From http://www.jonesreport.com/article/01_08/010108_ten_corrupt.html
Judicial Watch List of “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians” for 2007
Judicial Watch | January 1, 2008
Washington, DC –Judicial Watch, the public interest group that investigates and prosecutes government corruption, today released its 2007 list of Washington’s “Ten Most Wanted Corrupt Politicians.” The list, in alphabetical order, includes:
1. Senator Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-NY): In addition to her long and sordid ethics record, Senator Hillary Clinton took a lot of heat in 2007 – and rightly so – for blocking the release her official White House records. Many suspect these records contain a treasure trove of information related to her role in a number of serious Clinton-era scandals. Moreover, in March 2007, Judicial Watch filed an ethics complaint against Senator Clinton for filing false financial disclosure forms with the U.S. Senate (again). And Hillary’s top campaign contributor, Norman Hsu, was exposed as a felon and a fugitive from justice in 2007. Hsu pleaded guilt to one count of grand theft for defrauding investors as part of a multi-million dollar Ponzi scheme.
2. Rep. John Conyers (D-MI): Conyers reportedly repeatedly violated the law and House ethics rules, forcing his staff to serve as his personal servants, babysitters, valets and campaign workers while on the government payroll. While the House Ethics Committee investigated these allegations in 2006, and substantiated a number of the accusations against Conyers, the committee blamed the staff and required additional administrative record-keeping and employee training. Judicial Watch obtained documentation in 2007 from a former Conyers staffer that sheds new light on the activities and conduct on the part of the Michigan congressman, which appear to be at a minimum inappropriate and likely unlawful. Judicial Watch called on the Attorney General in 2007 to investigate the matter.
3. Senator Larry Craig (R-ID): In one of the most shocking scandals of 2007, Senator Craig was caught by police attempting to solicit sex in a Minneapolis International Airport men’s bathroom during the summer. Senator Craig reportedly “sent signals” to a police officer in an adjacent stall that he wanted to engage in sexual activity. When the police officer showed Craig his police identification under the bathroom stall divider and pointed toward the exit, the senator reportedly exclaimed 'No!'” When asked to produce identification, Craig presented police his U.S. Senate business card and said, “What do you think of that?” The power play didn’t work. Craig was arrested, charged and entered a guilty plea. Despite enormous pressure from his Republican colleagues to resign from the Senate, Craig refused.
4. Senator Diane Feinstein (D-CA): As a member of the Senate Appropriations Committee's subcommittee on military construction, Feinstein reviewed military construction government contracts, some of which were ultimately awarded to URS Corporation and Perini, companies then owned by Feinstein's husband, Richard Blum. While the Pentagon ultimately awards military contracts, there is a reason for the review process. The Senate's subcommittee on Military Construction's approval carries weight. Sen. Feinstein, therefore, likely had influence over the decision making process. Senator Feinstein also attempted to undermine ethics reform in 2007, arguing in favor of a perk that allows members of Congress to book multiple airline flights and then cancel them without financial penalty. Judicial Watch’s investigation into this matter is ongoing.
5. Former New York Mayor Rudy Giuliani (R-NY): Giuliani came under fire in late 2007 after it was discovered the former New York mayor’s office “billed obscure city agencies for tens of thousands of dollars in security expenses amassed during the time when he was beginning an extramarital relationship with future wife Judith Nathan in the Hamptons…” ABC News also reported that Giuliani provided Nathan with a police vehicle and a city driver at taxpayer expense. All of this news came on the heels of the federal indictment on corruption charges of Giuliani’s former Police Chief and business partner Bernard Kerik, who pleaded guilty in 2006 to accepting a $165,000 bribe in the form of renovations to his Bronx apartment from a construction company attempting to land city contracts.
6. Governor Mike Huckabee (R-AR): Governor Huckabee enjoyed a meteoric rise in the polls in December 2007, which prompted a more thorough review of his ethics record. According to The Associated Press: “[Huckabee’s] career has also been colored by 14 ethics complaints and a volley of questions about his integrity, ranging from his management of campaign cash to his use of a nonprofit organization to subsidize his income to his destruction of state computer files on his way out of the governor’s office.” And what was Governor Huckabee’s response to these ethics allegations? Rather than cooperating with investigators, Huckabee sued the state ethics commission twice and attempted to shut the ethics process down.
