relations with the Vatican and signed a Constitution the day he was murdered on the Order's fifth attempt. With Alexander III in the pocket of the Black Pope, the Czar overruled the Constitution and persecuted the Jews during the 1880s, blaming the Jews for the killing of Alexander II.
But the Jesuit General had had enought of the back-and-forth support and non-support of the Russian Czars. So the Knights of Malta aided the Order's Bolshevik Revolution in 1917. In 1922 Jesuit Edmund Walsh from Georgetown University went to Moscow and set up Stalin to be the Secretary of the Communist party until Stalin's poisoning in 1953. From that time on the Jesuits have built up Soviet/Communist Russia using American cartel corporate fascists who were high level Freemasons (Henry Ford and Thomas J. Watson---IBM) and Knights of Malta (J. Peter Grace, Averill Harriman, etc). This explains the 11 billion USD in supplies given to Stalin during the Lend Lease period including the atomic bomb/device in 1943. Those ingredients necessary for the building of the bomb were then shipped into Japan, as Jesuit Hirohito's Japan was not at war with the Jesuit Stalin's USSR, and later detonated on the ground in Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately after the airbursts of magnesian flash bombs dropped by Masonic LeMay's B-29s.
Now the Jesuit Order has its huge Russian Empire as desired from the days of Napoleon's betrayal of his army for the benefit of Russia. The Russian/Soviet enemy of the American people is alive and well. That enemy is to be used on the US in a joint attack that includes allies China and the Sunni Moslem World. This threefold cord will not be broken; for the devil and his Jesuit General abide by the maxims of the Scriptures though openly against the Word of God being in the hands of the common man.
Thanks again.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
______________
| QUOTE |
| Hi Eric, Did former Jesuit Rivera ever make any comments regarding Napoloen Bonaparte that you know of. Or have any other former-jesuits, or former high-level freemasons mentioned the links to Napoleon? Regards |
Dear Tom,
Abbe Barruel the Jesuit mentioned Napoleon's connection to Grand Orient Freemasonry as did Roman Catholic Nesta Webster in her Secret Societies and Subversive Movements. These were attempts to confine the French Revolution and Napoleonic Wars to mere Masonic influence apart for the Order.
To my knowledge no ex-Jesuit has ever mentioned the Order's control of Napoleon. It was the Emperor's policy to be openly anti-Jesuit as was the policy of Mao Zedong when he expelled the Order from China in 1949. But Napoleon's secret but true policy (as was Mao's) was to be their tool from the moment he was recruited on Corsica---the prison for the Order when returned on Spanish ships by order of the king from its South American holdings.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
_____________________
>Sir,
>
>Please refer to the following comments in your post to a member of the mailing list:
>
>"“This explains the 11 billion USD in supplies given to Stalin during the Lend Lease period including the atomic bomb/device in 1943. Those ingredients necessary for the building of the bomb were then shipped into Japan, as Jesuit Hirohito's Japan was not at war with the Jesuit Stalin's USSR, and later detonated on the ground in Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately after the airbursts of magnesian flash bombs dropped by Masonic LeMay's B-29s.”"
>
>
>I seek to comprehend that even accepting Hirohito’s complicity with Jesuits, could Japanese establishment be willing to undergo the trauma caused by atomic explosion and radiation.
Absolutely. High-level Freemason Emperor Hirohito was completely controlled by the Jesuits since his accession to the throne in 1926. His grandfather, Emperor Meiji, was placed on the throne after the Order assassinated his father, Emperor Komei, for refusing to allow White Christian (Roman Catholic) missionaries into Japan. Meiji was used to abolish the Shogonate in 1868 and to centralize power in Tokyo. The Order used Meiji to attack Russia in 1905 destroying the Orthodox Tzar's navy via a surprise attack. The Order also used Meiji to attack China in the attempt to overthrow the Manchu dynasty, which dynasty was a enemy of the Black Pope.
So yes, in 1941 the Jesuit General used his servants FDR and Hirohito to bring on the attack of Pearl Harbor justifying FDR's entrance into WWII. The Offici of Naval Intelligence has also placed explosives in the magazine of the USS Arizona and then detonated them in a mere 13 minutes into the Japanese airborne attack. In July of 1945, again the ONI and Japanese Intelligence worked together to sink the USS Indianapolis after it delivered the uranium to be used in the magnesium flash bomb, Little Boy, to be dropped by Paul Tippits on August 6, 1945. And finally, the Japanese Imperial High Command protected the Jesuit physicists as they assembled the bomb in Hiroshima for at least one year.
For Masonic Hirohito's obedience, he was sparred from trial at the War Crimes Trial in Japan by none other than 33rd Degree Freemason Douglas MacArthur. MacArthur's advisor was Georgetown University Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh. I have a picture of both Walsh and MacArthur at the War Crimes Trial in 1947.
We must come to the horrible conclusion that there were no military leaders during WWII who were loyal to their own people. Those who were loyal, men like Generals Patton, Rommel, and Polish General Sikorski, were murdered by the intelligence agencies of their own countries. Those agencies (OSS, SIS and the SS) were all ruled by the Jesuits or their immediate agents (Knights of Malta American William Donovan, British Kim Philby and Nazi Heinrich Himmler).
I can understand the complicity of traitor. But, complicity which endanger’s traitor’s survival is hard to fathom. Does it imply that Jesuits and Hirohito’s Japanese establishment were willing to sacrifice physically at the altar of Jesuit General.
Correct. If Japan was to be brought into a future unity with Far Eastern nations, her most devoted patriots must be mass-murdered. This was done; the Emperor was spared and was no longer considered to be a "god on earth" in competition with the pope; and Japan occupied by American forces for over 60 years, her economy and navy rebuilt in prepartion for her alliance with China.
>
>
>Further, WWII was driven by Jesuit Agenda, then why would Japan overtake British Colonies in South East Asia during WWII, since the Crown is considered to be a Jesuit pawn, why will Jesuit upset the British Crown supremacy over South East Asian Colonies.
There are two reasons. First, the Japanese Army was commanded by Jesuit Coadjutors who imprisoned or murdered every Protestant, Bible-believer they could find. This is why the Japanese Army invaded China to destroy the British Chinese Inland Mission which brought the gospel to millions of Chinese. This is also why MacArthur abandoned the American missionaries in the Philippines when he moved to Australia, giving them over to their bloody fate at the hands of Japanese inquisitors.
Secondly, the Order was busy destroying the Protestant British Empire during WWI and WWII---the Company's Second Thirty Years's War (1914-1945). The Black Pope used the British Empire for its purposes from the days of King George III (1780) up to Masonic King George VI (1945). Further, after WWII the Order used the British navy to attack and sink ships carrying surviving European Jews to Palestine thus bringing on the Lord's Curse pronounced in Genesis 12:3 upon the dying British Empire. By 1948 the Jesuits had used Ghandi to break India away from the Empire for which he was then murdered by one of the Order's assassins.
>
>Faithfully yours,
>
>Ashish Raje
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
>
>Please refer to the following comments in your post to a member of the mailing list:
>
>"“This explains the 11 billion USD in supplies given to Stalin during the Lend Lease period including the atomic bomb/device in 1943. Those ingredients necessary for the building of the bomb were then shipped into Japan, as Jesuit Hirohito's Japan was not at war with the Jesuit Stalin's USSR, and later detonated on the ground in Hiroshima and Nagasaki immediately after the airbursts of magnesian flash bombs dropped by Masonic LeMay's B-29s.”"
>
>
>I seek to comprehend that even accepting Hirohito’s complicity with Jesuits, could Japanese establishment be willing to undergo the trauma caused by atomic explosion and radiation.
Absolutely. High-level Freemason Emperor Hirohito was completely controlled by the Jesuits since his accession to the throne in 1926. His grandfather, Emperor Meiji, was placed on the throne after the Order assassinated his father, Emperor Komei, for refusing to allow White Christian (Roman Catholic) missionaries into Japan. Meiji was used to abolish the Shogonate in 1868 and to centralize power in Tokyo. The Order used Meiji to attack Russia in 1905 destroying the Orthodox Tzar's navy via a surprise attack. The Order also used Meiji to attack China in the attempt to overthrow the Manchu dynasty, which dynasty was a enemy of the Black Pope.
So yes, in 1941 the Jesuit General used his servants FDR and Hirohito to bring on the attack of Pearl Harbor justifying FDR's entrance into WWII. The Offici of Naval Intelligence has also placed explosives in the magazine of the USS Arizona and then detonated them in a mere 13 minutes into the Japanese airborne attack. In July of 1945, again the ONI and Japanese Intelligence worked together to sink the USS Indianapolis after it delivered the uranium to be used in the magnesium flash bomb, Little Boy, to be dropped by Paul Tippits on August 6, 1945. And finally, the Japanese Imperial High Command protected the Jesuit physicists as they assembled the bomb in Hiroshima for at least one year.
For Masonic Hirohito's obedience, he was sparred from trial at the War Crimes Trial in Japan by none other than 33rd Degree Freemason Douglas MacArthur. MacArthur's advisor was Georgetown University Jesuit Edmund A. Walsh. I have a picture of both Walsh and MacArthur at the War Crimes Trial in 1947.
We must come to the horrible conclusion that there were no military leaders during WWII who were loyal to their own people. Those who were loyal, men like Generals Patton, Rommel, and Polish General Sikorski, were murdered by the intelligence agencies of their own countries. Those agencies (OSS, SIS and the SS) were all ruled by the Jesuits or their immediate agents (Knights of Malta American William Donovan, British Kim Philby and Nazi Heinrich Himmler).