7. I. Lewis “Scooter” Libby: Libby, former Chief of Staff to Vice President Dick Cheney, was sentenced to 30 months in prison and fined $250,000 for lying and obstructing the Valerie Plame CIA leak investigation. Libby was found guilty of four felonies -- two counts of perjury, one count of making false statements to the FBI and one count of obstructing justice – all serious crimes. Unfortunately, Libby was largely let off the hook. In an appalling lack of judgment, President Bush issued “Executive Clemency” to Libby and commuted the sentence.
8. Senator Barack Obama (D-IL): A “Dishonorable Mention” last year, Senator Obama moves onto the “ten most wanted” list in 2007. In 2006, it was discovered that Obama was involved in a suspicious real estate deal with an indicted political fundraiser, Antoin “Tony” Rezko. In 2007, more reports surfaced of deeper and suspicious business and political connections It was reported that just two months after he joined the Senate, Obama purchased $50,000 worth of stock in speculative companies whose major investors were his biggest campaign contributors. One of the companies was a biotech concern that benefited from legislation Obama pushed just two weeks after the senator purchased $5,000 of the company’s shares. Obama was also nabbed conducting campaign business in his Senate office, a violation of federal law.
9. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-CA): House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, who promised a new era of ethics enforcement in the House of Representatives, snuck a $25 million gift to her husband, Paul Pelosi, in a $15 billion Water Resources Development Act recently passed by Congress. The pet project involved renovating ports in Speaker Pelosi's home base of San Francisco. Pelosi just happens to own apartment buildings near the areas targeted for improvement, and will almost certainly experience a significant boost in property value as a result of Pelosi's earmark. Earlier in the year, Pelosi found herself in hot water for demanding access to a luxury Air Force jet to ferry the Speaker and her entourage back and forth from San Francisco non-stop, in unprecedented request which was wisely rejected by the Pentagon. And under Pelosi’s leadership, the House ethics process remains essentially shut down – which protects members in both parties from accountability.
10. Senator Harry Reid (D-NV): Over the last few years, Reid has been embroiled in a series of scandals that cast serious doubt on his credibility as a self-professed champion of government ethics, and 2007 was no different. According to The Los Angeles Times, over the last four years, Reid has used his influence in Washington to help a developer, Havey Whittemore, clear obstacles for a profitable real estate deal. As the project advanced, the Times reported, “Reid received tens of thousands of dollars in campaign contributions from Whittemore.” Whittemore also hired one of Reid’s sons (Leif) as his personal lawyer and then promptly handed the junior Reid the responsibility of negotiating the real estate deal with federal officials. Leif Reid even called his father’s office to talk about how to obtain the proper EPA permits, a clear conflict of interest.
Judicial Watch is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization. Judicial Watch neither supports nor opposes candidates for public office. For more information, visit www.judicialwatch.org.
______________
Chemtrail Proof - German Military Exposed
The German Military are exposed spraying Chemtrails. This is a Mainstream Media Exposé. Here is the proof that brings this subject to the realm of 'Conspiracy Fact'
_____________________
Obama Girl Has a 'Crush' on Army Recruits
JonesReport.com | January 2, 2008
Reports have come in that NewsCorps' Myspace.com and other web resources have been pushing circulation of YouTube's infamous Obama Girl in the days leading up to the Iowa Caucuses and the start of primary voting.
"I need a man defending the U.S.A." says Amber Lee Ettinger in her rather manipulative video for "I Like a Boy"-- Obama Girl has been stumping for not only Barack but also military might.
Obama Girl utilizes Edward Bernay's 101 propaganda techniques to associate products with sex and other unconscious desires. The tried and true method of manipulating base level psychology not only steers sales but controls minds.
"I Like a Boy" lends babes in bikinis to the pop song format-- where civilian boys are summarily rejected and ridiculed in favor of military men. "I feel at ease with an Army guy," the song lyrics read as Obama Girl sits on recruits doing push-ups.
It also features an assorted cast of Giuliani Girls, Romney Girls, ineffectual civilian boys and studly military men-- all in a high-production push to make the establishment candidates seem appealing.
Ettinger has used the same 'sex sells' technique to salute Barack Obama's presidential bid, including pining over the junior Senator in swim trunks.
Meanwhile, Barack Obama won't end the war and military recruits will be over seas in the meat grinder-- not poolside with the ladies. Their price for falling for the sexy propaganda will be vaccine injections, exposure to D.U., high risk of injury and death and bearers of the Iraqi slaughter.
Whether or not Obama Girl will be a factor in the election remains to be seen, but it has been giving Ron Paul Girl nightmares....
From the video's credits: Starring: Amber Lee Ettinger as Obama Girl
Amina Sade and Sena Khoda as the Obama Girls
Rebecca Dipietro, Dani Gross and Kristina Adelina as the Giuliani Girls
Carrie, Chrsitine and Carolyn Ditmar as the Romney Girls
Members of the US Military (as themselves)
_____________
In recent months I have become very interested in your work, some of it is available on the internet. I saw a discussion you gave discussing the Jesuits in Europe, and you said Napoleon was a freemason, and said he worked for the Jesuits to conquer their enemies.
Correct. Napoleon's advisor, Abbe Sieyes was himself a Jesuit on the Directorate and later he was the Second Consul of the three.
I would have a few questions,as I am studying Napoleon at the present, and obviously the Jesuits aren't mentioned in the books I am reading.
What the books do mention is that Napoleon was against freemasonry/secret societies and he laughed at them, and they go on to strongly suggest he was opposed to secret societies and thought they weren't anywhere near as powerful as the societies themselves wanted to imagine. Now what makes you think Napoleon was a freemason?
It is an indisputable fact of history. Many sources mention his membership in the Grand Lodge of Paris. Roman Catholic historian Nesta Webster is one of them.
Also King Frederick is mentioned as having been an ally of the Jesuit Superior General and he protected him. Napoleon treated Frederick very badly, humiliated him and divided up Germany and was an oppressor there. So if Napoleon was working for the Jesuits, then why did he oppress and humiliate Frederick so much.
The Bible-hating and author of the Masonic 33rd Degree, Frederick II, was a traitor to his Protestant Lutheran Germany. This may be the reason why Hitler admired him so, as Austrian Hitler was also a traitor to Germany, ensuring the total destruction of Protestant Prussia by the end of the Second Thirty Years' War (1914-1945). Frederick had backed the French Revolution as per his advisors, the Jesuits, whom he protected after the Order's suppression by the pope in 1773. So as Freemason Napoleon secretly worked with brother Freemason Frederick for the attempted destruction of Protestant Germany, even so covert Freemason Hitler worked with covert Freemason Stalin for the destruction of Protestant Prussia and Protestant East Germany. I prove this secret collusion between Hitler and Stalin in VAIII.
WHy didn't Napoleon re-institute the Jesuits himself as soon as he came to power???
Because the collusion between the Order and Napoleon had to remain a secret. That secret nexus between the Emperor and the Company was accomplished by Illumnized Freemasonry. The connection between Jesuit Weishaupt, his Illuminati founded in the Jesuit stronghold of Bavaria, and the French Revolution is also an undeniable fact of history. The same principle is followed by the Order when it instituted Communism in China. Mao openly expelled the Jesuits in 1949, but his secret policy was to remain subject to the Order that had put him in power via the American OSS (Knight of Malta Wild Bill Donovan) and the British SIS. Yes Communist China is completely in the hands of the Jesuits. Alexander Haig, who is the Honorary Advisor to COSCO has a brother named Francis. Francis Haig is a powerful US Jesuit priest.
I would appreciate any details you can give me, as at the present I have to imagine the role of the Jesuits is exagerated regarding Napoleon, based on the information I have at present. You might be able to show me that he was in fact working for them,
Please consult my Vatican Assassins, third edition. Therein I show that every move Napoleon made in the subjugation of his enemies, until his deliberate sacrifice of his Grande Armee in the snows of Russia, benefitted the Jesuit Order. It is impossible to understand the true purpose of Napoleon without taking into account of the expulsion of the Jesuits from Roman Catholic Portugal (1759), Roman Catholic France (1764), Roman Catholic Spain (1767), Roman Catholic Malta by the Knights of Malta (1768) and the formal Bull of Suppression and Extinction of the Society of Jesus by Pope Clement in 1773. Roman Catholic
Austria then expelled the Order in 1774. Meanwhile the Order had been expelled by Peter the Great in 1723 which invasion by Napoleon and the burning of heretic Christian Orthodox Moscow was a payback.
Best Regards
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
Thanks so much for the honour of a detailed reply.
I would be pleased to purchase VAIII, but it isn't available in any stores in my country and I have searched your own website (where I found your email), but I didn't notice any link to actually purchase your book.
The information you put forward is fascinating indeed, one would even have to feel a certain sense of admiration as to the extent, power and influence the Jesuit Order have achieved if all you say is correct. The achievements of the Order seem too large to fully comprehend, without knowing all the details.