I can understand the complicity of traitor. But, complicity which endanger’s traitor’s survival is hard to fathom. Does it imply that Jesuits and Hirohito’s Japanese establishment were willing to sacrifice physically at the altar of Jesuit General.
Correct. If Japan was to be brought into a future unity with Far Eastern nations, her most devoted patriots must be mass-murdered. This was done; the Emperor was spared and was no longer considered to be a "god on earth" in competition with the pope; and Japan occupied by American forces for over 60 years, her economy and navy rebuilt in prepartion for her alliance with China.
>
>
>Further, WWII was driven by Jesuit Agenda, then why would Japan overtake British Colonies in South East Asia during WWII, since the Crown is considered to be a Jesuit pawn, why will Jesuit upset the British Crown supremacy over South East Asian Colonies.
There are two reasons. First, the Japanese Army was commanded by Jesuit Coadjutors who imprisoned or murdered every Protestant, Bible-believer they could find. This is why the Japanese Army invaded China to destroy the British Chinese Inland Mission which brought the gospel to millions of Chinese. This is also why MacArthur abandoned the American missionaries in the Philippines when he moved to Australia, giving them over to their bloody fate at the hands of Japanese inquisitors.
Secondly, the Order was busy destroying the Protestant British Empire during WWI and WWII---the Company's Second Thirty Years's War (1914-1945). The Black Pope used the British Empire for its purposes from the days of King George III (1780) up to Masonic King George VI (1945). Further, after WWII the Order used the British navy to attack and sink ships carrying surviving European Jews to Palestine thus bringing on the Lord's Curse pronounced in Genesis 12:3 upon the dying British Empire. By 1948 the Jesuits had used Ghandi to break India away from the Empire for which he was then murdered by one of the Order's assassins.
>
>Faithfully yours,
>
>Ashish Raje
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
___________
We talked extensively of the present crisis in Italy on my last Radio Show with Greg Szymanski's on Monday you should check it out.
Fraternaly yours,
Leo
Fraternaly yours,
Leo
| QUOTE |
| New Radio Interview with Leo Zagami Show: The Investigative Journal Host: Greg Szymanski Date: Monday, Januray 21, 2008 Topic: Today's guest is Leo Zagami who is just back from Rome, reporting on the recent Jesuit Conclave and their election of Fr. Adolfo Nicolas S.J. as the new Superior General of the Jesuits. Website: http://www.illuminaticonfessions.webfriend.it/ Download the Interview: MP3 format, 2 hours, 20 MB, 24kbps (left click) http://www.megaupload.com/?d=D1T5HKB3 --- |
(1:16:15 you'll hear Leo speak of myself haha.)
_____________________
______
New Radio Interview with Eric Jon Phelps
Show: The Investigative Journal
Host: Greg Szymanski
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Topic: Replay of a pre-President JFK Speech detailing his position
towards the Papacy. Then, Eric Jon Phelps is the guest.
Points covered:
The 6 different types of Zionist.
The 20 Maxims of the Jesuits relating to Canon Law and the Papacy.
The destruction of America and coming invasion.
Analysis of the new Jesuit Superior General, and much more.
Eric's Website: http://vaticanassassins.org
Download the Interview:
MP3 format,
2 hours, 20 MB, 24kbps
(left click)
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=KA4JOOT6
Show: The Investigative Journal
Host: Greg Szymanski
Date: Wednesday, January 23, 2008
Topic: Replay of a pre-President JFK Speech detailing his position
towards the Papacy. Then, Eric Jon Phelps is the guest.
Points covered:
The 6 different types of Zionist.
The 20 Maxims of the Jesuits relating to Canon Law and the Papacy.
The destruction of America and coming invasion.
Analysis of the new Jesuit Superior General, and much more.
Eric's Website: http://vaticanassassins.org
Download the Interview:
MP3 format,
2 hours, 20 MB, 24kbps
(left click)
http://www.megaupload.com/?d=KA4JOOT6
________
Show: Cloak and Dagger
Host: Lenny Bloom
Date: January 6, 2008.
http://arcticbeacon.com/sound_tidbits/2008...g_Szymanski.mp3
Eric Phelps and Greg Szymanski. Szymanski largely talks about little unknown lawsuits launched against the Vatican. Szymanski has written about them recently here.
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/4-Jan-2008.html
Host: Lenny Bloom
Date: January 6, 2008.
http://arcticbeacon.com/sound_tidbits/2008...g_Szymanski.mp3
Eric Phelps and Greg Szymanski. Szymanski largely talks about little unknown lawsuits launched against the Vatican. Szymanski has written about them recently here.
http://www.arcticbeacon.com/articles/4-Jan-2008.html
________
Show: Cloak and Dagger
Host: Lenny Bloom
Date: January 23, 2008.
ERIC PHELPS DEBRIEFING ON U.F.O.'S
Host: Lenny Bloom
Date: January 23, 2008.
ERIC PHELPS DEBRIEFING ON U.F.O.'S
No comments:
Post a Comment