As regards Napoleon and Frederick, I would still find it unusual why Napoleon would humiliate him so much, particularly at the treaty of Tilsit between Napoleon and Alexander of Russia and Frederick. Frederick wasn't permitted to the talks, was left to watch from a distance, and Napoleon let it be known that he would have taken the throne off Frederick and given it to one of his own frends/family, but Alexander persuaded Napoleon to leave Frederick in his position. Immediately before the treaty at Tilsit Napoleon could have continued his war against the russian forces if he wished, as it was clear his armies were superior to the russian forces and Alexander himself remarked that he had to agree to a treaty otherwise Napoleon could easily take Russia. Now if the 1812 war was "payback" for Peter the great expelling the Jesuits, as you suggest, then why didn't Napoleon press home is advantage in 1807?
Because the haven for the Jesuits in Europe was St. Petersburg. The Society was first recognized to exist by Pope Pius VII in 1801---in Russia. It was there also that the Order had driven the Knights of Malta from Malta. The alliance between the Order and the Knights of Malta is still in effect today. Recount Tolstoy's narration of Napoleon's deliberate retreat from Russia, sacrificing his army. Tolstoy could not figure this out and again this is in VAIII.
There hasn't been a satisfactory of why Napoleon advanced on Moscow rather than the capital St. Petersburg.
The war of 1812 was more a result of Russian aggression than French aggression, Napoleon made various efforts to avoid the war with Russia, trying to renegotiate peace with Alexander, but it was Alexander who pushed for war.
Both dictators were controlled. Alexander knew that Peter had been poisoned by the Order and was thus afraid of it for which reason he did not expel the Order from Russia until 1820.
How did the war with Russia benefit the Jesuit Order?
The killing of the Orthodox heretics and the destruction of Napoleon's army. This soldiers thought they were relly fighting the monarchs of Europe. That mass-murder of troops had to be accomplished in light of the coming Holy Alliance, that Jesuit conspiracy against the development of any free nations in Europe.
And why did the order want to sacrifice Napoleons army if he was such an asset to them.
Addressed above. The same was done with the German army in the East during WWII and the same will be done with the American army once it has been used for its designated purpose.
Also Napoleon presented a threat to the protestant Britian who were the other superpower of the day, why didn't the Jesuit Order use their influence to instigate the destruction of protestant Britain???
Because, like Hitler, Napoleon worked with the British. He, like Hitler, never intended to conquer Britain. Britain had become a haven for the Order which controlled King George III.
On another point, I was recently reading up a piece of Disraeli/Gladstone, the british PM's, it was in relation to the intense rivalry between the conservative Disraeli and the liberal Gladstone, they hated each other. Jewish Disraeli was close to the Queen and was even made an earl. It was in relation to the British policies in relation to Ireland during the 1800's that I was reading about the two politicains, I am Irish myself and Ireland suffered oppression and famine at the hands of the British authorities, the Irish were treated badly, as were the victims of all the other countries who were taken over by a larger empire.
Remember that Rome and the Jesuits were in complete control of the British Empire since no later than 1800. Every policy of Whitehall benefitted the design of the Order. It was that witch Queen Victoria who was behind the Irish famine, sending eight freighters a day from Ireland loaded with meats and vegetables---to foreign ports. That starved the Irish, nearly one million of my racial brethren.
While going through some info I saw a remark where the jewish Disraeli claimed the original Jesuits were jews, the Jesuit Order was really a covert jewish order whose purpose was to take control of the Vatican/Roman Catholicism for the jews, or words to that effect. I haven't yet had time to verify the claim or highlight the exact quote, but I thought it was a strange remark. What are your opinions of Disraeli's view that the original Jesuits were secret jews???
Disraeli was a tool of the Jesuits just as was Gladstone. I would love to see the quote. The Order controlled both sides of the political spectrum---as in the US today.
Also, you have mentioned Hitler and Stalin working together, something which wouldn't surprise me at all. The sudden failure of the German forces and their woeful miscalulation does seem to me to have been engineered somewhat by their own side.
Agreed.
The WWII Battle of Moscow doesn't seem to get as much attention as it should, it was the bloodiest battle with the highest death toll of WWII with 2.5 million deaths, the Battle of Stalingrad gets more attention.
HItler was deliberately sacrificing his primarily Protestant army in the east in preparation for the rape, pillage and destruction of Protestant Prussia and East Germany.
The delays caused by Hitler in attacking Moscow, diverting troops to Kyiv doesn't seem to make alot of sense to me and isn't explained satisfactorily, particularly bearing in mind that the German Generals wanted a quick attack on Moscow, and Hitler over-ruled them forcing a diversion to Kyiv, which cost them precious time before the winters approach.
Agreed. You are seeing the picture. Futher, many Orthodox Ukranians had to be murdered as Stalin had murdered them in the 1930s.
However apart from a few inconsistencies, I haven't seen enough evidence to strongly support the claim that Germanys battles in Stalingrad and Moscow were deliberatly sabotaged by their own side to be able to argue the issue. The delays at Kyiv can be explained (even though I find them unsatisfactory explanations). The success or failure of the Germans in Russia was a very close-run thing, and if it was manipulated there was no guarantee the German soldiers on the battlefield wouldn't win. I am inclined to believe the demise of the 6th Army and the failure to take Moscow earlier was self-destruction, but I would like to be aware of as much details as possible to support it if I am to be able to express that opinion to others with any confidence.
You must read VAIII. It is all there.
It must be noted that Hitler did demand that his army destroy St. Petersburg and Moscow, wanting to burn them to the ground and exterminate all their populations. If Hitler was working to destroy St. Petersburg and Moscow (like Napoleon did before him), then why didn't the German army succeed in taking those cities?
Like Rome, HItler had an open but false policy and a secret but true policy. The secret but true policy prevailed.
Why would the Jesuit Order have wanted Hitler to declare war on Russia, have early spectacular gains, and then to destroy the Germans before they had fulfilled their mission?
It is all in VAIII. Your questions are wonderful!
The Role of the Jesuits, what their actual ambition was in WWII doesn't seem very clear to me, some of it appears contradictory. Hitler was an open Roman Catholic, as was his Nazi regime. So, considering their religious affiliations and their closeness to the Jesuit Order (Himmler), then why did the Jesuit Order engineer their defeat???
Covered in VAIII; again wonderful questions!
It is often said that Fascism is the prefered Government of the Jesuit Order, so why did the Order allow the German Nazi regime to be defeated???
Covered in VAIII.
Did the Jesuit Order engineer the German defeat, or was the success or failure outside their control???
They engineered it via Mueller, Bormann and Gehlen.
To what extent were the Jesuits able to manipulate the outcomes of the war.
Entirely.
Wouldn't the Vatican and the Jesuits have prefered Roman Catholic Nazi Germany to actually defeat Orthodox Russia and Protestant Britain, and in USA the fascists (Prescott Bush, Dulles et al) who were sympathetic of the Nazi's were very powerful in that country, so a defeat of USA wouldn't have been necessary, they were already well on their way to taking over that country, so I don't see how the outcome of WWII furthered the Jesuits agenda, wouldn't a German victory over Britain and Russia, followed by a truce with USA, have been alot more favourable for the Vatican???
No. You are asking all the right questions. They are answered in VAIII.
And what about Hitlers death in the bunker, what are your thoughts on that, I know some speculate that he escaped, although the stronger evidence that I have seen suggest he died and his corpsed was burned by the germans before the soviets got to him. (It is also speculated Himmler escaped, Hugh Thomas' 2001 book The Unlikely Death of Heinrich Himmler ).
Both HItler and Himmler escaped via the Jesuits' Vatican Ratline including the OSS and the British SIS. Covered in VAIII.
By the way, on your site, I have seen examples of the regime in Croatia and Germany working with the Catholic church to kill non-catholics, which could be seen as a parallel to the Roman Catholic Inquisitions. I haven't seen Slovakia mentioned on your site, maybe it is mentioned but I haven't seen. I assume you are already aware that the Slovakians were also governed by Catholics, a Jesuit Priest in fact I believe (you may be able to confirm, it is a while since I read it and can't recall all details). The Slovakians paid the Nazis to take their Jewish women and children to the death camps.
Yes, the Slovakians were Roman Catholics governed by a Jesuit. This is also covered in VAIII.
Anyway, thanks so much for reply, very much appreciated, and if you can find the time I would appreciate further answers regarding Napoleon, and Germans war with Russia WWII. You might also advise as to where I can purchase VAIII.
You can purchase VAIII from me. It is a CD with rights to put it in book form. It is 40 plus 10 for shipping overseas. You may call me at 610-589-5300 and I can take a card or send a check or MO to:
Lowvehm
P.O. Box 326
Newmanstown, PA
17073
Very Best Regards and wishing you a Happy 2008,
Tom
May the Lord bless you my friend. It was a delight to address your questions.
Sincerely in faith,
Brother Eric
No comments:
Post a Comment